Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0031
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/16/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/18/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 18 JUNE 2008 D08-0031/UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, SECTIONS 405 AND 406 IS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS. PROVIDE A NEW REFERENCE NOTE TO THAT EFFECT FOR THE CURB RAMP TO THE WEST BUILDING ENTRANCE. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS. B. DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. STANDARD DETAIL 207 IS FOR R.O.W. RAMPS ONLY. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS. C. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FINISHED SURFACES TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 3. SHOW AND PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. PEDESTRIAN WAY. a. EXTEND ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON WEST SIDE OF BUILDING TO WILMOT ROAD PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE WALK WAY. D. VERIFY ACCESSIBILITY OF ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AS REQUIRED PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. E. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUT SHOWN PROVIDES ACCESSIBILITY TO BUILDING FOR ONLY TWO ACCESSIBLE SPACES. WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER FOUR ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES? REDESIGN LAYOUT AND PROVIDE ACCESSIBILITY OF ALL SPACES TO THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. CLARIFY HOW ACCESS IS ACHIEVED FROM THE ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. 2. IDENTIFY "VAN ACCESSIBLE" PARKING SPACES AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. LARGE SCALE DETAILS NEED TO SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES AND SIGN LOCATIONS ON SITE PLAN. 3. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. F. DETAIL 10/4: TOP RAMP DETAIL DOES NOT WORK. THERE IS NO LANDING AT THE TOP OF THE RAMP. G. DETAIL 2/4: WHAT STANDARD IS R7-8? ALL SIGNAGE SIZES, DESIGN, VERBIAGE AND FINE NOTICES ARE TO BE BY "PARK WISE". H. DETAIL 1/4: 1. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT BOTH ENDS OF THE MARKED CROSSING AS PER 2006 IBC, ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405, 406 AND PARAGRAPHS 406.12 AND 406.14. 2. MARKED CROSSING TO BE SAME WIDTH AS ACCESSIBLE AISLE. 3. CURB RAMP DOES NOT WORK, NO 4' CLEAR LANDING OT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT TOP OF RAMP, JUST THE END OF A PARTITION. 4. REDESIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING LAYOUT FOR ACCESSIBILITY FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, PRIVATE PROPERTY SIDE WALK RAMPS AND CURB RAMPS AND RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS TO MEET 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS, SECTION 405 AND 406. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF EACH DIFFERENT TYPE SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER SECTION 406.12 AND 406.14. SHOW ALL DETAILS SPECIFIC TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAYOUT, NOT A-TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUTS. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/19/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/24/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: June 24, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0031 Urological Associates Of Southern Az Staff has no comments. |
| 06/25/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0031 UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 6/25/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 06/26/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/30/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 25, 2008 To: Steven W. Hill Leadstar Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: UASA Expansion for USMD Tucson Cancer Center Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-031 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #11 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Provide a letter from the owner of the existing private collection sewers, authorizing this connection and indicating that the existing private sewers have sufficient capacity to handle the additional flow. Connection to the private sewers is okay(provided receipt of letter referenced above) but are the existing private sewers deep enough to sewer a building with a FFE of 9.30 and approximately 65’ of 4” sewer @ 2%? Clarify whether or not the new building is connecting to the existing BCS of the existing building. Show the existing BCS of the existing building less boldly than any proposed BCS lines. Show the rim and invert elevations of the existing private manholes/cleanouts and length ,size and slope of the private sewer pipe to which the connection is proposed. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/01/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: June 26, 2008 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0031 UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH T141506 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 07/07/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | July 3, 2008 To: Leo Katz Leo R. Katz Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Site plan –4th Submittal D07-045 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/09/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0031 Urological Associates of South Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/09/2008 DUE DATE: 07/15/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 06/15/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 Provide a phone number for the primary owner of the site and developer of the project. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0031 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Correct the note regarding the MS&R design criteria (in note #4). Should read per LUC section: 2.8.3. 5. DS 2-05.2.3.C This project in adjacent to the MS&R for Wilmot Rd. It appears that the property is within the intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. For Wilmot Road the taper has half R/W of fifty (50) feet in width for a length of three hundred (300) feet measured from the centerline of Pima Road, then tapers for three hundred (300) feet to meet the future half R/W of thirty-eight (38) feet. Please verify with City Engineering if additional widening will required for this intersection. If no further widening is proposed for this section of Wilmot Rd. provide documentation from TDOT verifying such. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Please add a note to the plans listing the type of document that provides the vehicle cross access agreement with the property to the north. Add the recordation information (docket and page number) of the document. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.F Clearly indicate the location of the future ½ right of way and future curb location along Wilmot Rd. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.G Provide clarification for the 1' NAE along the property line adjacent to Wilmot Rd. Indicated on the plan is a 1'NAE being abdandoned, a 1' NAE by separate instrument and a 1' NAE granted by dk X pg X all indicating the same line. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.K Per DS 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Provide a pedestrian circulation path (sidewalks, crosswalks, handicap ramps) that connects from the building to the sidewalk in the right of way for Wilmot Rd. The sidewalk that is around the 12X35 loading zone on the east side of the building must be a continuous pedestrian circulation path. Cannot stop at the northwest corner of the loading zone and then start again on the west end of the loading zone. Clearly indicate the width of the sidewalk in this area (min. 4'). Clearly indicate the width of the sidewalk and the required 5' pedestrian refuge area along the west side of the building for both the new and existing sidewalk.. See DS 3-05.2.2.B.1. The location of the handicap ramp does not allow for a 4' pedestrian path at the front of the ramp. 10. DS 2-05.2.1.D.3 Provide documentation of a building permit for the covered parking structure along the south side of the project. Clearly indicate the required 1' setback from the PAAL to the edge of the carport per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide on the footprint of the structures the existing and proposed height of the buildings. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.O The number of required loading zones is correct but the required size for both loading zones per LUC 3.4.5.3 is 12 X35. The 10X18 loading zone is allowed only if the Office Use was a stand alone structure less than 5000 sq. ft. Revise plan. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.P Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 vehicle use areas are required to provide wheel stops for all of the parking spaces along the west property line in order to prevent damage to the screen wall. Provide on the standard parking space detail the required 2'-6" clearance from the front of the parking space to the wheel stop or clearly indicate the required 2'-6" clearance from the front of the parking spaces curb to the screen wall. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.Q In the bicycle parking calculations clearly indicate the number of class one and class two bicycle parking spaces provided. Indicate the location of the required class one bicycle parking spaces. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.R Provide location of future sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0031dp.doc |
| 07/09/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | July 9, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0031 PROJECT NAME: Urological Associates of South PROJECT ADDRESS: 6325 E Tanque Verde Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. The proposed access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) Call out the radius on the curb return to verify compliance. 2. The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines 5.4 requires a minimum driveway separation of 80' along any major-street and route such as Wilmot Road, therefore confirm that the proposed driveway is in compliance against the existing driveway on the northern parcel. 3. Jogs of less than 150' in local alignment of roadways and/or driveways are not acceptable (DS 3-01.6.3). The offset of the proposed driveway for this project and the existing driveways for the Northridge Apartments are within 150' of each other. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/11/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 11, 2008 SUBJECT: Urological Associates of Southern Arizona Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 6325 E Tanque Verde, T145S R15E Sec06 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0031 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Report (Leadstar Engineering, 28MAY08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0031) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.A.1: Revise the Development Plan to provide the telephone number for the primary owner of the site. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2: Revise the Development Plan to provide the following note; "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the Development Plan. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but maybe required to verify if any easements affect this property. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Revise the Development Plan and the proposed 1-foot no access easement (NAE) that is shown along the west property line. All easements that are to be abandoned or created must provide the recordation information on the Development Plan prior to approval. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify the location of the proposed, existing and abandoned 1-foot NAE. The Development Plan must correctly label locations for the proposed, existing and abandoned portions of the easement. 7) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to clarify the existing right-of-way for Wilmot Road. Label the right-of-way as existing and or future. Verify that the existing right-of-way meets the MS&R maps. 8) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to label Wilmot and Tanque Verde Roads as MS&R (Tanque Verde Road- Arterial; Wilmot Road- Collector). 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.1: Revise the Development Plan so that it is designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0. Label the required 25-foot radii at the access points along Wilmot Road (MS&R). The curbs should be constructed at the edge of pavement, which must also be depicted on the Development Plan. Curb returns must be constructed entirely within the subject parcel. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C and the Transportation Access Management Guidelines for street development standards. For further information contact the Tucson Department of Transportation, Jose Ortiz, P.E. at 837-6730. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Provide the cross-access and cross parking (if applicable) easement agreement required for the proposed PAAL and vehicular use area for the 2 adjoining properties. Provide the recordation information in plan view for the cross access agreement. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly distinguish between existing and proposed vertical curbing (clarify if vertical curbing is proposed within the vehicular use area or if extruded curbing is acceptable) within the vehicular use area. Label all proposed curbing as to be constructed. Plan view shows Keynote #12 at these locations, however the keynote definition is for the curb to be removed, clarify. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan and cross sections to show wheel stop barriers for the parking spaces located along any adjacent pedestrian circulation paths or landscape area meet the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path and/or landscape areas. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Verify the location of all proposed utilities and provide any applicable easements for sewer, electric, water, gas, etc. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show that all proposed water harvesting areas within the vehicular use area are constructed as to maximize stormwater run off per Ordinance #10210 The Water Harvesting Guidance Manual dated October 25. Provide curb cuts within the vertical curbing to allow stormwater runoff to enter the landscape areas prior to leaving the site to help alleviate off site run off. Provide the location of the curb cuts on the Development Plan with spot elevations showing that the stormwater run off is directed into these areas. 15) Revise General Note #18 on Sheet 1 to state "All landscaping to be depressed maximum 6-inches for stormwater harvesting. Refer to the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual dated October 25 for further recommendations for stormwater harvesting." 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan and or cross section to verify stormwater runoff. Per the Drainage Report and exhibits all stormwater is directed to the northeast corner, however per cross section #7 it shows that the stormwater runoff is directed south to the vertical curbing and then drains east to the refuse container location. Provide clarification on the proposed drainage solution for the vehicular use area. If the stormwater is directed to the curbing and then east along the south portion of the property verify that the water does not encroach into the refuse container and is allowed to flow in existing conditions to the northeast portion of the property. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan and details to label and dimension the required 6-foot wide sidewalk along Wilmot Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. If an existing 4- or 5-foot sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of Wilmot Road provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to include a pedestrian access point to all street frontages. Per DS Sec.2-08.3.1 this path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located along the adjacent Wilmot Road. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to provide for a continuous pedestrian circulation path at the proposed loading location along the east side of the proposed building. Pedestrian circulation in this area must be continuous, revise. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise Keynote # 3 to reflect on-site handicap ramps that are to be constructed per ADA requirements. Per this keynote Public Standard Detail #207 is proposed, however this detail is only for handicap ramps located within the public right of way not for onsite use. Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show that the sidewalk located along the west side of the proposed building meets the maximum slope requirements for ADA compliance. Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk for all areas that are adjacent to a PAAL. Per DS Sec.2-08 all sidewalks adjacent to a PAAL require a minimum 4-foot sidewalk with an extra 1-foot of space between the sidewalk and the PAAL, revise. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Label and dimension the maneuverability for all required loading zones on the subject property. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide a detail for the existing refuse containers. Verify that the detail meets the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. The enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 25) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses slope stability recommendations for the proposed constructed slopes as shown on the Development Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/11/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area per LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Revise the plans to provide water harvesting for any new or reconstructed landscape borders or tree planters. Provide curb and/or wall openings where necessary. 2) Revise the landscape plans to show screen wall locations. Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.3.2.C 3) Revise Sections 5 & 6 on sheet 4 of the Development Plan to locate the proposed screen walls at the back or behind the street landscape border (see above comment). 4) Add the CDRC case number and any other related case numbers to the landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B Resubmittal of all plans is required. The Native Plant Preservation Exception Application is approved. |
| 07/14/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify if there will be one responsible party for the management and maintenance of the solid waste disposal service and storage area/s. If so, provide a general note clarifying such and add one single refuse/recycle enclosure, in addition to existing, to support the needs of this expansion. If not, then add two single enclosures or one double wide enclosure. 2. Provide detail of enclosure area/s fully dimensioned. Ensure to include wall protection (bollards) and gates equipped with the ability to secure in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.0 3. Increase curb returns at entrance/exit to 25 ft radius to allow adequate ingress/egress for development. DS 6-01.3.0. Circulation and maneuverability within development okay. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/16/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: Urological Associates of South D08-0031 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 7, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Customer has agreed to pay for 2nd transformer per conversation 04/24/08. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nance DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Tina Zarate Administrative Design/Build tz Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/17/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/17/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 07/17/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0031, UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES OF SOUTH: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 866 PM Peak: 131 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae, Ph.D. 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 07/18/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | There is a $200.00 application fee for processing the Abandonment of the 1' no-vehicle access easement along Wilmot. The Real Estate Division will need a legal description for the area to be closed off and one for the new opening. Please contact me regarding the process and I will explain the different options available. Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Division City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/21/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 21, 2008 Joe Zeman Leadstar 1010 North Finance Center Drive, Suite200 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: D08-0031 Urological Associates of Southern Arizona Development Plan Dear Joe: Your submittal of June 18, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Wastewater, Zoning, Traffic, Landscape, Engineering, ESD, Real Estate, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 571-1961 |