Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: D08-0032
Parcel: 12810064B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D08-0032
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/27/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
07/02/2008 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC SITE REVIEW Denied 2 JULY 2008
D08-0032/TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN
ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1
DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

I. SHEET 1 OF 13:
A. NOTE 19: DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY NOT ADA FEDERAL REGISTER REQUIREMENTS.
B. NOTE 26: ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ARE TO BE PER 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406, NOT ADA. ALL R.O.W. CURB RAMPS AS PER COT DOT 207.
II. SHEET 4 OF 13:
A. DETAIL E: PROVIDE A "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN MOUNTED BELOW THE LARGER SIGN
B. PLEASE PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ACTUAL PARKING LAYOUTS SHOWING ALL DIMENSIONS, SLOPES AND ETC.
III. SHEET 5 OF 13:
A. AT THE SOUTH WEST MARKED CROSSING:
1. A 14' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP PROVIDES ACCESSIBILITY TO VEHICLE HAZARDOUS AREAS THAT ARE NOT MARKED OR DEFINED AS A PROTECTED CROSSING. DETECTABLE WARNINGS DO PROVIDE A CONTROLLED DIRECTION TO MARKED CROSSINGS. TO PROVIDE A MORE CONTROLLED AND DIRECTED ACCESS TO THE MARKED CROSSING, DO THE FOLLOWING:
a. MAINTAIN A RAISED WALKWAY AT THIS CORNER AND DELETE THE TWO SIDEWALK RAMPS.
b. PROVIDE A 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP.
2. AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE ANOTHER 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP.
B. AT THE NORTH EAST MARKED CROSSING:
1. AT THE NORTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE A DETECTABLE WARNING AT THE SIDEWALK RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.
2. AT THE SOUTHERN END OF THIS MARKED CROSSING, PROVIDE ANOTHER 4' WIDE CURB RAMP THAT COMPLIES WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 406 WITH DETECTABLE WARNINGS ONLY THE WIDTH OF THE RAMP.
C. BOTH ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS:
1. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED BY CODE AT THESE TYPES OF AREAS AND ARE AN OWNER'S OPTION. A PARKING AISLE IS A SAFE ZONE, NOT A HAZARDOUS VEHICLE AREA.
a. IF DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE PROVIDED, THEY NEED BE ONLY AS WIDE AS THE PARKING AISLE.
b. INSURE A 4' WIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DIRECTLY BEHIND THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING IF PROVIDED
2. MAINTAIN A 6" HIGH CURB IN FRONT OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES EITHER INTEGRAL WITH THE SIDEWALK OR SURFACE MOUNTED IF THE PARKING SURFACE AND THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARE FLUSH.
END OF REVIEW
07/02/2008 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied The proposed building appears to be over area per the IBC. Justify the type of construction including the existing.
07/08/2008 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied July 8, 2008

To: KEVIN MORROW
GD&A SOUTHWEST LLC

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: TEXAS INSTRUMENT
Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal
D08-032


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

This project will be tributary to the Roger Rd Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Central.
Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf.

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.

Sheet 2: The symbols for existing public sanitary sewer and existing private sanitary sewer are not distinguishable enough from each other.

Sheet 8: Show the flow arrows on both the proposed and existing sewer lines.

Sheet 8: Include the rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan.

Sheet 8: The IMS # shown for the manhole fronting the property is not correct.

Sheet 8: Include the pipe size for all of the existing private sewer lines shown on property.

Sheet 8: The symbols shown on Sheet 2 for existing and proposed private manholes do not match what is shown on plan.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
07/08/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project.

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by e-mail, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
07/09/2008 PGEHLEN1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied 1. Add additional single solid waste enclosure to support for both refuse and recycle waste.

2. Single enclosure shown at the NE corner of building B does not meet the minimum design requirements nor provide the minimum required 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach to enclosure. Refer to DS 6-01.3.0 & 6-01.4.0.

3. Sheet 4, G-Trash enclosure detail. Must provide a gate for side access to enclsoure. Front enclosure gates must be equipped with the ability to secure in both the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Show and annotate within detail.
Recommend "positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation."

4. All existing enclosures and detail must meet minimum requirements and be fully dimensioned. Refer to DS 6-01.4.2.

Please provide corrections on resubmittal.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
07/10/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Texas Instruments
Development Plan (1st Review)
D08-0032

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2008

DUE DATE: July 28, 2008

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

The following comments are in regards to the layout of the development package, see the Draft DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. First sheet - Master Cover Sheet.
2. Next sheet(s) should be all notes, General notes, Paving notes, Utility notes, etc.. All notes should be organized under a heading indicating which plan the note(s) are for, ie. Development plan, grading plan Utility plan etc. Sheet 1 maybe used for notes or calculations if there is room.
3. Next sheet(s) should be the Development plan
4. Next sheet(s) should be the Grading, Paving, Drainage plan.
5. Next sheet(s) should be the details sheet(s).
6. Next sheet(s) should be the Utility plan.
7. Next sheet(s) should be the Landscape plan(s)

The following comments are based on the Draft Development Standards 2-01.0.0 DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DOCUMENTS, dated 2-26-08.

1. Provide a copy of the last approved development plan.

2. Upon completing my site research it appears that there are permits for covered parking structures that have expired. Provide documentation that permits all existing cover parking shown on the development plan.

3. D.S. 2-01.2.5 Revise the "CITY OF TUCSON DSD/CDRC APPROVAL STAMP" to be twice the size shown. Also provide an area below the stamp for additional comments. Per D.S. 2-01.2.5 a three (3) inch by five (5) area is to be provided.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.1 Relocate the owner and registrants information to the right half of the cover sheet.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Remove the C9-55-77 and C9-77-61 case numbers from the plan.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.7 Revise Architectural General Note #1 to include LAND USE AREA "E".

7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The Maximum Floor Area Ratio must be broke out based on the area in each Development Area "D" & "E" as the requirement is different for each development area. Zoning acknowledges that it appears that both development areas will not exceed the allowed Maximum Floor Area Ratio.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B If applicable all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to the site shall be provided: type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs and sidewalks.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D The three (3) parcels, 128-10-064B, 128-10-064C & 128-10-078B will need to be combined prior to approval of this development plan. Please provide a copy of the approved Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a copy of a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with the next submittal.

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.D As the three (3) parcels will be combined remove the lot line shown under the proposed building.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5 If the proposed covered parking shown under Keynote 11 is to remain on this plan show the required one (1) setback to the parking area access lane (PAAL) on the plan, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.2.

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.c It is not clear how access is provided to the northern most loading space. It appears that there is a curb preventing access.

14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d The bicycle parking calculation in not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.5 Bicycle Parking Requirements. The number of required bicycle parking spaces is calculated as a percentage of the total number of motor vehicle parking spaces provided. This said with the total number of parking spaces provided is 671 x 8% = 53.6 or 54 bicycle parking spaces required, 75% Class 1 and 25% Class 2, or 40 Class 1 and 24 Class 2.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.G.5.d For you information a single inverted "U" bicycle rack can support two (2) bicycle racks.

16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.K Keynote 21 calls out a "NEW TRANSFORMER - REF. SHEET 8; VERIFY W/TEP.", a new easement maybe required for this transformer. If required show the easement and recordation information on the plan.

17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.P Provide overall dimension for the proposed building on the plan.

18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q As no wheel stops are proposed for the parking spaces shown along the northeast side of the proposed building the sidewalk is required to be 6'-6" not 6' as called out under Keynote 23. Either provide wheel stops for this area or a 6'-6" wide sidewalk.

19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.V If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal & billboard).

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com


Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0032
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents.


CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Texas Instruments
Grading Plan (1st Review)
T08BU01173

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 10, 2008

DUE DATE: July 28, 2008

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the development plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Development plan has been approved.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents.
07/10/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved DATE: July 09, 2008

TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov

FROM: Glenn Hicks
Parks and Recreation
791-4873 ext. 215
Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov


SUBJECT: D08-0032 Texas Instruments: Development Plan(6-30-08)


No comments.
07/10/2008 CDRC1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved CASE: D08-0032, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS





Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1376 PM Peak: 186











Please call if you have questions or need additional information.



P.S:

Hello, my name is KoSok Chae, new member of PAG.

To review your request promptly, please send your distribution to

Pima Association of Governments (PAG)

ATTN: KoSok Chae



Thanks,



-------------------------------------------

KoSok Chae, Ph.D.



177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405

Tucson, AZ 85701



520-792-1093 x487 [tel]

520-620-6981 [fax]

www.PAGnet.org
07/11/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
07/16/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Development areas 'D' & "E" require the following:

Minimum Usable Open Space Per Residential Dwelling Unit, Excluding Hotel
Rooms: 200 square feet; for all other uses a minimum of 10 percent of the total lot
area. P. V-11

Usable Open Space is defined in the PAD as:
Includes common area open space, yards, courts, deck areas, landscaped areas, balconies,
ramadas, and porches which are usable and accessible for recreational purposes. It does
not include areas set aside for vehicular parking, maneuvering, driveways, loading,
exterior stairwells, or exterior corridor areas less than six feet wide used primarily to gain
access to buildings.

Provide calculations and revised plans as necessary.

2) Revise the landscape plan to include bicycle parking locations. All improvements and site information shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan, tentative plat, or development plan.
DS 2-07.2.2

3) Revise the landscape plan to include the entire site. Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0

4) Show and identify existing plants on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e

5) Identify and describe all screening elements on the landscape plans per
DS 2-07.2.2.A.3.

6) A minimum of five percent of the total parking lot area shall be landscaped. No landscaped area shall be less than 80 square feet in size per page V-15 of the PAD.
Revise as necessary. Provide calculations.

7) Major pedestrian ways, described in Exhibit D, shall be landscaped and be a minimum of four feet in width. Revise the plans to provide the Primary Pedestrian Access as appropriate and the required landscaping.

8) ENERGY CONSERVATION
The Williams Addition Plan is designed to meet the ever-increasing need to conserve natural resources. The Plan provides for a mix of uses which will allow individuals the opportunity to combine business and leisure activities within walking distance of their home. Transit and pedestrian planning reinforce this concept and the general arrangement of use encourages the development of energy efficient projects. The site plan for each development area shall include an energy conservation plan. The energy conservation plan shall address the following:
1. Building orientation.
2. Solar analysis.
3. Prevailing winds.
4. LANDSCAPING
5. Shading effect on adjacent development parcels.
6. Building thermal analysis identifying the thermal characteristics of the building enclosure.
7. Annual energy consumption in BTU/S.F.
8. Passive and active energy conservation measures proposed for the projects.

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS
1) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area.
LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Provide information on how runoff is used to supplement irrigation.

2) Revise the grading plans as necessary to correspond with the Development Plan and Landscape Plan revisions.
07/16/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved SUBJECT: Texas Instrument
D08-0032


Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development
plan submitted July 7, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts
with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed
development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate
location of the existing facilities.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction
Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including
approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the
AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be
secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:

Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Ms. Mary Boice
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8732

Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you
have any questions.


Sincerely,



Tina Zarate
Administrative
Design/Build
tz
Enclosures
cc: City of Tucson, (Email only)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
07/18/2008 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied The development plan has been reviewed and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered:

Sheet 1: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation do not match that shown on Sheet 3. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation.

The grading plan has been reviewed and is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered:

Sheet 3: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation do not match that shown on Sheet 1. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation.

Sheet 6: There is no horizontal control data in the Horizontal Control Data table.

Sheet 13: Please indicate the location of the stabilized construction entrances. It is assumed that one will be necessary for the subject site and one for the adjacent Block 6. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash. It is assumed that permission will be obtained to enter and work upon Block 6.

The following is offered regarding the utility plan:

Sheet 7: The Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation are not listed. Please revise so that all sheets reflect the same Basis of Bearing and Basis of Elevation.

The SWPPP is not acceptable for approval. The following comments are offered:

June 19 letter: The June 19 letter correctly notes that additional information is necessary for inclusion into the report. Please ensure that this information is inserted into the field copy of the SWPPP.

Page 18: Please indicate the rock aprons on Figure 4-1. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash.

Figure 4-1: Please indicate the rock aprons as described in Sec. 4.3.2. It is important that sediment be kept out of Williams Boulevard and Williams Circle. Both public streets contain storm drain facilities which discharge into Arcadia Wash.

The drainage letter is acceptable for approval.
07/24/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D08-0032 Texas Instruments 7/24/08

() Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-77-61; D00-024; D99-0001

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Williams Addition PAD

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: July 28, 2008

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
( X ) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( X ) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
( X ) Pedestrian Circulation Plan

REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 7/24/08

Comments


Please correct Architectural General Notes 1, on sheet 1 of 3, and change to indicate that part of the project is also within Development Area E. And if applicable include language that project will follow the development standards of Development Area “D”. Please reflect the correct Development Area boundaries on sheet 2 of 3.

Please make the necessary changes under Development Area Criteria on sheet 1 of 3, to reflect Development Area “E” performance criteria.

Please provide building elevations that show proposed building is linked architecturally and/or physically with the other two existing buildings. (Development Area “D” and “E” performance criteria number 4).

Please correct Note 7, under Development Area Criteria, sheet 1 of 3, to read, “Minimum Usable Open Space for all other uses is 10% of the total lot area.” (Development Area “D” and “E” performance criteria).

The Williams Addition PAD on exhibit D identifies this area as a primary pedestrian access point. Please provide a pedestrian circulation plan that shows how the internal pedestrian circulation system links up with the external pedestrian circulation system with adjoining parcels/buildings, i.e. continues linkage to the north for existing and future building pads.
07/29/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Passed
07/29/2008 ANDY DINAUER COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved >>> Jim Stoyanoff 07/29/2008 8:04 AM >>>
No comment
07/29/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
07/30/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

JENNIFER STEPHENS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: JENNIFER STEPHENS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0032 TEXAS INSTRUMENTS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 7/29/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

Delete direction from all streets on location map and key plan.
Label buildings A, B, C & D as 1, 2, 3 & 4 in Development Area Criteria on sheet 1 and all other applicable sheets.
Add “portion of block 13 to Williams Centre Book 39 M & P. Page 28” in title block on all sheets.
Add “portion of block 7 to Williams Centre Book 40 M& P, Page 84 in title block on all sheets.
Label section corners on location map.
Delete section, township, range labels from location map.
Delete all “unnamed streets” from location map & key plan.
Delete duplicated street names” on location map & key plan.
Delete address information from title block on all applicable sheets.
Add Book & Page information to “Williams Centre block 6 on sheets 5, 6, 8 and all other applicable sheets.
07/31/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

July 31, 2008

Kevin Morrow
GDA Southwest, LLC
250 South Craycroft Road, Suite 200
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: D0/-0032 Texas Instruments Development Plan

Dear Kevin:

Your submittal of June 30, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, ADA, Wastewater, ESD, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, Addressing, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DUPD, DSD)

2 Copies Building Elevations (DUPD, DSD)

2 Copies City of Tucson Lot Combo Documents (Zoning, DSD)

The CDRC Office has asked both landscape and engineering to edit their comments to include grading comments. Please check the website in the next couple of days for additional comments.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 881-4390