Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0023
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/04/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 04/04/2008 10:48 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMRNT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 04/04/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0023 D & K TRUCKING PHASE 2/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 4/03/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 04/10/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/14/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: April 10,2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0023 D & K TRUCKING (PHASE 2) * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 04/14/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0023 D and K Trucking Phase 2 04/10/08 ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: D99-0047 & C15-95-16 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon/Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 4/28/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral DATE: 4/07/08 |
| 04/14/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | April 10, 2008 To: GREG CARLSON GREG CARLSON ENGINEERING, L.L.C. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: D & K TRUCKING (PHASE 2) Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-023 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/16/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/18/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Add the following note to the NPP Plan. Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas of Protected Native Plants and for individual Protected Native Plants to be preserved-in-place. DS 2-15.6.A 2) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary. 3) Submit revised landscape plans for review. DS 2-05-2-0 The basin modification (DP2) and related activity appears to result in reduction in or relocation of landscaping. In addition aerial photos of the site indicate that a signficant portion of the landscaping approved on the previous plan is no longer on site. If the plants removed from the site were documented protected native plants an additional NPP revision willl be required. 4) Add any previous related case numbers to the Development Plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B |
| 04/22/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/23/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 196056 April 22, 2008 Greg Carlson Engineering Attn: Greg Carlson 1521 E. Broadway Blvd. Tucson, AZ 85653 Dear Mr. Carlson: SUBJECT: D & K Trucking - Phase 2 D08-0023 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted March 19, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development (both on site and off site) including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/28/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: D08-0023, D&K Trucking, Ph. 2, DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 4/28/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/25/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Related: annexation - pre-annexation agreement Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED – No comments. No resubmittal required. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/25/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0023_DK_Trucking_Ph_2.doc |
| 04/29/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0023 D & K Trucking (Phase 2) Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 04/29/2008 DUE DATE: 04/28/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 03/30/08. 2. Provide a copy of the last stamped and approved development plan with next submittal. D99-0047. Per research done on the aerial photos and the submitted approved landscape plan, it appears the area between the main building and training area has been converted into vehicular use area (parking spaces and PAALs). This area was to remain as a landscape area. Along the east side of the existing truck driving school paved area, it appears that approximately 45' of undisturbed area has also been converted into vehicular use area. Provide vehicular use area expansion calculations for the entire site including the area for the "phase 2" vehicular use area. Per note #5 the additional vehicle area expansion will be greater than 25% therefore full code compliance for the entire site will be required. FYI: The phase plan submitted expired two years after approval of the development plan. Remove notes regarding Phase 2. Provide documentation showing that the canopy located west of the modular building for the truck driving school has been permitted. Provide documentation from El Paso Natural Gas clearly indicating approval of the modular building and the canopy being located within the gas line easement. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. The scale will be labeled. Valencia Rd. does not appear to be in the correct location. Should be approximately centered between Drexel and Littletown Rd at Wilmot Rd.. 2. The shaded area indicating the project is incorrect. Revise. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0023 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a note on the plans that indicate this project is designed to meet the criteria of : Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Per the letter from Wayne Bogdan dated 2-26-08 the only areas that can use the asphalt millings are the storage areas for the trailers. All off street parking and loading areas as well as PAALs (which are the access areas to the storage areas) including existing storage areas must meet the LUC Sec.3.3.7.3 for surfacing materials. This will also apply to the area being used for parking spaces indicated in comment #2 (b). Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. This comment will apply to the entire site. Additional comments may be forth coming based on changes to the plan. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.F Provide location of existing and future curb along Wilmot Rd. See engineering comments. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.G If applicable, all proposed easements are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.I Indicate all applicable building setbacks. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.K Show on site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in DS 2-08. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.M Provide, as a note, the square footage of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, show the locations and footprints of all structures. Label the heights and dimensions. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.O Show all loading zones, fully dimensioned, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required and the number provided. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.P Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to the Uniform Building Code. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Development Standard 3-05.0. 15. DS 2-05.2.4.T Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. See engineering comments. 16. Per The ADC-2 Airport Environs Zone overlay the maximum allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is 0.30 not 6.00 as indicated in note #7. Revise note and allowed FAR. See LUC 2.8.5.8.B.1.c. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.V Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0023dp.doc 29 APRIL 2008 D08-023/K AND D TRUCKING, PHASE 2 REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW THE SCOPE OF WORK FOR PHASE 2 APPEARS TO BE 25% OR MORE OF THE ENTIRE SITE WHICH WILL REQUIRE A CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. AS THERE ARE NO PHASE I PLANS SUBMITTED, A FULL REVIEW CAN NOT BE COMPLETED. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF PHASE I APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/29/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 04/30/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/30/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: PAG COMMENTS, Case: D08-0023, D&K TRUCKING (PHASE2): DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: UNKNOWN Please call if you have questions or need additional information. ------------------------------------------- KoSok Chae 177 N. Church Ave., Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 520-792-1093 x487 [tel] 520-620-6981 [fax] www.PAGnet.org |
| 05/01/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for Solid Waste disposal requirements. Identify means for on site refuse and recycle collection and storage. Refer to DS 6-01.3 & 6-01.4 Please include on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/21/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: Development Plan Engineering Review submittal PROJECT: D&K Trucking Phase 2 LOCATION: 6251 S Wilmot Rd, Ward 4 FEMA PANEL: 2265K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0023 SUMMARY: The Development Plan was submitted and reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2: The project is within the Julian Wash Watershed, a balanced basin management area. Address the following drainage comments: a) From field visit, erosion is evident along edges of top of basin and appears lower than weir. Add more spot existing elevations at existing South Basin outlet weir to clarify intent of this structure, or show proposed spot elevations for top of basin in areas that need build-up / reconstruction. Discuss in report. b) State in the report that the project shall meet balanced basin requirements. c) Label north basin on Figure 3 exhibit. d) Add case number D08-0023 and administrative address to cover page of report. e) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A, 10-02.3.5.1: Percolation tests are required for any basin which utilizes infiltration as a means of basin drainage. Include percolation test results in revised drainage report, or provide geotechnical report and include discussion of drain down time in drainage report. f) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.6.A.4.a: It is imperative that a bleed pipe be provided if post construction percolation tests do not provide adequate drain down time. If infiltration rates are poor, it may be necessary to revise basin design to provide outlet and clarify the outlet structure on Development Plan. g) For the Onsite Drainage Plan, revise the proposed basin contours to stay out of the gas easement or it may be necessary to provide acceptance from El Paso Gas. h) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.2, 2-05.2.4.H.1: Delineate the 100-year flood limits, for all flows of 100 cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations. Label water surface contour intervals. The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed 200 feet. i) Provide pre-developed and post developed WSEL's and velocities for the floodplain. j) DS Sec.10-02.3.5.1: No "on-line" detention facilities are permitted if any portion of a wash is in a natural state upstream of the proposed basin, or if the upstream watershed is greater than 100 acres. In order to determine whether the proposed additional on-line basin detention volume can be permitted, existing and proposed detention volumes, the floodplain limits, velocities, WSEL's need to be reviewed. Provide discussion in report. If the basin falls within the main flow area of the floodplain, it may be necessary to provide additional detention in "north basin" k) DS Sec.2-05: Provide minimum finished floor elevation for existing building based on determined WSEL. l) DS Sec.10-02.12.5: Obstructions are not allowed in the floodplain. Where floodplain impacts the existing chain link fences, openings may be required depending on 100-year flow depth. Discuss flow depths along existing fences. Show any areas and provide details if/where the chain link fence will need to be modified to allow for openings. m) DS Sec.10-02.12.2.1.4, 10-02.12.3.2: Flow depths shall not exceed 1-foot during the 100-year event. Provide cross sections for the site to show all weather access is provided during 100-year event. n) Special Note 2 on sheet 1 indicates 3" millings are proposed. In floodplain areas the material must meet stormwater pollution prevention requirements; discuss in drainage report how this will not be detrimental to floodplain (will be combined with hot asphalt). DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.S, 6-01.4.1.I, & 3.2.A: Show / explain where solid waste pick-up facility and solid waste vehicle circulation is provided. 3) Label existing CMU block wall along east side of project. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Add general note stating that the project is designed to meet the special overlay zone criteria: LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C, 2-05.2.4.D.1: The following information regarding existing public right-of-way for Wilmot Road shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. Label existing and any new header curb radius dimension of 25-ft or 40-ft (industrial) for entrances to accommodate future vehicle and truck use will be provided at Wilmot Road. 6) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit application and floodplain use permit application submittal will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Resubmittal is required. The next submittal should address all the above items. Submit a revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Report, response letter, and other documentation. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services Department |
| 05/22/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 22, 2008 Greg Carlson Greg Carlson Engineering 1521 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D08-0023 D&K Trucking Phase 2 Development Plan Dear Greg: Your submittal of March 31, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, TEP, Zoning, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Last approved Development Plan (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-4197 dp-resubmittal |