Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0043
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/22/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 22 SEPTEMBER 2008 D08-0043/COMFORT IN SUITES AT WILMOT REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY. B. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS, PARKING FACILITIES POINT AND TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FINISHED SURFACES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 2. SHOW AND PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. PEDESTRIAN WAY. C. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. D. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 1. IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. 2. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. 3. LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF PARKING ARE TO SHOW ALL RAMPS REQUIRED, SLOPES, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, SIZES, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS AND DIMENSIONS. 4. SIGN DETAIL TO SHOW BOTTOM OF LARGER SIGN TO BE 7' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE AND PARKING FINE IS NOW $532.00. E. MARKED CROSSINGS: 1. AT THE MOST SOUTH WESTERLY MARKED CROSSING; STRAIGHTEN PATH ACROSS PAAL SO PARKED CARS CANNOT DIRECTLY BACK INTO CROSSING. 2. AT THE MOST SOUTH EASTERLY MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE A STRAIGHT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE INTO THE ISLAND WITH A CURB RAMP AS PER ICC, SECTION 406 AND A 90 DEGREE PATH WAY TO THE NEXT MARKED CROSSING HEADING WEST. 3. INSURE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT BOTH ENDS OF ALL MARKED CROSSINGS, AS PER ICC, SECTIONS 406.12 AND 406.14. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/24/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof per LUC 3.7.2.4. Revise plan to indicate that with 440 linear feet of street landscape border along the I-10 frontage road, a total of 14 canopy trees are required/provided. 2. Add the CDRC development plan case number (D08-043) to the lower right hand corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan and NPPO plan. 3. In addition to depressing landscaped areas 6 inches for water harvesting, demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 11 by indicating on the landscape plan how all runoff from rooftops, parking areas and access lanes will be conveyed to planted areas on site prior to discharging overflow into the retention/detention basin. 4. One tree (a blue palo verde) proposed near the northwest corner of the site is shown to be planted within a parking space. Revise to show tree within landscaped area. 5. Dimension the minimum width and label the square footage measured from the inside of tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 6. Label any required or proposed perimeter screen walls on the plan, including their location, height and materials of construction. Rezoning condition 1 refers to a requirement for a masonry wall along the west perimeter of the site. Clarify and revise plan if necessary. DS2-07.2.2.A.3 |
| 09/24/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Comfort Suites D08-0043 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 24, 2008 DUE DATE: October 10, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 9, 2009. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Remove the reference to S06-138 and S01-040 from the plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Place the development plan number D08-0043 in the lower right hand corner of the plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B Based on available one-line copies of the plat, the "24' ING.-EG., PUB. SEWER & P.U.E., BK. 63 PG. 83 should be called out as "24' ING.-EGRESS, ACCESS, STORMDRAIN, SEWER, FLOWAGE MAINT. & P.U.E.". Also the easement does not appear to be placed correctly on the plan. Per the plat the 24' easement is 18' east of the west property line. On the development plan you show it 19.5' from the west property line. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A As it appears that a lot split and lot combo are proposed, both the lot split and combo must be completed prior to approval of this development plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Show all existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 7. 1. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent vehicles from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This said clearly indicated on the plan what type of barrier is used to prevent vehicles from accessing any landscape or undeveloped area of the site. It is not clear where curbs are proposed. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide a copy of the approved development plan D07-0044 so that the required pedestrian circulation can be verified. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K As the parking spaces adjacent to the striped area, located along the southeast property line, are not handicapped parking spaces, the striped area must be a sidewalk, physically separated from the parking spaces. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide an accessible route to the refuse container location. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of structure. This needs to include the total of all floors. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Until the total square footage for the proposed building is provided the loading space requirement cannot be verified. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The handicapped vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per the International Building Code (IBC) Table 1106.1 total vehicles parking spaces provided, 76 - 100, four (4) handicapped vehicle parking spaces area required, one (1) being van accessible. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show, on the drawing, off-street bicycle parking locations. Provide a detail, including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and if required the type of directional signage. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q The provided bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Travelers' Accommodation, Lodging, the required bicycle parking is: Eight (8) percent - seventy-five (75) percent Class 1 and twenty-five (25) percent Class 2. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V If applicable show the location and type of postal service to be provided. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable show the location and type of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) on the plan. 18. This development plan cannot be approved until the revised tentative and final plat have been approved. 19. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 20. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0043dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/30/2008 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/30/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/01/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08 D08-0043 COMPORT SUITES: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 654 PM Peak: 47 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 10/01/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 1, 2008 To: TONY TSANG A.C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: COMFORT SUITES Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal D08-043 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Is the sewer line shown extending east of proposed public manhole #7 private or public? It would appear that the line should be part of the private 6” BCS. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #30 to read as follows: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/01/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 01, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0043 Comfort Suites: Development Plan Review(9-15-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/10/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: October 10, 2008 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator FOR: A. C. Tsang Engineering SUBJECT: Comfort Inn Suites 1st submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0043 SUMMARY: The Development Plan was reviewed by Engineering as part of the development for the Wilmot I-10 Commercial Center. The package included the Development Plan for the Comfort Inn Suites, rezoning conditions, the drainage report, and landscape plans. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-05.2.3.I.1, 2-05.2.3.E.1, 2-05.2.4.H, & 10-02.2.3.1.5, 10-02.1.5: Address the following drainage comments for the development plan: a) Planview sheets for the development plan shall match drainage exhibits. b) Revise basin design to show earthen basin side slopes. Retaining walls will not be accepted for basin design. c) Revise basin section on sheet 2 to clarify basin access ramp of 15%. d) Label dimensions of basin length on planview. e) Show detention/retention 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation for basins. f) Label basin slopes per drainage report. g) Clarify pedestrian access area across basin showing grades/slopes. h) Clarify basin outlets for offsite discharge areas. i) Clarify types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points on planview. j) Show basin maintenance access on planview. k) For the development plan indicate roof drainage on a plan view sheet. l) Show where sidewalk scuppers will be needed and provide calculations. m) Provide information on planview showing provision for water harvest areas. n) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Clarify the following in the drainage report: i) Provide copy of the block plat layout showing the basin locations. The Comfort Inn Suites design shall match the block plat with regard to watershed delineation and basin locations. ii) Clarify and explain outlet design for basins in body of report. iii) Provide detail showing 2-ft off set from property boundary along west side of west basin. iv) Explain how sediments are controlled / reduced when entering stormdrain system. v) Provide discussion of maintenance requirements for proposed drainage improvements. vi) On exhibit, label Q100 within the offsite stormdrain system adjacent to this project. 2) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: A soils report which includes proposed solution for any land with unusual topography, soils, or other geographic hazards to life, health, or property shall be prepared and submitted with resubmittal. 3) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.D, 2-05.1.1: Explain how Rezoning conditions are addressed: a) For Rezoning Condition 26, clarify the spine road improvements to be completed during Commercial Center Block Plat improvements. Clarify access improvements to be completed prior to Comfort Inn Suites C of O. Address any revised TIA requirements and explain in response letter how the access will be provided for this use. b) Show and explain how sediment control feature is provided. c) Show on plan and explain in response letter how human activity zones are provided. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.9: The applicable case number is D08-0043; provide at lower right hand corner of sheet next to the block plat case number. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2: Complete General Note 16. 6) IBC 1101.2: Truncated domes are required for any ramps along the accessible routes per ANSI. Add to legend or provide note to clarify handicap ramps. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Assure all existing and proposed utilities and easements are delineated and labeled on the plan view with any applicable dimensioned widths and invert elevations. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C, 2-05.2.4.D.4: Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for this project. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. Explain how phases will affect Grading Plan. Since the project is part of a phased block plat, the phase under consideration shall be designed so that there is assured legal access. If such access is required through the other phases, and roads or PAAL's are shall be constructed and provided. Clarify construction of access areas on plan and in response letter. Also, provide copy of cross access easement. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Clarify proposed pavement, sidewalks, and curb on planview. Clarify elevations for each. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Provide recordation information for north right-of-way, also dimensioning any ADOT setbacks. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 12) DS Sec.2-03.7: The proposed hotel extends beyond the block plat boundaries, is over an acre in size, is a portion of a 2 acre parcel, and can not be added through a record of survey. This issue had been identified by DSD as being a plat issue earlier when this hotel project was informally proposed. Due to the significant changes affecting this Development, it has been determined in a meeting by CDRC staff (Elizabeth Eberbach, David Rivera and Steve Shields) that a request for revised Block Plat / Final Plat is appropriate. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for information and requirements for a revised Block Plat / Final Plat. Further comments forthcoming. 13) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit application submittal with SWPPP will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Submit the revised Development Plan addressing all of the comments. Include the revised drainage report, the revised Final Plat block plat, copy of rezoning conditions, copy of soils report, and response letter thoroughly explaining each comment. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 10/10/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0043 COMFORT SUITES/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 10/09/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label project number on all sheets. Delete address above address block, sheet 1. Spell out “Interstate Highway 10” on plan. Delete names and project numbers on surrounding properties. Delete “Rodeo Wash” from Location Plan. Identify jurisdiction lines on Location Plan. Delete “west ½, Section 19, T15S, R15E,” on Location Plan. My records indicate that the portion of unsubdivided land which this project includes was a split off of a larger parcel. Please provide the recorded deed for the split. |
| 10/10/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 10/14/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ES approves of this DP under the following conditions: 1. Sheet 2, The solid waste enclosure must be fully diemensioned and requires a minimum inside clear dimension of 20 ft. Measured between the inside face of each side bollard/s not from the center. 2. Also, provide/show a 1 ft dimension from the inside face of the bollard to the inside face of the CMU wall. 3. Call out gate post so identied as separate detail from CMU wall...i.e. 4"x4" metal post. Please provide corrections/additons as mentioned above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/15/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | October 15, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0043 PROJECT NAME: Comfort Suites PROJECT ADDRESS: 7652 S Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development. The following items must be addressed during re-submittal of the development plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how the comment has been addressed. 1. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Wilmot Road Right-of-way. This development plan will need to be tied to the PIA associated with D08-0019 (Holiday Inn. Contact the PIA Coordinator at 791-5550 ext. 1107 or myself for additional PIA information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/20/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 10/20/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has no comments on this submittal. Thank you. TM. -----Original Message----- From: Patricia Gehlen [mailto:Patricia.Gehlen@tucsonaz.gov] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 7:11 AM To: Daniel Williams; Tom Martinez Subject: CDRC plans |
| 10/20/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: D08-0043 CASE NAME: Comfort Suites (Wilmot/I-10 Comm. Ctr.) DATE SENT: Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Cross Reference Cases: C9-01-05, S06-138, S07-025, D07-0044, D08-0019 Area or Neighborhood Plan: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan Gateway or Scenic Route: N/A Due Date: October 10, 2008 Comments: 1) Regarding rezoning condition #8, please include the recording information (docket and page numbers) in General Note #32. 2) The only screen wall shown is around the dumpster at the northwest corner of the site. If any other screen walls are proposed, please provide a decorative wall detail, to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #14. 3) Please provide color elevations with the next submittal to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #15. 4) Thank you for showing pedestrian connectivity to the adjacent sites. The next submittal for the lot to the east (The Roadside Steakout, D07-0044) must show matching connectivity. 5) Resubmittal of the Development Plan is required. Joanne Hershenhorn, 791-4505 September 29, 2008 |
| 11/03/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#204673 November 3, 2008 Dear A.C. Tsang: SUBJECT: Comfort Suites D08-0043 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted October 24, 2008 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Warren McElyea at (520) 918-8268, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:W. McElyea |
| 11/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 4, 2008 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0043 Comfort Suites Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of September 15, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 10 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Zoning, Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Engineering, ESD, Traffic, DUPD, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 dp-resubmittal |