Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0032
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/27/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/02/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 2 JULY 2008 D08-0032/TEXAS INSTRUMENTS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 OF 13: A. NOTE 19: DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY NOT ADA FEDERAL REGISTER REQUIREMENTS. B. NOTE 26: ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE TO BE PER 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406, NOT ADA. ALL R.O.W. CURB RAMPS AS PER COT DOT 207. II. SHEET 4 OF 13: A. DETAIL E: PROVIDE A "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN MOUNTED BELOW THE LARGER SIGN B. PLEASE PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ACTUAL PARKING LAYOUTS SHOWING ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES AND ETC. III. SHEET 5 OF 13: A. AT THE SOUTH WEST MARKED CROSSING: 1. A 14' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP PROVIDES ACCESSIBILITY TO VEHICLE HAZARDOUS AREAS THAT ARE NOT MARKED OR DEFINED AS A PROTECTED CROSSING. DETECTABLE WARNINGS DO PROVIDE A CONTROLLED DIRECTION TO MARKED CROSSINGS. TO PROVIDE A MORE CONTROLLED AND DIRECTED ACCESS TO THE MARKED CROSSING, DO THE FOLLOWING: a. MAINTAIN A RAISED WALKWAY AT THIS CORNER AND DELETE THE TWO SIDEWALK RAMPS. b. PROVIDE A 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP. 2. AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE ANOTHER 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP. B. AT THE NORTH EAST MARKED CROSSING: 1. AT THE NORTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING AT THE SIDEWALK RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406. 2. AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE ANOTHER 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP. C. BOTH ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS: 1. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED BY CODE AT THESE TYPES OF AREAS AND ARE AN OWNER'S OPTION. A PARKING AISLE IS A SAFE ZONE, NOT A HAZARDOUS VEHICLE AREA. a. IF DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE PROVIDED, THEY NEED BE ONLY AS WIDE AS THE PARKING AISLE. b. INSURE A 4' WIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DIRECTLY BEHIND THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING IF PROVIDED 2. MAINTAIN A 6" HIGH CURB IN FRONT OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES EITHER INTEGRAL WITH THE SIDEWALK OR SURFACE MOUNTED IF THE PARKING SURFACE AND THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARE FLUSH. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/02/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The proposed building appears to be over area per the IBC. Justify the type of construction including the existing. |
| 07/08/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 8, 2008 To: KEVIN MORROW GD&A SOUTHWEST LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: TEXAS INSTRUMENT Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-032 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Rd Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Central. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 2: The symbols for existing public sanitary sewer and existing private sanitary sewer are not distinguishable enough from each other. Sheet 8: Show the flow arrows on both the proposed and existing sewer lines. Sheet 8: Include the rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan. Sheet 8: The IMS # shown for the manhole fronting the property is not correct. Sheet 8: Include the pipe size for all of the existing private sewer lines shown on property. Sheet 8: The symbols shown on Sheet 2 for existing and proposed private manholes do not match what is shown on plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/08/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 07/09/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add additional single solid waste enclosure to support for both refuse and recycle waste. 2. Single enclosure shown at the NE corner of building B does not meet the minimum design requirements nor provide the minimum required 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach to enclosure. Refer to DS 6-01.3.0 & 6-01.4.0. 3. Sheet 4, G-Trash enclosure detail. Must provide a gate for side access to enclsoure. Front enclosure gates must be equipped with the ability to secure in both the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Show and annotate within detail. Recommend "positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation." 4. All existing enclosures and detail must meet minimum requirements and be fully dimensioned. Refer to DS 6-01.4.2. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/10/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Texas Instruments Development Plan (1st Review) D08-0032 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2008 DUE DATE: July 28, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are in regards to the layout of the development package, see the Draft DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. First sheet - Master Cover Sheet. 2. Next sheet(s) should be all notes, General notes, Paving notes, Utility notes, etc.. All notes should be organized under a heading indicating which plan the note(s) are for, ie. Development plan, grading plan Utility plan etc. Sheet 1 maybe used for notes or calculations if there is room. 3. Next sheet(s) should be the Development plan 4. Next sheet(s) should be the Grading, Paving, Drainage plan. 5. Next sheet(s) should be the details sheet(s). 6. Next sheet(s) should be the Utility plan. 7. Next sheet(s) should be the Landscape plan(s) The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08. 1. Provide a copy of the last approved development plan. 2. Upon completing my site research it appears that there are permits for covered parking structures that have expired. Provide documentation that permits all existing cover parking shown on the development plan. 3. D.S. 2-01.2.5 Revise the "CITY OF TUCSON DSD/CDRC APPROVAL STAMP" to be twice the size shown. Also provide an area below the stamp for additional comments. Per D.S. 2-01.2.5 a three (3) inch by five (5) area is to be provided. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.1 Relocate the owner and registrants information to the right half of the cover sheet. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Remove the C9-55-77 and C9-77-61 case numbers from the plan. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7 Revise Architectural General Note #1 to include LAND USE AREA "E". 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The Maximum Floor Area Ratio must be broke out based on the area in each Development Area "D" & "E" as the requirement is different for each development area. Zoning acknowledges that it appears that both development areas will not exceed the allowed Maximum Floor Area Ratio. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B If applicable all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to the site shall be provided: type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs and sidewalks. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D The three (3) parcels, 128-10-064B, 128-10-064C & 128-10-078B will need to be combined prior to approval of this development plan. Please provide a copy of the approved Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a copy of a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with the next submittal. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D As the three (3) parcels will be combined remove the lot line shown under the proposed building. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 If the proposed covered parking shown under Keynote 11 is to remain on this plan show the required one (1) setback to the parking area access lane (PAAL) on the plan, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c It is not clear how access is provided to the northern most loading space. It appears that there is a curb preventing access. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d The bicycle parking calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. This said with the total number of parking spaces provided is 671 x 8% = 53.6 or 54 bicycle parking spaces required, 75% Class 1 and 25% Class 2, or 40 Class 1 and 24 Class 2. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d For you information a single inverted "U" bicycle rack can support two (2) bicycle racks. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K Keynote 21 calls out a "NEW TRANSFORMER - REF. SHEET 8; VERIFY W/TEP.", a new easement maybe required for this transformer. If required show the easement and recordation information on the plan. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.P Provide overall dimension for the proposed building on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q As no wheel stops are proposed for the parking spaces shown along the northeast side of the proposed building the sidewalk is required to be 6'-6" not 6' as called out under Keynote 23. Either provide wheel stops for this area or a 6'-6" wide sidewalk. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.V If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal & billboard). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0032 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Texas Instruments Grading Plan (1st Review) T08BU01173 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2008 DUE DATE: July 28, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the development plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Development plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 07/10/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: July 09, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0032 Texas Instruments: Development Plan(6-30-08) No comments. |
| 07/10/2008 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0032, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1376 PM Peak: 186 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. P.S: Hello, my name is KoSok Chae, new member of PAG. To review your request promptly, please send your distribution to Pima Association of Governments (PAG) ATTN: KoSok Chae Thanks, ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/11/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 07/16/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Development areas 'D' & "E" require the following: Minimum Usable Open Space Per Residential Dwelling Unit, Excluding Hotel Rooms: 200 square feet; for all other uses a minimum of 10 percent of the total lot area. P. V-11 Usable Open Space is defined in the PAD as: Includes common area open space, yards, courts, deck areas, landscaped areas, balconies, ramadas, and porches which are usable and accessible for recreational purposes. It does not include areas set aside for vehicular parking, maneuvering, driveways, loading, exterior stairwells, or exterior corridor areas less than six feet wide used primarily to gain access to buildings. Provide calculations and revised plans as necessary. 2) Revise the landscape plan to include bicycle parking locations. All improvements and site information shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan, tentative plat, or development plan. DS 2-07.2.2 3) Revise the landscape plan to include the entire site. Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0 4) Show and identify existing plants on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 5) Identify and describe all screening elements on the landscape plans per DS 2-07.2.2.A.3. 6) A minimum of five percent of the total parking lot area shall be landscaped. No landscaped area shall be less than 80 square feet in size per page V-15 of the PAD. Revise as necessary. Provide calculations. 7) Major pedestrian ways, described in Exhibit D, shall be landscaped and be a minimum of four feet in width. Revise the plans to provide the Primary Pedestrian Access as appropriate and the required landscaping. 8) ENERGY CONSERVATION The Williams Addition Plan is designed to meet the ever-increasing need to conserve natural resources. The Plan provides for a mix of uses which will allow individuals the opportunity to combine business and leisure activities within walking distance of their home. Transit and pedestrian planning reinforce this concept and the general arrangement of use encourages the development of energy efficient projects. The site plan for each development area shall include an energy conservation plan. The energy conservation plan shall address the following: 1. Building orientation. 2. Solar analysis. 3. Prevailing winds. 4. LANDSCAPING 5. Shading effect on adjacent development parcels. 6. Building thermal analysis identifying the thermal characteristics of the building enclosure. 7. Annual energy consumption in BTU/S.F. 8. Passive and active energy conservation measures proposed for the projects. GRADING PLAN COMMENTS 1) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Provide information on how runoff is used to supplement irrigation. 2) Revise the grading plans as necessary to correspond with the Development Plan and Landscape Plan revisions. |
| 07/16/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Texas Instrument D08-0032 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 7, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Administrative Design/Build tz Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/18/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The development plan has been reviewed and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: Sheet 1: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation do not match that shown on Sheet 3. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation. The grading plan has been reviewed and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: Sheet 3: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation do not match that shown on Sheet 1. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation. Sheet 6: There is no horizontal control data in the Horizontal Control Data table. Sheet 13: Please indicate the location of the stabilized construction entrances. It is assumed that one will be necessary for the subject site and one for the adjacent Block 6. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash. It is assumed that permission will be obtained to enter and work upon Block 6. The following is offered regarding the utility plan: Sheet 7: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation are not listed. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation. The SWPPP is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered: June 19 letter: The June 19 letter correctly notes that additional information is necessary for inclusion into the report. Please ensure that this information is inserted into the field copy of the SWPPP. Page 18: Please indicate the rock aprons on Figure 4-1. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash. Figure 4-1: Please indicate the rock aprons as described in Sec. 4.3.2. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash. The drainage letter is acceptable for approval. |
| 07/24/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0032 Texas Instruments 7/24/08 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-77-61; D00-024; D99-0001 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Williams Addition PAD GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: July 28, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( X ) Pedestrian Circulation Plan REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/24/08 Comments Please correct Architectural General Notes 1, on sheet 1 of 3, and change to indicate that part of the project is also within Development Area E. And if applicable include language that project will follow the development standards of Development Area “D”. Please reflect the correct Development Area boundaries on sheet 2 of 3. Please make the necessary changes under Development Area Criteria on sheet 1 of 3, to reflect Development Area “E” performance criteria. Please provide building elevations that show proposed building is linked architecturally and/or physically with the other two existing buildings. (Development Area “D” and “E” performance criteria number 4). Please correct Note 7, under Development Area Criteria, sheet 1 of 3, to read, “Minimum Usable Open Space for all other uses is 10% of the total lot area.” (Development Area “D” and “E” performance criteria). The Williams Addition PAD on exhibit D identifies this area as a primary pedestrian access point. Please provide a pedestrian circulation plan that shows how the internal pedestrian circulation system links up with the external pedestrian circulation system with adjoining parcels/buildings, i.e. continues linkage to the north for existing and future building pads. |
| 07/29/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 07/29/2008 | ANDY DINAUER | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 07/29/2008 8:04 AM >>> No comment |
| 07/29/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/30/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 JENNIFER STEPHENS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0032 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 7/29/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete direction from all streets on location map and key plan. Label buildings A, B, C & D as 1, 2, 3 & 4 in Development Area Criteria on sheet 1 and all other applicable sheets. Add “portion of block 13 to Williams Centre Book 39 M & P. Page 28” in title block on all sheets. Add “portion of block 7 to Williams Centre Book 40 M& P, Page 84 in title block on all sheets. Label section corners on location map. Delete section, township, range labels from location map. Delete all “unnamed streets” from location map & key plan. Delete duplicated street names” on location map & key plan. Delete address information from title block on all applicable sheets. Add Book & Page information to “Williams Centre block 6 on sheets 5, 6, 8 and all other applicable sheets. |
| 07/31/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 31, 2008 Kevin Morrow GDA Southwest, LLC 250 South Craycroft Road, Suite 200 Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D0/-0032 Texas Instruments Development Plan Dear Kevin: Your submittal of June 30, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, ADA, Wastewater, ESD, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, Addressing, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Building Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies City of Tucson Lot Combo Documents (Zoning, DSD) The CDRC Office has asked both landscape and engineering to edit their comments to include grading comments. Please check the website in the next couple of days for additional comments. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-4390 |