Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0047
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/26/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/03/2009 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/03/2009, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Quick Trip #1453 D08-0047, T14S, R14E, SECTION 23 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Grading Plan Landscape Plan and Drainage Report on February 11, 2009 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Statement is acceptable and it is hereby approved. Additional drainage related information may be required with the grading permit submittal. The Development Plan Package submittal can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location on the Development Plan Grading Plan and SWPPP, where the revisions were made: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1. DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the development plan documents to provide a standard Title Block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 2. DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: All easements that are proposed to be vacated have to be processed and removed from the Development Plan before the plan can be approved. Additionally, submit a Title Report to verify all the onsite easements. 3. DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: A Floodplain Use Permit will be required for all work within the mapped floodplain of 29th Street and for the connection of the private storm drains into the existing public HERCP of the Naylor Wash. Submit a Floodplain Use Permit application with the next submittal of the Development Plan Core review. 4. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H: According to the MS & R map, 29th Street width is 100'. Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the future right-of-way width (100-feet) for 29th Street adjacent to the site. Clearly label if the right-of-way for 29th is in accordance with the MS&R Plan or if dedication will be required to complete the street width. 5. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H: Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the intersection widening for 29th Street and Craycroft Road. 29th Street has a future MS&R r-o-w of 100-feet which requires a taper. For 29th Street the taper has a ½ r-o-w of 65-feet in width for a length of 300-feet measured from the centerline of Craycroft Road, then tapers for an additional 300-feet to meet the future ½ r-o-w of 50-feet. No improvements are allowed within this future r-o-w area. 6. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: If dedication is not required through TDOT at this time label the Major Streets right-of-way lines for 29th Street and provide the label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, curbing, etc for both Craycroft Road and 29th Street. 7. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Provide a letter of approval (or an approval email) from City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for the proposed private storm drain connection to the public infrastructure and associated Detail 3 on Sheet 8. The detail as shown needs to be approved by the City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for the connection of the private storm drain into the public infrastructure. Verify that the detail meets or exceeds the requirements of Streets and Maintenance. Contact Lance Peterson, Lance.Peterson@tucsonaz.gov or Kurt Hough, Kurt.Hough@tucsonaz.gov with City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for detail review. 8. Since the project does not provide storm water detention/retention, remove any reference to detention/retention basins from the maintenance notes. 9. Keynote #38, shown on the north side of the project (Sheet 4 of 26) appears to be misplaced. Revise as necessary. 10. Provide additional construction details (pipe size, material, invert elevations, etc.) for the storm drain connection the building roof drain to the 4' storm drain manhole on the west side of the project. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 1. Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. The owner of the property since known is required to sign the owner certification section prior to SWPPP approval. 2. Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. For any questions or to schedule meetings call Jason Green, Senior Engineer Associate, at 837-4929. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan package |
| 03/04/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1453 Development Package (2nd Review) D08-0047 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2009 DUE DATE: March 11, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development package for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development package to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The two (2) "INGRESS/EGRESS EASMENTS" slated to be vacated, need to be vacated prior to final approval of this development package. The recordation information, docket and page for the abandonment of these easements will need to be on the final drawings for this project. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d Per DSMR 08-58 provide a General Note on the development package that states the DSMR Number, Date of Approval, and Modifications Granted. In addition , the Case Number, "DSMR 08-58 must be added to each sheet of the Development Package. 4. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0047-2nd RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1453 Grading Plan (2nd Review) T08BU01781 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 4, 2009 DUE DATE: March 11, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the grading plan for this project, subject to approval by the Engineering and Landscape Review sections. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised grading plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01781 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 03/26/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Need exhibit of right of way information for Andy Dinauers review. |
| 03/27/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 27, 2009 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D08-0047 Quiktrip #1453 Development Plan Dear Richard: Your submittal of February 11, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Water Havesting Plan (OCSD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |