Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0024
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/14/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0024 PARK N SHADE RITA RANCH/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete direction from street names in Location Map. Number all buildings numerically. The address of 8452 S. Rita Road, previously assigned for this project, will need to be changed to Old Vail Road where the access is located. es |
| 04/16/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 16, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0024 PARK N SHADE RITA RANCH T 151527 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 04/18/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT with this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/18/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/21/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D08-024) along with the annexation case number (C9-84-84) to the lower right hand corner of each sheet of the development plan, landscape plan and native plant preservation plan. DS 2-07.2.1 2. Complete general note 10 on the native plant preservation plan to read "...as per LUC 3.8.6.4.D". 3. The preservation and mitigation requirements of the Set Aside Methodology shall be satisfied by the set aside of an area of the site as Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in conformance with the following requirements. The provisions of this Section may be combined, or used in conjunction, with the Plant Inventory Methodology and/or the Plant Appraisal Methodology, per Sec. 3.8.6.5, Combined Methodologies. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) A. Site Assessment--An Environmental Resource Report (ERR) per Development Standard 1-07.0 and in conformance with Development Standard 2-15.3.5 shall be prepared for the entire site to determine the general viability, density, and variety of Protected Native Plants within areas on the site. The Report shall include an assessment of such areas of NUOS and shall prioritize the natural resource value of vegetated areas on the site in conformance with the intent and purpose of this Division. Any area left undisturbed as provided in Sec. 3.8.6.4.A shall be shown in the Report, and no other assessment need be done for such areas. The natural resource value for an area shall be assessed by the consideration of factors such as: (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) a. Health, size, density, and variety of native plant species; and b. The visual resource value of the area(s); and c. The potential to maximize the preservation of contiguous areas of NUOS both on- and off-site. (Ord. No. 9246, §1, 10/11/99) 4. On the native plant preservation plan, in addition to the calculation given for the saguaro provide information and calculations on other protected native plants found on the site. 5. There are exisiting sewer easements and proposed sewer lines, as well as elecric lines shown within the NUOS. The boundary of the NUOS must be revised to remove these areas as disturbance will be necessary at the time of sewer line installation or . Revise plan to show correct NUOS area and revise calculation of percent NUOS as required. Per LUC 3.8.6.4.B a minimum of thirty (30) percent of the site shall be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS area. 6. The set aside area as delineated on the development plan must be designated by legal description on a document to be recorded with the Pima County Recorder to be set aside in perpetuity as NUOS. DS 2-15.3.5 7. Revise or remove any lettering and dimensions in the "site-plan" inset map on landscape plan sheets 1 and 2 which does not meet the minimum text size requirement of 12 point (0.12"). 8. The sight visibility triangles are drawn incorrectly on landscape plan sheet 1. The 20-foot stem side of the triangles shall be drawn adjacent to the edge of the entrance drive rather than in the center of the drive. Refer to DS 3-01.5.1.A.1. 9. Note the height of the vegetative screen for the parking area at 30 inches on landscape plan sheet 1. LUC Table 3.7.2-I 10. Note the height and construction materials of all other screening elements on the landscape plan, including the existing masonry wall along the corner of Old Vail Road and Rita Road. Whether or not required by this Division, screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. Fences or walls constructed in a single continuous line shall extend into a street landscape border no more than the actual width of the fence or wall. Where a fence or wall incorporates offsets or similar design features, a screen may extend a maximum of three (3) feet into the street landscape border. DS 3-07.2.2.A.3; LUC 3.7.3.2.C & B.3 11. The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance or add a statement to general note 17 regarding d.g. in the right-of-way. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 12. Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. Show the amount and disposition of flow and indicate drainage points from buildings and paved areas. DS 2-07.2.2.C 13. Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A 14. C Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 15. The development plan, landscape plan and cross sections show 1:2 rip rap slopes extending well within and in some places completely across the 10-foot street landscape border. Revise plan as necessary. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. On streets designated as Major Streets and Routes (MS&R), the street landscape border is measured from the MS&R right-of-way line as determined by LUC 2.8.3.4. Per LUC 6.2.19 a street landscape border is defined as an area along the street frontage of a site containing landscape materials, screening, and open space, the purpose of which is to enhance the visual appearance of the streetscape. A building can serve as the required screen along a street if only landscaping is proposed between the building and the street property line. DS 2-06.3.7.B.4 |
| 04/22/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#196133 April 22, 2008 Greg Carlson Engineering 1521 E. Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85719 To Whom It May Concern:: SUBJECT: PARK N SHADE RITA RANCH D08-0024 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 14, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garcia at (520) 917-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc: City of Tucson (email letter only) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/23/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 22, 2008 To: GREG CARLSON GREG CARLSON ENGINEERING, L.L.C. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: PARK 'N SHADE RITA RANCH Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-024 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facilty via the SEI Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. Sheet 1: In the Legend show a symbol for PROPOSED PRIVATE SEWER. Sheet 1: In the Legend the existing sewer should be marked as public. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORDINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED). Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 3: Mark the existing public sewer line in Rita Rd as 18” not 8” and call out the construction plan #. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/30/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D08-0024, PARK N SHADE RITA RANCH: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: UNKNOWN Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 05/01/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The two side by side single enclosures (one double wide) at the NE corner of the development has a 50 ft x 12 ft unidentified structure in the direct line of approach to the south enclosure. Require adequate maneuverability to acess the minimum 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach in front of the enclosure. DS 6-01.3.1.A & 6-01.4.1.C. 2. Maneuverability for collection vehicle is too restrictive when exiting from enclsoure area in the NE corner. Require a minimum turning radii of 36 ft inside and 50 ft outside with a 3 ft clear area on either side of the collection vehicle from any structure, parking stall, and vertical curb. DS 6-01.0 figure 1. 3. No enclosure detail provided. Refer to DS 6-01.4.0. Ensure to provide a 10 ft x 10 ft clear container service area between the rear and side wall protectors and the front gates. Gates should be mounted to a separate post positioned at the face of the CMU wall with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. Annotate and show within detail accordingly. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/01/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: D08-0024, Park N Shade, Rita Ranch: DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 5/1/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/30/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Related: land use plan(s) – Esmond Station Area Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED – No comments. No resubmittal required. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/30/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0024_ParkNShade_Rita_Ranch.doc |
| 05/01/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Program City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/01/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Along Old Vail Road at the Rita Road intersection call out the 60' half future right of way dimension for Old Vail Road. |
| 05/05/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0024 Park N Shade Rita Ranch Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 05/05/2008 DUE DATE: 5-1-08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 04/03/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.K List as reference the annexation case number (C9-84-84) in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets including landscape and NPPO sheets. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise note #2. The RV storage is considered Personal Storage. The entire site use is then " Personal Storage "34" subject to: Sec. 3.5.10.3.C and .F". 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0024 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria: Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone: Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ). Remove verbiage from note #3, wrong code section for the ADC-2 which is the only portion of the AEZ which affects this site. Per LUC Sec. 2.8.5.8.B.1.c The maximum FAR (floor area ratio) is 0.30 of the project site area. Revise the FAR calculations. 6. DS 2-05.2.3.B In general notes "Easements" note #1indicates a blanket easement for a pipeline. Resolve the easement issue as buildings cannot be built within an easement with out permission of the utility company or the affected party. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.C If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. Phase lines will not be allowed to be over building lines. Clearly indicate how vehicular and pedestrian circulation will meet code requirements for each phase. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.F The future right of way at the intersection widening for the 300' taper does not appear to be indicated correctly. See engineering comments. Provide the location of the future curb along both Old Vail Rd and Rita Rd. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide setback dimensions from the buildings to the back of future curb for both Rita Rd and Old Vail Rd. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. Per DS 2-08.3.1 Pedestrian Circulation Paths Required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per the above code requirement a pedestrian circulation path (concrete sidewalk) is required to connect the self storage buildings which do not have vehicular access to the office building. Per the above code requirement the pedestrian circulation path is required to connect to each adjacent street. Missing to Rita Rd. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.7.2.C.4 Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs) in Storage Use Group Development. A one-way parking area access lane (PAAL) within a development for storage must be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. A two-way PAAL within a development for storage must be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width, with a minimum four (4) foot wide pedestrian refuge area delineated on one (1) side of the PAAL. Provide the required pedestrian refuge areas per the above code requirement. This will apply to all storage units which have vehicle access not the open covered RV parking spaces. PAAL widths and pedestrian circulation requirements must be meet for each phase of this project. Example: The phase line between the storage units at the east end of the property appears to limit the width of the PAAL and pedestrian circulation path to less than the required 20' one-way width. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 A backup spur per DS 3-05.2.2.D is required at the west end of the parking spaces. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing label the height of each structure as well as dimensions of the footprint for each structure. Provide dimensions of the portions of the storage structures which do not have vehicle access. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.O The loading zones indicated are to be located in close proximity to each of the storage buildings that do not have vehicle access. Per a determination by the zoning administrator a self storage use does not require loading zones if vehicle access is provided for all units. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.P On the detail for the standard parking space on page 4 of 4, provide the minimum width dimension of 8'-6". 15. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. Provide a detail of the class 2 bicycle rack. The bicycle parking spaces must be physically separated from vehicular use areas. See DS 2-09.4.3. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.R Show existing and future sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 19. Additional comments may be forth coming based on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0024dp.doc 5 MAY 2008 D08-0024/PARK AND SHADE RITA RANCH REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 4: A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY, DENOTE RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS; COT DOT STANDARDS FOR CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAYS. B. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2066 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402. 1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. C. SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM OFFICE TO ENCLOSED STORAGE UNITS. II. SHEET 2 of 4: A. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES THROUGH OUT ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHOWING SLOPE COMPLIANCE WITH 1CC 117.1, SECTIONS 403.3 AND 502.5 B. THE CURB RAMP AT NE END OF MARKED CROSSING NEEDS TO HAVE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL DRAWN UP AND REFERENCED. C. ONE OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES MUST BE "VAN ACCESSIBLE". IDENTIFY SUCH. D. AT NOTE 10, REFERENCE DETAIL 4/4. III. SHEET 3 of 4: A. DITTO NOTES IB AND IC ABOVE IV. SHEETS 4 of 4: A. PARKING SPACE DETAIL: 1. DETECTABLE WARNING TO BE 2' DEEP; ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.12. 2. CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE BEHIND DETECTABLE WARNING TO BE MIN 4' WIDE 3. DELETE DETECTABLE WARNING, NOT REQUIRED 4. RELOCATE SIGNS TO A POINT OUTSIDE OF THE BUMPER OVERHANG AREA B. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE CURB RAMP AT NE END OF MARKED CROSSING. C. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF R.O.W. CURBS COMPLYING WITH COT DOT STANDARDS 207. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/05/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding 06-0012 SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0024 Park N Shade Rita Ranch 05/02/08 () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84, Ordinance 6143 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/01/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: April 22, 2008 |
| 05/30/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 30, 2008 SUBJECT: Park N Shade Rita Ranch- Development Plan Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 8452 S Rita Road T15S R15E Sec27 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D08-0024 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Drainage Report (Greg Carlson Engineering, LLC, 01APR08). The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purpose only. The Development Plan is not approved at this time. Please address the following comments: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile area shown, specifically label all major watercourses (Julian Wash). 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D08-0024) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Provide a General Note on Sheet 1 of the Development Plan to reference all special overlay zones. Specifically the note should confirm conformance with LUC Code for the overlay that affects the subject property such as follows; "Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "A floodplain use permit is required for all work proposed within the limits of the mapped 100-year floodplain and erosion hazard setback of the regulatory wash as shown on the Development Plan." Provide a Floodplain Use Permit application with the resubmittal of the Development Plan for review and approval prior to Development Plan approval for the encroachment into the erosion hazard setback. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.1: Provide the following Street and Roads Note on the Development Plan; "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the Basis of Bearing Section and Development Plan to fully describe the monuments that are shown for the basis of bearing line. Specifically describe the monument opposite the intersection one. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify all existing easements (gas line, water, electric/telephone, sewers, drainage ways, etc.) that are shown on the Development Plan. A Title Report is required to verify existing easement locations and recordation information. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to label Old Vail Road and Rita Road as either Public or Private. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Revise the Development Plan to include the following information regarding existing utilities. Provide the location of all existing sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts. Provide the Pima County Wastewater Management Department reference number for all sewers. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Revise the Development Plan to identify all existing utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project site. This is important where pedestrian access and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping may be in conflict. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.F: Revise the Development Plan to provide the improvement plan number for all existing storm drains and catch basins within the public right-of-way. Provide the improvement plan number for the existing RCBC under Rita Road. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.1: Provide a more descriptive detail for the detention/retention basin adjacent to the existing 100-year floodplain. Clearly show the floodplain limits and the setback dimensions for the toe of slope for the proposed basin berm and outlet structure. The construction of the detention/retention basin can not encroach into the 100-year floodplain or natural open space. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C: Provide a revised Drainage Report with a discussion and time line of the proposed drainage design for the entire project through phasing. Indicate which portions will be constructed in phases, in conjunction with other major activities. Each phase must function independent of future phases, provide development calculations for each phase. Clarify the drainage patterns to the proposed basin if the vehicular use areas and PAALs are not constructed along the south portion of the project until phase 2 and 3. A redesign of the project to locate the storage units to the north portion of the property is highly recommended for phased drainage patterns. Phase lines can not be shown through the proposed buildings, revise. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Revise the Development Plan to indicate if the existing streets are public or private. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that are associated with this project. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show how the PAALs are designed for the long term use and collection of stormwater runoff from the proposed vehicular use areas. Long term maintenance must be considered when designing PAALs to collect runoff and direct it as channels to a proposed basin. Clarify proposed design option (grates/catch basins with storm drains into the basin, thickened asphalt, valley gutters, etc.) to prevent breakdown of the PAALs. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to verify the minimum 24-foot wide PAAL that is required at all access gate locations. Provide the dimensions in plan view for verification purposes. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide for the required back-up spur at the northwest end of the parking lot with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a 3 foot separation between curb and any proposed walls or unsurfaced areas. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show bollards or other barriers at the fire hydrant locations on both sides of the vehicular use areas between the proposed canopies to prevent damage to the fire hydrants and vehicles from driving down a dead end. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the Development plan to label the MS&R right of way for Old Vail Road at the intersection with Rita Road to be 120-feet as shown. Clearly label the 60-foot ½ right-of-way with dimensions to curb and required 6-foot sidewalk. Provide the right-of-way dedication information for the future right-of-way at the intersection widening. Street dedication in accordance with the MS&R is required prior to Development Plan approval. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.E: Revise the Development Plan to label the right-of-way for both Old Vail Road and Rita Road as "Existing and Future MS&R right-of-way" (with the exception of the intersection widening that will be label as "Future." 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Revise the Development Plan to label all proposed easements with recordation information, specifically the proposed water easement throughout the property must be recorded and the recordation information must be shown prior to Development Plan approval. 23) Tucson Code Chapter 26-11: Provide a Floodplain Use Permit with the resubmittal of the Development Plan for the encroachment of the vehicular use area and detention/retention basin within the calculated erosion hazard setback. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show the limits of ponding within the vehicular use area along the basin inlet. Provide the ponding limits in plan view on Sheet 2 for verification that the stormwater ponding is less than 1-foot. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to clarify drainage patterns for the proposed swale adjacent to the natural open space. Clearly show with details and cross sections that the swale does not adversely impact the natural open space and cause erosion to the surrounding area. Provide a swale that contains the flow on both side and outlets it onto a riprap splash pad prior to it leaving the site and draining into the natural open space. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: The minimum percent longitudinal slope allowed within the bottom of proposed channels or basins is 1% per DSD policy. Revise the Development Plan to provide the minimum percent slope (1%) in the bottom of the proposed basin that is to be achieved by grading. 27) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to show the proposed 8-inch bleed pipe at the outlet of the proposed basin. The basin must be designed to show positive drainage to the outlet to prevent ponding water. Revise the weir detail to include the location of the bleed pipe and the dimension of the pipe invert from the bottom of the basin. 28) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the weir detail on the Development plan to show the required free board from the water surface elevation and the top of the berm and/or weir. Provide the 1-foot weir depth dimension as called out in the proposed Drainage Report. Provide the proposed fence location with additional details for the fence at the weir location. 29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to provide a detail for the proposed 8-foot high steel fence. Specifically clarify flow through opening locations with supporting calculations within the Drainage Report showing that the proposed fence allows water to inlet into the basin as proposed. 30) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan and keynote 14 to provide the required curb cut dimension per the Drainage Report. 31) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Verify that all details and drainage improvements that are on the proposed Development Plan meet the minimum requirements and design parameters per the Drainage Report. Verify that the proposed drainage improvements, rock riprap erosion protection, drainage swales, basin details, etc meet the requirements within the Drainage Report and the recommendation within the geotechnical report. 32) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide specific details for all proposed rock riprap slope protection. Provide method of placement, size, thickness, depth of embedment; filter fabric specifications, etc. to verify it matches the recommendations within the geotechnical report. 33) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Revise the Development Plan, Drainage Report and cross sections to show a minimum 3-foot wide top of berm along the south side of the proposed basin. For construction purposes (compaction, fencing installation, freeboard to verify that the water outlets at the weir, etc) the 3-foot wide berm must be installed to allow access and room for constructing that portion of the basin side. 34) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Provide dimensions for all transitions that are shown on the proposed Development Plan. All of the transitions from the proposed constructed slopes must be clearly dimensioned to verify site layout. 35) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.4: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required basin access ramp. Verify that the ramp meets the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis. 36) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show pedestrian refuge (4-feet of striped crosswalk) along the entire frontage of all proposed storage buildings. This does not apply to the RV/Boat canopies only to the storage buildings. 37) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to provide a pedestrian circulation path from the proposed office to the storage buildings that do not have direct access to a PAAL. The proposed sidewalk must be constructed per the requirements within DS Sec.2-08 and must be physically separated from the PAAL with curbing or 6" raised concrete sidewalk. 38) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to include a pedestrian access point to all street frontages. Per DS Sec.2-08.3.1 this path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located along the adjacent streets. 39) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the development plan and details to show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way. Revise dimensions on development plan to show the existing or proposed 6-foot wide sidewalk along Old Vail Road and Rita Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. All sidewalks must comply with ADA accessibility requirements. If an existing 4- or 5-foot sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of Old Vail Road and Rita Road provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing sidewalk, if less than the minimum 6-foot required, to remain. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 40) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Label and dimension the maneuverability for all required loading zones on the subject property. Clarify all loading zone locations on the Development Plan (label and dimension). 41) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the sight visibility triangles that are shown in plan view for the access driveway, specifically the near side. The dimensions must meet the requirements within DS Sec.3-01.5.1 (PAAL to Arterial). 42) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the required SVTs for the intersection of Rita Road and Old Vail Road. Provide the near side and far side triangles that apply to this site. 43) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide a detail for the proposed refuse containers. Verify that the detail meets the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01. The enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Provide the minimum 14-ft x 40-ft clear approach to all enclosure areas. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 44) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Label and dimension the minimum maneuverability for the proposed refuse container. Label and dimension the minimum 36-foot inside and 50-foot outside radii to show vehicle maneuverability to verify that structures and parking spaces are not an obstruction. 45) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.W: Provide a General Note on the Development Plan stating that "All fencing and walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Development Services Departments." 46) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: Provide a geotechnical report that addresses all the items under the Geotechnical Report Comment section. Verify that all recommendations have been addressed on the proposed Development Plan. Refer to the Geotechnical Report Comment Section for further clarity. 47) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.H: Any Development Standard Modification Requires (DSMRs) related to the Development Plan should be submitted to the CDRC Department. 48) Revise the Development Plan and all associated cross sections to label and dimension the location of the required temporary fencing to prevent disturbance of the 100-year floodplain and natural open space area. Provide a General Grading Note that states per DS Sec.9-04.3.1.A.2; "The portion of the site to be left ungraded are to remain undisturbed and are not to be used for stockpiling of materials or excess fill, construction vehicle access, storage of vehicles during construction, or similar uses. Temporary fencing will be installed on sites where the grading limits and the 100-year floodplain abut the construction areas in order to prevent encroachment into these natural areas." 49) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the Development Plan for grading plan purposes. 50) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Development Plan and all associated details and cross sections to provide the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries and natural open space to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, detention/retention basins, and associated erosion protection. Provide additional cross-sections on the Development Plan for all property boundaries that shows the limits of grading and the required 2-feet setback from property lines and natural open space. Revise the cross sections to show conformance with the required 2-foot setback from property boundaries 51) DS Sec.10-02.14.3.2: Provide a note on the Development Plan stating that, (a) the owner or owners shall be solely responsible for operation, maintenance, and liability for drainage structures and detention/retention basin; (b) that the owner or owners shall have an Arizona Registered Professional Civil Engineer prepare a certified inspection report for the drainage and detention/retention facility at lease once each year, and that these regular inspection reports will be on file with the owner for review by City staff, upon written request; (c) that City staff may periodically inspect the drainage and retention/detention facility to verify that scheduled and unscheduled maintenance activities are being performed adequately; and (d) that the owner or owners agree to reimburse the City for any and all costs associated with the maintaining of the drainage and detention/retention facility, should the City find the owner or owners deficient in their obligation to adequately operate and maintain their facilities." 52) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 53) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C: Provide a revised Drainage Report with a discussion and time line of the proposed drainage design for the entire project through phasing. Indicate which portions will be constructed in phases, in conjunction with other major activities. Each phase must function independent of future phases, provide development calculations for each phase. Clarify the drainage patterns to the proposed basin if the vehicular use areas and PAALs are not constructed along the south portion of the project until phase 2 and 3. A redesign of the project to locate the storage units to the north portion of the property is highly recommended for phased drainage patterns. Phase lines can not be shown through the proposed buildings, revise. 54) Revise the Drainage Report and Development Plan to clearly show how the PAALs are designed for the long term use and collection of stormwater runoff from the proposed vehicular use areas. Long term maintenance must be considered when designing PAALs to collect runoff and direct it as channels to a proposed basin. Clarify proposed design option (grates/catch basins with storm drains into the basin, thickened asphalt, valley gutters, etc.) to prevent breakdown of the PAALs. 55) The minimum percent longitudinal slope allowed within the bottom of proposed channels or basins is 1% per DSD policy. Revise the Drainage Report and Development Plan to provide the minimum percent slope (1%) in the bottom of the proposed basin that is to be achieved by grading. 56) Revise the Drainage Report and Exhibits to show the proposed 8-inch bleed pipe at the outlet of the proposed basin. The basin must be designed to show positive drainage to the outlet to prevent ponding water. Revise the weir detail to include the location of the bleed pipe and the dimension of the pipe invert from the bottom of the basin. 57) Provide a weir detail in the Drainage Report to show the required free board from the water surface elevation and the top of the berm and/or weir. Verify that all details, dimensions and requirements within the Drainage Report are on the proposed Development Plan. 58) Provide calculations within the Drainage Report showing that the proposed 8-foot steel fence allows water to inlet into the basin as proposed. Provide openings or verify with a detail the design of the fence. 59) Revise the Development Plan, Drainage Report and cross sections to show a minimum 3-foot wide top of berm along the south side of the proposed basin. For construction purposes (compaction, fencing installation, freeboard to verify that the water outlets at the weir, etc) the 3-foot wide berm must be installed to allow access and room for constructing that portion of the basin side. 60) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.5: Verify that all drainage infrastructure and details that are on the proposed Development Plan meet the minimum requirements and design parameters per the revised Drainage Report. Verify that the proposed drainage improvements; stilling basin, basin sections, erosion protection, PAAL drainage etc. meet the requirements and design details within the Drainage Report and the recommendation within the geotechnical report. 61) DS Sec.10-01.2.2: Provide a geotechnical report with infiltration rates for the required detention/retention basin, slope stability recommendations, and pavement design recommendations. Clarify if the Drainage Report and Development Plan match the geotechnical report. Infiltration rates must have a drain down time per 10-01.3.5.1.3. 62) Provide a revised Drainage Report showing scupper calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under any proposed sidewalk at all scupper locations. Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the proposed scuppers that meet minimum requirements. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 63) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the detention/retention basin, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and building or structure setbacks from the required detention/retention basin. b) Provide percolation rates for the detention/retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. d) Provide slope stability recommendations for all proposed constructed slopes. GRADING PLAN: 64) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit will be required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 65) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 66) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan, Drainage Report, a geotechnical report and a Floodplain Use Permit that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan, Drainage Report and geotechnical report reviews. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/02/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 2, 2008 Greg Carlson Greg Carlson Engineering 1521 East Broadway Blvd Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D08-0024 Park N Shade Development Plan Dear Greg: Your submittal of April 4, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Landscape, Wastewater, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies ERR (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-4197 |
| 06/02/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | March 9, 2010 Greg Carlson Greg Carlson Engineering 1521 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85719 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILE Development Plan Per Section 5.3.8.2.A, Expiration Dates, of the Land Use Code, "an applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A development plan application that has been in review for a period of one (1) year which has not been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a development plan for the property, a new development plan which complies with regulations in effect at that time must be submitted. The new submittal initiates a new one (1) year review period." Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date D08-0024 Park N Shade April 2, 2008 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat application is required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. CDRC members should be advised of their ability to review the new applications per the current regulations. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file D08-0024 |