Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0051
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/26/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0., LUC 3.7.4.3.A. Revise the planting plan for the basin near the intersection of Irvington and Benson Highway to include the following: Plant materials that can withstand periodic inundation. A minimum of 20 trees per acre should be provided, 33% of trees should be 24 inch box or larger. A minimum of 2 shrubs for each tree should be provided. Along arterial streets planted areas should account for at least 35% of the basin area. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include canopy trees within the eastern segment of the landscape border required along Irvington Rd. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 3) Incorporate any suggestions from OCSD on the Water Harvesting Plan. |
| 03/02/2009 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 2, 2009 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1490 Development Plan Core Review- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2345 E Irvington Road, T145S R14E Sec32 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0051 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report No. 2 (DOWL Engineers, 10FEB09), Geotechnical Evaluation (ConformaTech, 17OCT08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 10FEB09). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Complied. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. 11) Complied. 12) Complied. 13) Complied. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 14) Complied. 15) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the development plan documents to provide a Title Block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. It is acknowledged that QuickTrip has its own standard for plan submittal; however the Development Plan Package must be per the requirements of Development Standard Sec.2-01. Any deviation from the referenced standard requires prior approval from the CDRC Manager, Patricia Gehlen. Provide an email or letter from Patricia Gehlen stating approval to deviate from DS Sec.2-01. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 16) Complied. 17) DS Sec.2-01.2.8: Revise the development plan documents so that the drawing is oriented with the north towards the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with the north to the left side of the sheet. This comment was specific to the cover sheet which has the north arrow oriented to the right side of the sheet not to the top or left side. Any deviation from the referenced standard requires prior approval from the CDRC Manager, Patricia Gehlen. Provide an email or letter from Patricia Gehlen stating approval to deviate from DS Sec.2-01. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.2: Acknowledged, however the Title Block must be per DS Sec.2-01. Any deviation from the referenced standard requires prior approval from the CDRC Manager, Patricia Gehlen. Provide an email or letter from Patricia Gehlen stating approval to deviate from DS Sec.2-01. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 19) Complied. 20) Complied. 21) Complied. 22) Complied. 23) Complied. 24) Complied. 25) Complied. 26) Complied. 27) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Provide a letter of approval from all entities that have interest in the existing easements on the property where improvements are being proposed, specifically the detention/retention basin within the 20'x30' Communication Easement. This approval is required prior to Development Plan Package approval. A discussion with Steve Shields, Zoning Planner does not satisfy Development Services Engineering Section requirements or comments. To deviate from the required entity approval permission must be granted from the Development Services Director or Deputy Director (not a Zoning Planner) and must be in writing and submitted to the Engineering Section at resubmittal. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 28) Complied. 29) Complied. 30) Complied. 31) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.D: Clarify the proposed lot lines as shown on the development plan document. Per the last recorded subdivision, Book 48, Page 51, this project proposes a new lot line configuration or lot combination, clarify. All lot combinations or reconfigurations will require approval from the Zoning Section of the City of Tucson Development Services Department prior to Development Plan Package approval. Any deviation from the referenced standard requires prior approval from the CDRC Manager, Patricia Gehlen. Provide an email or letter from Patricia Gehlen stating approval to deviate from DS Sec.2-01, a discussion with Steve Shields, Zoning Planner does not satisfy this comment. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 32) Complied. 33) Complied. 34) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5.a: Provide a cross access agreement along with a notarized letter of approval from the adjacent property owner for all proposed offsite improvements. Specifically the proposed PAAL along the west side of the property that is being constructed on the adjacent property. A notarized approval letter from all property owners is required along with a construction and maintenance easement that must be recorded prior to Development Plan Package approval. Any deviation from the referenced standard requires prior approval from the Development Services Director or Deputy Director. Provide an email or letter stating approval to deviate from DS Sec.2-01, a discussion with Steve Shields, Zoning Planner does not satisfy this comment. This comment was not fully addressed at 2nd submittal. 35) Complied. 36) Complied. 37) Complied. 38) Complied. 39) Complied. 40) Complied. 41) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Acknowledged. However there is a conflict with Sheet 3 and 7 of the development plan documents. Both sheets show the basin access ramp, but Sheet 7 keynotes a basin weir (Keynote #12) that is to be constructed in the middle of the ramp, clarify or remove. 42) DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8: Acknowledged, however revise the development plan documents to provide an additional clean out in the middle of the 263-foot 12-inch PVC storm drain for maintenance purposes due to the length and size of the pipe. 43) Complied. 44) Complied. 45) Complied. 46) Complied. 47) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Acknowledged. The DSMR to alleviate the 6-foot sidewalk requirement must be approved prior to Development Plan Package approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 48) Complied. 49) Complied. 50) Complied. 51) Complied. 52) Complied. 53) Complied. 54) Complied. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 55) Acknowledged. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 56) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. The owner of the property, since known, is required to sign the owner certification section prior to SWPPP approval. This comment was not addressed at 2nd submittal. 57) Complied. 58) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that will be submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. This comment was not addressed at 2nd submittal. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package and SWPPP. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 03/04/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 4 MARCH 2009 D08-0051/QUICKTRIP STORE NUMBER 1490-RESUBMITTAL REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW-RESUBMITTAL 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW SHEET 4: A. THE GOVERNING ACCESSIBLE CODE FOR THIS PROJECT IS 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11 AND ICC ANSI 117.1. ALL REFERENCES (AT LEAST 10) TO "ADA" FOR ACCESSIBILITY IS INCORRECT. PLEASE CORRECT ACCESSIBILITY REFERENCE FOR ALL DETAILS AND NOTE REFERENCES. B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAILS 1 AND 3/4: 1. REFERENCE ZONING REQUIREMENTS FOR MINIMUM 4' WIDTH FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AND RAMPS. C. SIGN DETAIL 5/4: 1. BOTTOM OF MAIN SIGN TO BE 7' AS PER CITY OF TUCSON, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS. D. RAMP DETAIL 7/4: 1. RIGHT FLARED SIDE REQUIRES A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1:10, REFERENCE ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/06/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Development Package (2nd Review) D08-0051 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2009 DUE DATE: March 12, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development package to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. Contact Patricia Gelhen, CDRC Project Manager, @837-4919 in regards to any deviation from the required Development Package layout. The following comments are in regards to the layout of the development package, see the Draft DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. First sheet - Master Cover Sheet. 2. Next sheet(s) should be all notes, General notes, Paving notes, Utility notes, etc. All notes should be organized under a heading indicating which plan the note(s) are for, i.e. Site plan, grading plan Utility plan etc. Sheet 1 maybe used for notes or calculations if there is room. 3. Next sheet(s) should be the Site plan 4. Next sheet(s) should be the Grading, Paving, Drainage plan. 5. Next sheet(s) should be the details sheet(s). These details should be details for both the site and grading plans. The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. These documents have been reviewed for full code compliance. 1. Zoning acknowledges that a lease agreement is proposed for this development. Per LUC Section 4.1.2 DEFINITIONS Subdivision. Improved or unimproved land or lands divided for the purpose of financing, sales, or lease, whether immediate or future, into four (4) or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land, or, if a new street is involved, any such property which is divided into two (2) or more lots, tracts, or parcels of land, or, any such property, the boundaries of which have been fixed by a recorded plat, which is divided into more than two (2) parts. "Subdivision" also includes any condominium, cooperative, community apartment, townhouse, or similar project containing four (4) or more parcels, in which an undivided interest in the land is coupled with the right of exclusive occupancy of any unit located thereon. This said per discussions with the Zoning Administrator this lease agreement would need to be processed through the City of Tucson Development Services as a lot split. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D There appears to be some type of lot split, lot line reconfiguration planned for this project. Please clarify what is planned and provided documentation showing that the lot split, lot line reconfiguration has been approved by The City of Tucson. 2. Zoning acknowledges that a DSMR has been applied for. If the DSMR is approved provide a General Note on the development package that states the DSMR Number, Date of Approval, and Modifications Granted and any conditions. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d It does not appear that the proposed bicycle parking location meets the requirements of revised D.S. 2-09.4.1 & D.S. 2-09.4.4. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Based on the proposed lease agreement some type of pedestrian/vehicle access agreement or easement is required for proposed PAAL along the west property line. This agreement/easement needs to be shown on the plan along with the recordation information, docket and page prior to final approval of the Development Package. 4. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0051 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Grading Plan (2nd Review) T08BU01925 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2009 DUE DATE: March 12, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the grading plan for this project, subject to approval by the Engineering and Landscape Review sections. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised grading plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01928 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 03/06/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 6, 2009 Lorenzo Ortiz DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 857?? Subject: D08-0051 Quiktrip Store No. 1490 Development Plan Dear Lorenzo: Your submittal of February 11, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (ADA, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |