Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/16/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/16/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 16 MAY 2008 D08-0028/TUCSON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION/ALBERTSONS AT RIO PLAZA LOT REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY B. DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. STANDARD DETAIL 207 IS FOR R.O.W. RAMPS ONLY. 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406 IS FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDE WALK RAMPS. C. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. 2. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FINISHED SURFACES TO REASONABLY SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SLOPES AS REQUIRED BY ICC 117.1, SECTION 403.3 D. ACCESSIBLE PARKING: 1. PROVIDE ONE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.5; ICC 117.1, SECTION 503. LARGE SCALE DETAILS NEED TO SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. a. SHOW "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN ON SIGN DETAIL 2. SURFACE SLOPES FOR ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREAS TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES REFLECTING COMPLIANCE. 3. ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, PRIVATE PROPERTY SIDE WALK RAMPS AND CURB RAMPS AND RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS TO MEET 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS, SECTION 405 AND 406. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF EACH DIFFERENT TYPE SHOWING SIZE OF SPACE AND ISLE, SIGNAGE, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND GRADE SLOPES. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER SECTION 406.2. SHOW ALL DETAILS SPECIFIC TO SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LAYOUT, NOT A-TYPICAL PLAN LAYOUTS. E. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONFUSION WITH ACCESSIBLE PARKING, MARKED CROSSING, SIDE WALK RAMPS AND ACCESSIBILITY CONTROL AT THIS POINT: 1. MOVE ACCESSIBLE PARKING CLUSTER OVER ONE PARKING SPACE TO THE EAST. 2. SEPARATE RAISED MARKED CROSSING FROM PARKING AISLE AND DUPLICATE MARKED CROSSING DESIGN SHOWN AT THE NORTHERLY END OF THE SITE. WIDEN LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT NORTH END OF MARKED CROSSING BY ONE PARKING SPACE. 3. CREATE ADDITIONAL REGULAR PARKING SPACE ON SOUTH ROW OF PARKING. F. WHAT HAPPENED TO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE CONNECTION TO OTHER BUILDINGS FACILITIES ON THE SITE? END OF REVIEW |
| 05/19/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/21/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: May 21, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0028 ALBERTSONS T141303 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 05/21/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/28/2008 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The landscape plan shall indicate individual catch basins LUC 3.7.4.3.B. Identify water harvesting areas on the landscape plans. 2. Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Obtain approval for relocation of tree within ROW. |
| 05/28/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 05/30/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | >>> <CZarate@tep.com> 05/29/2008 7:12 AM >>> SUBJECT: Albertson's at El Rio Lot 4 D08-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted May 22, 2008. |
| 06/04/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 4, 2008 To: RICHARD LOZANO PSOMAS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: ALBERTSONS EL RIO LOT 4 / TUCSON FEDERAL CREDIT UNION Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-028 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #17 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #14 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: General Notes 15 & 16: Is there a property owner’s association that cares for the private sewer collection lines? If so General Note#15 applies and General Note #16 should be deleted. If there is no property owner’s association then delete General Note #15. Sheet 2: Are you proposing a 4” BCS to serve the TFCU. Please clarify on the plans. Is the sewer line to the vacant lot to the east existing or proposed? Please clarify. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/09/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 06/09/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. |
| 06/12/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0028 ALBERTSONS AT EL RIO LOT 4/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 6/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Revise Title Block to read: A development of Lot 4 of Albertsons at El Rio Plaza Book 53, Page 41. |
| 06/12/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Denied | CASE: D08-0028,ALBERTSONS @ EL RIO LOT4:DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NEED MORE REVIEW AND TRAFFIC MITIGATION Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily 14,869 PM Peak: 3,993 Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 06/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Add one single enclosure or provide one double wide enclosure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle waste streams. 2. Sheet 3, trash enclosure detail, call out a 4 ft. dimension for spacing between front side bollard and rear side bollard. 3. Enclsoure gates should be of metal angle frame with metal deck for durability. Please provide corrections as indicated above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/23/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0028, Tucson Federal Credit Union at Albertson's Shopping Center 1740 W. Speedway Boulevard 1st Review, Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2008 DUE DATE: June 16, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 15, 2009. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS). Development plan content was reviewed under DS 2-05. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.C, please increase type size to 12 point - in location map sheet 1 and for fine and code reference on detail G, sheet 3. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.8, near title block, please reference subdivision number "S98-066" for the Albertsons at El Rio recorded plat. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B. regarding easements: A) per S98-066 plat, a 1' No Vehicle Access Easement appears to be blocking the new entry to the financial service. Please clarify the starting/ending points of this easement and note that if it interferes with the proposed access point, either a redesign of access or abandonment of that NVAE is required. If NVAE abandoned, note recordation on plan. B) Please call out the starting/ending points of the easement keynoted as 1 on sheet 2. C) please double check to ensure no access easements are existing through lot 4 to the adjacent lots north. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B, please note that the lots to the north and east are zoned C-1. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, regarding Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs) A) please dimension width of all PAALs - site entry, entry to parking lot at north B) dimension width of each drive thru lane, meeting DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 C) show each drive thru lane holds 4 vehicle stacking spaces per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.C D) note that stacking spaces are to be shown from the transaction station - back to drive thru entry. E) per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.A, ensure stacking do not interfere with lanes accessing parking. F) on sheet 1, in note 1, add the following: "This project subject to LUC 3.5.4.5.A & C G) in compliance with LUC 3.5.4.5.C, show which lane is the ATM only lane H) note width of "break away" lane along drive thru I) provide directional arrows in drive thru lanes for traffic circulation 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, regarding building setbacks: A) on sheet 1, in general notes, please list "the minimum required building setback from C-1 to adjacent C-1 lots is 0' feet". B) on sheet 1, in general notes, please list "the minimum required building setback from back of future curb of Speedway is the greater of 21' or the height of the building." C) for records and inspections, provide the actual setback distances to the building from each adjacent lot line - including off Speedway, and also from the back of the future curb of Speedway. D) please call out/keynote the future curb location of Speedway - label as existing/future curb if already maxed out E) I further acknowledge there are no setback issues, the above is for records/inspections. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian circulation: A) provide sidewalk/crosswalk connection from proposed sidewalk to existing sidewalk on north part of lot 4, to tie into pedestrian route to Albertson's store. B) please clarify if sidewalk along building front is in flush with asphalt or if curbing is provided and if ramps are needed to get access to the walkway from the access aisle. C) please dimension sidewalk area around class 2 bike parking to ensure sufficient room for pedestrian access around it. D) per DS 2-08.3.1, please provide marked pedestrian route to the dumpster 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, regarding the building: A) clarify building proposed will have height measured from grade to top of flat roof. Allowance for a 4' tall parapet is permitted, not included with actual height measurement. B) clarify if canopy over drive thru? dimension and note vertical clearance from asphalt. C) call out any building overhangs or roofed entry porches and show with dashed lines D) note vertical clearance of any roofed entry porches or overhangs. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) in sheet 1, please note building is 6000 s.f. in parking calculation - i.e. 6000 s.f./175 = B) sheet 1, note 34 parking spaces are required at minimum (includes handicapped) 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) sheet 3, detail C-provide an elevation of class 2 bike racks, meeting updated DS 2-09. B) dimension clearance around class 2 bike racks to ensure adequate pedestrians area. B) on sheet 1, in bike parking calc, correct calc to read 3 bike spaces minimum needed. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, please indicate how postal delivery will be accomplished. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, please call out any freestanding monuments signs and billboards. 15. Please call out free-standing lighting, with vertical clearances and pole/base width. 16. I acknowledge conditions of rezoning case C9-68-18 were met per recorded plat. 17. Please note that depending upon responses, further review comments may be forthcoming. Should you have any questions on this review, I may be reached via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. C:\planning\cdrc\dp\D08-0028 tucson federal credit union near albertsons.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 06/24/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | DATE: June 24, 2008 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D08-0028 Albertsons at El Rio Lot 4(5-08) Denied. Silvercroft Wash is identified as Trail Route #136 by the Eastern Pima County Trail System Master Plan. Please indicate dedication of a 16 ft wide public trail easement adjacent to Silvercroft Wash along the northeast side of Lot 4. The easement is measured from top of west bank of Silvercroft Wash. Also, indicate the existing sidewalk adjacent to Albertsons and Silvercroft Wash will be continued across Lot 4. |
| 06/25/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 25, 2008 D08-0028 Albertsons at El Rio Plaza Lot 4 Development Plan First Review Resubmittal Required: Revised Development Plan The Engineering Division does not recommend approval of this development plan at this time. The following comments must be addressed. 1. Revise the development plan and detail D on Sheet 3 to provide 6-foot sidewalks in the right-of-way where new sidewalks are proposed. Show transitions from existing to proposed sidewalks. The transitions should not exceed 1 lateral foot per 3 longitudinal feet. 2. Dimension the PAAL between the drive-through lanes and the curb near the property line. 3. Provide sufficient grade information and show curb openings as necessary to demonstrate that water harvesting will be maximized. 4. Clarify the status of the No Vehicle Access Easement. The entry into the site cannot cross the NVAE unless it has been abandoned. 5. The westerly entrance into the El Rio Plaza currently provides access to the shopping center. Provide evidence that the other owners in the shopping center consent to the termination of this access into the center. If you have any questions or wish to set up a meeting I can be contacted at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/26/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT S08-028 Albertsons At El Rio Plaza Lot4 (Tucson Credit Union) () Tentative Plat (x) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-68-18 & D00-003 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Santa Cruz Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: June 16, 2008 (DUPD staff received on 6/25/08) SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (X) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (*) Attached comment for reference only, resubmittal not required by DUPD staff. REVIEWER: MSP 791-4505 DATE: 6/25/08 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments S08-028 Albertson’s at El Rio Plaza, Lot 4 Review June 25, 2008 Heads up note for DSD staff: The site is zoned C-1 and is allowed three drive-thru lanes with the one of the lanes restricted to self serv ATM only. Development Plan S08-0028, sheet 2 of 3, key note #11, identifies the drive-through area without defining the restricted condition as required by the C-1 zone. |
| 07/03/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 3, 2008 Pattie Davis Psomas 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D08-0028 Albertsons @ El Rio Lot 4Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of May 16, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Landscape, TEP, Wastewater, Addressing, PAG, ESD, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 dp-resubmittal |