Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0053
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 01/05/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 5, 2009 Thomas Sayler-Brown SBBL Architecture & Planning 1001 North Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D08-0053 Towne Place Suites Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of November 25, 228 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 set of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, Landscape, DUPD, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DUDP, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 620-0535 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/24/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/26/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Driveway on north side of project appears to be 18' wide. Per 2006 IFC, fire department requires 20' wide unobstructed access around the project, or a way to turn the trucks around. |
| 12/01/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/05/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/08/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Towne Place Suites Development Plan (1st Review) D08-0053 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2008 DUE DATE: December 23, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 24, 2009. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.F As this project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) provide a reduced-scale map of the PAD District on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0053 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M The "BUILDING COVERAGE" appears to be incorrect. Please show the calculation on the plan. Per the PAD the definition of Building Coverage (Lot Coverage) is "Building coverage includes all structural buildings and paved areas, including vehicular parking lots and driveways." 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M The "FAR PROVIDED" appears to be incorrect. The floor area includes all floors of the proposed building. Please show the calculation on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide overall dimensions for the proposed structures. 7. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 8. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. 9. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0053 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 12/09/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/10/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/12/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 10, 2008 To: THOMAS SAYLER-BROWN SBBL ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: TOWNEPLACE SUITES HOTEL Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-053 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facilty via the SRC Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the RWRD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #32 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 2: Revise the pipe size shown for the existing public sewer line G-82-002 to 8” instead of 6”. Sheet 2: Reduce the private BCS proposed from 8” to 6” and clearly mark the BCS line running from MH#1 to the property as private. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Upon receiving Owner(Applicant) or Title Company with address and Trust # from you we will generate the SSA. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of thedevelopment plan . This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/15/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#206037 December 11, 2008 SBBL Architecture and Planning Attn: Thomas or Carolyn 1001 N Alvernon Way #105 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Thomas or Carolyn : SUBJECT: Towne Place Suites D08-0053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 25, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/15/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 15, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0053 Towne Place Suites: Development Plan(11-25-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 12/17/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Towne Place Suites Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 384 S Williams Blvd, T145S R14E Sec14 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0053 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Report (Greg Carlson Engineering, Inc., 20NOV08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the location map on the Development Plan to label all major water courses adjacent to the project, i.e. Arroyo Chico and the portion of the Arcadia Wash in the northeast corner of the location map. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.3: Revise the location map on the Development Plan to label the Section, Township and Range. The Section corners have been shown however the TRS must still be labeled. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.E: Revise the Development Plan to provide a small index drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet. An Index Reference on the first sheet will satisfy this requirement since the Development Plan is only 3 sheets. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0053) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets were indicated by "D08-_ _ _ _." 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the Development Plan to clarify or include the site boundary information for the property line adjacent to Williams Blvd. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensions for the width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks (if applicable). 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.F: Revise the Development Plan to label all existing storm drainage facilities adjacent to the site. Provide the improvement plan number for the catch basin and Manhole (along with elevations) within the public right-of-way. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: Clarify Keynote #8 on the Development Plan to label the wall along the west property line as either existing or proposed. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Revise the Development Plan so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. Label the required 18-foot radii at the access points along Williams Boulevard. The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the Development Plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. If the radii of the returns differ from the Guidelines please provide the radii call out and a detail showing how it matches the existing curbs at driveway entrances. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Revise the Development Plan to label the existing curb and the proposed sidewalk within the right-of-way of Williams Boulevard. All new sidewalks for new development along Public Right-of-Ways is required to be 5 feet, label to verify. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly label the minimum 24-foot PAAL widths at all PAAL locations and at intersections. Specifically the PAAL adjacent to the loading zone. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Verify the location of all proposed utilities and provide any applicable easements for sewer, electric, water, gas, storm pipes, etc. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show the limits of ponding within the vehicular use area at the basin inlet per the statement within the Drainage Report. Provide the ponding limits in plan view on Sheet 2 for verification that the storm water ponding is less than 1-foot. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Provide a cross section or detail for the proposed retention basin to label the 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations along with all other details per the Drainage Report for the proposed basin. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan and/or Keynote 23 to provide the required curb cut dimension for all proposed curb cuts per the Drainage Report. Either label the dimensions in plan view or provide a separate detail for the 3-foot opening and a statement in Keynote #23 for the 2-foot opening. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to clearly label the proposed scuppers per the Drainage Report. Verify the locations and provide a reference to the Standard Detail for a Type 1 scupper as proposed in the report. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8; either 1) provide manholes/clean outs at all storm drain pipe junctions as shown on Sheets 2, or 2) verify that the angle as shown is equal to or less than 10 degrees. Per the DS "Manholes shall be located at such places as junctions, changes in pipe size, curves and angle points in excess of 10 degrees and points where an abrupt change in grade occurs." Verify that the design conforms to the requirements within this section. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide a detail for all proposed rock riprap slope protection. Provide method of placement, size, thickness, depth of embedment; filter fabric specifications, etc. to verify it matches the recommendations within the Drainage Report. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Verify that all details and drainage improvements that are on the proposed Development Plan meet the minimum requirements and design parameters per the Drainage Report. Verify that the proposed drainage improvements, rock riprap erosion protection, basin details, storm drain pipe call outs (plan view is missing 2 locations), etc are labeled and that they also meet the requirements within the Drainage Report. 20) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required basin access ramp. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. 21) Revise General Note #17 on Sheet 1 to state "All landscaping to be depressed maximum 6-inches for stormwater harvesting. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual dated October 25 for further recommendations for stormwater harvesting." 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Revise the Development Plan to provide cross sections for the proposed west basin to show basin size, slopes, high water elevation, etc. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Clarify Keynote #4 as shown on the Development Plan for the proposed handicap access ramps within the Public Right-of-Way. Revise to include a separate Keynote or provide a note to state that the handicap ramps that are to be constructed within the right-of-way are constructed per COT Standard Detail Reference #207, which differs from the proposed onsite ANSI handicap ramps. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensions for the far side and near side proposed sight visibility triangles (SVTs) at all driveway entrances. The SVTs appear to be drawn correctly however the dimensions are still required to be labeled. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Clarify that Detail 8/DP2 for the proposed refuse containers to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01 for double gate enclosures. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 26) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Development Plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, and associated drainage infrastructure. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of fill slopes for the proposed basin and any proposed walls at property lines. 27) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the Development Plan where indicated on Sheet 1 for grading plan purposes. 28) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 29) Clarify Section 1.4 within the report and provide a discussion that the drainage design for this property meets or exceeds the overall Master Drainage Report for Williams Centre, dated 22OCT85. This study was approved for the overall design of the subdivision and verification within this report must address hat this property complies with or exceeds the intent and design of the master drainage scheme is required. 30) Revise Section 3.0 of the Drainage Report to clearly call out all drainage improvements that are proposed for this project, specifically; a) Paragraph 2 and Figure 3 needs to be revised to provide the location and sizing for all roof drains and sidewalk scuppers that are connected to the proposed 10-inch HDPE pipe. b) Paragraph 4 and Figure 3 needs to be revised to provide the pipe sizing and percent slope for the roof drainage that is connected to the proposed 4- type 1 scuppers. c) Paragraph 6 and Figure 3 needs to be revised to clarify if the proposed scupper outlet and 10-inch HDPE pipe outlet will cause erosion to the slopes of the proposed East Basin. Verify if a splash pad (or other erosion protection method) is required to dissipate the outlets velocity in order to maintain the required slope of the basin without head cutting or rill erosion taking place. d) Paragraph 7 and/or Figure 3 needs to be revised to reflect the proposed basin slopes for the West basin. Figure 3 calls out 2:1 (H: V) slopes that are to be protected with hand-placed riprap over filter fabric for one side of the basin and 4:1 (H: V) slopes for the east side of the basin. Provide a discussion with calculations for any erosion protection and verify on the figure with dimensions that the slopes can be achieved at the grading stage with the set dimensions for the site. e) Paragraph 8 and/or Figure 3 needs to be revised to call out the elevation height for the proposed 6-inch orifice plate on the 12-inch outlet for the East Basin. f) Figure 3 needs to be revised to show the ponding limits within the vehicular use area for the 100-year flow event. Per the report the basin is sized to have the capacity to hold 10,520 cubic feet and that water will back up into the parking spaces and south and west PAAL in order to achieve that volume. Provide the ponding limits in plan view to verify that the standing water in the PAAL does not exceed the 1-foot requirement. 31) Provide cross sections and/or details on the figures for the proposed retention basin to label the 100-year ponding limits, basin side slopes, erosion protection, basin bottom, etc. along with all other details per the Drainage Report for the proposed basin. 32) Revise the Drainage Report and Figure 3 to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8; either 1) provide manholes/clean outs at all storm drain pipe junctions as shown on Sheets 2, or 2) verify that the angle as shown is equal to or less than 10 degrees. Per the DS "Manholes shall be located at such places as junctions, changes in pipe size, curves and angle points in excess of 10 degrees and points where an abrupt change in grade occurs." Verify that the design conforms to the requirements within this section. 33) Revise the Drainage Report and/or figures to provide a detail for all proposed rock riprap slope protection. Provide method of placement, size, thickness, depth of embedment; filter fabric specifications, etc. and verify that all drainage details or on the proposed Development Plan and matches the recommendations within the Drainage Report. GRADING PLAN: 34) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 35) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 36) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and Drainage Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Report. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/23/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0053 TOWNE PLACE SUITES: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1,013 PM Peak: 73 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 12/23/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ES approves of this DP with the following condition/s: 1. Sheet 2, 8 Trash enclosure plan - Dimension rear bollards so the outside rear bollards are 3 ft to center from the side CMU wall and 4 ft between the next rear bollard. Two rear bollards will suffice for each container area if spaced as mentioned. Please correct as noted above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/23/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 12/23/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise LS 1.2 & LS 2.1. DS 2-05.2.1.A 3) The site plan for each development area shall include an energy conservation plan per Williams Addition Planned Area Development, P. V-21. 4) A minimum of five percent of the total parking lot area shall be landscaped per Williams Addition Planned Area Development, P. V-15. Provide calculations. 5) Provide a statement on the Native Plant Preservation Plan regarding the presence of buffelgrass. C9-08-08 6) Contact Ann Audrey at The Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development for review of the Water Harvesting Plan. Provide verification of OCSD approval. |
| 12/31/2008 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0053 TOWNE PLACE SUITES/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/29/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Delete directions from streets on Location Map. 2.) Label project number on all sheets. 3.) Delete taxcode number from Title Block. 4.) Add subdivision Book and page to Title Block. 5.) Add "G&SRBM" to legal description in Title Block. 6.) Add legal description for Location Map. (STR) 7.) Correct legal in Title Block to read EX PTN 175'. 8.) Delete title information from sheet 3 (survey, notes, schedule B, certificate). |
| 12/31/2008 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0053 Towne Place Suites ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: Williams Addition PAD, C9-08-08 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Williams Addition PAD GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/23/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: ( )Tentative Plat (X)Development Plan (X)Landscape Plan ( )Other REVIEWER: MSP 791-4505 DATE: 12/30/08 The Department of Urban Planning and Design D08-0053 - Towne Place Suites - Development Plan December 30, 2008 Staff offers the following comments: 1. Development plan sheet DP-1, Calculations, Land Use Code, distance between hotel buildings to adjacent sites: The note addresses the distance between the western most building to adjacent uses. The note also indicates the western most hotel building to have a height of thirty-one (31) feet. However, DP sheet-2 shows a site layout with the same building at a height of plus or minus forty-one (41+-) feet? Please correct inconsistency. If DPsheet-2 indicates the correct proposed height at 41+- feet, then please elaborate on the additional height, since the approved rezoning conceptual site plan indicates a maximum building height of 36+- feet on the same western building. 2. Development plan sheet DP-1, Calculations, Land Use Code, building coverage: Building coverage is allowed up to 80% of lot area. Property is shown to have 88,445 square feet and building coverage is shown at 63,714 square feet. I assume lot coverage is at approximately 72%. However, DP Sheet-1 shows lot coverage at 22%? Please ignore if my calculation is incorrect. |