Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0046
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/02/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/06/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Automatic fire sprinklers will be required. |
| 10/10/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 10/10/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 10, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0046 Walgreens: Development Plan(10-03-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/16/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the CDRC development plan case number (D08-0046) along with any other related case numbers, including the previous development plan case number, to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the development plan and landscape plan. 2) Within vehicular use areas every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a. At least one of the parking spaces in the row immediately south of the proposed Walgreen's building does not fall within 40 feet of a canopy tree trunk. Revise landscape plan to meet this code requirement. 3) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 4) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B 5) The Native Plant Preservation Application for Exception is approved as submitted. |
| 10/20/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 20 OCTOBER 2008 D08-0046/WALGREENS AT MISSION AND AJO REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 WALGREENS AT MISSION AND AJO DENIED: THESE COMMENTS ARE VERY SIMILAR TO THOSE PRESENTED FOR THE THURSDAY PRESUBMITTAL REVIEW; SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET DP-2 A. AT THE RAISED MARKED CROSSING FROM THE MISSION ROAD PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY TO THE ACCESSIBLE FRONT ENTRANCE: 1. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT BOTH ENDS OF THE CROSSING AT THE BOTTOM OF BOTH RAMPS. 2. PLEASE PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF CURB ENTRY, RAMP, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND CLARIFY COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406, MARKED CROSSINGS AND CURB RAMPS. LARGE SCALE DETAIL TO SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS. B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 1. PLEASE CLARIFY ACCESS FROM PARKING SPACES TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL. LARGE SCALE DETAIL IS TO BE OF SPECIFIC DESIGN, NOT GENERIC AND IS TO SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, SIGNAGE AND LOCATIONS, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ETC. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS C. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ALL OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SHOW SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 D. WHERE THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING RELOCATED AND RESTRIPED, SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SEPARATION FROM VEHICLE PAVING. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS. II. SHEET DP-3 A. WHERE THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE BEING RELOCATED AND RESTRIPED, (EXISTING BUILDING, LOTS 4, AND 5) SHOW ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE; I.E. NEW RAMPS, SLOPES ETC. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS FOR BOTH. FOR OTHER BUILDINGS SHOWING RAMPS (BUILDINGS LOTS 1 AND 8) PROVIDE SPECIFIC LARGE SCALE DETAIL. LARGE SCALE DETAILS ARE TO BE OF SPECIFIC DESIGN, NOT GENERIC AND SHALL SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES, SIGNAGE AND LOCATIONS, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ETC. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS B. WHERE A NEW MARKED CROSSING IS INDICATED FROM MISSION ROAD TO LOT 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING, PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL SHOWING NEW RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406. C. WHERE THE MARKED CROSSING IS SHOWN FROM AJO WAY TO LOT 5, THERE APPEARS TO BE A CONFLICT WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING AISLE RAMP AND NOT HAVING ENOUGH ROOM FOR BOTH RAMPS. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL AND ETC. III. SHEET DP-4 A. AT DETAIL 5: PARKING SPACERS TO BE OF SPECIFIC PARKING LAYOUT DESIGN AS SHOWN ON SITE PLAN, NOT GENERIC. SHOW ALL RAMP ACCESS TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTES. B. AT DETAIL 2: IF REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 406.12 AND 14, DETECTABLE WARNINGS NEED BE ONLY 2' DEEP. IV. SHEET DP-5 A. AT ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING PLANS: 1. 2% MAXIMUM SLOPES TO BE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS 2. SOME PLANS DO NOT SHOW SIGN LOCATIONS 3. ALL MARKED CROSSINGS ARE TO HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND RAMPS AS REQUIRED IF A 6" HIGH CURB IS PRESENT 4. A PHYSICAL SEPARATION BETWEEN THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND THE VEHICLE PAVING IS TO BE PROVIDED AS PER ZONING REQUIREMENTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/22/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0046 Walgreens Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/30/2008 DUE DATE: 10-30-08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 10-02-08. 2. DS 2-05.2.1 Remove the existing under lying parking spaces, curbs, islands, etc. from the development plan. A separate sheet can be provided with this information if required. Show only what the site will look like once the development is completed Remove grade point callouts from the development plan. Provide only the grade points required by the handicap and engineering reviewers for a development plan. A separate sheet can be provided with all the additional grade points if required. The above comments are required in order to provide a legible development plan. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner and provide the following information. a. Provide the section corners on the location map b. Identify the City of Tucson jurisdictional limits. 4. DS 2-05.2.1. K Provide the rezoning case # C9-78-38 in the lower right corner of each sheet near the title block. Provide the conditions of rezoning per C9-78-38 (ordinance 5021) on the plan. Provide a separate letter stating how each of the rezoning conditions have been meet. Provide the previous development plan numbers associated with this development, C12-79-21 and D03-0040, in the lower right hand corner of each sheet near the title block. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0046 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In general note #6 list the proposed use as follows: "General Merchandise Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A" 7. DS 2-05 2.2.B.10 Please add a note to the general notes stating: This project has been designed to meet the criteria of the "Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone LUC section 2.8.3", and "Gateway Corridor Zone LUC section 2.8.4". 8. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 Please provide the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage in general note #1. 9. DS 2-05.2.3.B & DS 2-05.2.4.G Clearly indicate (heavier line weight) all existing easements on the plan along with recordation information, location, width, and purpose. If an easement is no longer in use and scheduled to be vacated or has been abandoned, so indicate and provide recording information (docket and page) for the abandonment on the plan. Clearly indicate any new easements which are purposed please draw, dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be public or private. Provide recording information (docket and page) for each new easement on the plan. Because of the widening of the entrance from Ajo Way a portion of the 1'No Access Easement will be required be abandoned. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.A This site contains three (3) separate parcels (Lots 2,3 &7) therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property. Provide on the plan the recording information for the covenant. (docket and page). Provide copies of both documents with the next submittal. Once the tax parcel combo has been completed remove from the plans the indicated property lines for lots 2,3,&7 Forms may be found at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved for the new property lines for the Walgreens parcel. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. Provide a copy of the approved lot split with the next submittal. Clearly indicate the new property lines for the Walgreens in a heavier line weight. The lot split application cannot be approved until the Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded covenant regarding development and use of real property has been completed and recorded. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.B Clearly indicate the location of zoning boundaries of the C-1 and C-2 zoning on the development plan. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. Clearly indicate the widths of all PAALs. For example: Along the north side of the new loading zones for the existing grocery, minimum width for 2 way traffic is 24' with a 2' shy area at the north property line, at the north end of the drive through lane the 12' PAAL is interrupted by the loading zone near the Walgreens store, indicate the PAAL width between the parking spaces located along the south side of the Walgreens, indicate the PAAL width between the parking spaces located along the north side of the Credit Union, at the entrance from Ajo Way indicate width of both PAALs and indicate direction of travel for any one way PAALs, the PAAL width north of the parking spaces located north of lot 1 existing buildings the curb appears to be located with the PAAL, These are just some of the areas requiring clarification. Please review entire plan and comply. Per LUC Sec. 2.5.3.2.B In the C-1 zone with a Retail Use Group, only one (1) drive-through lane is allowed. Plans indicated 2 drive-through lanes. Revise. Per DS 3-05.2.1.C.a, .b &.c Drive-Through Aisles. All aisles used for drive-through service must meet the following criteria. a. The motor vehicle stacking area for each drive-through lane must be separated from the circulation routes necessary for ingress to, or egress from, any parking space. On-site pedestrian access must not cross the stacking area for drive-through lanes. b. The minimum drive-through lane width leading to the window is eleven (11) feet and must be striped, marked, or otherwise clearly delineated. The minimum drive-through lane width at the window is nine (9) feet. No more than two (2) car lengths may be less than the minimum width of eleven (11) feet. c. The minimum vehicle stacking capacity of any drive-through facility with one (1) drive through lane is six (6) vehicle spaces, including the space at the window. Provide on the plan the location of the stacking spaces, minimum length of 18' as well as dimensions to comply with the above requirements. Clearly indicate if there is a canopy over the drive through lane or lanes. If there is a canopy clearly indicate that the canopy has a minimum 15' clearance from grade to the under side of the canopy. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.F Provide dimensions from the right of way to the future curb location. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.I All applicable building setback lines will be shown. On zoning setbacks, if the building is proposed for location at a greater distance from the property line than the required setback, show only the dimension of the distance between the building and the property line. If the setback's point of measurement is not the property line, include the distance from the property line to the point of measurement. 15. Ds 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Clearly indicate by different line weight or some other method where new sidewalks are being installed and existing sidewalks are remaining Clearly indicate the widths of all sidewalks. Minimum width of 4'. The west end of the crosswalk leading from the credit union to the right of way sidewalk where adjacent to the parking space must be a physically separated from the vehicular use area (concrete sidewalk) with a handicap ramp. Clearly indicate the minimum 4' sidewalk width at the top of the new handicap ramps. At existing buildings lot #1, at existing building lot #8, also the required 4' sidewalk width at the bicycle parking spaces at the north west corner of the Walgeens building. Handicap ramp missing at crosswalk near the southwest corner of the Walgreens building. A sidewalk connecting to the pedestrian circulation path will be required at the east side of existing grocery store between the building and the relocated parking spaces. Per DS 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. (See Figure 2.) Per DS 2-08.3.1 Pedestrian Circulation Paths Required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Areas within the development which are not required to be connected to the pedestrian circulation path are those which will be used only for maintenance or for nonpublic truck use, such as truck loading spaces. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This accessible route may be identical to the pedestrian circulation path. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all places of public accommodation, all buildings, all parking spaces designated for use by the physically disabled, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas adjacent to accessible buildings, and all other common use areas. Review DS 2-08 and comply for the entire site. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide dimensions of the foot print of the new Walgreens building on the plan. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.O Clearly indicate maneuverability for the loading zones at the north side of the proposed new building. If the west loading zone has a vehicle parked in it how does the east loading zone meet maneuverability requirements. See engineering comments. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.P Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided. The plan is not legible enough to verify number of parking spaces provided As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of standard handicap parking and van accessible parking spaces. 19. DS 2-5.2.4.Q Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. Bicycle parking provided on the DP does not meet the requirements of revised DS (Development Standard) 2-09. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Bicycle access to a parking facility may cross a pedestrian way at a right angle (DS2-09.3.2). The class two type of rack proposed does not provide two-point support for bicycles. Please review DS 2-09.8.0 Figure 2 - 7 for acceptable and unacceptable rack designs, Figure 8 for rack location, and Figure 9 for dimensional requirements. 20. DS 2-05.2.4.R The future sight visibility triangles do not appear to be located correctly. See engineering comments. 21. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 22. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 23. Provide the allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the entire site. 24. Provide the cumulative expansion calculation as a percentage value. The cumulative expansion appears to be 21.6%. 25. Based on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments may be forth coming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0046dp.doc |
| 10/23/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | October 23, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0046 PROJECT NAME: Walgreens PROJECT ADDRESS: 1740 W Ajo Way PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The access points shall have a minimum 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6). Call out the radius on the development plan. Do not exceed a radius of 40' curb returns. 3. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40), because of the porch chop design dimension the lane width for both entry and exit. Keep in mind that Fire may require a minimum of 20' lane width in both directions. 4. The goal of the pork chop is to force vehicles to turn right onto westbound Ajo Way, therefore the pork chop dimension can be reduced to provide better maneuverability for ingress/egress through this access point if it is clearly demonstrated that vehicles will turn right out onto Ajo Way. 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/23/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/24/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | October 24, 2008 D08-0046 Development Plan for Walgreen's at Park View Plaza. The Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. Please address the following comments. 1. Indicate in the general notes that Mission Road is a MS&R arterial and a scenic route. Also note stating that the project is designed to meet the criteria of the MS&R setback zone and scenic corridor zone. 2. Add a note indicating that all work within the adjacent washes requires a floodplain use permit. 3. Show areas adjacent to the project site such as the adjacent washes. Include representative water surface contours on the plan. 4. Show on the development plan the location of the inspection ports recommended for the Stormtech system. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting, please contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/28/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 22, 2008 To: ERIC APANTE OPTIMUS CIVIL DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: WALGREENS Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-046 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #13 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #11 to read as follows:Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/28/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#204068 October 22, 2008 PVP7 LLC an AZ LLC Attn: Rick Volk 2730 E. Broadway # 200 Tucson, AZ 85716 To Rick Volk: SUBJECT: Walgreens D08-0046 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 9, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities The customer is responsible for the new trenching to relocate them as well as the relocation cost. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 10/29/2008 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: D08-0046 CASE NAME: Walgreen's (NEC Mission and Ajo) DATE SENT: 10/29/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Cross Reference Cases: C9-78-38 Area or Neighborhood Plan: Santa Cruz Area Plan Gateway or Scenic Route: Mission Rd. is Scenic Route; Ajo is Gateway Route Due Date: October 30, 2008 Comments: 1) Since the shopping center has already been constructed, it appears that the rezoning conditions have been satisfied. The plans are APPROVED - no resubmittal is necessary. 2) Staff notes that the City's zoning maps and zoning history maps appear to provide conflicting information relative to this site. The zoning maps indicate that this area is zoned C-1, while the zoning history maps indicate this area was successfully rezoned to B-2A (now C-2; case history map #4, R-4 to B-2A ordinance #5021, conditions met 10/22/79). Joanne Hershenhorn, 837-6965 date: October 28, 2008 S:\Case_Review\CDRC\D08-0046_Walgreens_DP.doc |
| 10/30/2008 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> "KoSok Chae" <kchae@pagnet.org> 10/29/2008 2:46 PM >>> CASE: D08-0046, WALGREENS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1,305 PM Peak: 128 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 10/31/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Walgreens will generate both refuse and recycle type waste. Therefore provide one additional single enclosure or one double wide enclsoure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle containers...If a cardboard baler will be provided then clarify as such and annotate. 2. Must provide detail for both a single and double wide enclosure. A. Ensure detail to include the minimum required 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear service area between the rear and side wall protectors (bollards) and the front gates. DS 6-01.4.1.B. & 6-01.4.2.C.2. B. Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Show and annotate..recommend, " positive locking with (Bayonet) anchors, Qty - 4, 1dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation." Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/31/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 11/04/2008 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0046 WALGREENS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/03/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete all street directions on all corresponding sheets and on Project Title, sheet 1. List scale on Index Map. Add recorded subdivision in legal description to Title Block on all sheets. Shade in subdivision information for surrounding properties on all applicable sheets. Label all buildings numerically beginning with the existing buildings. The legal description on sheet 1 does not match project layout. Are portions of subdivision lots being combined? Has the legal description been recorded and conveyed by a deed? Assessor’s office does not show as seprate piece of property. Please provide correct recorded legal description or delete legal description on sheet 1 starting with “Beginning at the northwest corner…” to end. Label suffix for “Freedman” on Location Map. Delete “Holiday Isle Blvd” from Location Map. |
| 11/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 6, 2008 Josh Fonger Evergreen Devco 2390 East Camelback Road, #410 Phoenix, Arizona 85016 Subject: D08-0046 Walgreens Development Plan Dear Josh: Your submittal of October 3, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 9 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, ADA, Zoning, Traffic, Engineering, Wastewater, ESD, Addressing, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Conditions of Rezoning and last approved plans (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combination Documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 567-7176 |
| 11/06/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed |