Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0052
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/05/2009 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 01/05/2009 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/05/2009 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | verbally by Joe Olsen |
| 01/06/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 6, 2009 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D08-0052 Quebedeaux Dealership Expansion Development Plan Dear Richard: Your submittal of November 25, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 9 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, DUPD, Zoning, Wastewater, Real Estate, Engineering, Landscape, ESD, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Letter for Miramonte Neighborhood Association (DUPD, DSD) 3 Copies Last approved site and landscape plans (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Documents (Zoning DSD) DUE TO THE COMMENTS FROM LANDSCAPE ABOUT THE DUMPSTER LOCATION, ESD WILL NEED TO SEE THE REVISED PLAN EVENTHOUGH THEY HAVE APPROVED THE PLANS. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/26/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/26/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 25 NOVEMBER 2008 D08-0052/QUEBEDEAUX PONTIAC-GMC EXPANSION REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. SHEET 1 0F 5 1.DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY ENTRANCES. B. SHEET 2 OF 5: 1. GENERAL COMMENT: A COMPLETE ACCESSIBLE REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED BECAUSE IT APPEARS THAT ALL ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN ROUTES ARE ASPHALTIC PAVING, FLUSH WITH THE PARKING LOT PAVING WITH NO ACCESS CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS. PLEASE REFER TO ZONING COMMENTS FOR CONCRETE WALK AND SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. ONCE THE ZONING REQUIREMENTS HAVE BEEN MET, FURTHER ACCESSIBILITY REVIEW MAY BE POSSIBLE. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIRED GRADE SLOPES AS PER ICC/ANSI 117.1, SECTION 403.3. 3. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. C. SHEET 3 OF 5: 1. THE MARKED CROSSING NORTH EAST OF THE EXISTING DETAIL BUILDING IS A DANGEROUS DIAGONAL, FOUR WAY INTERSECTION CROSSING. REDESIGN CROSSING TO CROSS ONE STREET AT A TIME, PREFERABLY AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE TO THE TRAFFIC FLOW. 2. THE MARKED CROSSING AT THE DRIVE ENTRANCE FROM PALO VERDE BLVD NEEDS TO BE REDESIGNED TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. D. SHEET 4 OF 5: 1. THERE EXISTS THREE ADDITIONAL MARKED CROSSINGS THAT ARE NOT IDENTIFIED AS SUCH AND HAVE NO DETECTABLE WARNINGS: TWO BETWEEN THE EXISTING COLLISION BUILDING AND THE EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING AND ONE FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING TO THE MARKED CROSSING TO THE EXISTING SHOWROOM BUILDING. 2. IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. 3. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. E. SHEET 5 OF 5: 1. FURTHER ACCESSIBLE REVIEW COMMENTS ARE RESERVED UNTIL MODIFICATIONS TO DETAILS ON THIS SHEET COMPLY WITH ZONING COMMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/26/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | >>> Rebecca Noel 11/25/2008 6:10 PM >>> I do not have any objections to this proposal at this time. |
| 11/28/2008 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/05/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/11/2008 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: D08-0052 CASE NAME: Quebedeaux Auto Dealership: DP DATE SENT: 12/11/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Cross Reference Cases: C9-07-33, PA-07-03 Area or Neighborhood Plan: Alvernon-Broadway Area Plan Gateway or Scenic Route: N/A Due Date: December 24, 2008 A resubmittal is required - please address the following comments: 1) Regarding rezoning condition #11, please provide a decorative detail for the perimeter screen wall, and indicate on the plans that it will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials. Decorative details may include using two or more wall materials; incorporating a visually-interesting design on the wall surface; and/or including decorative features such as stone, tile, bricks, wrought iron, etc. Painting the wall is not considered sufficient decorative treatment. 2) Per rezoning condition #16, the landscape plan is to be presented to the Miramonte Neighborhood Association (MNA) for review and comment, and reasonable comments are to be incorporated to the greatest extent possible. Please provide a letter from the MNA indicating that this condition has been satisfied. Joanne Hershenhorn, 837-6965 December 10, 2008 S:\Case_Review\CDRC\D08-0052_Quebedeaux_Auto_Spdwy.doc |
| 12/15/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#206036 December 11, 2008 DOWL HKM 166 W Alameda Street Tucson, Arizona 85701 Dear DOWL HKM : SUBJECT: Quebedeaux Pontiac-GMC Expansion D08-0052 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 25, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation or relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 12/15/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quebedeaux Auto Dealership Development Plan (1st Review) D08-0052 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 15, 2008 DUE DATE: December 24, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 24, 2009. 2. Based on discussions with the Zoning Administrator this plan was reviewed for compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance for the entire site. 3. Based on discussions with the Zoning Administrator the three (3) parcels (125-11-0590, 125-11-0600 & 125-11-0840) located on the east side of Richey Blvd. are part of this project and need to be shown on the development plan and require full code compliance.. 4. Provide a copy of the last approved site or development plan with the next submittal. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 & D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide as a general note "EXISTING ZONING IS C-2, C-3 & R-3. PROPOSED ZONING IS C-2, C-3 & P". 6. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0052 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A This project appears to encompass eight (8) parcels. These parcels will need to be combined into one (1) parcel. Provide an approved Pima County Combination Request form and a copy of a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. The three parcels located east of Richey will require the same documentation. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAAL's intervene. This said the proposed striped areas around the "PROPOSED TEMP. SALES BUILDING" are required to be sidewalks that meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.4.1 & 5.1. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 The striped area shown running north from the "PROPOSED TEMP. SALES BUILDING" to the sidewalk located in the right-of-way (ROW) along Speedway Blvd. is required to be a sidewalk that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-08.4.1 & 5.1. The only area that is allowed to be striped is the area as it crosses the parking area access lane (PAAL). 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAAL's intervene. This said a sidewalk is required between the east side of the "EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING" and the proposed angled parking. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide a sidewalk that connects the "EXISTING SHOWROOM AND OFFICE BUILDING" to the "EXISTING 2-STORY USED CAR BUILDING" to the "EXISTING COLLISION CENTER BUILDING" to the "PROPOSED TEMP. SALES BUILDING". This sidewalk is required to meet of D.S. 2-08.4.1 & 5.1. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The proposed striped area, running north from the "EXISTING COLLISION CENTER BUILDING" to the sidewalk located within the ROW of Speedway Blvd. is required to be a sidewalk that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-08.4.1 & 5.1. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide as a note, the square footage of each structure and the specific use. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M The "PROPOSED/EXISTING FAR" needs to be broke out for each zone. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide a floor area expansion calculation on the plan. As the floor area calculation is cumulatively provide a copy of the last approved site/development plan, see comment 2. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide a lot area expansion calculation on the plan. As the lot area calculation is cumulatively provide a copy of the last approved site/development plan, see comment 2. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M As Zoning does not look at any structure as temporary the structure labeled as "PROPOSED TEMP. SALES BUILDING" needs to be shown as "PROPOSED SALES BUILDING" 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide overall dimensions and the height for the proposed structures. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Fully dimension all loading spaces shown on the plan. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Show the square footages used to calculate the vehicle parking requirement, i.e. building square footage and lot square footage. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P For the proposed angled parking shown along Richey Blvd. provide a detail that includes; A - Parking Angle, B - Space Width, E - Curb Length. 22. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show how the proposed location for the Class 1 bicycle parking meets the requirement of D.S. 2-09.4.3 Separation from Automobile Parking. Bicycle parking facilities will be separated from vehicle parking and drive areas by a barrier or sufficient distance to prevent damage to the parking bicycles. 23. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T It does not appear that the proposed location of the dumpster enclosure will work, see Environmental Services & Engineering comments 24. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 25. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. 26. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0052 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 12/15/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: December 15, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0052 Quebedeaux Auto Dealership: Development Plan(11-25-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 12/19/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 16, 2008 To: J. Lorenzo Ortiz, P.E. DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Quebedaux Pontiac-GMC Expansion Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-052 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 1: Remove General Note # 7. Sheet 3: Show the public sewer easement with recordation information for the existing public sewer line on property. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/23/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 23, 2008 SUBJECT: Quebedeaux Pontiac-GMC Expansion Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3566 E Speedway Blvd, T145S R14E Sec09 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0052 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Report No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 14NOV08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Based on discussions with the Zoning Reviewer, Steve Shields this plan was reviewed for full code compliance for the entire site. Compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) and Land Use Code (LUC) for full code compliance was reviewed. 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.G.1: Revise the Development Plan to provide the address for the subject parcel. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: Provide the Development Plan number (D08-0052) in the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the following information regarding the public right-of-way of Richey Blvd adjacent to the site; provide the dimensioned width of curb cuts (driveway entrances), paving, curbs and required 5-foot sidewalk. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Provide the recordation information with the COT approved lot reconfiguration for the subject parcel. Provide the new lot dimensions and bearings for each proposed lot on the revised Development Plan. The Zoning Department prior to Development Plan approval must approve all lot reconfiguration. The lot combination must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Revise the Development Plan to provide dimensions for the proposed Public Road reconfiguration. Provide on the Development Plan the standard right-of-way widths, cul-de-sac and curb knuckle design per DS Sec.3-01 and Figures 2, 21 and 22: a) Provide the full right-of-way width for the public roadway. The pedestrian circulation (5-foot sidewalk and curb) must be included within the public right-of-way, contact Tucson Department of Transportation for further clarity on the required right-of-way width and design requirements. Verify that the Development Plan matches the PIA submittal. b) Provide all dimensions for the standard knuckle radii. c) Provide all dimensions for the cul-de-sac radii. d) Provide the tangent lines at all intersect points per details 21 and 22. e) Provide the degree and bearing for all other lines as shown in the standard detail for cul-de-sac and knuckle design. f) Show street monuments per the standard detail. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide the minimum 24-foot dimension for all proposed 2-way parking area access lanes (PAALs). Verify that all areas show the minimum widths required per DS Sec.3-05. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Provide a detail on the Development Plan to accurately dimension all proposed angled parking spaces shown on Sheet 4. Refer to Table 1 within DS Sec.3-05 for further clarification on angled parking requirements. Once all dimensions are shown for the angled parking a better review of parking stalls and PAAL widths can be made. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show the one-way PAALs that are proposed. Clearly delineate on the plan what type of signage or pavement markings will be used for directional arrows. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show the location of all proposed scuppers under the sidewalk for roof drainage. Provide separate details or keynote call outs for the scuppers showing the standard detail number for public improvements required meeting these requirements in order to convey the 10-year flow under the pedestrian circulation. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the Development Plan. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but is required to verify if additional easements affect this property. Clarify all easements shown as "Private or Public." 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk along the frontage of Richey Blvd and Palo Verde Blvd. All new development or development under a full code compliance review requires a new 5-foot sidewalk to be constructed within the public right-of-way. If an existing 4- sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of the roadway provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 5-foot required, to remain. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to provide all required on-site pedestrian circulation as required per DS Sec.2-08.4.1 and DS Sec.2-08.5.1. A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAAL's intervene. The only area that is allowed to be striped is the area as it crosses the parking area access lane (PAAL). 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Refer to DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. The placement of the refuse container and the construction of the new Public Road must meet all requirements within DS Sec.3-01 and 6-01. Curbing and sidewalk are required along the right-of-way of the road which would not allow refuse vehicle access. A meeting is required with the applicant, TDOT and Environmental Services to assure that all of the public improvements meet the minimum requirements of the Development Standards and City Code. 15) Approval from TDOT Traffic for the proposed Public Roadway improvements (all public roadways and cul-de-sac design) will be required. Contact Jose Ortiz at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov for all Public Roadway requirements and PIA application procedures. 16) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. GRADING PLAN: 17) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 18) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 19) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/23/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0052 QUEBEDEAUX AUTO DEALERSHIP EXPANSION COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS - for TOTAL AREA Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 5,379 PM Peak: 550 - for Proposed AREA only Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 316 PM Peak: 32 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 12/23/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/23/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | The utility easement running within the vacated portion of Palo Verde will need to remain free of permanent structures. (Keynote no.#12 on sheet 3) Check with all utilities within this easement for what is allowed. Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Division City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/24/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) The provisions of LUC 3.7 apply to: A. All new development. B. Expansion of existing development. 1. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows. b. If the expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a twenty-five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. Provide calculations for expansions as detailed above. If the expansion calculation exceeds 25% a landscape plan is required for the entire site and major site modifications may be required. 3) Provide a copy of the previously approved site/development and landscape plans. 4) The proposed refuse pickup location is required to be located behind a street landscape border per LUC Table.3.7.2-I. New development is required to provide on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas with service access from within the tract or from an alley adjacent to the tract per DS 6-01.4.1.A 5) The proposed screen wall is required to include a decorative design and graffiti resistance per C9-07-33. Provide details. 6) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 7) Provide landscape borders for Richey Boulevard and the remainder of Speedway Boulevard on the landscape plans. LUC 3.7.2.4 8) Note the height of existing walls on the site. Per LUC screen walls may not obstruct the visibility of the street landscape borders. Revise plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.3.2.B 9) Note the materials to construct perimeter walls. Six inch or greater block is required per C9-07-33. 10) Show all existing or proposed walls on the development and landscape plans. DS 2-07. THE NATIVE PLANT APPLICATION IS APPROVED. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL OTHER PLANS IS REQUIRED. |
| 12/26/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/31/2008 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0052 QUEBEDEAUX AUTO DEALERSHIP/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 12/24/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Label project number on all sheets. 2.) Delete "Ward 6" from Location Map. 3.) Label all buildings numerically starting with existing buildings. 4.) Delete all owner/parcel information for surrounding properties on all corner sheets. 5.) Label 1st Street on sheet 3 and sheet 1 of Landscape Plan. 6.) Label suffix for Speedway, sheet 1 of Landscape Plan. 7.) On sheet 1 of Landscape Plan correct matchline to read "matchline see sheet 2". 8.) Label Speedway Boulevard on sheet 2 of Landscape Plan. 9.) On sheet 2 of Landscape Plan correct matchline to read "matchline see sheet 1". |