Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0030
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/21/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/22/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/25/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Holiday Inn Express - Valencia Road and Commerce Court D08-0030 Development Plan (2nd Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 25, 2008 DUE DATE: September 19, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 3, 2009. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Remove the references to C9-83-84, D97-015, D98-011 & D04-016 from the plan. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the rezoning, C9-89-20, conditions on the plan. 4. This comment was not addressed. Per the Pima County Assessor's Office there was a split done in 2006. Provide documentation that this split was approved by the City of Tucson. D.S. 2-05.2.4.A There appears to have been some type of lot line realignment/lot split done on this parcel. This lot line realignment/lot split exceeds the allowed number of lot splits for a subdivided parcel. Provide documentation that shows that the lot line realignment/lot split has been approved by the City of Tucson. 5. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide dimensions for the PAAL's adjacent to Building 3 and the PAAL's located between Buildings 1 & 3. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide dimensions for all proposed parking area access lanes (PAALs) on the plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clarify if cross access is proposed to the Golden Coral Restaurant, it is not clear on the plan. If cross access is not proposed some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from crossing over the property line. If no cross access is proposed provide dimensions for what appears to be backup spurs located adjacent to Building #3, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.D 7. This comment was not addressed. The provided landscape plans do not match the provided development plan. There are numerous area where plants area shown in areas on the landscape plan where sidewalks, bicycle parking etc. are shown on the development plan. 8. This comment was not addressed. The lot combination will need to be completed prior to development plan approval. It appears that the proposed 10,000 S.F. Food Service building is proposed to be built over a property line, which is not allowed. 9. Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 10. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0030dp-2nd.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised tentative plat/development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 08/27/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | August 26, 2008 To: Anthony Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Holiday Inn Express Hotel Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-030 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. We have sent to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of fixture units. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the . This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 09/05/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the landscape plan and development plan to be consistent with each other as far as the location, shape and size of the parking lot planter islands. Also, dimension the typical width of the parking lot planter islands on the landscape plan. |
| 09/19/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 19, 2008 TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager FOR: A. C. Tsang Engineering PROJECT: Commerce Court Holiday Inn Express 2nd submittal SUBJECT: Development Plan Engineering Review LOCATION: 6401 S Midvale Park Rd, Ward 1 FEMA PANEL: 2238K X-unshaded REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0030 SUMMARY: The Holiday Inn Express revised Development Plan was reviewed by Engineering. The package included the revised Development Plan for the Holiday Inn Express, rezoning conditions, the revised drainage report, landscape plans, and response letters. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Per soils report, revise pavement section to match structural design for pavement. 2) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: For clarification on detail section C-C, show 2-ft offset from property line. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H: Address the following drainage comments on the Development Plan: a) DS Sec.2-03.2.4.L.7: Clarify by providing sections and details to address conveyance and erosion protection for flows exiting at concentration point northeast of the proposed building pad that cross the water easement. b) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.F: Explain how sediments are controlled / reduced for proposed exit point for downstream stormdrain system. c) Provide/clarify information on planview showing provision for all water harvest areas. d) Planview sheets for the development plan shall match drainage exhibits. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Provide more general spot elevations on sheet 1 for clarification of grading concept that follows proposed drainage scheme. 5) DS Sec.3-01.5.1.A.1: Other than trees as noted below, plant materials located within existing and future sight visibility triangles shall be limited to ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than thirty inches. Trees may be located within existing and future sight visibility triangles only if clear of leaves and branches to a height of at least six feet above grade upon installation, and at all times thereafter. The trunk caliper of any species selected may not exceed twelve inches in diameter at maturity. Trees with multiple trunks are not allowed. Trees may not be planted in a line that could result in a solid wall effect as viewed from the motorist's perspective. The number and location of trees within existing and future sight visibility triangles may be restricted or modified by the City of Tucson in order to preserve visibility. Revise sheet L1 to assure sight visibility at entrances. Relocate / remove proposed trees from SVT's at these locations to assure visibility. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O, 2-05.2.4.S, 6-01.4.1.I, & 3.2.A: Label height of over hang structures at porte cochere. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Label local benchmark datum on planview. 8) Identify proposed development for the south portion of the project just south of the proposed main building pad. It is unclear how a leased parcel can be overlapping an offsite parcel with one building proposed for the area. Clarify. Submit documentation for offsite improvement. Resubmittal is required. Submit the revised Development Plan addressing all of the comments. Include the revised drainage report, the revised Development Plan, soils report, other documentation, and response letter thoroughly explaining each comment. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 09/24/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | ES approves this DP on the condition that the double enclosure detail includes for (6) six rear wall protectors/bollards or (3) per 10 ft x 10 ft container service area. Dimension accordingly. Please provide corrections as noted above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/26/2008 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#190818 August 15, 2008 A.C.Tsang Engineering . Attn: Antony C.Tsang 4626 E. Ft. Lowell #S Tucson, AZ 85712 Dear Mr. Tsang: SUBJECT: Holiday Inn Express Commerce C- Resubmittal D08-0030 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted September 8, 2008. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocations costs will be billable to the developer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build aa Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) M. Kaiser, TEP |
| 09/29/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 29, 2008 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0030 Holiday Inn Express Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of August 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combination Documentation (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies City approved lot split/line line movement paperwork (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Soils Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 |