Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0050
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/21/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/02/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0050 Radiology LTD. Lot 22 Midvale Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 02/02/2009 DUE DATE: 02/19/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 10/21/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G Please draw all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate. Keynote #8: Per lot split S06-261 a 24'access easement is in place 24' west of the property line dividing the two properties, provide recording (docket and page) information for the abandonment of this easement. Provide recording information for the cross access agreement with the property to the west. Provide a copy of the agreement for review. Key note #9, provide docket and page information for the new ingress/egress easement. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.A This site contains two (2) separate parcels therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately by providing a cross access agreement for pedestrian use, vehicular use, drainage and possibly for the trash enclosure (see engineering comments). Provide a copy of this agreement for review and provide as a note the recording docket and page information for this agreement. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.I The indicated 24' building setback for the street perimeter yard is incorrect. This project qualifies for developed area setbacks. See LUC. Sec. 6.2.4 for definitions of developed areas and developing areas. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.A the required street perimeter yard setback is 20' or 1 ½ times the height of the proposed wall which ever is greater. The wall height indicated to top of parapet is 20' the required setback from the front property line would be 30'-0". Revise plans or an application for a Design Development Option will be required to be approved prior to approval of this development plan. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.K This project is considered as one site in conjunction with the properties located to the east and west. Provide an accessible pedestrian circulation path connecting the three buildings. The crosswalk for the existing building where adjacent to the parking space at the north end is required to be a physically separated concrete sidewalk with a handicap ramp at the south end of the sidewalk where the sidewalk meets the crosswalk. Clearly indicate the location of the handicap ramps at the relocated handicap access aisles for the existing building. Per the aerial photographs these are new handicap parking spaces, indicate as such. The provided aerial photo showing pedestrian circulation to the west property does not meet the requirements of DS 2-08.3.1. All areas within the development must be connected without the pedestrian circulation path being located within the right of way. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.P Per the last approved development for the existing building wheel stops where provided at all parking spaces for the existing building to prevent limiting the sidewalk to less than 4' width and the overhanging landscape areas along the south property line. Clearly indicate the location of all wheel stops for the parking spaces at the existing building.. Provide a standard parking space detail with the location of the wheel stops clearly indicating the required 2'-6" setback from the front of the parking space. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not appear meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Provide the location of the main entrance for the proposed structure. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0050-2dp.doc |
| 02/03/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Any changes made to the development plan based on other review comments must also be made to the landscape plan where necessary for consistency. |
| 02/04/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | February 2, 2009 To: JOE ZEMAN LEADSTAR, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department From: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager Development Review Division ( Wastewater) Subject: RADIOLOGY LIMITED LOT 22, MIDVALE PARK COMMERCE CENTER II Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-050 The drawings for the proposed Final Plat for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The PDEQ and the PCRWRD hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the Development Plan as received by us on January 20, 2008. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality Department. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating, or engaging in any activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Copy: Project File |
| 02/06/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | February 6, 2009 D08- 0050 Radiology LTD, Development Plan Resubmittal Required: Development Plan The engineering division recommends that the development plan can be approved on the condition that the following comments have been addressed.. If you wish to set up a meeting or discuss any questions, please contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. 1. Revise the keynotes so the details are correctly called out. Where standard details are referenced such as in keynote 1, indicate the specific type intended. 2. The curb ramps indicated by keynote 19 do not match the referenced standard detail. Provide a detail on the plan sheet showing the modification. 3. Provide copies of recorded joint use and maintenance agreements for the shared use of the solid waste container and the drainage and water harvesting basins. Include recordation data as well. |
| 02/11/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. This DP shows two seperate parcels. Each parcel must demonstrate its own abilty for on site solid waste disposal in the event they are sold separately. Refer to zoning for proper recording of common use for access easment. Contact Andy vera @ (520) 791-5543 ext.1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov, if you have any questions. |
| 02/11/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Good morning Peggy, The revised DP with the access easement agreement is acceptable as shown. Environmental Services grants an approval of this DP review as it pertains to Solid Waste Disposal requirements. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson Environmental Services Accounts Representative Office (520) 791-5543 ext.1212 Fax (520) 791-4156 e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/12/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0050 RADIOLOGY LTD. LOT 22 MIDVALE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 2/10/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project pending the following is met: 1. Correct project # from D08-0500 to D08-0050 on all sheets 2. Delete taxcodes from map, sheet 1. 3. Correct northwest to northeast in legal description on location map. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 02/23/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 23, 2009 Joe Zeman Leadstar, LLC 6303 East Tanque Verde Road, Suite 101 Tucson, Arizona 857?? Subject: D08-0050 Radiology LTD, Lot 22, Midvale Park Commerce Center II Development Plan Dear Joe: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled blueline COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. AND 1 Rolled blueline set of the Development Plan. AND 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra rolled blueline set that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the rolled bluelines copies to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html. BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE FINAL PLANS TO THE CDRC OFFICE, ESD MUST REVIEW AND APRPOVD THE PLANS. THE APPROVAL MUST BE IN WRITING (E-MAIL IS OKAY). Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 547-0195 dpapproved |
| 02/23/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0050 RADIOLOGY LTD., LOT 22 MIDVALE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/12/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |