Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0035
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/15/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | October 15, 2008 To: KENT A. DELPH GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: ACADEMY OF TUCSON - WRIGHTSTOWN Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-035 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Tanque Verde Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 10/21/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of 12 point (0.12") in size. Revise the lettering within the drawing on sheet L1 to demonstrate compliance. DS 2-05.2.1.C 2. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border or fraction thereof per LUC 3.7.2.4. With a length of 565 feet the landscape border along the west property line must contain a total of 18 trees and with a length of 530 feet (as stated in the table) the landscape border along the south property line must contain 17 canopy trees. Note that the dimension stated on the development plan drawing for the south property line reads only 520 feet. Revise dimensions to be consistent and revise landscape border table and landscape plan drawing as needed. 3) The development plan cannot be approved until the ERZ overlay zone application has been approved. |
| 10/23/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Provide an 18' radius curb returns to both returns associated with the relocated eastern driveway. 25' radius curb returns are still required for the access driveway associated with this development. |
| 10/24/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/28/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0035 Academy of Tucson Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 10/28/2008 DUE DATE: 11/07/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 07/28/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.4.G Provide recordation information (docket and page) for the proposed water easement indicated on the plan and in keynote #41. Provide recordation information (docket and page) for the proposed new 20' sewer easement indicated on the plan. 3. The development plan cannot be approved until the ERZ (T08SA00374) overlay zone application has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0035dp.doc |
| 11/05/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 11/05/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Academy of Tucson D08-0035, T14S, R15E, SECTION 03 RECEIVED: Development Plan, Drainage Report and Landscape Plan on October 10, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. It appears that the proposed structure encroachment on the Tanque Verde floodplain is self imposed. The site appears to have ample flood-free area to install the proposed building. Address this issue and revise as needed. 2. Since the Tanque Verde Wash FEMA floodplain is the only recognized floodplain, and since a LOMR-F will not be submitted to revise the existing floodplain, remove from the drainage exhibit any reference to the new floodplain. Additionally, if the building is relocated to a flood-free area, encroachment on the FEMA floodplain will be eliminated completely and a floodplain use permit will not be required. Development Plan: 1. The proposed 15' water easement dedication shall be processed and the recordation information shall be provided on the Development Plan (D.S. 2-05.2.4.G.). 2. Provide the bearing for the tie between the parcel and the basis of bearing (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A). 3. Since the Tanque Verde Wash FEMA floodplain is the only recognized floodplain, and since a LOMR-F will not be submitted to revise the existing floodplain, remove from the Development Plan any reference to the new floodplain. 4. Clarify if the running tracks are proposed to be removed or relocated. 5. Call out the water harvesting areas on the Development Plan (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2). 6. Show all proposed drainage structures including the number of proposed sidewalk scuppers, curb opening wisths, roof drains and roof drainage arrows, sidewalk scuppers associated with roof drains etc. as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3). Landscape Plan: 1. Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan, and Drainage Report |
| 11/13/2008 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0035 ACADEMY OF TUCSON/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete taxcode, sheet 1 (per comment letter dated 8/26/08). Delete “#” from building labels on all applicable sheets. Shade in lot numbers for surrounding subdivisions on all applicable sheets. (per comment letter dated 8/26/08). Delete duplicate label for Wrightstown Road, sheet 5. |
| 11/14/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 19, 2008 Kent A. Delph, P.E. Grenier Engineering, Inc. 5517 East 5th Street Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D08-0035 The Academy of Tucson Development Plan Dear Kent: Your submittal of July 29, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, Landscape, Zoning, Wastewater, Engineering, Addressing,DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 326-7508 dp-resubmittal |