Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0020
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/18/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/20/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/25/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: March 25, 2008 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D008-0020 SPECTRAL INSTRUMENTS PHASE II T141311 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 03/25/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 03/25/2008 7:51 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 03/28/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 28, 2008 To: Aaron Barton Design Construction Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Special Instruments-Phase II Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-020 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D08-020, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Northwest Outfall. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #9 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: Per the Legend on Sheet 1 the BCS to Pad 4 would be proposed yet it is called out as existing, revise or explain. Sheet 2: The 4”proposed BCS to Pad 4 should be directly connected to the 8” public sewer line and not at the manhole as shown. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/28/2008 | FRODRIG2 | LANDFILL | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Approved for landfill ordinance issues. Jeff Drumm 2/27/08 |
| 03/28/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0020 SPECTRAL INSTRUMENTS PHASE II/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 27, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 04/01/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area expansion area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the landscape plan and other plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A 2) Revise the landscape plan to include a complete planting plan for the Bonita Avenue street landscape border. Include the location of individual plants one (1) gallon or larger in size. The area between the property line and the buildings should include 50% vegetative coverage. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.a, LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 3) Submit the previously approved NPPO plan. The landscape and NPPO plans will be reviewed for compliance with the previously approved plans. RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 04/04/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0020 Spectral Instruments Phase II 04/04/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rio Nuevo PAD-4 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: April 15, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 4/2/08 Comments, 1) The Rio Nuevo PAD calls out for circulation design that provides for safe and adequate linkages to the street system, adjacent developments, and pedestrian trails. It appears that the new parking area will remove some linkages/paths to the river park trail. Please show how the development plan provides a pedestrian connection to the adjacent river trail. 2) Outdoor storage areas, i.e. mechanical yards, need to be screened. Please provide a detail of how these areas will be screened using a combination of landscaping, fences, or walls. |
| 04/04/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/07/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | To Whom it May Concern: The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the project D08-0020. Summary: CASE: D08-0020 COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS. Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 277 PM Peak: 34 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Sandy Sandra C. Holland Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 Tel: 520 792 1093 X462 Fax: 520 620 6981 |
| 04/15/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/16/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0020, Spectral Instruments Phase II, 420 N. Bonita Ave, zoned PAD-4, parking lot & building expansion - greater than 25% expansion full code Development Plan, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 15, 2008 DUE DATE: April 15, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 18, 2009. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Planned Area Development (PAD) 4, and the Development Standards (DS). Specifically, this project was reviewed for compliance with criteria in DS 2-05, development plan content. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.F, on PAD reference map, add street name "Bonita Ave" to map. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.K, list DSD assigned case number "D08-0020", near title block. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, please ensure any/all easements are shown graphically, and their recordation information area listed as well. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.A, the Pima County Assessor shows two lots for this project. As the lots function as one site, and a lot line is essentially cutting through an existing building, the lots should have a lot combination - or at minimum a lot combination covenant ensuring that should they be sold independently, the lots will continue to function as one site. Please provide recordation receipt and copy of recorded lot combo and or covenant. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B, please note the existing "I-1" zoning of the lots east of the project 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D.3, regarding the Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs) A) dimension the PAAL width between the loading zones and the parking. B) dimension the PAAL width between parallel parking and 5' striped pedestrian refuge C) please provide a 1' setback between PAAL and carport structure, per DS 3-05.2.2.B.2 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian access: A) per DS 2-08.3.1 - connect pedestrian path from main building to mechanical building. B) per DS 3-05.2.2.B.1 - dimension width of sidewalk between PAAL and building C) per DS 2-08.5.1.A - dimension sidewalk width between building and parking spaces D) per DS 2-08.3.1 - connect pedestrian path to dumpster 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M - regarding buildings A) please keynote all building entries B) please show any roof overhangs with dashed lines C) please declare type of roof - flat with parapet or pitched with ridge D) declare height measured from grade to flat roof adding parapet or midpoint of gable E) please dimension the equipment area, call out walls - roofing? F) PAD-4 business park definition, including research & development, mandates all activities conducted within fully enclosed building. Explain purpose of equipment yard. F) on sheet 1, please list the total GFA (39,790 for both buildings) G) on sheet 1, please list the total FAR for both buildings. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O - on sheet 1, in loading zone requirements, list square footage of buildings as 39,790 and reference LUC 3.4.5.3. for requirement to provide 3 loading zones. I further acknowledge the loading zones provided meet code, thank you. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) I acknowledge the parking calculation and detail drawings meet code, thank you. B) it's hard to tell if there are parking spaces just south of the equipment area, clarify C) if parking next to equipment area, note a 10' wide space is needed abutting a wall. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) I acknowledge the bike parking calc and detail drawing meet code, thank you. B) per DS 2-09.4.1, all class 2 bike parking spaces must be within 50' of building entry. Call out building entries closest to bike parking -note 50' dimension to bike parking. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.T, please darken dumpster location sheet 2 keynote 18 -hard to see. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, please call out postal service location for the site. 16. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, please call out all free-standing signage & lighting - & height. 17. Please note, further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. Please see accessible review comments by Ron Brown, as follows. Ron may be reached at 837-4908 if you have any questions, thank you. 14 APRIL 2008 D08-0020/SPECTRAL INSTRUMENTS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW 1. GENERAL COMMENT: A. THIS REVIEW WAS CONDUCTED UNDER THE PREMISE THAT THE AREA OF EXPANSION REQUIRES A FULL CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW FOR THE ENTIRE SITE. B. DENOTE ACCESSIBILITY COMPLIANCE TO 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 2. SHEET 1, NOTE 12: CHANGE VAN SPACE REQUIREMENTS FROM 1 OF EVERY 8 TO 1 OF EVERY 6, IBS 2006, SECTION 1106.5. 2. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBS SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 402. A. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION DROP OFF POINT. B. PROVIDE SPOT ELEVATIONS THROUGH OUT THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THAT SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SLOPES AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 405 AND 406. C. WIDTH OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO BE MINIMUM OF 4' AS PER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS. 3. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE CURB RAMPS AND DOUBLE LOADED ACCESSIBLE PARKING ISLE, PARKING SPACES, RAMPS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AND SIGNAGE. A. SHOW ALL DIMENISIONS AND SIDE WALK OR CURB ACCESS RAMPS AS PER ICC 117.1; SECTION 405 AND 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010. B. SURFACE SLOPES TO BE NO GREATER THAN 1:48, ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.5. C. PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAIL 4. THE CURB RAMP NEXT TO THE CLASS 2 BIKE SPACES DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE ENOUGH SPACE AT THE TOP OF THE RAMP FOR A PROPER LANDING. VERIFY AND REWORK AS PER ICC 117.1 SECTION 406. 5. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LARGE SCALE DETAILING OF ALL THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS; SIDE WALK RAMP, CURB RAMPS, AND RAMPS AT RAISED MARKED CROSSINGS AND INSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 405 AND 406. A. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE RAISED MARKED CROSSING AT BOTH END OF THE MARKED CROSS WALK AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 406.12 AND 705. 6. VERIFY THAT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES ARE ACCESSIBLE AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. 7. PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106 AND ICC117.1, SECTION 503. END OF REVIEW If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0020 spectral instruments dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 04/16/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 04/17/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Exisitng dumpster enclosure conditions will support phase II development. |
| 04/18/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/18/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#195439 April 8, 2008 DCC, Co. 2828 N Country Club Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear DCC, Co. : SUBJECT: Spectral Instruments Phase II D08-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 19, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/18/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#195439 April 8, 2008 DCC, Co. 2828 N Country Club Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear DCC, Co. : SUBJECT: Spectral Instruments Phase II D08-0020 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 19, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/24/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0020 CASE NAME: Spectral Instruments Ph. 2, DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 4/15/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/23/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan (DP) and Landscape Plan (LP) Related: Rio Nuevo Redevelopment Plan/Planned Area Development (RNRP/PAD) Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: NOT APPROVED – Please address the following, and resubmit the DP and LP. A land use objective of the RNRP/PAD is to provide for continued development of the Santa Cruz River linear park system through the project area, including an associated, interconnected pedestrian and bikeway network. While the DP and LP show a paved path from the eastern edge of the proposed parking lot to the river park path along the western side of the Santa Cruz River, it is not readily convenient to the main building entrance on the south side of the building. Please provide a minimum 6-foot-wide paved, landscaped path around the southern edge of the existing and proposed parking areas on the eastern side of the buildings. This path should link the proposed pedestrian-way in the PAAL near the southeast corner of the building to the Santa Cruz River Park paved path. Please call Joanne Hershenhorn at 791-4505 if you want to discuss this comment. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/23/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0020_Spectral_Instr_Ph_2.doc |
| 05/09/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager SUBJECT: Spectral Instruments Development Plan Engineering submittal review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0020 SUMMARY: The Development Plan sheets were submitted for review. Development Services Department Engineering recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan. DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONDITIONS: 1) DS Sec.2-05: Address the following for Development Plan mylar submittal: a) Add D08-0020 to the plan. b) Provide registrant's signature and expiration date for seal on all sheets. Expiration date is required per recent AzBTR requirements. 2) The subsequent grading plan shall demonstrate water harvesting to the maximum extent reasonably possible, in accordance with the City of Tucson Land Use Code, section 3.7.4.3 B and DS 10 01.0, Section 14.2.10. A grading plan submittal and review will be required prior to issuance of a grading permit for grading activity. If you have questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/14/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 14, 2008 DCC Co. 2828 North Country Club Road, Suite 100 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D08-0020 Spectral Instruments Phase II Development Plan Dear Sir: Your submittal of March 19, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Parks and Recreation, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies City of Tucson lot combo documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 829-7856 |