Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0020
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/03/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/03/2008 | CDRC1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | June 3, 2008 To: Aaron Barton Design Construction Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Special Instruments-Phase II Dev. Plan - 2nd Submittal D08-020 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 06/12/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Development Plan and Landscape Plans and other plans as necessary to provide tree planters sized in accordance with LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c. Provide details with dimensions. |
| 06/17/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NAME & NUMBER: Spectral Instruments Ph. 2, DP; D08-0020 Submittal #: 2 COMMENTS DUE: 7/1/09 COMMENTS SENT: 6/13/09 Items reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Other – notes from meeting w/consultants on 5/19/08 Related: Rio Nuevo Redevelopment Plan/Planned Area Development (RNRP/PAD) Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED – No resubmittal required. No additional comments. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 6/13/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0020a_Spectral_Instr_Ph_2.doc |
| 06/27/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0020, Spectral Instruments Phase II, 420 N. Bonita Ave, zoned PAD-4, parking lot & building expansion - greater than 25% expansion full code Development Plan, 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 27, 2008 DUE DATE: July 1, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. C:\planning\dev plans\D08-0020 spectral instruments phase II 2nd rev.doc 27 JUNE 2008 D08-0020/SPECTRAL INSTRUMENTS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN RESUBMITTAL ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW COMMENT 1B: DENOTE ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 COULD NOT FIND AMENDMENT, A GOOD LOCATION PLACEMENT WOULD BE AT THE END OF THE FIRST SENTENCE OF NOTE 13, SHEET 1 OF 4. ALSO, NOTES 12 AND 28, SHEET 2 OF 4, NEED TO REFERENCE SAME. COMMENT 2A: SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. NEAREST BUS STOP IS NEAR WEST CORNER OF ST. MARY'S AND BONITA AV. COMMENT 2C: PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAIL NO RESPONSE NOTED AND LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLAN COMMENT 5 A: PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE RAISED MARKED CROSSING AT BOTH END OF THE MARKED CROSS WALK AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 406.12 AND 705. NO RESPONSE NOTED ON PLANS END OF REVIEW |
| 07/02/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0020 Spectral Instruments Phase II 07/01/08 () Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rio Nuevo PAD-4 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: July 1, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 4/2/08 ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 6/25/08 |
| 07/09/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 9, 2008 DCC Co. 2828 North Country Club Road, Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D08-0020 Spectral Instruments Phase II Development Plan Dear Sir: Your submittal of June 4, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 829-7856 |