Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0032
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/28/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/29/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/08/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Texas Instruments Development Plan (2nd Review) Revised D08-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 8, 2008 DUE DATE: September 26, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Zoning acknowledges that fee's have been paid for two permits, T99BU01608 & T00BU03651. Provide copies of the approved plans that show which covered parking was permitted. Upon completing my site research it appears that there are permits for covered parking structures that have expired. Provide documentation that permits all existing cover parking shown on the development plan. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The site area used for Development Area 'D' should be only the area of the site within Development Area 'D' and the site area used for Development Area 'E' should be only the area of the site within Development Area 'E', not the entire site. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The Maximum Floor Area Ratio must be broke out based on the area in each Development Area "D" & "E" as the requirement is different for each development area. Zoning acknowledges that it appears that both development areas will not exceed the allowed Maximum Floor Area Ratio. 4. This comment has not been fully addressed. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Tax Parcel Combo. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D The three (3) parcels, 128-10-064B, 128-10-064C & 128-10-078B will need to be combined prior to approval of this development plan. Please provide a copy of the approved Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a copy of a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with the next submittal. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. The required number of bicycle parking is 54, per LUC 3.3.3.8 Fractional Amounts. When the final result of the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half (½) or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d The bicycle parking calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. This said with the total number of parking spaces provided is 671 x 8% = 53.6 or 54 bicycle parking spaces required, 75% Class 1 and 25% Class 2, or 40 Class 1 and 24 Class 2. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K Provide the docket and page for the electrical easement prior to approval of the development plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0032-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Texas Instruments Grading Plan (2nd Review) T08BU01173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 5, 2008 DUE DATE: September 26, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the development plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 09/12/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | DSD Engineering has no objection or adverse comment to approval of the development package. |
| 09/15/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/22/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/23/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0032 Texas Instruments 9/22/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-77-61; D00-024; D99-0001 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Williams Addition PAD GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 26, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) See Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 7/28/08 ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Pedestrian Circulation Plan REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/22/08 Comment Conditionally approved, as long as the following is corrected: 1) Please correct Note 8, under Development Area Criteria (sheet 1 of 14), Development Area 'E' - Buildings 'A' and 'C', from Maximum Height: 120' to Maximum Height: 200 feet. |
| 09/23/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | September 23, 2008 To: KEVIN MORROW GD&A SOUTHWEST LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: TEXAS INSTRUMENT Dev. Plan - 2nd Submittal D08-032 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 09/26/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0032 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 9/26/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Per comment letter dated 7/29/08: Label all buildings numerically in Development Area Criteria notes on sheet 1 and on plans on all applicable sheets. 2.) Per comment letter dated 7/29/08: Delete address information from title block on all applicable sheets. (sheets 3-8). 3.) Per comment letter dated 7/29/08: Add book and page information to Williams Centre Block 6 on sheets 4, 6 and 8. |
| 09/30/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a general note stating " One single property owner, management, or association will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection service/s and storage area/s for all buildings/development." 2. Enclosure west of building A does not provide adequate maneuverability for collection vehicle to position itself perpendicular to the west side of the enclsoure/container area. DS 6-01.4.1.C. Conflict with the the adjacent curbed island. The civil/lanscape plans show a greater curb radius that appears to work. Please clarify and correct accordingly. 3. Enclosures east of building C & D does not provide adequate maneuverability for collection vehicle to position itself perpendicular to the enclosure/container areas. Recommend repositioning enclosures clockwise so have a direct eastbound approach within PAAL. Stagger enclosure to accomodate for minimum 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 6, 2008 Kevin Morrow GDA Southwest, LLC 250 South Craycroft Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D08-0032 Texas Instruments Development Plan Dear Kevin: Your submittal of August 28, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (ESD, Zoning, Addressing, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies City of Tucson Lot Combo Documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-4390 |