Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0033
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | CITY OF TUCSON PROJECT REFERENCE ADA FOLDER |
| 07/22/2008 | ANDY DINAUER | PDEQ | PIMA COUNTY DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | Denied | MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS - DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: July 21, 2008 TO: Patricia Gehlen, City of Tucson CDRC Manager FROM: Robert E. Flynt, Public Works Manager Development Review Division (Environmental Quality) SUBJECT: Tucson Eastside Service Center D08-0033 On behalf of the Department of Environmental Quality, the Development Plan has been reviewed for conformance with Pima County Department of Environmental Quality requirements for on-site wastewater disposal and air quality. Please note the following comments: 1. Please delete the Wastewater Management Notes category and associated Note 1. Please add a General Note and Permitting Note section to the cover sheet. 2. Please add a General Note identifying the water service provider for this development. 3. Please add a General Note to reflect the daily design flow of each on-site wastewater disposal system, based on Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9, Unit Flows Table. Please note the expectation is such that this information shall be in table form, will be building specific and will include the applicable unit and design flow/unit calculations. Additionally, please indicate the total g/d loading for the entire site. 4. Please add a Permitting Note as follows: On-site disposal systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapter 9. Please add a Permitting Note as follows: The proposed development will be served by on-site sewage disposal system(s). Prior to construction, a Notice of Intent to Discharge shall be submitted to PDEQ in order to receive a Construction Authorization for each system. Please add a Permitting Note as follows: The proposed on-site wastewater disposal systems, as indicated, are conceptual. Approval of the proposed designs is not granted, nor implied, by approval of this Development Plan. Although conceptual areas have been indicated for primary and reserve on-site wastewater disposal, please provide the results of soil analysis and/or percolation testing, at an adequate depth, in both the primary and reserve disposal areas, along with trench design calculations, to ensure the areas are appropriately sized based on the proposed loading (refer to comment 3) and the assigned Soil Absorption Rate (SAR). Additionally, please indicate the location of such testing on the site plan(s). If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at 740-6502. The Department’s Air Quality Control District requires that air quality activity permits be secured by the developer or prime contractor before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. REF/rf |
| 07/22/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 18 JULY 2008 D08-0033/TUCSON WATER EASTSIDE SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 1994 ADAAG DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW SHEET 1 A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 19194 ADAAG FOR ALL CITY IOF TUCSON PROJECTS. MAKE ALL NECESSARY REFERENCE NOTE CHANGES TO THAT EFFECT. B. DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. STANDARD DETAIL 207 IS FOR R.O.W. RAMPS ONLY. MAKE ALL NECESSARY REFERENCE NOTES TO THAT EFFECT. SHEET 2 A. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ADAAG 4.1.2. 1. LOCATE AND SHOW ON PLAN THE CLOSEST BUS STOP. SHEET 3 A. PROVIDE A NEW NOTE REFERENCING ALL SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMPS WITH IN THE PROPERTY BOUNDS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADAAG SECTIONS 4.7 AND 4.8. 1. CHANGE ALL NOTE 5 REFERENCES INSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO NEW NOTE. 2. PROVIDE ALL DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED BY 4.7, 4.7.7, 4.29.2, 4.29.5, 4.8 AND AS ELSEWHERE REQUIRED. 3. THE TWO CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS AT THE MARKED CROSSING DO NOT MEET THE ABOVE STATED ADAAG STANDARDS, PLEASE REDESIGN. B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 1. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PARKING SPACES AS PER ADAAG SECTION 4.1.2.5 AND 4.6. 2. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHOWING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON SITE PLAN. 3. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:50, ADAAG, SECTION 4.6.3. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. 4. CLARIFY HOW ACCESS IS ACHIEVED FROM THE ONE ACCESSIBLE SPACE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE TRASH ENCLOSURES ARE CONNECTED TO THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. IT DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONNECTED TO THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. C. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE STEPS TO THE LOADING DOCK. SHOW ALL DIMENSIONS, RAILING AND COMPLIANCE WITH ADAAG 4.9 D. IS THE "L" CONCRETE WALK SECTION JUST SOUTH OF THE WATER HARVESTING BARRELS A SERIES OF ACCESSIBLE RAMPS AND LANDINGS? PLEASE CLARIFY AND IF SO, PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS WITH DIMENSIONS, RAILINGS AND SPOT GRADES SHOWING SLOPES IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADAAG 4.8. E. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE MARKS: 1/7 TO 1/14 AND 4/8 TO 4/15,. SHEET 4 A. PROVIDE A NEW NOTE REFERENCING ALL SIDEWALK AND CURB RAMPS WITH IN THE PROPERTY BOUNDS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ADAAG SECTIONS 4.7 AND 4.8. 1. CHANGE ALL NOTE 5 REFERENCE INSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO NEWLY ADDED NOTE. B. CORRECT THE FOLLOWING REFERENCE MARKS: 5/9 TO 5/22. C. REFERENCE SHEET 15 NOTES FOR COMMENTS ABOUT MULTI ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEETS 9, 10 AND 14: A. IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AND PROVIDE SLOPE ARROWS AND SLOPE PERCENTAGES THROUGH OUT THE ROUTE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ADAAG 4.3.7. SHEET 15 A. DETAIL 5: SHOW LATERAL DIMENSIONS 1. CHANGE ALL NOTE 5 REFERENCE INSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES TO NEWLY ADDED NOTE. 2. THE 3' WIDE RAMPS DO NOT MEET ADAAG RAMP STANDARDS, DELETE THEM AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPE PLANTER AREAS. TURN CURB BACK AT DETECTABLE WARNINGS STRIP SIDES. EXTEND TO BEGINNING OF 1:12 RAMP. 3. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:50, ADAAG, SECTION 4.6.3. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. B. DETAIL 4: SHOW 1:12 RAMP AT END OF SIDEWALK WITH DETECTABLE WARNING C. DETAIL A: NOTE FOR R.O.W. ONLY END OF REVIEW |
| 07/22/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/22/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | TDOT-Traffic approves the development plan (activity # D08-0033) TDOT-Traffic has the following condition which is also noted under the Re-zoning case # C9-08-10 August 12, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: C9-08-10 PROJECT NAME: Tucson Water Eastside Service PROJECT ADDRESS: 2401 S Houghton Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Traffic requires the following condition for Case # C9-08-10 Tucson Water Eastside Service. - Access drives along Houghton Road and Old Spanish Trail shall be limited to one access drive on each roadway (existing or proposed). All access drives shall be in conformance with the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for the City of Tucson. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x305 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/22/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/24/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan (D08-0033). DSD Engineering does not recommend approval of the grading plan (T08BU01203). DSD Engineering has no objection or adverse comment regarding approval of the Scenic Corridor Zone overlay submittal (T08SA00244). Sheet L3 indicates arrows pointing to Scenic Corridor boundaries that are not present on plan. DSD Engineering has no objection or adverse comment to the rezoning (C9-08-10) of this site to C-2. The following comments are offered: Cover Sheet - Please correct Zoning and Land Use Note #4 to note that the MS&R setback zone is Sec. 2.8.3 of the LUC. Sheets S2 (2&3/22), S4 and S6 - Please correct reference to Reflection Vista to Lots 1-5, Book 56, Page 18. Sheet S2 (3/22) - Please correct Basis of Bearing along Houghton Road to match that on Sheet C1. Sheet S2 (3/22) - Please label curb radii along west side of drive from Golf Links Road to detention/retention basin inlet. Sheet S3 (4/22) - Keynote 36 indicates curb openings per plan. The plan shows the 10' curb openings on the downhill side of the water harvesting area (Keynote 17). Is this the intent? C-Sheets (general) -- Please correct matchline callouts to correspond with Sheet C1. Sheet C1 (8/22) - Please indicate the cut and fill quantities. Sheet C2 (9/22) - The Basis of Bearing (along Houghton Road centerline) does not agree with the stated Basis of Bearing on Sheet 1/22. Sheet C2 (9/22) - There is a 3' dimension shown along the proposed sidewalk along the north side of Golf Links Road. Please clearly position the arrow or label what distance is being measured. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Please label the width of the proposed sidewalk along the north side of Golf Links Road. Dev. Std. 3-01.3.3.A specifies a minimum width of 5'. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Keynote 23: Indicates a bottom elevation of 2875; Sheet D1 (14/22) and plan view on this sheet indicates a varying elevation from 2875.65 to 2876. WSEL is given as 2880; that is below the invert of the outlet weir shown on Detail 11/16. Please correct information or eliminate extraneous information. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Regarding the plan view of the detention/retention basin: Weir/wall detail is called out as 11/15 but can be found on Sheet 16. Please correct callout. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Regarding the detention/retention basin outlet: Callout refers to Detail 10/15 but looks to be Detail H on Sheet 16. Please correct callout. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Please label the width of the proposed sidewalk along the exit onto Golf Links Road. Dev. Std. 3-01.3.3.A specifies a minimum width of 5' for Golf Links Road. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Regarding the open channel section: Callout refers to Section 7/15 but appears on Sheet 16. Please correct callout. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Please correct matchline callout along eastern matchline. Sheet C2 (9/22) - Please correct matchline callout along northern matchline to reflect 2 different sheets (11 & 12). Sheet C3 (10/22) - Please indicate the upstream portion of the storm drain beginning at the matchline (Sheet C2 (9/22)) to the upstream terminus located north of the dumpster location (there appears to be a trio of 96.0 elevations at that location). Provide pipe data and detailing for the upstream catch basin. Sheet C3 (10/22) - Keynote 36 indicates curb openings per plan. The plan shows the 10' curb openings on the downhill side of the water harvesting area (Keynote 17). Is this the intent? GRADING (T08BU01203): Sheet D1 (14/22) - Suggest labeling the elevations on the 2 easternmost corners of the washout area. Currently, the grate elevation looks to be higher than the corner nearest the detention/retention basin entrance. Sheet D1 (14/22) - Please label the invert at the western terminus of the 189 lf 24" RCP entering the detention/retention basin. Sheet D1 (14/22) - Please label the pipe length, material and diameter for the 2 pipe segments leading from the 2-Type 1 catch basins into the detention/retention basin (just north of the property line). Sheet D1 (14/22) - Please label additional elevations surrounding the scuppers at the eastern end of Detail 1. Provide a callout for the scuppers detailing size, length, type, etc. Sheet D1 (14/22) - Please label the invert at the western terminus of the 313 lf 24" RCP entering the channel at the eastern end of detail 1. Sheet D1 (15/22) - Suggest labeling the elevations on the 2 easternmost corners of the washout area. Currently, the grate elevation looks to be higher than the corner nearest the detention/retention basin entrance. Sheet D1 (16/22) - Please indicate 6" bleeder pipe material on Detail 11. SWPPP - The SWPPP is not approved. The following comments are offered: There is no SWPPP text to accompany the plan. Please provide text in conformance with the 2008 General Permit. Revise SWPPP plan to reflect that landscape disturbance will extend into Golf Links right-of-way. The current plan shows silt fence to be installed between the landscape on the site and that within Golf Links right-of-way. Sheets L3 and L4 indicate landscaping to be installed beyond the disturbance limits indicated by the SWPPP. The SWPPP should be revised to reflect this disturbance. If the intent of the silt fence along the southern boundary is intended to keep sediment generated onsite from discharging off-project, it should probably be relocated to beyond landscape areas where landscaping abuts the property line. Describe the perimeter controls in the SWPPP text. Drainage Report - The drainage report is acceptable for the development and grading plans. It should be noted that the retention volume was calculated incorrectly (5-year coefficients should be used, not 100-year values). However, the water harvesting scheme provides extra volume not accounted for in the basin calculation. Landscape Plan -- Sheet L3 indicates ¼" minus d.g. is to be placed in all non-paved areas. From a stormwater perspective, this office's experience has been that this will retard infiltration in water harvesting areas and the smaller fractions (clays, e.g.) in the d.g. will be carried into detention/retention facilities and cause the basin to lose infiltration capacity. Rezoning -- Three roadways bound the 28.1-acre site: Old Spanish Trail, Houghton Road and Golf Links Road. Old Spanish Trail is a Scenic Route and designated as an MS&R Arterial with a proposed right-of-way of 100'. Houghton Road is also a designated Scenic Route and Arterial with a proposed right-of-way of 200'. Golf Links Road is a local street east of Houghton Road. Access is proposed from Golf Links Road. Houghton Road is proposed to be improved as part of RTA Project #32. The northeastern portion of the site lies within the Hidden Hills Wash watershed and drains toward Old Spanish Trail. The majority of the site lies within the Eastview Wash watershed and drains toward Houghton Road and Golf Links Road. The existing corrugated metal pipes beneath Houghton Road are undersized for the 100-year event and will be replaced as part of the Houghton Road improvements. 2-36" RCPs were installed beneath Golf Links Road as part of the Eckerd Drugstore (now CVS Pharmacy) development and are designed to current standards. The site does not contain any regulatory floodplains, ERZ washes or WASH washes. Neither watershed is considered to be a balanced/critical basin. Detention is not required. Threshold retention for the 5-year event is required as is water harvesting. The following conditions are requested: 1. Preparation of a complete Drainage Report, including details of detention/retention, is required. 2. Each detention/retention basin shall include a sediment trap, or other sediment control measures as approved by the City Engineer, to prevent sedimentation of the detention/retention basin. Each sediment trap, or other sediment control measure, shall have a provision for total drainage. 3. Detention/retention basin floors shall be graded to drain either toward the outlet structure or other logical point. Basin floors shall not be flat. 4. Detention/retention basins shall be located adjacent to a street or accessible common area. Basin sideslopes in the adjacent area(s) shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Detention/Retention Manual for human activity zones. 5. Rectangular basin shapes shall be avoided unless necessitated by recreational or visual amenities within the basin. 6. Vegetation shall be used as screening and/or security barrier for a minimum of ten percent of the basin perimeter. |
| 07/24/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Water Eastside Service Development Package (1st Review) D08-0033 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 24, 2008 DUE DATE: August 14, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is July 16, 2009. The following comments are in regards to the layout of the development package, see the Draft DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. The landscape plans and storm water pollution prevention plans should be put into the development package not shown as separate sheets. List the landscape plans and storm water pollution prevention plans under the SHEET INDEX for a total of 32 sheets and number the landscape plans and storm water pollution prevention plans accordingly. 2. The detail/section references to not match the detail number and sheet numbers. The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. 1. D.S. 2-01.3.1 If available provide the email addresses for owner, developer, architect, engineer and landscape registrant(s) on the plan. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development plan number D08-0033, rezoning case number C9-08-10, grading plan number T0BU01203 and the Scenic Corridor Overlay number T08SA00244 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.1 The existing zoning listed under "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" number 1 in not correct. Revise the existing zoning to be "SR". 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 List the rezoning conditions of approval on the plan. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Under "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" number 3 the existing use should be "DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM". The proposed use should include "DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.11.1.A, .E, AND .I. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Under "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" number 4 revise the note to read "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA; Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. For the Scenic Corridor Zone Overlay provide the case number date of approval, what was approved and the conditions of approval. 7. For all calculations, allowed and provided, must be provided for both uses on site, i.e. Floor Area Ration (FAR), Vehicle Parking, Handicapped Vehicle Parking, Bicycle Parking, Loading Space etc. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Based on development designator "30" for both the Construction Service and Distribution System the Allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) should be 0.75. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Just for clarification the allowed building height of thirty (30) feet is only applicable within the Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ). Development Designator "30" allows forty (40) feet. Revise the building height calculation to reflect both the SCZ and Development Designator "30" requirements. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B If applicable show all existing easements of record graphically on the plan together with purpose and recording docket and page reference. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C Provide the recordation data for Houghton Road on the site plan. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E Provide the zoning for the parcel located across the Golf Links right-of-way southeast of this parcel on sheet 2. The zoning is County Zone CR-1. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.2 Show the future sight visibility triangles (SVT's) for the entrance off of Golf Links road. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.2 Show the existing and future SVT's for the entrance off of Houghton Road. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Sheet 3 provide a dimension from the fence shown at the north side of the Storage Yard to the edge of the Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL). Per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 A minimum distance of two (2) feet must be maintained between a PAAL and any wall, screen, or other obstruction, provided pedestrian activity is directed to another location. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Sheet 4 provide a dimension from the fence shown along the west side of the proposed vehicle parking spaces, shown without wheel stops, to the curb. Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 this distance must be two (2) foot six (6) inches from the face of curb. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 It appears that one-way PAALs are proposed along the south, east and north side of the Operations Buildings and some type of drive-thru is proposed of Operations East Building, indicate on the plan how the one-way PAAL system will be controlled, i.e. signage, pavement marking. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Show the required paved access PAAL from Houghton Road to the required parking for the Distribution System (reservoir) on the lane. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Any area around the Distribution System (reservoir) for vehicle use is required to be paved, show on the plan. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 Provide some type of barriers to prevent a vehicular from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a The vehicle parking calculation does not appear to be correct. Based on my count there are only 147 vehicle parking spaces provided. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a Provide a separate parking calculation for the Distribution System (reservoir). 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a It does not appear that the handicapped vehicle parking space shown north of the warehouse matches the provided detail, provide width dimension for this parking space. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a On Detail C Sheet 15, STANDARD PARKING SPACE, the dimension shown for the location of the wheel stop is not correct. See D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 and D.S. 3-05 Figure 5 for correct dimension. 25. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a Show the required parking for the D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.a 26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c For the Construction Service use, the loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.4.5 Commercial Services Use Group (Sec. 6.3.5), Section 3.4.5.3. for building square footage of 21,634, two (2) 12 x 35 loading spaces are required. 27. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. Based on 148 vehicle parking spaces provided per the plan twelve (12) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. 28. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d The proposed location for the Class 2 bicycle parking does not meet the location requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.0. Review the revised D.S. 2-09. 29. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d Provide an off-street bicycle parking detail; including materials for lighting, paving, and security; fully dimensioned layout; location; specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports; and the location and type of directional signage if required. 30. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I Show the location for the future curb and sidewalk for Houghton Road, Golf Links Road and Old Spanish Trail on the site plan. 31. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K If applicable show all proposed easements on the site plan. Dimension and label as to their purpose and whether they will be private or public. 32. D.S. 2-05.3.9.P Within the footprint of the proposed buildings provide the specific use and overall dimensions. 33. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q There is a drainage structure shown south of Operations West building that appears to cut though the pedestrian circulation please clarify. 34. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Per 2-08.3.1 provide a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route the refuse locations. 35. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Provide the required continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route from the ROW to the Distribution System (reservoir). 36. D.S. 2-05.3.9.T Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning, also provide a separate letter indicating how each rezoning condition has been met. 37. D.S. 2-05.3.9.V If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards on the plan. 38. Per LUC Section 2.5.4.6.B Unless modified by specific performance criteria or Sec. 2.5.4.6.A, land uses in the Commercial Services, Industrial, Restricted Adult Activities, and Wholesaling Use Groups shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building. This said the proposed outdoor storage yard is not allowed within the C-2 Zone. 39. Per LUC Section 3.5.11.1.I The Distribution System (reservoir) must be located wholly within an enclosed building or within an area enclosed on all sides with a masonry wall or compact evergreen hedge, not less than six (6) feet, nor more than ten (10) feet, in height. 40. Clarify what the 40' LANDSCAPE BUFFER is for. Per 2.8.2.4.A. a buffer area thirty (30) feet wide, adjacent to the MS&R right-of-way line, is to be preserved and maintained in its natural state for the SCZ. 41. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D08-0033 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Water Eastside Service Grading Plan (1st Review) T08BU01203 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 24, 2008 DUE DATE: August 14, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU01203 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Rezoning Section FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Water Eastside Service C9-08-10 Rezoning from SR to C-2 TRANSMITTAL: July 24, 2008 The zoning for this property is proposed as C-2. The existing use falls under the Commercial Services Use Group, Sec. 6.3.5, Construction Service "30" and Utilities Use Group, Sec. 6.3.12, Distribution System "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.11.1.A, .E, and .I. Also per the 2.5.4.6 General Restrictions, the following restrictions apply to all uses and development in this zone. A. Outdoor display of finished products for rent or sale at retail or wholesale is permitted, unless prohibited by specific performance criteria. B. Unless modified by specific performance criteria or Sec. 2.5.4.6.A, land uses in the Commercial Services, Industrial, Restricted Adult Activities, and Wholesaling Use Groups shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building. Development designator "30" requires or allows the following: Minimum site area 0 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) = 0.75 Maximum building height = 40 feet Interior perimeter yard indicator = DD Per LUC Section 2.8.2.5.A.2 Structure Height with in the 400' Scenic Corridor Zone, Nonresidential structures may not exceed thirty (30) feet in height. 1) Zoning has reviewed this proposal for compliance with The City of Tucson Development Standard Land Use Code (LUC). The proposed project meets the minimum requirements for the proposed use. 2) This project is subject to LUC Section 3.5.4.11.G and will require review by the Design Board (DRB). 3) Based on the City of Tucson's Zoning maps and the legal description for rezoning case C9-70-47 (rezoning for the parcel located to the north) The existing zoning for this project is R-1 and MH-1. DSD Rezoning section, Mark Castro, has been made aware of this issue. Off-Street Parking: Required 87, Provided 147 Off-Street Loading: Required 2 - 12'x35', Provided 1 12'x55' Bicycle Parking: Required Class 2 = 12, Provided Class 2 = 8 Pedestrian Access: The proposed pedestrian Access appears to meet the requirements of the Development Standards and the Land Use Code. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Rezoning Section FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Tucson Water Eastside Service T08SA00244 Scenic Corridor Overlay (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 12, 2007 DUE DATE: February 14, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. LUC Sec. 2.8.2.4.A Label the required thirty (30) foot buffer as "30 FOOT UNDISTURBED NATURAL BUFFER TO BE PRESERVED AND MAINTAINED IN IT'S NATURAL STATE". 2. LUC Sec. 2.8.2.6.B Provide the view corridor calculation on the plan. 3. If a color or construction materials palette is proposed, add both matrix tables, which includes the proposed exterior color name, number and manufacturer, proposed roof material type and color, required screening wall materials and color, etc. 4. Please add the following notes to the site plan. a. No grading beyond what is necessary for siting of buildings, drives, private yards, and structural improvements. All viable vegetation with a caliper of 4 inches or greater and all saguaro cacti will be preserved or relocated on the site per the Native Plant and Preservation Ordinance. b. All new utilities for development on private property or public right-of-way along Houghton Road and Old Spanish Trail will be underground. Trenching is permitted for the placement of utilities lines, if area is re-vegetated in accordance with Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.5.2.D c. Building or structure surfaces, which are visible from Houghton Road or Old Spanish Trail will have colors, which are, predominate within the surrounding landscape such as desert and earth tones. d. Fencing and freestanding walls facing Houghton Road or Old Spanish Trail will meet material restrictions in Land Use Code Sec. 3.7.3, Screening Requirements. e. All areas between the MS&R right-of-way line and the existing street right-of-way that are disturbed by development shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. f. All disturbed areas on the site that are visible from Houghton Road or Old Spanish Trail and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. 5. All requested information will be provided on the development plan or as attachments to the development plan If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 07/25/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: TUCSON WATER EASTSIDE SERVICE D08-0033 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 17, 2008. Alberta Adrian Office Specialist 918-8347 Ofc. 793-7504 Pgr. |
| 08/12/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section has reviewed the applications for D08-0033, T08SA00244, & T08BU01203 and offers the following comments. 1) Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants and for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. The area to be fenced shall be beyond the "drip-line" of the vegetation by one-half (½) the distance of the "drip-line" radius. DS 2-15.6.A Show the fence locations on the native plant preservation plan. 2) Show and identify all existing or proposed chain link type fencing. Non-wood fences, such as chain link, may not be used along a street frontage along a Gateway Route or within the SCZ. LUC 3.7.3.7.D 3) We could not locate the appendices A & B referred to in the Environmental Resource Report. 4) The set-aside area is required to be protected in perpetuity as Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS). The NUOS area must be delineated in a surveyable manner on the development plan and designated by legal description on a document recorded with the Pima County Recorder. Include the recording information on the development Plan. LUC 3.8.6.4 5) Indicate the size of the water harvesting tanks used at the site on the Development/Landscape Plans. 6) Provide additional plantings along Golf Links Road to provide a continuous screen (a solid 5' high visual barrier). LUC 3.7.3 7) Add relevant case numbers to landscape submittal. |
| 08/13/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | ES has no objections to the rezoning request C9-08-10. ES has the following comments regarding D08-0033. 1. Sheet 15 trash enclosure G - Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. Annotate and show within detail...recommend "positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, QTY - 4, 1 inch long x 6 inch diameter galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation." 2. Access, approach, and maueverability within development and to solid waste storage/enclosure areas work. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/14/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 08/15/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/15/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | From: Douglas Kratina Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:42 AM To: 'TucsonRezoning TucsonRezoning' Cc: Tom Martinez Subject: D08-0033 TUCSON WATER EASTSIDE SERVICE ADOT has NO COMMENT on the Rezoning |
| 08/15/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/15/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0033 Tucson Water Eastside Service 08/15/08rh ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-08-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Golf Links & Houghton COMMENTS DUE BY: 8/14/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 8/15/08 This project is subject to rezoning requirements as part of rezoning approval . Resubmittal request is based on the assumption that rezoning conditions are adopted as proposed per case C9-08-10. Staff reserves the right to make additional comments depending on the final wording of rezoning conditions. 1. Please list rezoning conditions on the development plan. 2. Please add rezoning case number and development plan number to all sheets. 2. Per rezoning conditions which states, "An eight-foot-high acoustical masonry wall shall be provided along the eastern edge of the site as shown on the PDP to protect the neighborhood to the east and a 10-foot high acoustical masonry wall along the loading dock on the west side of the site to isolate neighbors to the west. Walls over 75 feet in length and over three feet in height shall include the use of two or more wall materials and/or incorporate a visually interesting design on the wall surface consistent with the architecture of the site" Please submit wall detail. 3. Per rezoning conditions which states, "high albedo and pervious alternative paving materials shall be incorporated in pedestrian areas and adjacent to planting areas. These paving materials to be shown on the landscaping plans at the time of development plan submittal." Please demonstrate paving materials on the landscape plan. |
| 08/15/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0033 TUCSON WATER EASTSIDE SERVICE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 8/14/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete directions from streets on location map sheets 1, 8, 17, stormwater plan sheet 2, L1 Sheet 1, L3 Sheet 3, ERR Sheet 1. Correct jurisdiction lines for City of Tucson and Pima County on location map sheets 1, 8, 17, stormwater plan sheet 2, L1 sheet 1, L3 sheet 3, ERR sheet 1. Delete address from property description on sheet 1. Label project number on all sheets. Delete location map from sheet 2. Delete Address block from all sheets except sheet 1. Correct book and page information for Reflection Vista on Sheets 2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 17 and 21. Delete address (lower right hand corner) from all sheets. Correct matchlines on sheet 9. Delete duplicate label for streets on sheet 9. (smaller type). Correct matchlines on sheets 10, 13 and 20. According to Sheet 8: Sheet 12 should be Sheet 11 and Sheet 11 should be Sheet 12. Please correct. Also correct matchlines for both sheets. Correct “Matchlin” to “Matchline” on Sheet 21. |
| 08/15/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0033, TUCSON WATER EASTSIDE SERVICE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 74 PM Peak: 11 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, KoSok ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 08/15/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Septic |
| 08/19/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: August 18, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0033 Tucson Water Eastside Service: Development Plan(7-17-08) Staff has no comments. |
| 08/20/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 20, 2008 Kim Fernandez ABA Architects PC 1001 North Alvernon way Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D08-0033 Tucson Water Eastside Service Center Development Plan T08BU01203 Grading Plan T08SA00244 Scenic Corridor Overlay Plan C9-08-10 - Rezoning Dear Kim: Your submittal of July 17, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Package (ADA, PDEQ, Zoning, Engineering, Landscape, ESD, Addressing, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised ERR (Landscape, DSD) Please note that the rezoning comments are not included with this letter. The Rezoning Section of DUPD will be in contact separately. The public comments period for the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone will be opened in the next two weeks. Once the conditions of rezoning have been established by the Mayor and Council and prior to resubmittal of this development package, please schedule a meeting with me. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7505 |