Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D08-0042
Parcel: 10408095C

Address:
700 W WETMORE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: CORE REVIEW

Permit Number - D08-0042
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/15/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/22/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 13 AUGUST 2008
D08-0042/PRECISION TOYOTA OF TUCSON
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

NOTE: THIS PROJECT WAS REVIEWED UNDER AS A 100% SITE CODE COMPLIANCE PROJECT.

I. SHEET 1 of 9
A. NOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY.
B. NOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; COT DOT FOR PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY.
II. SHEET 2 of 9:
A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITHIN THE SITE FROM ALL PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STOPS, ACCESSIBLE PARKING, ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONES, AND PUBLIC STREETS OR SIDEWALKS TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES BEING SERVED AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1104.1, .2, AND .3. NOT ALL STRUCTURES ARE CONNECTED TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. MARK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A PARTICULAR SCHEDULE SYMBOL.
1. PROVIDE PERCENTAGE SLOPE ARROWS THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FINISHED SURFACES BASED UPON GRADING PLAN, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3.
2. SHOW AND PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. PEDESTRIAN WAY.
a. EXTEND AND SHOW CONNECTION OF BOTH ACCESSIBLE ROUTES ON SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING TO WETMORE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WALK WAY.
B. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY OF ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303.
III. SHEET 3 of 9:
A. DITTO COMMENT 2a ABOVE.
B. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF EXISTING RAMP AT MOST NORTHERLY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY AND COMPLIANCE WITH ICC SECTION 405.
C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMPS, BOTH NEW AND EXISTING, SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 405 AND 406.
D. ALL MARKED CROSSINGS, NEW AND/OR EXISTING, MUST HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT BOTH ENDS, EITHER RAISED OR FLUSH ACCESS AS PER ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 406.12 AND 406.14. SEVERAL CROSSINGS SHOWN ON THE PLAN DO NOT HAVE DETECTABLE WARNINGS. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF DETECTABLE WARNING CONFIGURATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE.
E. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUTS SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 502.
1. IDENTIFY AND PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503.
2. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE.
3. LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF PARKING ARE TO SHOW ALL RAMPS REQUIRED, SLOPES, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, SIZES, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS AND DIMENSIONS.
4. SIGN DETAIL PARKING FINE IS NOW $532.00.
F. DETAIL 5 SHOWS SIDEWALK RAMP ACCESS SYSTEM. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING DESIGN LAYOUTS ARE SHOWN WITH CURB RAMPS. GENERIC DETAILS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PROVIDE EXACT DESIGN DETAILS.
1. SHOW LOCATION OF ALL SIGNAGE ON SITE PLAN.
2. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SPACES ON SITE PLAN.
3. SHOW INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL IN EACH PARKING SPACE.
G. REDESIGN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTING EXISTING 2 STORY BUILDING TO NEW SERVICE BUILDING. ACCESS SHOWN DOES NOT WORK.
H. CURB RAMP LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE NEW CAR SALES BUILDING DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE FOR A LANDING AT THE TOP OF THE RAMP. REDESIGN.
I.
IV. SHEET 4 of 9:
A. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE END OF BOTH ACCESSIBLE ROUTES.
B. AT THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE "T" OFF IN THE NORTH WEST CORNER, SWING THE GATES IN, PROVIDE A MIN OF A 5X5 TURN AROUND IN A CURBED ISLAND AND INCLUDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PRIOR TO CROSSING THE PAAL.
09/30/2008 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied The FDC is missing on the one story service building.
10/01/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied October 1, 2008

To: ROBERT RAMOS
BAKER & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING, INC.

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: PRECISION TOYOTA OF TUCSON - IMAGE USA II
Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal
D08-042


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

Sheet 1: Revise General Note #18 to read as follows:

THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E).

And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values.

Sheet 1: Remove General Note #15 and #11.

Sheet 1:Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1.

Sheet 5: Show the 6” public sewer line with construction plan # extending south of MH#9752-01.

Sheet 5: According to the Legend on Sheet 1 there is no proposed sewer shown on plan. Also sswr is not shown in the Legend, what does this symbol indicate?

Sheet 6: Show the 8” sewer line extending south of MH# 9728-01. Also G-145 should be shown continuing east of MH# 9728-01.
This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
10/03/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: D08-0042
CASE NAME: Precision Toyota of Tucson, Core Review (DP)
DATE SENT: 10/2/08

Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan

Cross Reference Cases: annex. ord. # 6292; zoning ord. # 6323
Area or Neighborhood Plan: General Plan
Gateway or Scenic Route: N/A
Due Date: October 10, 2008

Comments:

The proposal complies with the annexation conditions. The project is APPROVED. No resubmittal is required.


Joanne Hershenhorn, 837-6965
October 2, 2008

















S:\CASE_REVIEW\CDRC\D08-0042_Precision_Toyota_of_Tucson_Core_Review.doc
10/06/2008 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: D08-0042
Precision Toyota of Tucson
Development Plan

TRANSMITTAL: 10/06/2008

DUE DATE: 10/10/08

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 09/14/09.

2. DS 2-05.2.1.D Provide the City of Tucson jurisdictional limits on the location map.

3. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide in the lower right corner of all sheets the annexation case number, C9-85-44.

4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0042 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets.

5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In general note number 2, list the existing use as Vehicle Rental and Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.5.A and .B

6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 In general note #3 add "Sec. 2.8.3, " before the wording Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone.

7. DS 2-03.2.2.11 List the gross lot area of the site by acreage as well as square footage.

8. DS 2-05.2.3.B The indicated electrical easements which are located under the proposed new service building will be required to be abandoned and relocated. Provide docket and page recording information for the abandonment on this plan and if relocated provide recording docket and page for the new easements. An option is to provide written verification from the utility company or companies that the building is allowed to be constructed over the easements.

The above comment also applies to the 10' public utility easement which is under the proposed new car sales building (sheet 3 of 9).

The appears to be an unlabeled easement located about 5' to the east of the above mentioned 10' utility easement ( sheet 3 of 9). Clarify if this is an easement and the same comment above will apply.

9. DS 2-05.2.4.A The covenant regarding the use and development of real property will require to be completed by adding case number (D08-0042) and then recording the documents. Add a note to the plans stating that a covenant regarding the development and use of real property has been completed and recorded in docket______ and page ______.

10. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide parking layout for all three floors of the parking garage. The layout indicated for the first floor garage parking indicates 76 parking spaces. The note indicates 337 parking spaces total for all three floors. Clarify.

Plans indicate the garage parking is for employee and storage parking. Clearly indicate which parking spaces are for employees and which are for storage.

Provide backup spurs where parking space is adjacent to any barrier in excess of 6" in height. (in the parking garage) Clearly indicate the required 3' radius and 3' clear area behind the curb.

Clearly indicate the widths of all PAALs located within the garage for each floor with employee parking

The PAAL located south of the existing used car sales building does not meet the minimum width requirement of 24' nor does the PAAL located along south side of the used car sales building meet the requirement of DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 requiring a setback from a PAAL of 1'to any open structure.

The concrete display pad located south of the used car sales building appears to interfere with the width of the PAAL as well as limiting the length of the parking spaces on the north side of the pad.

Clearly indicate the width of all PAALs. Such as, the area near the northeast corner of the proposed two story new car sales building, indicate the width of the PAAL between the loading zone and the canopy area, between the car wash parking spaces and the crosswalk, between the trash enclosure and the building

11. DS 2-05.2.4.C Since this project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. As an example, show how the existing buildings and vehicular use areas that are in phase 2 and 3 will function after phase 1 is completed, vehicle access, barriers to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site, pedestrian circulation, etc. The same will need to be provided for when phase 1 and 2 are completed with the existing conditions of phase 3.

One of the areas of concern is the existing drive through canopy at the used car building currently shows a loading zone blocking one end and parking spaces blocking the other end. Show how this will work during phase 1 and 2 if the used car building and surrounding area are in phase 3.

There are several areas such as the one described above which do not appear o function.

12. DS 2-05.2.4.F Clearly indicate the location of the future curb and future sight visibility triangles along Wetmore Road.

13. DS 2-05.2.4.G If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private.

14. DS 2-05.2.4.K Provide the widths of all sidewalks (existing and proposed), crosswalks and required pedestrian refuge areas. Example: the east and west side of the proposed new car sales building, the west side of the used car sales building, the pedestrian circulation paths from Wetmore, etc.

The indicated crosswalk from the used car building connecting to the right of way side sidewalk (per aerial photos) is required to be a physically separated concrete sidewalk between the parking spaces. Handicap ramps are required at the crosswalks where it crosses the PAALs.

15. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide dimensions on the plan for each foot print of all structures.

16. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking calculations provided are incorrect. Parking calculations for Vehicle Sales and Rental are base on the gross floor area, which includes second floor area, (GFA) and the gross lot area (GLA) not on the ground floor area nor on the net site area.

There has been a determination by the zoning administrator which may help in the number of required parking spaces. The determination is as follows:

RETAIL TRADE USE GROUP
Vehicle Rental and Sales Motor Vehicle: SB One (1) space per two hundred fifty (250) sq. ft. GFA plus one (1) space per ten thousand (10,000) sq. ft. of GLA.

Automotive Dealerships, Full Service GFA does not include interior space used for the parking, display or storage of vehicles. Also excluded from GFA are interior driveways, PAALs, ramps, access drives and maneuvering areas.
Full Service means providing such services
as body and paint shops, parts departments,
repair and maintenance facilities, rentals, etc.
GLA (gross lot area) means the area of land within the property lines of the development site excluding public right of ways.


The number of required parking spaces per the above criteria can be used for customer and employee parking only. Clearly indicate the location of the customer and employee parking spaces and revise parking calculations. Service and display vehicle parking spaces are not included in the parking calculations.

The number of required handicap parking spaces is incorrect. If the number of provided customer and employee parking spaces is 394 the per the IBC Sec. 1106.1 the number of handicap parking spaces required is 8. This may change based on the revised parking calculations. Review IBC Sec. 1106.1 for the correct number required.

The display parking spaces along Wetmore Rd. will be required to have wheel stops in each parking space in order to prevent overhanging into the required landscape border.

Provide barriers or wheel stop curbing to prevent damage to buildings along the north side of the new car sales building, at the vendor parking spaces, the car wash parking spaces, and at the south side of the drive through canopy for the used car building at the bicycle parking spaces, etc.

17. DS 2-05.2.4.Q The required bicycle parking for vehicle rental and sales is to be all class one type spaces. The calculations and detail 8 of 4 indicate that all bicycle parking spaces are class two. Revise.

Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 bicycle parking spaces, including a detail of the type and size of locker, required 5' access aisle, and separation from vehicular use areas.. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result.

18. Provide a layout and type of existing and proposed lighting for the site.

19. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan.

20. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so.

21. The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) appear to be incorrect. The FAR is the (GFA) gross floor area of all buildings divided by the (GLA). The parking garage does not count towards GFA. Revise.

22. Based on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments, additional comments will be forth coming.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0042dp.doc
10/10/2008 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: October 10, 2008
TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager
SUBJECT: Development Plan Engineering Review submittal
PROJECT: Precision Toyota of Tucson
LOCATION: Ward 3
FEMA PANEL: 1636K X-unshaded
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0042

SUMMARY: The Development Plan package including development plan, drainage report, easement documents, title report, and landscape plan was submitted and reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time.

DRAINAGE COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2: The project is within a non-designated basin management area. Address the following drainage comments:
a) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Address the following additional Drainage comments:
i) Any jurisdictional floodplain shall be delineated.
ii) Label existing and proposed Q100 entering and exiting the site at eastern channel.
iii) Clarify in Hydrology Section of Report the capacity of the existing eastern drainageway and discuss whether additional capacity is available for this channel.
iv) Label WSEL's in eastern channel and provide floodplain intervals.
v) Provide discussion in the report on how the minimum FFE for proposed east structure was derived based on existing floodplain data for the project.
vi) Discuss in report and show on plan, how the proposed stormwater runoff for proposed fuel area at northwest corner of site is controlled to minimize groundwater contamination.
b) The project shall demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B and DS 10 01.0, Section 14.2.10. Explain in report and revise watershed Figure 2 to show whether landscape areas along project boundary can be areas where parking runoff can be captured.
c) Add case number D08-0042 to cover page of report.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS:
2) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: A soils report which includes proposed solution for any land with unusual topography, soils, or other geographic hazards to life, health, or property shall be prepared and submitted with resubmittal.
3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O, 2-05.2.4.S, 6-01.4.1.I, & 3.2.A: Show maneuverability for northwest solid waste pick-up facility so that solid waste pick-up trucks are prevented from backing into proposed fuel unit.
4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a: Add the following as a general note if applicable: "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations."
5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Add the following as a general note: "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required.
6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Clarify eastern parcel as a part of the project. Revise/correct/clarify east parcel boundary information, including bearing and distances for the north portion of the east parcel that appears to be missing.
7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: All easements as indicated by the title report or other surveys shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits.
8) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Some sidewalk is shown. Clarify existing versus proposed sidewalk and curb along project boundaries.
9) IBC 1101.2: Truncated domes are required for any ramps along the accessible routes per ANSI. Add to legend or provide note to clarify handicap ramps.
10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Assure all existing utility information is provided on the Development Plan. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.
11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private.
12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide proposed scuppers locations on planview.
13) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Provide Basis of Elevation with datum; clarify note 9 on sheet 1. Provide a local benchmark on planview.
14) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: Other significant conditions on the site, such as signs, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be labeled to be removed or retained.
15) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I: Any floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations and water surface contours, shall be indicated.
16) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.3: On the development plan, a symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals for east channel should be included in the legend.
17) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.D: For conceptual grading review purposes, address the following comments:
a) Clarify sidewalk areas adjacent to proposed structures. Assure minimum of 4-ft is provided if T-intersection type of accessible ramp is proposed, otherwise more area may be needed for ramp and landing areas.
b) Label general slope grades in PAAL areas to assure sufficient slope is provided in parking areas. A minimum 0.5% should be provided to minimize ponding.
c) Provide several sections at north boundary showing the 2-ft setback at north property line, construction area, and proposed structures. Construction area needs to be shown or provide offsite construction access easement along north boundary.
d) The plan shall demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B and DS 10 01.0, Section 14.2.10. Show with flow arrows and label locations where PAAL runoff can be directed toward landscape areas for water harvesting.
18) Please acknowledge that separate grading permit application(s) and submittal(s) will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Traffic control construction diagram will be needed at grading review stage for the phased construction to assure safe access to the constructed phases while subsequent phases are under construction. SWPPP will also be required at grading review stage.

Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit a revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Report, soils report, title report, and response letter, and other documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services Department
10/10/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Provide a landscape plan for the entire site. LUC 3.7.1.2.B.1.b

2) Show the location of individual plants one (1) gallon or larger in size and all existing plants to remain on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.A

3) If temporary use of the MS&R right-of-way is proposed, a site plan/landscape plan is required indicating how the project will comply with LUC requirements when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan is to be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the LUC at no cost to the City. LUC 2.8.3.5.F
See: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Major_Streets_Covenant.pdf

4) Show the property boundaries on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.1.A

5) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

6) Dimension the length and width of all street landscape borders on the Development plan per DS 2-04.2.5.X and the Landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f.

7) Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each ten (10) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. Revise the plans as necessary. All vehicular use areas are required to comply with Sec. 3.7.2.3.A for the required parking spaces. Only vehicular use areas used for storage of motor vehicles (excess spaces) are not required to comply. In addition, structurally covered or underground motor vehicle parking spaces (or spaces at the top level of a garage) are not included when calculating the required number and location of canopy trees.

8) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the plans as necessary document and describe the screening requirements and proposed materials for the Wetmore Rd. frontage. LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7.

9) Address phasing of the site development on the landscape plans. DS 2-05.2.4.C

10) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C

11) A 5' X 5' tree opening is indicated in sheet 8. An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree.
10/10/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

JENNIFER STEPHENS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0042 PRECISION TOYOTA OF TUCSON/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 10/09/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Correct Resubdivision book in Title Block.
Label project number on all sheets.
Label Wetmore Road on Sheet Index.
Delete “Parcel 1” & “Parcel 2” from Sheet Index.
Delete “Extempore Road” from Sheet Index.
Correct “Circuit Drive” to “Circuit Road” on Location Plan.
Correct “Competition Drive” to “Competition Road” on Location Plan.
Correct “Auto Sprint Drive” to “Auto Sprint Road” on Location Plan.
Label all buildings numerically starting with existing buildings as “Building 1” on all applicable sheets.
Label Wetmore Road on sheet 5.
10/14/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond ES approves of this DP under the following condition:

1. Clarify and correct keynote 26 labeled on DP at NW corner of existing building. I am assuming this is in error. If not, then a loading zone positioned within this area may conflict with vehicle circulation.

Please provide clarification or correction.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
10/15/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approv-Cond October 15, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0042
PROJECT NAME: Precision Toyota of Tucson
PROJECT ADDRESS: 700 W Wetmore Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan.

1. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns (DS 3-01.0 figure 6). Call out the radius for the curb returns.

2. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
10/15/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: PRECISION TOYOTA OF TUCSON
D08-0042


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted September 15, 2008.



Alberta Adrian
Office Specialist
918-8347 Ofc.
793-7504 Pgr.
10/20/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

October 20, 2008

Dennis M. Mulligan AIA
MS Engineering & Technology Corp
2440 West Ruthrauff Road, Suite 170
Tucson, Arizona 85705

Subject: D08-0042 Precision Toyota of Tucson Development Plan

Dear Dennis:

Your submittal of September 15, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 10 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Fire, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, Addressing, Landscape, ESD, Traffic, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Soils Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Title Report (Engineering, DSD)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 293-1028
dp-resubmittal