Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0051
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/27/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: April 27, 2009 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1490 Development Plan Core Review- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2345 E Irvington Road, T145S R14E Sec32 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0051 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report No. 2 (DOWL Engineers, 10FEB09), Geotechnical Evaluation (ConformaTech, 17OCT08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 10FEB09 revised 13APR09). Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. The following items need to be addressed prior to CDRC stamped approval: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 14) Complied. 15) Complied. 16) Complied. 17) Complied. 18) Complied. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Complied. 23) Complied. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. 26) Complied. 27) Complied. 28) Complied. 29) Complied. 30) Complied. 31) Acknowledge. 32) Complied. 33) Complied. 34) Acknowledge. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5.a: However, provide in plan view the recordation information for the proposed cross access agreement. Development Plan can not have final CDRC approval until the recordation information is provided. 35) Complied. 36) Complied. 37) Complied. 38) Complied. 39) Complied. 40) Complied. 41) Acknowledged. However removable bollards are required at the top of the basin access ramp entrance to prevent encroachment into the proposed basin. Provide a revised plan with associated key note on the grading plan sheet to label the required bollards. 42) Complied. 43) Complied. 44) Complied. 45) Complied. 46) Complied. 47) Complied. 48) Complied. 49) Complied. 50) Complied. 51) Complied. 52) Complied. 53) Complied. 54) Complied. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 55) Acknowledged. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However a total of 3 copies are required for stamp approval. Only one SWPPP Report was submitted to Engineering Section: 56) Complied. 57) Complied. 58) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package for CDRC stamped approval that shows the above revisions (removable bollards and recordation information) and 3 copies of the SWPPP Report and Exhibits for Engineering Section stamped approval. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 04/27/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Reviewed and approved for all outstanding items from conditional approval. JG |
| 04/30/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/08/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Development Package (3rd Review) D08-0051 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 8, 2009 DUE DATE: May 13, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development package to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 1. A lot split will need to processed and approved through the City of Tucson Development Services prior to approval of the Development Plan. Zoning acknowledges that a lease agreement is proposed for this development. Per LUC Section 4.1.2 DEFINITIONS Subdivision. Improved or unimproved land or lands divided for the purpose of financing, sales, or lease, whether immediate or future, into four (4) or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land, or, if a new street is involved, any such property which is divided into two (2) or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land, or, any such property, the boundaries of which have been fixed by a recorded plat, which is divided into more than two (2) parts. "Subdivision" also includes any condominium, cooperative, community apartment, townhouse, or similar project containing four (4) or more parcels, in which an undivided interest in the land is coupled with the right of exclusive occupancy of any unit located thereon. This said per discussions with the Zoning Administrator this lease agreement would need to be processed through the City of Tucson Development Services as a lot split. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D There appears to be some type of lot split, lot line reconfiguration planned for this project. Please clarify what is planned and provided documentation showing that the lot split, lot line reconfiguration has been approved by The City of Tucson. 2. Zoning acknowledges receipt of a copy of the EASEMENTS, COVENANTS, CONDTIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AGREEMENT. This agreement will need to be recorded prior to approval of the Development Plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Based on the proposed lease agreement some type of pedestrian/vehicle access agreement or easement is required for proposed PAAL along the west property line. This agreement/easement needs to be shown on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page prior to final approval of the Development Package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0051 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Approved lot split and record agreement. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Grading Plan (2nd Review) T08BU01925 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2009 DUE DATE: March 12, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the grading plan for this project, subject to approval by the Engineering and Landscape Review sections. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised grading plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01928 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 05/08/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/18/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 18, 2009 Lorenzo Ortiz DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 857?? Subject: D08-0051 QuikTrip Store No 1490 Development Plan Dear Lorenzo: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blueline COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. AND 1 Rolled blueline set of the Development Plan. AND 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra rolled blueline set that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the rolled bluelines to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dpapproved |