Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0047
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/13/2008 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/20/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1453 Development Package (1st Review) D08-0047 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 24, 2008 DUE DATE: November 03, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. These documents have been reviewed for full code compliance. D.S. 2-01.2.3 Sheet S1, the text shown on this sheet does not appear to meet the minimum of 3/32 inches in height. D.S. 2-01.2.5 Show the required three (3) by five (5) inch spaces for the approval stamp on all sheets. D.S. 2-01.2.8 The plan drawing shall be oriented with the north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.1 If available provide the email addresses for owner, developer, architect, civil engineer and landscape registrant(s) on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package plan number D08-0047 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 Under "LAND USE REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF TUCSON, PROJECT SITE AREA" the square footage for the site is listed as 66,6155 and under "MINIMUM SITE AREA, PROPOSED" it is listed as 66,615, please clarify which number is correct. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Under the LAND USE REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF TUCSON block revise the "PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO THE "MAJOR STREET AND ROUTES (MS&R SETBACK ZONE)" to include the LUC section 2.8.3. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The two (2) "INGRESS/EGRESS EASMENTS" slated to be vacated, need to be vacated prior to approval of this plan, provide documentation, along with the recordation information for the abandonment of the easements. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C For all existing public right-of-way (ROW's) adjacent to the site provide the right-of-way width, both existing and future if applicable. Based on the current MS&R map there is intersection widening proposed for this intersection, insure that this plan shows the correct configuration for the future ROW. It appears that the proposed intersection widening for 29th Street may effect the location of the proposed building and some of the parking. This project is required to be designed to meet the future ROW or a future site plan must be provided showing how this site will comply with The City of Tucson's Land Use Code and Development Standards at the time of street widening. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E Clearly show the split zoning boundary on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.2 Show the future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.2 Show existing and future SVT's for the intersection of Craycroft and 29th. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The provided parking calculation is not correct. Remove the reference to "GASOLINE SALES: 1 PER EMPLOYEE & NOT LESS THAN2" from the calculation. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The proposed vehicle parking space locate directly south of the proposed "AIR/YARD HYDRANT & PAD" cannot be counted as a required and/or provided vehicle parking space. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a Once the future ROW is shown correctly for 29th the vehicle parking calculation can be verified. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c The loading space shown on the plan does not appear to meet the twelve (12) foot width requirement, please clarify. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d It does not appear that the proposed bicycle parking location meets the requirements of revised D.S. 2-09.3.2, D.S. 2-09.4.1 & D.S. 2-09.4.4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d For your information a single "INVERTED U" type bicycle rack can support tw0 (2) bicycles. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d On the bicycle parking detail provide the specific type of rack, type of lighting, and once the finale locations had been determined a fully dimensioned layout, see D.S. 2-09.5.0. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I Show the future sidewalks, curbs, right-of-way lines and SVT's on the plan for both Craycroft and 29th. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K If applicable show all proposed easements on the site plan. Dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be private or public. D.S. 2-01.3.9.N Until a proposed building height is provided required setbacks cannot be verified. Provide building elevations. The building and canopy setbacks to both Craycroft and 29th are measured from the back of future curb. Once the future curbs are shown correctly and a setback dimension is provided from the back of curb to the building and canopy, zoning will be able to verify setback requirements. D.S. 2-05.3.9.P Within the footprint of the proposed building and canopy provide the proposed height. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q There appears to be some type of pop-outs or canopies proposed along the east and west side of the proposed buildings. Provide a sidewalk dimension at these locations. If the sidewalks in these areas are reduced to less than six (6) foot six (6) inches some type of barrier is required to prevent parking vehicles from overhanging the sidewalk, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1, D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and D.S. 2-08.5.1.A. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a pedestrian circulation path/accessible route will be provided to the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This said provide a pedestrian circulation path/accessible route to the sidewalk along Craycroft Road. D.S. 2-05.3.9.V Until all required sight visibility triangles, existing and future, are shown correctly on the plan sign locations cannot be reviewed for location. Under the "LAND USE REQUIREMENTS - CITY OF TUCSON, FUEL DISPENSING LOCATIONS" the "12 MAX" only applies if the fuel dispensing locations are located within the C-1 Zone. Also if each location shown on the plan has pumps on both sides it is consider 2 fuel dispensing locations there for the provided for this site is 16. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0047 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: QuickTrip #1453 Grading Plan (1st Review) T08BU01781 TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 24, 2008 DUE DATE: November 03, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01781 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 10/28/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 27, 2008 SUBJECT: QuikTrip #1453 Development Plan Core Review- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1884 S Craycroft Road, T145S R14E Sec23 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0047 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 06OCT08), Geotechnical Evaluation (ConformaTech, 03SEP08) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (DOWL Engineers, 06OCT08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) at this time. This review falls under the draft policy for Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Revise the Drainage Statement to provide a discussion for Section 2.2 as shown on Page 2. Section 2.2 is for onsite drainage and is not discussed in the report, clarify. 2) Revise the Drainage Statement to include a discussion and calculations for both the existing below ground box culverts and the catch basin within Craycroft Road. Verify if the existing culverts and catch basin have the capacity to except the proposed storm water drainage as designed. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Revise the Section 2.4 of the Drainage Statement to show that the area underneath the gas canopy is not hydraulically connected to the proposed storm drain system within the vehicular use area causing contaminants to enter the public storm drain system. 4) Revise the Drainage Statement to include a discussion with Section 5.1 that addresses water harvesting. Provide a statement that all Water Harvesting Basins will be designed per the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Guidance Manual to maximize Stormwater run off within these areas. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 5) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the development plan documents to provide a Title Block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 6) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include a 3-inch by 5-inch space in the lower right quadrant that shall be reserved for an approval stamp. 7) DS Sec.2-01.2.8: Revise the development plan documents so that the drawing is oriented with the north towards the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with the north to the left side of the sheet. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.2: Provide the following information in the Title Block: a) The proposed name of the project or subdivision or if there is no name the proposed tenants name. b) A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re subdivision are to be provided. c) The administrative street address. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0047) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.4.B: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to label the major water course (Naylor Wash) adjacent to the site. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Revise the note on Sheet 2 for the overlay zone associated with this project. Specifically add "LUC Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.C.2: Revise General Note #30 to read per this section; "No structures or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0." 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the development plan documents. Clarify all easements shown as "Private or Public." A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but maybe required to verify if additional easements affect this property. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan documents to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site. Provide a label for the existing catch basin within the right-of-way of Craycroft Road. Provide the Improvement Plan number for all existing drainage improvements. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the wall design at the 50-foot drainage easement to include a gate or opening for maintenance access across the public drainage easement. Provide approval from City of Tucson Real Property for all improvements within the Public Right-of-Way. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.G: Revise the development plan documents to clearly label the start/end for the proposed ornamental iron fence to verify that it is not encroaching into the right-of-way along the north portion of the site. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: Revise the development plan documents and the legend on Sheet 2 to include a symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals shown on the development package documents. A Floodplain Use Permit will be required for all work within the mapped floodplain of 29th Street and for the connection of the private storm drains into the existing public HERCP of the Naylor Wash. Provide a Floodplain Use Permit with the next submittal of the Development Plan Core review. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.1: Revise the development plan documents and associated grading sheets to provide the required information for the revised traffic circulation: a) Provide the required 25-foot curb returns for the PAAL access at 29th Street. b) Revise the PAAL intersection on 29th Street that is closest to Craycroft Road to meet the minimum separation per the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson, 17MAR03. A minimum of 150-feet, measured at curb line, shall separate the nearest pavement edge of any entrance or exit driveway and the curb line to any signalized intersection with arterial and collector roadways. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.2: Revise the development plan documents to dimension the pedestrian Site Visibility Triangle for the intersection of 29th Street and Craycroft Road. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.2: Revise the development plan documents to clearly show that the proposed sign at the PAAL intersection on the west side of the QuikTrip is not within the SVT. 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G.5.b: Revise the development plan documents to verify the minimum 18-foot radii at all PAAL intersections that are used for fire and solid waste vehicle maneuverability. 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H: Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the future right-of-way width (100-feet) for 29th Street adjacent to the site. Clearly label if the right-of-way for 29th is in accordance with the MS&R Plan or if dedication will be required to complete the street width. 23) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H: Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the intersection widening for 29th Street and Craycroft Road. 29th Street has a future MS&R r-o-w of 100-feet which requires a taper. For 29th Street the taper has a ½ r-o-w of 65-feet in width for a length of 300-feet measured from the centerline of Craycroft Road, then tapers for an additional 300-feet to meet the future ½ r-o-w of 50-feet. No improvements are allowed within this future r-o-w area. Contact Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov for clarity on the additional widening that is required for this intersection. 24) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.I: If dedication is not required through TDOT at this time label the Major Streets right-of-way lines for 29th Street and provide the label and dimension the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, curbing, etc for both Craycroft Road and 29th Street. 25) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.2: Revise the development plan documents to show that the area underneath the gas canopy is not hydraulically connected to the proposed storm drain system within the vehicular use area causing contaminants to enter the public storm drain system. 26) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Revise the development plan documents to clearly show how the water in the vehicular use area enters the proposed 12-inch and 15-inch storm drains. The Drainage Statement proposes roof drains, gutters and down spouts to collect canopy drainage, however these are not shown on the plan, revise. . 27) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Revise the call out for the new 4' Manhole as shown on Sheet 7 to include the page reference for Detail 8. 28) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Revise the call out for the proposed "double grate" catch basin shown on Sheet 7 to reference the page and associated detail. Clearly provide the detail that is specific to this catch basin (inlet in continuous sag or inlet in 90 degree parking). Verify that all pipe inlets, outlets, inverts and size are labeled for this specific improvement. 29) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Revise the call out for the proposed catch basin that is in the northwest corner of the site. Clearly provide the detail on Sheet 8 that is specific to this catch basin (inlet in continuous sag or inlet in 90 degree parking). Verify that all pipe inlets, outlets, sizes and inverts are labeled for this specific improvement. 30) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Revise the development plan documents to provide a manhole at the junction of the 12 inch to 15 inch storm drains as shown on Sheets 7. Provide a detail reference for this improvement for construction purposes. Per DS Sec.10-02.10.9.1.8 "Manholes shall be located at such places as junctions, changes in pipe size, curves and angle points in excess of 10 degrees and points where an abrupt change in grade occurs." Verify that the design conforms to the requirements within this section. 31) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M.3: Provide a letter of approval from City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for the proposed private storm drain connection to the public infrastructure and associated Detail 3 on Sheet 8. The detail as shown needs to be approved by the City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for the connection of the private storm drain into the public infrastructure. Verify that the detail meets or exceeds the requirements of Streets and Maintenance. Contact Lance Peterson, Lance.Peterson@tucsonaz.gov or Kurt Hough, Kurt.Hough@tucsonaz.gov with City of Tucson Streets and Maintenance for detail review. 32) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.Q: Revise the development plan documents to include a pedestrian access point to all street frontages (Craycroft Road). Per DS Sec.2-08.3.1 this path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located along the adjacent roads. 33) Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project. 34) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.S: Verify on the development plan documents that the proposed detail for the refuse container meets the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure (approach pad) and construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 35) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the development plan documents to provide cross sections to verify the required 2 foot setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, water harvesting basins, fill slopes, block wall and any associated erosion protection. Plan view on the development documents shows that the limits of grading encroach within the required 2 foot setback and in some areas encroach into the Public r-o-w. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2 foot setback from property lines to top of fill slopes and associated erosion protection. Provide a cross section for all property boundaries that show the 2 foot setback at all property lines. 36) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on Sheet 2 of the development plan documents to state that, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for all detention/retention basins, drainage infrastructure, drainage channels and water harvesting areas; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once every 12-months, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the detention/retention basins and drainage structures should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 37) Provide a General Note on the development plan documents stating that "All proposed fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments." 38) Provide a General Note on the development plan documents to reference the Geotechnical Evaluation that was prepared for this project. Provide the name, date and job number that relates to the Geotechnical Evaluation and any additional addendums. 39) Provide a General Note on Sheet 2 of the development plan documents to state the following: "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a DSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Development Services Department, or contact DSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html 40) Approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way and for the connection of the private storm drains into the public infrastructure. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact Thad Harvison, (520)-837-6592 or Thad.Harvison@tucsonaz.gov for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 41) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: Per the Geotechnical Report Section 6.2 provide an evaluation prepared by a structural engineer to determine if the existing below ground box culvert can safely support the new loads imposed during construction and operation of the new QuikTrip Store. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments: 42) Part III.A.3 and VIII.J.2: Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. The owner of the property since known is required to sign the owner certification section prior to SWPPP approval. 43) Part III.C.2.c: Indicate the total acres of the site and the number of acres that will be disturbed (include off-site borrow and fill areas, staging and equipment storage areas). Clarify the difference in site area that is called out on the SWPPP versus the limits called out on the Grading Plan. 44) Part III.C.2.d: Indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious before and after construction. 45) Part III.C.2.f: Include a map showing the project location (e.g. U.S.G.S. quadrangle, portion of a city or count map). The map must also show any washes or other water bodies within 1 mile of the site. Label the Naylor Wash that is adjacent to the site. 46) Part III.C.4: Identify the nearest receiving water(s). Receiving water is a natural watercourse into which Stormwater would flow in a storm event and includes dry washes, streams, tributaries, and other waters of the U.S. (such as designated canals). Man-made structures such as retention basins, storm sewer systems, or city storm drains are not receiving waters. 47) Part III.C.6: Describe any pollutant sources from areas other than dirt moving (e.g., dedicated concrete and asphalt plants, fueling operations, material or waste storage etc., that are associated with the construction project). Identify where these sources are or will occur on site. Revise the concrete wash out area so that it is located outside of the water harvesting basin. Wash out and storage areas can not be located within basins, water harvesting areas or any area downstream that is adjacent to a storm drain. 48) Part III.C.3.a: Use arrows to show the directions(s) where Stormwater will flow for all areas within the project limits (This is for the period during construction, not final contours. Flow direction may change as project grading progresses; when this occurs, maps are to be updated.). 49) Part III.C.3.c: Show all structural BMPs identified in the SWPPP. Specifically the proposed sandbags 50) Part III.C.3.e: Show locations of on-site material storage, waste storage or receptacles, borrow areas, equipment storage or other supporting activities. 51) Part III.C.3.h: Show the location and registration number of all onsite dry-wells and dry-wells located on adjacent properties that could receive Stormwater from the site (if none exist, indicate that). 52) Part III.C.5.c: Provide drawings and/or specifications of structural BMPs that include design or installation details. The drawings must meet or exceed the approved publications, i.e. Caltran or Maricopa County Details, for structural BMPs. 53) Part III.D.3: Include a copy of the completed NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ. The NOI must be signed by the owner prior to SWPPP approval. 54) Part IV.C.3: Provide sizing criteria and show calculations for sediment basin(s) and indicate whether basin(s) will be temporary or permanent (i.e., post-construction). 55) Part IV.C.3: Provide reason(s) or rational why a sediment basin was determined to not be possible at the project site (if applicable). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Geotechnical Report, SWPPP, Drainage Statement, structural engineering evaluation and a Floodplain Use Permit that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package, Geotechnical Report, SWPPP and Drainage Statement. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 11/03/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to show the parking space striping. DS 2-07.2.1.A 2) Landscaping proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. LUC 3.7.2.9 3) Revise the Water Harvesting Plan to match any changes made to the landscape, site, and grading plans. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 4) Clarify the water harvesting proposal by including the location of any pipes or drainage drainage structures used to facilitate Stormwater runoff into landscape areas. 5) Revise the landscape plan to include canopy trees within the landscape border required along Craycroft Road. The trees must be located on the site and must be canopy trees as defined in LUC 6.2.3. Palm trees do not count towards this requirement. LUC 3.7.2.4 6) Revise the landscape plan to include the following calculations: a. Square footage of the site. b. Square footage of the vehicular use area; number of parking spaces, including the required and provided parking space calculations; and the calculation of the required number of canopy trees. c. Minimum width and square footage measured from the inside edge of tree planters in vehicular use areas. d. Length and width of landscape borders and number of canopy trees per length. e. Square footage of all landscape border areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage. 7) Revise the landscape plans to provide 50% vegetative coverage for the landscape borders. Additional coverage in the public right-of-way is not included in the calculation. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 TO8BU01871: GRADING PLAN Revise the Grading Plan to match any changes made to the landscape, site, and Water Harvesting plans. Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.3.B Clarify the water harvesting proposal by including the location of any pipes or drainage drainage structures used to facilitate Stormwater runoff into landscape areas. |
| 11/07/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 7, 2008 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 West Alameda Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D08-0047 Quiktrip #1453 Development Plan Dear Richard: Your submittal of October 7, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Structural Engineering Evaluation (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Floodplain Use Permit (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/07/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 7, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0047 PROJECT NAME: QuickTrip # 1453 PROJECT ADDRESS: 1884 S Craycroft Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Illustrate and call out both existing and future right of way information along Craycroft Road. 3. If applicable, along 29th Street verify that adequate right of way is available for existing/future bus shelters or bus stops. Verify with Tom Fisher at 520-791-5409 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 5. What improvements will be installed to ensure right in/right out movements from the eastern most driveway along 29th Street. 6. If applicable, schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. 7. In the Traffic Impact Analysis was a queuing analysis conducted for Craycroft Road (north leg of the Craycroft Rd/29th St intersection)? Results could effect the access point into this development off of Craycroft. Depending on the results left in movements maybe prohibited if the results indicate that left turn movements from southbound Craycroft Road to eastbound 29th Street has excessive queuing. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |