Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D08-0026
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/07/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/08/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 8 MAY 2008 D08-0026/EL CON MALL, PAD 4 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW 1. DENOTE ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 2. PROVIDE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN SHOWING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND CONNECTION TO PUBLIC R.O.W. AND LOCATIONS OF CLOSEST BUS DROP OFF POINTS. 3. SHOW HOW PAD 4 IS CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND CLOSEST BUS DROP OFF. a. SHOW ALL CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS, MARKED CROSSINGS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLUS LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF EACH DIFFERENT TYPE OF RAMP. 4. ON SHEET SP1.4: a. DETAILS 1 AND 3, RAMP TO BE 1:12 SLOPE OR 6' LONG, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND RAMP TO BE MIN 4' WIDE b. DETAIL 3, BOTH ACCESSIBLE SPACES TO BE 9' WIDE? IDENTIFY ONE AS "VAN ACCESSIBLE" c. DETAIL 2, SHOW "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN END OF REVIEW |
| 05/12/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/21/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 20, 2008 To: PATTIE DAVIS PSMOAS Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: EL CON MALL Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-026 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet 3: Create a Legend showing symbols for the various sewer elements both existing and proposed. Sheet 3: Show the pipe sizes for both existing and proposed sewer lines. The proposed BCS should include the slope and length of pipe. Sheet 3: Distinguish on plan private from public sewer lines/manholes and cleanouts. For public manholes show the IMS# and rim and invert elevations. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 05/28/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#197716 May 23, 2008 Pattie Davis PSOMAS 800 E. Wetmore Rd., Suite 110 Tucson, AZ 85719 To Whom It May Concern: : SUBJECT: El Con Pad 4: Core Review D08-0026 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 7, 2008. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Alberta Adrian Office Specialist Design/Build aa Enclosures cc: City of Tucson, (Email only) |
| 05/30/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/30/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the landscape plan to indicate the minimum width and square footage of tree planters in vehicular use areas. Planters are to be measured from the inside edge of tree planters and may not interfere with full use of the parking spaces. DS 2-06.0 Figure 5, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e, LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c 2) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 3) The loading and refuse storage areas are required to be screened from the street per LUC table 3.7.2-I. Revise the landscape and development plans to include the required wall. |
| 06/05/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0026 El Con Pad 4 6/4/08 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: CD-56-01; CD-74-13; CD-88-12 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon-Broadway GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Gateway COMMENTS DUE BY: June 5, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 6/4/08 Comments, Please provide building elevations that show that front elevation for the building is carried around to the sides and rear of the building. Please provide self-certification letter that confirms that the proposed design is consistent with the El Con Mall design criteria as established by the Mall’s management team. Please provide architectural detail of new screen wall (Key Note 18). All walls shall be graffiti resistant materials. |
| 06/05/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0026 El Con Mall, Pad 4 Development Plan, 1st review TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 3, 2008 DUE DATE: June 5, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 6, 2009. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS). Plan content was reviewed under criteria of DS 2-05. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.C, increase type size in location map to 12 point for copying. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.D, please add Dodge Boulevard to the location map. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, Parking Area Access Lanes (PAAL)s -staff reviewed SP1.3 A) please call out drive thru lane B) dimension width of drive thru lane per DS 3-05.2.1.C.2 C) please provide & note a minimum 1' building setback from drive thru lane D) please call out the ordering and pick up windows E) demonstrate 6 vehicle stacking spaces from back of 1st window, DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.C F) call out entry & exit of drive thru - provide arrows at each side for traffic direction G) dimension all PAALs north of PAD 4 - as parking is changing from last approved DP. H) provide dimension for PAAL width between loading zone and dumpster 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, regarding setbacks: A) please call out back of future curb of Broadway for setback B) please dimension building setback from back of future curb of Broadway - the greater of 21' or the Height of exterior building wall. C) note BUILDING WALL HEIGHT facing south property line D) list note stating that "minimum building setback is the greater of 21' or the height of the exterior building wall from the back of the future curb of Broadway". 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding on site pedestrian circulation: A) DS 3-05.2.1.C.2.a, pedestrian route cannot cross drive thru - remove crosswalk/ramps B) per DS 2-08.3.1, provide pedestrian route to dumpster from building C) provide clearances around bike parking to ensure minimum 4' clear pedestrian access D) Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1, where providing a sidewalk on west side of drive thru-5' pedestrian refuge required - inclusive of a 4' wide sidewalk setback 1' PAAL. Dimension. E) show any outdoor seating - with 4' wide pedestrian clearance around seating F) DS 2-08.3.1, provide pedestrian connection to sidewalk along site entry PAAL to east G) per DS 2-08.3.1, pedestrian connection required to all buildings on site - demonstrate that pedestrian connection to this building from other pedestrian routes possible H) further comments on pedestrian access may be forthcoming 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, provide clarification on proposed uses -if available. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, note any outdoor seating area in the parking calculations. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bike parking: A) provide elevation view of class 2 bike racks, ensuring they meet the updated DS 2-09 acceptable types of racks. B) provide class 1 bicycle lockers for PAD 4 C) provide detail drawing of class 1 bike parking on SP 1.4 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, please call out any proposed free-standing signage & lighting locations with heights and dimensions. 12. Per condition VIh of the development agreement for EL Con, odor/exhaust scrubbers shall be provided for any food service uses. It is assumed with the drive thru lane that a restaurant use is proposed, thus needing an odor/exhaust scrubber - please clarify and provide any related information on the odor scrubber that would be implemented. 13. Please provide a copy (emailing a PDF is fine) of the development agreement approved by Mayor & Council in 2000 - specifically sections VIa, VIb, VIk. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided ( ie .loud speakers, loading zones, outdoor dining, etc). I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0026 El Con Pad 4.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 06/06/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Identify users/tenants for this multi-tenant pad. 2. Add an additional double enclosure to accomodate for potential waste generation of both refuse and recycle materials. DS 6-01.3.2.B. 3. Add a general note stating "A single property owner, management, or association will be responsible for the maintenance and management of the solid waste collection services and storage areas." 4. SP1.4 - Dumpster detail - Fully dimension enclosure inside and out accurately. Show a 4 ft space between the front side post barricade (bollard) and the rear side bollard. The rear bollards require a minimum of two per each container service area with the outside bollards spaced 3 ft from the CMU wall and 4ft between the bollards. 5. Provide a post at the face of the CMU wall for mounting the gates. Detail shows four gates but no center post/column for mounting center gates. Clarify. Ensure retain a 10 ft x 10 ft clear container service area between the rear and side bollards/center post and front gates. 6. Position the cane bolt sleeves and annotate so secure the gates in the fully open position not partially open as shown. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/11/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0026 EL CON PAD 4/CORE REVIEW DATE: 6/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Note: Approved with the following condition: 1.) Delete address information from sheet 1 of mylar. An address will be assigned to this project upon approval. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 06/18/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 18, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Commercial Development, 3699 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Plan D08-0026 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 09 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DS) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 3. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. Add a stripped crosswalk to the refuse enclosure. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 5. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 6. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22. 7. Show Development plan number (D08-0026) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 8. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. The dimensions on the detail do not "add" up. Revise as necessary. 9. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 10. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. This review was performed for DP purposes only. 3. Include in the statement that you have reviewed and agree to the data shown in the previous DR by Rich Engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/3699 E. Broadway Blvd._DP |
| 06/19/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 19, 2008 Pattie Davis PSOMAS 800 East Wetmore Road, Suite 110 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D08-0026 El Con Pad 4 Development Plan Dear Pattie: Your submittal of May 7, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (ADA, Wastewater, Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Dimensioned Building Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-1290 dp-resubmittal |