Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0051
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/29/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/07/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 7 NOVEMBER 2008 D08-0051/QUICKTRIP STORE NUMBER 1490 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. ACCESSIBLE PARKING DETAIL 1/4: 1. IDENTIFY VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 2. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. 3. DETECTABLE WARNINGS (TRUNCATED DOMES) ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PARKING SITUATION BY 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, OWNER OPTION. B. SIGN DETAIL 3/4: 1. BOTTOM OF MAIN SIGN TO BE 7' AS PER DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS. C. RAMP DETAIL 7/4: 1. IF FLARED SIDE PROVIDED, MAINTAIN MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1:10, REFERENCE ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.3. D. SHEET 4, GENERAL COMMENT: THE GOVERNING CODE FOR ACCESSIBILITY IS 2006 IBC, CHAPTER 11, ICC ANSI 117.1. PLEASE CHANGE ALL "ADA" COMPLIANCE REFERENCES TO THE IBC/ICC 117.1 E. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 11 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/12/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Development Package (1st Review) D08-0051 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 17, 2008 DUE DATE: November 28, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are in regards to the layout of the development package, see the Draft DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. First sheet - Master Cover Sheet. 2. Next sheet(s) should be all notes, General notes, Paving notes, Utility notes, etc. All notes should be organized under a heading indicating which plan the note(s) are for, i.e. Site plan, grading plan Utility plan etc. Sheet 1 maybe used for notes or calculations if there is room. 3. Next sheet(s) should be the Site plan 4. Next sheet(s) should be the Grading, Paving, Drainage plan. 5. Next sheet(s) should be the details sheet(s). These details should be details for both the site and grading plans. The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. These documents have been reviewed for full code compliance. D.S. 2-01.2.5 Show the required three (3) by five (5) inch spaces for the approval stamp on all sheets. D.S. 2-01.3.1 If available provide the email addresses for owner, developer, architect, civil engineer and landscape registrant(s) on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number "D08-0051" adjacent to the title block, lower right hand corner of each sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide as a general note "THIS PROJECT IS SUBJECT SECTION 2.8.3, MAJOR STREET AND ROUTES (MS&R SETBACK ZONE) AND SECTION 2.8.4 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE". D.S. 2-01.3.8.A Provide site boundary perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot on the site plan. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Show all existing easements, along with the recordation information and purposed of the easement stated, on the site plan. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C For all existing public right-of-way (ROW's) adjacent to the site provide the recordation data, width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalk on the site plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D There appears to be some type of lot split, lot line reconfiguration planned for this project. Please clarify what is planned and provided documentation showing that the lot split, lot line reconfiguration has been approved by The City of Tucson. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Provide dimensions for all proposed parking area access lanes (PAALs) on the site plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Provide dimensions for the back up spur, shown at the east end of the north parking area, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.D for minimum requirements. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The vehicle parking space shown adjacent to the proposed AIR YARD may not be counted as a required/provided vehicle parking space. Revise the parking calculation. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c The loading space shown on the plan may not be used for access to the dumpster locations. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d It does not appear that the proposed bicycle parking location meets the requirements of revised D.S. 2-09.4.1 & D.S. 2-09.4.4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d On the bicycle parking detail provide the type of lighting, and once the finale locations had been determined a fully dimensioned layout, see D.S. 2-09.5.0. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K If applicable show all proposed easements on the site plan. Dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be private or public. D.S. 2-01.3.9.N Provide setback dimensions for the proposed building and canopy. D.S. 2-05.3.9.P Within the footprint of the proposed canopy provide the proposed height. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Provide sidewalk width dimensions on the site plan. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q There appears to be some type of pop-outs or canopies proposed along the east and west side of the proposed buildings. Provide a sidewalk dimension at these locations. If the sidewalks in these areas are reduced to less than six (6) foot six (6) inches some type of barrier is required to prevent parking vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1, D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and D.S. 2-08.5.1.A. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q At the access ramp shown adjacent to the loading space demonstrate on the plan that a parking vehicle will not encroach into the ramp area. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Provide a striped crosswalk from the access ramp across the PAAL to the west. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q As zoning looks at the loading space as a parking space the proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible route may not cross the loading space as shown. See D.S. 2-08.4.1.F If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0051 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1490 Grading Plan (1st Review) T08BU01925 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 17, 2008 DUE DATE: November 28, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01928 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 11/24/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to show the parking space striping. DS 2-07.2.1.A 2) Landscaping proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. LUC 3.7.2.9 3) Revise the Water Harvesting Plan to match any changes made to the landscape, site, and grading plans. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 4) Clarify the water harvesting proposal by including the location of any pipes or drainage drainage structures used to facilitate Stormwater runoff into landscape areas. 5) Revise the landscape plan to include canopy trees within the landscape border required along Irvington Rd. The trees must be located on the site and must be canopy trees as defined in LUC 6.2.3. Palm trees do not count towards this requirement. LUC 3.7.2.4 6) Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations: a. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees. b. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas. c. Square footage of all landscape border areas (on site) and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. 7) Revise the landscape plans to provide at least 50% vegetative coverage for the landscape borders. Additional coverage in the public right-of-way is not included in the calculation. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 8) Revise the landscape plan to address the screening requirements of LUC 3.7.3. GRADING PLAN Revise the Grading Plan to match any changes made to the landscape, site, and Water Harvesting plans. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Clarify the water harvesting proposal by including the location of any pipes or drainage drainage structures used to facilitate Stormwater runoff into landscape areas. |
| 11/24/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/01/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 1, 2008 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1490 Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 2345 E Irvington Road, T145S R14E Sec32 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0051 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 28OCT08), Geotechnical Evaluation (ConformaTech, 17OCT08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 29OCT08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.10-01.2.1: Revise the Drainage Report and table to show that all requirements for balanced basin have been met. Per DS Sec.10-1.1.4 it is the policy that stormwater detention/retention facilities be incorporated within all new development to ensure that, at a minimum, the post development 2-, 10- and 100-year peak discharges from the site will not exceed the predevelopment values. The calculations and summary section of the Drainage Report state that the post developed 2-year discharge increases by 0.5 cfs, which does not meet the requirements of this section, revise. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.2.D: Revise the Drainage Report to include hydraulic calculations for the existing catch basin and storm drain within the public right-of-way that the proposed stormwater drains into. The calculations must show that the existing storm drain and catch basin are sized to except the flows from the proposed pipes. 3) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.2.D: Clarify Section 1.3 "Known Development Requirements" and the statement that no previous studies were found for the development. This project is part of a larger subdivision plat (Kino Gateway Center; Book 48, Page 51) and there should be a related Drainage Report for the subdivision that relates to the subject property. Verify that this proposed project meets all of the conditions of the last approved Drainage Report. 4) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.B.1: Provide and describe Reservoir-Routing Calculation sheets for the basin for the 2-, 10- and 100-year design floods. 5) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.B.2: Provide and describe the stage-storage and stage-discharge relationships with any Hydraulic Calculation Sheets prepared during the evaluation. 6) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.B.3: Submit plotted inflow and outflow hydrographs. 7) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.C: Revise the Drainage Report to provide for all requirements for the Basin and Drainageway Maintenance Section from the referenced Development Standard. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Revise the Section 2.4 of the Drainage Statement to show that the area underneath the gas canopy is not hydraulically connected to the proposed storm drain system within the vehicular use area causing contaminants to enter the public storm drain system. 9) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the development plan documents and report to label and dimension the required basin access ramp. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. 10) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide a revised Geotechnical Report (or addendum) with infiltration rates for the required detention/retention basin. Infiltration rates must have a drain down time per 10-01.3.5.1.3. Verify that the Drainage Report and Development Plan match the geotechnical report. 11) Revise the Drainage Report to include a discussion that addresses water harvesting. Provide a statement that all Water Harvesting Basins will be designed per the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual to maximize Stormwater run off within these areas. 12) DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8: Revise the Drainage Report to provide the required clean out for all storm drain junctions. Provide the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all clean outs in plan view for grading purposes. 13) DS Sec.10-02.10.3.4: Revise the Drainage Report to show that the portion of the proposed storm drain system that extends into the public right-of-way is constructed out of reinforced concrete with the minimum diameter of 18-inches. Provide revised calculation sheets for all pipe sizing. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 14) Verify that the development plan documents and Drainage Report meet or exceed the Water Harvesting Ordinance No. 10597. Label all areas of water harvesting on-site and clearly show how stormwater from the vehicular use area or canopies drain into these areas to satisfy the requirements of water harvesting. 15) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the development plan documents to provide a Title Block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 16) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant that shall be reserved for an approval stamp. 17) DS Sec.2-01.2.8: Revise the development plan documents so that the drawing is oriented with the north towards the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with the north to the left side of the sheet. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.2: Provide the following information in the Title Block: a) The proposed name of the project or subdivision or if there is no name the proposed tenants name. b) A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re subdivision are to be provided. c) The administrative street address. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0051) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.2: Provide a General Note on the document that list the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.4: Provide a General Note on the document that list the existing and proposed use of the property. 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the document for overlay zones associated with this project. Specifically add "LUC Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone" And "LUC Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone." 23) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.8: Provide the subdivision name and Book and Page Number since the property is part of a subdivision plat that has been previously recorded. 24) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.C.1: Provide a General Note on the development plan document; "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineering's Office for review and approval." 25) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.C.2: Revise General Note #30 to read per this section; "No structures or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." 26) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.D: Revise General Note #30 to read per this section; "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 27) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Provide a letter of approval from all entities that have interest in the existing easements on the property where improvements are being proposed, specifically the detention/retention basin within the 20'x30' Communication Easement. 28) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the development plan documents. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but is required to verify if additional easements affect this property. Clarify all easements shown as "Private or Public." 29) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan documents to label the shown right-of-way as either "existing and/or future." 30) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan documents to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. Provide a label for the existing catch basins and storm drainage improvements within the right-of-way of Benson Highway. Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage improvements. 31) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.D: Clarify the proposed lot lines as shown on the development plan document. Per the last recorded subdivision, Book 48, Page 51, this project proposes a new lot line configuration or lot combination, clarify. All lot combinations or reconfigurations will require approval from the Zoning Section of the City of Tucson Development Services Department prior to Development Plan Package approval. 32) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5: Revise the development plan documents to provide the dimensions for all proposed parking area access lanes (PAALs). Verify that all areas show the minimum widths required per DS Sec.3-05. 33) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5: Provide the dimensions for the proposed back up spur as shown at the east end of the north parking area. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for minimum requirements. 34) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5.a: Provide a cross access agreement along with a notarized letter of approval from the adjacent property owner for all proposed offsite improvements. Specifically the proposed PAAL along the west side of the property that is being constructed on the adjacent property. A notarized approval letter from all property owners is required along with a construction and maintenance easement that must be recorded prior to Development Plan Package approval. 35) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5.c: Revise the development plan documents to relocate the loading zone so that it is not in conflict with the proposed refuse container or the pedestrian access. The loading zone can not block the refuse access and the ADA accessibility path must pass safely around and not directly behind the loading zone. 36) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: If dedication or pedestrian improvements are not required through TDOT at this time label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, curbing, etc for both Benson Highway and Irvington Road. 37) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.K: Revise the development plan documents to dimension and label all proposed easements (utility, seer, drainage, access, etc.) and whether the will be public or private. 38) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Revise the development plan documents to label proposed cross section A (Sheet 7) in plan view. 39) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Revise the development plan documents to show that the area underneath the gas canopy is not hydraulically connected to the public storm drain system causing contaminants to enter through the proposed culverts. 40) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Clarify or revise Grading Keynotes to match. Clarify the pipe size discrepancy in Keynote #2 versus keynote #12. 41) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the required basin access ramp. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis 42) DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8: Revise the development plan documents to provide the required clean out for all storm drain junctions. Provide the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all clean outs in plan view for grading purposes. 43) DS Sec.10-02.10.3.4: Revise the development plan documents to show that the portion of the proposed storm drain system that extends into the public right-of-way is constructed out of reinforced concrete with the minimum diameter of 18-inches. A right-of-way use permit will be required for any construction or improvements within the public right-of-way. 44) DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8: Provide manholes or clean outs at all junction locations or pipe angles. Verify that the angle as shown is equal to or less than 10 degrees. Per the DS "Manholes shall be located at such places as junctions, changes in pipe size, curves and angle points in excess of 10 degrees and points where an abrupt change in grade occurs." Verify that the design conforms to the requirements within this section. 45) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage infrastructure (Storm drains and catch basins) within the Public Right-of-Way. 46) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project, if applicable. 47) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan documents to show the required 6-foot wide sidewalk with curb along both street frontages of Benson Highway and Irvington Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. If sidewalks already exist along the frontage of both streets provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to development plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 48) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.S: Revise the development plan documents to either relocate the loading zone or refuse container so that they are not in conflict with their associated maneuverability. 49) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan documents and associated details to provide the word "minimum 2 foot" setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, water harvesting basins, fill slopes, block wall and any associated erosion protection. 50) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a General Note on the development plan documents to state that, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for all detention/retention basins, drainage infrastructure, drainage channels and water harvesting areas; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once every 12-months, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the detention/retention basins and drainage structures should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 51) Provide a General Note on the development plan documents stating that "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments." 52) Revise General Note #4 on the development plan documents to reference the Geotechnical Evaluation that was prepared for this project. Provide the name, date and job number that relates to the Geotechnical Evaluation and additional addendums. 53) Provide a General Note on the development plan documents to state the following: "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 54) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the connection of the private storm drains into the public infrastructure. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 55) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1: Provide a revised Geotechnical Report (or addendum) with percolation rates for the retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum allotted time. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 56) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. The owner of the property, since known, is required to sign the owner certification section prior to SWPPP approval. 57) Part III.C.3.h: Show the location and registration number of all onsite dry-wells and dry-wells located on adjacent properties that could receive Stormwater from the site (if none exist, indicate that). 58) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that will be submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report, and SWPPP. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 12/03/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 3, 2008 Lorenzo Ortiz DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 857?? Subject: D08-0051 Quiktrip Store No. 1490 Development Plan Dear Lorenzo: Your submittal of October 29,2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (ADA, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies City approved lot split documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |