Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D08-0044
Parcel: 13711429H

Address: Unknown

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D08-0044
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/24/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/30/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
10/01/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1 OCTOBER 2008
D08-0044/HANSON'S GOOD TO GO
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

A. At the marked crossing located at the Midvale Park Rd. entrance, provide curb ramps at either end of the crossing. Provide large scale details of ramps showing compliance with ANSI 117.1, Section 406, slopes, detectable warnings, dimensions, accessible route and marked crossing.
1. Add a new note 37 calling for curb ramps with detectable warnings and complying with ANSI 117.1, Section 406.
B. Verify accessibility to building entrance as required by 2006 IBC Section, Section 1105 and ICC/117.1, Sections 302 and 303
C. Delete the two detectable warnings shown on the sidewalk ramp at the parking aisle and provide one 2' deep x 8' wide detectable warning at the top of the parking aisle on the concrete accessible route. Same comment for detail C/5
D. Provide a "Van Accessible" sign for the sign detail. Call out (note) location of signs on the site plan.

END OF REVIEW
10/02/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
10/02/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved CASE: D08-0044 HANSON'S GOOD TO GO: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS





Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1,953 PM Peak: 161











Please call if you have questions or need additional information.





-------------------------------------------

KoSok Chae, Ph.D.



177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405

Tucson, AZ 85701



520-792-1093 x487 [tel]

520-620-6981 [fax]

www.PAGnet.org
10/06/2008 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied October 3, 2008

To: CARDELL ANDREWS II
OLSSON ASSOCIATES

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: HANSON'S GOOD TO GO
Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal
D08-044


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states:

A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.

Sheet 1: Revise General Note #15 to read as follows:Add a General Note that states:

THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT.

Sheet 1: Remove General Note #12.

Sheet 4: The as-built sewer plans for G-2000-104 shows an existing 4” BCS line to serve this parcel. Revise the point of connection to the existing BCS. PCRWRD will not allow direct connection to MH#4395-01 as shown on this plan.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
10/06/2008 DAVID MANN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
10/10/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR# 204001 October 8, 2008



Olsson Associates
Attn: Cardell Andrews II
3025 W. Ina Rd.
Tucson, Arizona 85741

Dear Cardell Andrews::

SUBJECT: Hanson’s Good To Go
D08-0044

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted October 7, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time.

There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. The TEP underground primary cable could be on customer’s property. Customer is to have it located, to verify and locate on site plans. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Mike Kaiser at 918-8244 should you have any technical questions.

Sincerely,



Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist

hn
Enclosure
cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
10/10/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: October 10, 2008

TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov


SUBJECT: D08-0044 Hansons Good To Go: Development Plan Review(9-24-08)



Staff has no comments.
10/10/2008 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: D08-0044
CASE NAME: Hanson's Good to Go: DP
DATE SENT: 10/10/08

Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan

Cross Reference Cases: zoning ord. # 5843; not a rezoning
Area or Neighborhood Plan: Santa Cruz Area Plan
Gateway or Scenic Route: N/A
Due Date: October 22, 2008

Comments:

This proposal complies with the annexation conditions. Staff has no other comments. The project is APPROVED. No resubmittal is required.


Joanne Hershenhorn, 791-4505
date: October 9, 2008

















S:\Case_Review\CDRC\D08-0044_Hansons_Good_to_Go.doc
10/17/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Hanson's Good To Go
D08-0044
Development Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 17, 2008

DUE DATE: October 22, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 23, 2009.

2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Place the development plan number D08-0044 in the lower right hand corner of the plan.

3. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide width dimensions for all proposed on site sidewalks.

4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a sidewalk from the proposed building to the pedestrian circulation path located in the right-of-way along Irvington Road.

5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide wheel stops for all vehicle parking spaces adjacent to a sidewalk with a width of less than 6'-6".

6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There is a building pop-out shown within the handicapped ramp, provide a dimension for the sidewalk between the pop-out and what appears to be a sign pole so that the minimum sidewalk width of 4'-0" can be verified.

7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Detail "D" Sheet 5 shows a Class 2 bicycle rack. The "*NOTE" calls out "CYCLE-SAFE SECURE BICYCLE PARKING PROPARK SERIES BIKE LOCKER WITH THE VIEW-THRU OPTION", this spec is for a Class 1 bicycle locker not the rack shown on the detail. Please clarify.

8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q The proposed location of the Class 2 bicycle parking does not appear to meet the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1 Proximity to Main Entrance. Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than 50 feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building.

9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q As the proposed Class 2 bicycle racks are shown located perpendicular to the building wall provide the 36 inch minimum dimension between a rack and perpendicular wall, see D.S. 2-09.5.1.B.

10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q The provided bicycle parking calculation is not correct. The calculation shows "PARKING PROVIDED 2 SPACES", keynote 14 shows 6 spaces provided. Please clarify.

11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V If applicable show the location and type of postal service to be provided.

12. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans.

13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0044dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents.
10/20/2008 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 20, 2008
SUBJECT: Hanson's Good To Go Development Plan- Engineering Review
TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
LOCATION: 137-11-429H, T155S R13E Sec03 Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: D08-0044


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Report (Olsson Associates, Inc., 09SEP08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or Drainage Report at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed:


DEVELOPMENT PLAN:

1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the location map on the Development Plan to label all major streets adjacent to the project, i.e. Midvale Road.

2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.G.1: Revise the Development Plan to provide the address for the subject parcel.

3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0044) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Clarify Note #21 on the Development Plan. If a Floodplain Use Permit and Elevation Certificate is required for this project due to the ponding from the detention/retention basin then a revised Drainage Report is required that addresses finish floor elevation of the proposed building. Verify that the pad elevation is at or above the calculated water surface elevation.

5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the Development Plan to include the site boundary information for the property line adjacent to Irvington Road.

6) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensions for all existing sidewalks located along the public right-of-ways. Verify that the sidewalks meet the minimum width requirements for MS&R and public roadways.

7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Revise the Development Plan so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. Label the required 25-foot radii at the access points along both Irvington Road and Midvale Road (MS&R's). The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the Development Plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730.

8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan and cross sections to show that the wheel stop barriers for the parking spaces located along any adjacent pedestrian circulation paths or landscape area meet the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path and/or landscape areas.

9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensions for all future road right-of-way improvements. Draw the MS&R future sidewalk and curb widths for all MS&R streets to verify that when future right-of-way is built out there will be sufficient room for all future curb and sidewalk.
10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan and details to label and dimension the required 6-foot wide sidewalk along both MS&R Streets (Irvington and Midvale). Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. If an existing 4- or 5-foot sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of the roadways provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval.

11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to include a pedestrian access point to all street frontages. Per DS Sec.2-08.3.1 this path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located along Irvington Road.

12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project.

13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Clarify Keynote #9 as shown on the Development Plan. The note states "Typical handicap parking space per." Revise to include a standard detail or a reference to a detail on the Development Plan.

14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk along the frontage of Lavender Mountain Place. All new development requires a new 5-foot sidewalk to be constructed within the public right-of-way. If an existing 4- sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of the roadway provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 5-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 5-foot required, to remain.

15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Revise the Development Plan to provide the future sight visibility triangles (SVTs) for all driveway entrances. Verify that proposed improvements are not constructed within the future SVTs.

16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Revise the Development Plan to provide the SVTs for the intersection of Midvale and Irvington Road that affect this property.

17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise Detail E/5 for the proposed refuse containers to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements.

18) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Development Plan to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, and associated drainage infrastructure. Provide sufficient room to allow for the 2-feet setback from property lines to top of fill slopes and the proposed basin outlet as shown in Detail I/5.

19) DS Sec.10-02.14.3. Provide a note on the Development Plan stating that, "(a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention/retention basins; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facilities at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facilities to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facilities, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities".


DRAINAGE STATEMENT: All Drainage Statements and reports submitted to the City of Tucson must follow the requirements outlined within the City of Tucson Development Standards Sections 10-01 and 10-02. These standards can be accessed online at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf.

20) DS Sec.10-01.2.1: Revise the Drainage Report to provide a clear easy to read table that shows that all requirements for a balanced basin have been met. Per DS Sec.10-1.1.4 it is the policy that stormwater detention/retention facilities be incorporated within all new development to ensure that, at a minimum, the post development 2-, 10- and 100-year peak discharges from the site will not exceed the predevelopment values. The report only addresses the 100-year discharge not the 2- and 10-year, revise.

21) COT Code Chapter 26, Section 26-5.2.9: Revise the Drainage Report to provide a discussion with calculations on the finish floor elevation and the requirement for both Elevation Certificates that will be required. Per Keynote #21 and the water surface elevation (WSEL) shown within the vehicular use area, the proposed pad elevation must be at or above the calculated WSEL. Verify that the Drainage Report addresses all drainage aspects of this project.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

22) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following:

a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the retention basin, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and building setbacks from the required basin.

b) Provide percolation rates for the retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.

c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations.

d) Provide slope stability recommendations for the proposed constructed slopes that are proposed.


GRADING PLAN:

23) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval.

24) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf

25) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Report and a Geotechnical Report that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Development Services
10/21/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approv-Cond October 21, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0044
PROJECT NAME: Hanson's Good to Go
PROJECT ADDRESS: 1715 W Irvington Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan prior to final approval.

1. Confirm that a cross access easement is or has been created between this parcel and the parcel to the west.

2. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Call out the radius on development plan.

3. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
10/21/2008 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

JENNIFER STEPHENS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0044 HANSON’S GOOD TO GO/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 10/21/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Delete “COT Ward #1” and Latitude, Longitude information from Location Map.
Label project number on all sheets.
Delete street directions from Location Map.
Label Midvale Park Road on Location Map.
Delete parcels and owner information for all surrounding properties on all corresponding sheets.
Shade in lot numbers for surrounding properties on all corresponding sheets.
Shade in “Block 1” west of project, sheets 2, 3 and 4.
Change “Building 1” to “Proposed Building” (If only one building on project, number is not required).
10/22/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond ES approves of this DP with the following condition:

1. Add one single enclosure or design for one double wide enclosure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle waste as will be generated by this type of development. DS 6-01.3.2.B.
Must demonstrate adequate manueverability within development and approach to enclosure area as currently demonstrated.

2. Single enclosure detail is good.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
10/22/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Design the tree planters that extend in to parking spaces such that the location of the curb or wheel stop will not require parked vehicles to extend beyond the designated parking space dimensions. The standard vehicle overhang is 2.5 feet per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Provide dimensions on the plans for the unpaved portion of the tree planting areas.

2) Show all proposed screen walls on the development and landscape plans.
DS 2-07. The landscape plan employs a line similar to a wall along the Lavender Mountain Place property line. Screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. LUC 3.7.3.2.B

3) Add the proposed sign to the landscape plan and revise the planting plan accordingly.
DS 2-02.2.1.C

4) Show information for the street landscape water harvesting areas indicated on the site and landscape plans on the grading plan (sheet 3). Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. LUC 3.7.4.3.B

5) Provide screening for the loading area per LUC Table 3.7.2-I from Laurel Mountain place.
10/23/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Passed
10/23/2008 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
10/28/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment
10/30/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 30, 2008

Cardell Andrews II
Olsson Associates
3025 West Ina Road
Tucson, Arizona 85741-2107

Subject: D08-0044 Hanson's Good to Go Development Plan

Dear Cardell:

Your submittal of September 24, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 10 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Wastewater, TEP, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, Addressing, ESD, Landscape, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD)



Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 777-3872
dp-resubmittal