Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D08-0022
Parcel: 141180080

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D08-0022
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/21/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/24/2008 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied General Notes #9 and #10 reference the wrong code. The Fire Department has adopted the 2006 International Fire code, with C.O.T. amendments. Refer to chapter 5 of the IFC.
Also, please clearly locate all proposed future fire hydrants and proposed fire service for sprinkler system.
03/28/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)
FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor's Office
Mapping Department

DATE: March 28, 2008


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan
D08-0022 HOME DEPOT HOUGHTON T151435

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.


COMMENTS:

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390


ROSANNA WERNER
03/28/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0022 HOME DEPOT HOUGHTON/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: March 28, 2008



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.

NOTE:

1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.
04/02/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Approved ADOT has NO COMMENT on this Project.

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
04/02/2008 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved April 1, 2008


To: Thomas Sayler-Brown
SBBL Architecture and Planning

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: Home Depot
Dev. Plan – 1st Submittal
D08-022


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.


If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me.
04/04/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
04/07/2008 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Denied To Whom it May Concern:



The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the
project D08-0022.



Summary:

CASE: D08-0022

COMMENT: Further traffic impact and traffic mitigation study is
required.





Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 7267 PM Peak: 686



Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions,



Sincerely,

Sandy





Sandra C. Holland

Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst



Pima Association of Governments

177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405

Tucson AZ 85701



Tel: 520 792 1093 X462

Fax: 520 620 6981
04/07/2008 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Denied Pima Association Of Governments 4/7/08
2
Description/ITE Code Units Expected Expected PM Peak
Units Daily Trips Trips - Total
Truck Terminal 030 Acres
General Light Industrial 110 TSF Gross
Warehouse 150 TSF Gross
Mini Warehouse 151 TSF Gross
Single Family Homes 210 DU
Apartments 220 DU
Condo, Townhouse 230 DU
Mobile Home Park 240 DU
Assisted Living 254 Beds
Hotel 310 Rooms
Motel 320 Rooms
Health/Fitness Club 493 TSF Gross
Church 560 TSF Gross
Daycare Center 565 TSF Gross
General Office 710 (Rate) Employees
General Office 710 (Rate) TSF Gross
Medical Dental Office 720 TSF Gross
Building Materials/Lumber 812 TSF Gross
Hardware/Paint Store 816 TSF Gross 141.7 7,267 686
Nursery (Garden Center) 817 TSF Gross
Shopping Center 820 (Equation) TSF Gross
Shopping Center 820 (Rate) TSF Gross
Quality Restaurant 931 TSF Gross
High Turnover/Sit Down Rest. 932 TSF Gross
Fast Food w/o Drive Thru 933 TSF Gross
Fast Food with Drive Thru 934 TSF Gross
Drive Thru Only 935 TSF Gross Not Available
Service Station 944 Fuel Position
Serv.Station w/ Conven.Mkt 945 Fuel Position
Tire Store 848 Service Bays Not Available
Supermarket 850 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 24 hrs) 851 TSF Gross
Convenien. Mkt (Open 16 Hrs) 852 TSF Gross Not Available
Convenien. Mkt w/ Gas Pumps 853 TSF Gross
Manufacturing 140 TSF Gross
Pharmacy/Drugstore w/ Drive-thru 881 TSF Gross
Furniture Store 890 TSF Gross
Walk-In Bank 911 TSF Gross
Drive-In Bank 912 Drive-In Lanes
Car Wash 947 Wash Stalls Not Available
Industrial Park TSF Gross
TOTAL . 7,267 686
Expected PM Peak
Daily Trips Trips - Total
Vehicle Trip Generation Using Rates From The 7th Edition ITE Trip Generation Report
D08-0022 Home Depot Houghton
For Questions Contact:
Aichong Sun
Pima Association of Governments
177 N. Church Ave, #405, Tucson, AZ 85701
Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981
04/10/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
04/16/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR# 196028 April 16, 2008



SBBL Architecture & Planning
Attn: Thomas Sayler-Brown
1001 N. Alvernon Ste #105
Tucson, AZ 85711

Dear Mr. Sayler-Brown:

SUBJECT: HOME DEPOT
D08-0022

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted April 9, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment Specifically there is an existing overhead utility pole line on the south side of the project not identified. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions.

Sincerely,



Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist

hn
Enclosure
cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail)
S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power
04/18/2008 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Denied Per Special Exception (SE) Conditions No. # 2 and #3, please provide the Real Estate Division the following items;

1. Legal description for the 25 feet of additional right of way dedication along Houghton. SE No. #2
(MS&R is 200 foot of right of way, 100 foot half, only 75 foot half exist.)
2. Legal desc. for the 30 foot radius spandrel at the Southwest corner of Houghton/Old Vail Road. SE No.#3
3. Title report dated within 30 days for both parcels 141-18-0080 & 141-18-006C.

Please send the requested items to my attention at the following address.

Sincerely,

Jim Stoyanoff
Property Agent
Real Estate Program
City of Tucson
201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl.
Tucson, Arizona 85701
(O) 520.837.6719
(F) 520.791.5641
Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov
04/18/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Sheet DP2 references case D06-0012 as existing. Perhaps it is, but not at this address.

2) Sheet DP2 also references case D06-0013 as existing. It would be more accurate to delay labeling it as existing until it is constructed. References on other sheets to existing pavement or existing plant material are incorrect.

3) Provide dimensions for the tree planters located along the front of the Home Depot building. Minimum size requirements of LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c apply.

4) Revise the phase lines shown on the landscape plan to correspond with the Development Plan. Identify phase and information regarding timing of construction. Revise the irrigation plans if necessary.

5) Revise the landscape plan to use a substitution for Quercus rubra from the ADWR Plant List. LUC 3.7.2.2.A

6) Revise the plans to show the eight foot wide sidewalk required by the Special Exception. The sidewalk should be exclusive of outdoor sidewalk sales areas, vehicular traffic areas, and landscape planters.

7) Revise the Development Plan to show the location of curbing to comply with DS 3-05.2.3.C

8) Keynote 3 of the Development Plan indicates a tree planter where the Landscape Plan does not. Revise the plans to provide details and irrigation for the planter and specify the species of tree proposed.

9) The SE condition requires plaza or courtyard with a pedestrian seating area. Given the scale of the project, an enhanced seating area should be provided.

10) Note the scale of the Development Plan sheets.

11) Reference the Special Exception Case Number on the plans.

12) Extend the sidewalk along the front of the HD building to the east per SE condition 8. Revise the landscape plan as necessary.

13) Provide a Native Plant Preservation Plan or an explanation on the landscape plan regarding the status of related preservation plan activity and the status of mitigation plantings. LUC 3.8

14) Show any pertinent property lines or easements that impact the site.


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED.
04/21/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Approv-Cond 1. DP3 Keynote #7 Trash compactor. Add aditional annotation stating " will comply with DS 6-01.4.3. regarding minimum compactor requirements."

2. Recommend including provisions for recycling. Add an additional compactor for recycling or a double wide enclosure to accomodate two dumpsters. Or clarify if store will have a cardboard baler.

Please provide corrections on resubmittal.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
04/23/2008 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
04/24/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approv-Cond PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee

CASE NAME & NUMBER: D08-0022, Home Depot Houghton
Submittal #: 1

COMMENTS DUE: 4/18/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/23/08


Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan

Related: Special Exception - SE-06-23
CDRC – D06-0013 (Houghton Town Center)
land use plan(s) – Esmond Station Area Plan

Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments:


() CONDITIONALLY APPROVED – Subject to placing the following General Note on the Development Plan:

“A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until either 1) the 10-foot –wide paved path along Houghton Road, and associated landscaping and irrigation, have been constructed; and the City has inspected and accepted these improvements; or b) in lieu fees have been paid to the City for construction of the Houghton Road paved path, and associated improvements.”



REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/23/08
















S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0022_Home_Depot_Houghton.doc
04/24/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approved DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding
06-0012
SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D08-0022 Home Depot Houghton

() Tentative Plat
(XXXX) Development Plan
(XXXX) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other

CROSS REFERENCE: Annexation C9-84-84, Ordinance 6143, D6-0012 & D06-0013

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Scenic Route - Houghton

COMMENTS DUE BY: 04/18/08

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
(XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
() See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
() Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Other

REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: April 22, 2008
05/01/2008 HEATHER THRALL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner

PROJECT: D08-0020 Home Depot (at the Houghton Town Center)
New Home Improvement Large Retail Establishment
Development Plan, 1st Review

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 21, 2008

DUE DATE: April 18, 2008

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 20, 2009.

2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC) and Development Standards (DS). Specifically, this project was reviewed for development plan content defined under DS 2-05. This site is subject to Special Exception case SE -06-23, allowing a Large Retail Establishment to be developed on the site, subject to several conditions. This plan was reviewed for compliance with the conditions of approval of the Special Exception case as well.

3. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 - in general notes, list proposed use as Large Retail Establishment

4. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 - in Special Exception notes, add case number SE-06-23 to the heading & provide the case number in the lower right hand corner near the title block.

5. Development Services allotted case number D08-0022 to this plan, list near title block.

6. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, please ensure all easements are on the plan, note recordation info.

7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.A, please keynote south property line on sheet 3, difficult to distinct.

8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B, on sheet 3, please note adjacent zoning on all sides of this project (I-1), and note distance of nearest adjacent residential zone (RX-1) on sheet 2.

9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, regarding PAALs:
A) dimension vehicle entry points coming in off PAALs from Houghton Town Center
B) dimension PAAL south of building at smallest distance to property line
C) dimension PAAL under canopy in front of building
D) dimension PAAL at first row running east and west - off main entry PAAL
E) per DS 3-05.2.2.B.3, provide 2' separation between south PAAL and property line.
F) per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2, provide 1' setback between PAALs and canopy at building front.
G) is area under/near canopy in front a loading zone or a PAAL? Provide appropriate striping or directional arrows
H) dimension pavement width under canopy in front of building

10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.I, dimension building setback at closest point to south property line.

11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian circulation (accessibility separate review)
A) dimension sidewalk north of building, to be 8' wide unobstructed, LUC 3.5.9.7.A.5.
B) per LUC 3.5.9.7.A.5 - sidewalks shall be provided along the full length of any building where it adjoins a parking lot, shall be at least eight (8) feet wide and unobstructed. Provide sidewalks along the north, east and west side of the building meeting the above. Ensure walkway on north side is not impeded by sales area or pillars.
C) Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1, provide 5' wide pedestrian refuge-including a 4' wide sidewalk- along south side of building. (Note if employee only area, then striped paving allowed)
D) Per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1., pedestrian refuge striped 5' wide required along building from trash compactor to southeast corner of building.
E) crosswalk from handicapped parking at NE side of site ends before building - provide.
F) sidewalks on all sides of buildings - along entire length of building -must be physically separated from adjacent PAAL, per DS 2-08.4.1. Provide curbing, bollards every 8 feet, or physically raise walk from asphalt.

12. Per DS 2-05.2.4. regarding buildings -
A) dimension canopy in front of building
B) call out vertical clearance of canopy from pavement
C) site and elevation plans hard to determine if garden is roofed?
D) declare height will be measured from grade to top of flat roof and parapet height noted
E) declare height of garden center area
F) for issuing building permits, inspections and records, declare ACTUAL PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT(S) from grade to top of flat roof , it is understood that building cannot exceed 62' per AEZ requirements, your building will be less in height.

13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O, regarding loading zones -
A) Per 3.4.3.3 and 3.4.5.3, provide loading zones based upon the square footage of all use ares - GFA and outside display/sales and garden center. Per LUC 3.4.5.3, with 145,828 sf. of activity area, please provide 5 loading zones at 12x35 - the load and go spaces that you're providing do not count toward the required loading zones.
B) provide signage/striping for the "load and go" spaces you're proposing - dimension spaces
C) please ensure in the loading calculations that you're showing the garden and outdoor sales/display areas are factored in the calculations.

14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking -
A) Per DS 3-05.2.1.3, give measurements of parking spaces along side cart corrals. Must be 10' wide when abutting vertical object over 6".
B) provide wheel stop barriers in parking spaces abutting sidewalks
C) provide ratio of required minimum and proposed number of parking spaces per the traffic study - i.e. 2.7 parking spaces per 1000 s.f. of building is required - approximately 4.0 parking spaces per 1000 s.f. of building is proposed. Please ensure garden center is included in the calculation.

15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bike parking -
A) please clarify the parking ratio proposed for the total number of bike parking spaces, and each type of bicycle parking spaces
B) please see DS 2-09 Fig 2 or 3 and revise style of class 2 bike parking to meet the figures provided.
C) per DS 2-08.3.1, provide pedestrian route to class 1 bike parking spaces
D) per DS 2-09.4.1, all bike parking must be provided within 50' of entrance - move all spaces to be within 50' of entrance.

16. Per DS 2-05.2.4. V. indicate location of postal service/type

17. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, indicate location of free standing signage or lighting with base pole width and vertical clearance.

18. Per LUC 3.3.6.3.A.3. The maximum period of diversion is fifteen (15) days. Additional fifteen (15) day extensions up to a maximum of sixty (60) days per year may be granted for reasonable cause upon written request from the applicant. (Ord. No. 9392, §1, 5/22/00) Revise development plan notes on sheet 1 to indicate seasonal sales area will meet the above restrictions.
19. Declare if the line next to the loading zone is a screen wall. -provide height, length
20. On sheet 3, the sheets indicates that it is page 3 of 6. Please change to page 3 of 4.

19. REGARDING SPECIAL EXCEPTION REQUIREMENTS OF CASE SE-06-23
A) to meet condition 12, please clarify wall height of garden center
B) to meet condition 16, please provide detail of lights with vertical clearance and pole base width, keynote on plan (no photometric plan was found in the submittal package as stated in your submittal memo)

20. Note that further zoning review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. If you have questions on this review, I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951.


SEE ACCESSIBILITY COMMENTS PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS, BY RON BROWN IN STRUCTURAL BUILDING CODE DIVISION.

30 APRIL 2008
D08-022/HOME DEPOT AT HOUGHTON TOWN CENTER
REVIEWED BY RON BROWN

ACCESSIBLE REVIEW
2006 IBC/ICC 117.1

DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW

I. SHEET DP1:
A. NOTE 11: DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY NOT ADA FEDERAL REGISTER REQUIREMENTS.
1. ACCESSIBLE SIGNS TO CONFORM TO COT DOT HEIGHT STANDARDS OF 7' TO BOTTOM OF MAIN SIGN AND GRAPHICS AS PER "PARK WISE".
B. NOTE 15: ALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS IN THE PUBLIC WAY SHALL CONFORM TO COT DOT STANDARD DESIGN 207. ALL INTERIOR/PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS TO CONFORM TO 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406.
II. SHEET DP2:
A. DETAIL 9: CORRECT NOTE TO THE FOLLOWING ACCESSIBLE STANDARDS FOR RAMPS; ALL ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMPS IN THE PUBLIC WAY SHALL CONFORM TO COT DOT STANDARD DESIGN 207. ALL INTERIOR/PRIVATE PROPERTY CURB AND SIDEWALK RAMPS TO CONFORM TO 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 405 AND 406.
1. FLARED SIDES OF CURB RAMP TO BE MAX SLOPE OF 1:10
B. DETAIL 7:
1. SIGNS ATTACHED TO FACE OF BUILDING SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO DISTANCE AND DIRECT ASSOCIATION TO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
2. ADD "VAN ACCESSIBLE" SIGN AS NEEDED
3. MAIN SIGN LAYOUT DESIGN AS PER "PARK WISE"
C. DETAIL 4: THERE ARE TWO VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED, IDENTIFY WHICH SPACES ARE TO BE VAN ACCESSIBLE.
III. SHEET 4 OF 4:
A. IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402
1. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT.
B. ACCESSIBLE PARKING:
1. SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS ON THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.
2. THERE ARE TWO VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES REQUIRED, IDENTIFY WHICH SPACES ARE TO BE VAN ACCESSIBLE
C. THERE ARE SEVERAL ACCESSIBLE ROUTE VEHICLE CROSSINGS THAT ARE NOT MARKED:
1. AT MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF BUILDING
2. AT LUMBER PICK UP AREA, CONTINUE MARKED CROSSING FROM ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO ISLAND AND THEN TO SIDEWALK AREA NEAR THE BIKE RACKS.
3. AT MULTIPLE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES TO SIDEWALK AREA NEAR ENTRANCE. A BIG AREA IS IDENTIFIED BUT NOT AS THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DIRECT AREA ACCESS ACROSS THE PAAL.
D. DELETE THE RIBBON OF TRUNCATED DOMES AND PROVIDE A SEPARATION FROM THE CONCRETE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND VEHICLE PAAL BY RAISING THE SIDE WALK AND PROVIDING A 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB.
E. PROVIDE 2' WIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT EVERY RAISED MARKED CROSSING OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, AT BOTH ENDS OF THE CROSSING. ICC 117.1 406.12.
END OF REVIEW







If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608.


C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0022 Home Depot HTC.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents.
06/02/2008 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 2, 2008
CDRC/Zoning Manager


SUBJECT: 8880 S. Old Vail Rd., Home Depot
Development Plan D08-0022 (First Review)
T15S, R15E, Section 35

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report.

The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Development Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP.
2. Provide a North arrow, scale and the contour intervals on sheet 3 per D.S. 2-02.2.1.
3. Show all areas of proposed improvements. The project is not shown completely. Perhaps an additional sheet would work.
4. This DP cannot be approved prior to the "Mass Grading Plan" (T08BU00493) approval for phase I for the overall development. This includes all the special exception conditions listed with the improvements shown on the plan and/or the proper documentation included in the re-submittal.
5. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207.
6. Include a copy of the approved "Houghton Town Center" DP (D06-0013) and the approved "Mass Grading Plan" (T08BU00493) for phase I with the re-submittal.
7. Not used.
8. Add to notes: " An existing, underground natural gas pipeline is located within a(n) < ____>' wide utility easement located at the <_____> of this development".
9. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3.
10. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5
11. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. The access lane or street to the east of the Home Depot structure is shown as existing, what plan or phase constructs street/lane?
12. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12.
13. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14.
14. Show the limits of the 100-year floodplain and water surface elevation per D.S. 2-02.2.1.15.
15. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Show all improvements associated with all conditions.
16. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20.
17. Add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note verbatim per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DP.
18. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
19. Location and orientation of existing major physical features, such as railroad tracks and drainageways per D.S. 2-02.2.1.22.
20. Provide a Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
21. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Show any railing proposed along the drainage way.
22. Show Development plan number (D08-0022) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
23. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0.
24. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. and of the surrounding areas of all the slopes, ie next to the drainage way.
25. Call out the percentages of all slopes and the erosion protection.
26. Show all details of all drainage structures, rip-rap aprons, slope protection etc.
27. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice.
28. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
29. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to DP approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans".

Drainage Report:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR.
2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only.
3. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson/Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/8880 S. Old Vail Rd_Home_Depot_CDRC
06/06/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 6, 2008

Thomas Sayler-Brown/Carolyn Lemmon
SBBL Architecture & Planning
1001 North Alvernon Way #105
Tucson, Arizona 85711

Subject: D08-0022 Home Depot Houghton Development Plan

Dear Thomas:

Your submittal of March 21, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, PAG, TEP, Landscape, Real Estate, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Traffic Impact and Mitigation Study (PAG, DSD)

Please leave all existing case numbers on all sheets of all plans even if review comments ask for removal.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 620-0535