Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0046
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/12/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/15/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | NOT A COT OWNED/OPERATED PROPERTY |
| 06/17/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 17 JUNE 2009 D08-0046/WALGREENS AT MISSION AND AJO - RESUBMITTAL REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW-RESUBMITTAL 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 WALGREENS AT MISSION AND AJO DENIED: I. SHEET DP-2 A. AT THE RAISED MARKED CROSSING FROM THE MISSION ROAD PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO THE ACCESSIBLE FRONT ENTRANCE: 1. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT BOTH ENDS OF THE CROSSING AT THE BOTTOM OF BOTH RAMPS. 2. PLEASE PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF CURB ENTRY, RAMP, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406, MARKED CROSSINGS AND CURB RAMPS. LARGE SCALE DETAIL TO SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 3. As per ICC/ANSI, Section 406.12 Detectable Warnings at Raised Marked Crossings: the detectable warnings are to extend the full width of the marked crossing. Please delete all detectable warning strips beyond the limits of the width of the marked crossing at the entrance accessible route. 4. The markings for the marked crossing are to extend to the face of the curb of the island curb ramp atop the concrete valley gutter. 5. Reference Zoning comments for continued accessible route separation from the PAAL. Reference Development Standard number 2-08.4.1. 6. Re submittal Comments 3, 4 and 5 are also applicable to detail numbers 1 and 2 DP-8 B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 1. PLEASE CLARIFY ACCESS FROM PARKING SPACES TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL. LARGE SCALE DETAIL IS TO BE OF SPECIFIC DESIGN, NOT GENERIC AND IS TO SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, SIGNAGE AND LOCATIONS, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ETC. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 2. At all shown accessible parking aisles, detectable warnings strips are not required except where the accessible parking aisle is part of a marked crossing. Reference comment A3 above. Please delete all detectable warning strips at all parking aisles unless they are part of a marked crossing. a. This includes detail numbers 3 and 6/DP-8 and 11 and 13/DP-9 C. WHERE THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING RELOCATED AND RESTRIPED SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SEPARATION FROM VEHICLE PAVING. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. Detectable Warning strips are not an acceptable separation material between accessible routes and PAALs. They are required for marked crossings. Reference Zoning comments for continued accessible route separation from the PAAL. Reference Development Standard number 2-08.4.1. II. SHEET DP-3 A. WHERE THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING RELOCATED AND RESTRIPED, (EXISTING BUILDING, LOTS 4, AND 5) SHOW ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; I.E. NEW RAMPS, SLOPES ETC. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS FOR BOTH. FOR OTHER BUILDINGS SHOWING RAMPS (BUILDINGS LOTS 1 AND 8) PROVIDE SPECIFIC LARGE SCALE DETAIL. LARGE SCALE DETAILS ARE TO BE OF SPECIFIC DESIGN, NOT GENERIC AND SHALL SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, SIGNAGE AND LOCATIONS, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ETC. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. At all shown accessible parking aisles, detectable warnings strips are not required except where the accessible parking aisle is part of a marked crossing. Reference comment A3 above. Please delete all detectable warning strips at all parking aisles unless they are part of a marked crossing. a. This includes detail numbers 3 and 6/DP-8 and 11 and 13/DP-9 B. WHERE A NEW MARKED CROSSING IS INDICATED FROM MISSION ROAD TO LOT 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING, PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL SHOWING NEW RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. As per ICC/ANSI, Section 406.12 Detectable Warnings at Raised Marked Crossings: the detectable warnings are to extend the full width of the marked crossing. Please delete all detectable warning strips beyond the limits of the width of the marked crossing at the accessible parking aisle entrance accessible route. Same comment to Detail 15/DP-9. 2..Reference Zoning comments for continued accessible route separation from the PAAL. Reference Development Standard number 2-08.4.1. C. WHERE THE MARKED CROSSING IS SHOWN FROM AJO WAY TO LOT 5, THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE RAMP AND NOT HAVING ENOUGH ROOM FOR BOTH RAMPS. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL AND ETC. OK RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. Delete the detectable warning shown at the accessible parking aisle. D. As per ICC/ANSI, Section 406.12 Detectable Warnings at Raised Marked Crossings: the detectable warnings are to extend the full width of the marked crossing. At all the marked crossings shown on the site plan and detail numbers 4/DP-8 and 10, 11 and 12/DP-9 either increase the width of the marked crossing to match the detectable warnings or reduced the detectable warning widths to match the width of the marked crossings. III. SHEET DP-4 A. AT DETAIL 5: PARKING SPACES TO BE OF SPECIFIC PARKING LAYOUT DESIGN AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, NOT GENERIC. SHOW ALL RAMP ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. OK B. AT DETAIL 2: IF REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 406.12 AND 14, DETECTABLE WARNINGS NEED BE ONLY 2' DEEP. OK IV. SHEET DP-5 A. AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING PLANS: a. 2% MAXIMUM SLOPES TO BE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS OK b. SOME PLANS DO NOT SHOW SIGN LOCATIONS OK c. ALL MARKED CROSSINGS ARE TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND RAMPS AS REQUIRED IF A 6" HIGH CURB IS PRESENT OK d. A PHYSICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND THE VEHICLE PAVING IS TO BE PROVIDED AS PER ZONING REQUIREMENTS. RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS 1. Detectable Warning strips are not an acceptable separation material between accessible routes and PAALs. They are required for marked crossings. Reference Zoning comments for continued accessible route separation from the PAAL. Reference Development Standard number 2-08.4.1. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 17, 2009 To: ERIC APANTE OPTIMUS CIVIL DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), representing the Pima County Departments of Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department and Environment Quality Subject: WALGREENS Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-046 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD).This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/22/2009 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/24/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2009 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 9, 2009 D08-0046 Development Plan for Walgreen's at Park View Plaza. The Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. Please address the following comments. 1. Show on the development plan the location of the inspection ports recommended for the Stormtech system. The detail was revised to show one inspection port. Each chamber must have an inspection port and a maintenance access opening. 2. Check the key notes on all sheets to ensure that they correctly indicate what is called out in the drawings. 3. Revise the location of the bollards in the parking spaces in front of the existing store so that the parking spaces provide a total of 18 feet for parking. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting, please contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/09/2009 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0046 WALGREENS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/07/09 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on Location Map. Add Drive to Freedom on Location Map. Delete Holiday Isle Blvd and Via Ravenna on Location Map. These are not official street names. Change S.W. to S.E. under Location Map. Change Park View Plaza to Park View Center under legal description. Does this Development Plan include the entire plat of Park View Center 37/32? If not, please correct legal description. Change Building H to 6 on pages 3 and 5. Delete street directions on pages 4 and 5. |
| 07/13/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0046 Walgreens Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/13/2009 DUE DATE: 07/13/09 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 10-02-09. 2. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G Provide recording information (docket and page for all new easements and the abandonment of any easements. Must be completed and provided on the development plan prior to approval of the development plan. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.A This site contains three (3) separate parcels (Lots 2,3 &7) therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo. Provide copies of documents with the next submittal. Once the tax parcel combo has been completed remove from the plans the indicated property lines for lots 2,3,&7 4. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. The proposed escape lane, key note #15, is considered a one way PAAL. Clearly indicate the direction of travel and provide a dimension of the PAAL (min.12'). The following code requirements apply to the east side of the "escape lane". Per DS 2-08.4.1.B A sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.P Key note #56 indicates bollards being provide in the parking spaces in front of the existing bldg. #2 at the handicap parking spaces. The location of the bollards as indicated restricts the parking space to less than the required 18' in length. Relocate the bollards to the front of the parking space or provide wheel stop curbs at the 2'-6" location. Wheel stop curbs will be required in several areas to prevent vehicles from overhanging into required landscape areas, overhanging sidewalks and limiting the sidewalk width to less than 4'. For example: the parking spaces along the east side of the existing building #2, the parking spaces west of the proposed building, the parking spaces east of building #8, the parking spaces located along the ROW of Ajo Way, some of the parking spaces located east of building #7. Clearly indicate the location of all required wheel stop curbs. 6. The sidewalk area near the south west corner of the proposed building must be physically separated from the vehicular use area. Truncated domes do not provide the required separation and are to be used only at crosswalks.. 7. Based on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0046-2dp.doc |
| 07/15/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Move gate post to the face of the CMU enclosure in order to prevent damage to the eclosure wall during service operation. 2. Call out a 3 ft dimension from the center of the side wall protector (bollard) to the front gates/enclosure. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/16/2009 | JWILLIA4 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 16, 2009 Josh Fonger Evergreen Devco 2930 E. Camelback Road # 410 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Subject: D08-0046 Walgreen's Development Plan Resbumittal Dear Josh: Your submittal of October 2, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (HC-Site, Addressing, Engineering, Zoning, ENV SVCS, DSD) 2 Copies Tax Parcel Combo Documentation (Zoning, DSD,) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 567-7176 dp-resubmittal |