Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0041
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/10/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/12/2008 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | A fire hydrant is required within a 300 foot hose lay of all parts of the building or fire sprinklers are required and the hydrant distance can be 500 feet. |
| 09/16/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 8165 Camino de Cafe D08-0041 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2008 DUE DATE: October 7, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is September 9, 2009. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Place the development plan number D08-0041 in the lower right hand corner of the plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.3.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided type and dimensioned width of the existing sidewalk. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The proposed crosswalk from the handicapped access aisle to the proposed sidewalk presents a safety hazard. Reroute the crosswalk so that it runs perpendicular to the parking area access lane (PAAL). 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K For your information the crosswalks shown from the south side of the building to the parking and to the northwest parking are not required. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide the overall dimensions for the proposed building on the plan. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Indicate on the plan or the bicycle parking detail how the bicycle parking will be illuminated. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.V If applicable show the location and type of postal service to be provided. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable show the location and type of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) on the plan. 10. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 11. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0041dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/17/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 09/18/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 09/23/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0041 Brown/Rita Ranch ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation Ordinance No. 6143 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 10/7/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 9/22/08 |
| 09/26/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#202820 September 26, 2008 Physical Resource Engineering Attn: Dennis Dovovan P.O. Box 36985 Tucson, Arizona 85740 Dear Dennos Donovan: SUBJECT: LOT 14 BROWN/ RITA RANCH D08-0041 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted September 19, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. There are existing underground primary and junction cabinets not shown on the plan. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson or TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Warren McElyea at 918-8268 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/30/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 30, 2008 To: DENNIS DONOVAN PHYSICAL RESOURCE ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: LOT 14, BROWN/RITA RANCH - 8165 CAMINO DE CAFÉ Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-041 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #3 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 3: Show the private BCS going from existing sewer to proposed building with slope/length and size. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/01/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for an additional Landscape Section review. |
| 10/01/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0041 LOT 14 BROWN/RITA RANCH: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 28 PM Peak: 5 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 10/01/2008 | DCORRAL1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | |
| 10/01/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1 October 2008 D08-0041/BROWN-RITA RANCH LOT 14 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 I. SHEET 2 0F 4 A. The accessible route from Camino de Café on the North side of the entrance drive must be a minimum of 4' wide. B. The "T" marked crossing configuration from the marked crossing to the building to the most Northerly parking area is not required and is not code compliant. C. The Marked crossing from the Southerly Accessible Route from Camino de Café: 1. Provide large scale details of all curb and sidewalk ramps complying with section 405 and 405 showing all required slopes, dimensions, detectable warning strips, marked crossing and connection to accessible routes. 2. Delete the two detectable warning strips on the concrete accessible route walkway and provide a Detectable Warning strip 2' deep by 8' wide at the North end of the parking aisle on the concrete landing. 3. Redesign the location of the marked crossing so parked cars will not back directly onto the marked crossing. D. Show location of Accessible Parking signs. E. The marked crossing to the most southerly parking area is not required. F. The pedestrian access way to the dumpster area is not required to be an accessible pedestrian way or route but Zoning may require it to be concrete. See Zoning comments. II. SHEET 4 0F 4 A. Detail 5: 1. Delete pole mounting and note mounting to side of building. 2. Change fine to $532.00. 3. Refer purchase of sign to "Park Wise", Mr. Dan Angel, 429-3318. B. Detail 3: 1. Delete the two detectable warning strips shown and provide one 8' wide detectable warning strip at the top edge of the parking aisle, on the concrete accessible route. 2. Dimension the width of the side walk, 5' wide. 3. Show entrance door in relation to location of parking sign on building, conflict, redesign. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/01/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: October 01, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0041 Lot 14 Brown/Rita Ranch: Development Plan Review(9-10-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 10/06/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | DP demonstrates adequate access and maneuverability within development for collection vehicle...enclosure detail okay. 1. Recommend including provisions for recycling and add one single enclosure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle waste. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/07/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 10/08/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Lot 14, Brown/Rita Ranch D08-0041, T15S, R15E, SECTION 27 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Drainage Report on September 10, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Provide all design calculations for any required drainage solutions and structures (i.e. scuppers, erosion control structures, swales, roof drains, etc.). 2. Address water harvesting requirements in the report and demonstrate how roof and site drainage will be directed to maximize water harvesting. 3. The drainage report does not address roof drainage and sidewalk scuppers. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when concentrated runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Additionally, show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibit and provide sidewalk scuppers for the roof drains. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Demonstrate compliance with the sidewalk scupper requirement including design calculations. Show roof drainage on the drainage exhibits. Development Plan: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. Show on the plan the Basis of Bearing and the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the subject parcel corners (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A.). 3. Provide a 5 foot refuge area around the sides and the back of the building as required by D.S. 3-05.2.2.B. 4. Show and dimension existing and proposed sidewalks as required by D.S. 2-05.2.4.L. 5. Provide water harvesting areas and demonstrate how the drainage will be conveyed from the building roof and paved areas to the proposed water harvesting areas to maximize water harvesting (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2). 6. Show all proposed drainage structures including sidewalk scuppers, roof drains and roof drainage arrows, etc. as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3). 7. Revise the trash enclosure to show the interior width dimension correctly, in accordance with Figure 3 of Development Standard 6-01.0. 8. According to D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3. and D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when the runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Additionally, show the roof drainage proposed sidewalk scuppers where applicable. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Show the roof drainage direction and revise the Development Plan accordingly. 9. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Thad Harvison of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information. 10. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. 11. Additional information and details might be required with the Grading Plan and the PIA plans Landscape Plan: 1. Ensure that the proposed landscaping will not conflict with the sight visibility triangles (SVT's) during installation and after the plants have grown and matured. This is a safety issue and can create a liability issue to the property owner (D.S. 3-01.5.1.1.). RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Drainage Report |
| 10/08/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0041 LOT 14 BROWN/RITA RANCH/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 10/07/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete address from title block. Label project number on all sheets. Delete “T15S” from location map. |
| 10/08/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 10/10/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 10, 2008 Dennis L. Donovan Physical Resources Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 36985 Tucson, Arizona 85740 Subject: D08-0041 Lot 14 Brown/Rita Ranch Development Plan Dear Dennis: Your submittal of September 10, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and eight (8) copies of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Zoning, TEP, Wastewater, ADA, Engineering, Addressing, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 690-1769 dp-resubmittal |