Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0019
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/17/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/18/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please provide proposed hydrant location(s). Reference C.O.T. amendents to the 2006 IFC (Section 508) for location and spacing requirements. |
| 03/20/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 19, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0019 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS T151424 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 03/20/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D08-019), along with the rezoning case number and all other related case numbers to all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Native Plant Preservation Plan. 2. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a Revise plan to meet code, particularly in the northeast corner of the site where some of the parking spaces are located more than 40 feet from the trunk of a canopy tree. 3. Dimension the minimum width and label the square footage measured from the inside of tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 4. Revise plan to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 33, which states that rectangular basin shapes shall be avoided unless necessitated by recreational or visual amenities within the basin. 5. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 11 regarding the use of water harvesting techniques which convey all rooftop, PAAL, and parking area drainage to designated water harvesting areas prior to discharging the overflow in the retention/detention basins. 6. Demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 1.a. as may be applicable for this site. 7. The scale/size of the project site is not shown correctly on the location map on sheet L-1 making it difficult to determine the extent of the project area. Also, indicate the location of Rodeo Wash on this location map. |
| 03/27/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0019 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS//DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/26/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Wilmot/I-10 Commercial Center will need to be recorded prior to approval of this project, with recording information added to Title Block. es |
| 03/28/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0019 Holiday Inn Express 03/28/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-05, D08-0017 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: April 14, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( X ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( X ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( X ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: Comments 1) It should be noted that the rezoning conditions for C9-01-05 call for the applicant to demonstrate that its development is in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated October 2, 2006. These conditions call for an overall integrated site with the various planning elements of vehicular circulation, shared access, pedestrian systems, landscaping, water harvesting, and revegetation of set aside open space. Hence it is imperative that individual development plans being submitted show how these developments are integrated into an overall design context that is consistent with the required rezoning conditions. Please include a sheet with the development plan that provides a comprehensive overview of how this development plan is integrated into the overall project, and how it is consistent with the preliminary development plan submitted at the time of rezoning. This development plan sheet should include, overall vehicular circulation (access, cross access easements, shared access, connection to the residential development to the west), landscape border along the south and west boundary of the project, pedestrian circulation linkages between development lots/pads. (Rezoning Condition 1) 2) Please provide a cross section that depicts a safe and attractive pedestrian facilities between the hotel, restaurants, and mini mart, using planned open space. Identify this pedestrian circulation and open space areas on the development plan with a keynote. Also how will the pedestrian linkages be made to the development pads to the south across the proposed drive? And what are the pedestrian linkages to the west, i.e. sidewalk? (Rezoning Condition 1.d.) 3) Please show how rainwater harvesting is utilized on the site for all rooftop, parking areas, and PAALs. Defer to the Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development for Rezoning Conditions: 1.a., 11, 12, 13, 21, and 22. 4) Please provide a note on the development plan that a blanket cross-access and parking easement or covenants has been recorded and provided for the entire rezoning site. (Rezoning Condition 1.b and c. and 8) 5) Please provide in the General Notes what development lot this project is within, i.e. Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3 or Lot 4. 6) Defer to TDOT/Traffic for Rezoning Conditions: 2, 4, 6, 26, 27, and 28. 7) Defer to TPD for Rezoning Condition: 23. 8) Defer to DSD for Rezoning Condition 19. 9) Provide a note and/or keynote that identifies signage to be collocated and integrated in order to improve the overall appearance of the development site. (Rezoning Condition 16) 10) In order to address Rezoning Condition 18, please label on the development plan all existing zoning adjacent to the development site. 11) Please provide elevations that show that all sides of the structures will have the same level of architectural detail. (Rezoning Condition 15) |
| 03/28/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 26, 2008 To: TONY TSANG A.C. TSANG ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS Development Plan - 1st Submittal D08-019 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D08-019, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 2. Sheet 1: The existing public manholes shown as MH 38 should be shown as 3434-38. 3. Sheet 2: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 4. Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states : THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 04/02/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 195232 April 1, 2008 A.C. Tsang Engineering Attn: Antony Tsang 4626 E Ft. Lowell #S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Antony Tsang: SUBJECT: HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS D08-0019 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted March 21, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP's review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/07/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approv-Cond | To Whom it May Concern: The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the project D08-0019. Summary: CASE: D08-0019 COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS. However, further traffic impact and traffic mitigation study is recommended. Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 654 PM Peak: 47 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Sandy Sandra C. Holland Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 Tel: 520 792 1093 X462 Fax: 520 620 6981 |
| 04/09/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Holiday Inn Express - Wilmot & I-10 D08-0019 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: Revised May 9, 2008 DUE DATE: April 14, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 16, 2009. 2) This development plan cannot be approved until the tentative & final plat for this subdivision, S07-0025, have been approved. Due to significant changes affecting this Development it has been determined in a meeting by CDRC staff (Jose Ortiz, Elizabeth Eberbach, David Rivera and Steve Shields) that a request for revised tentative/development plan is appropriate. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for information and requirements for a revised TP/DP. 3) Provide a copy of the approved tentative & final plat for this subdivision, S07-0025, with your next submittal. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 4) D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 There appears to be a section line drawn through the center of the Location Plan, east/west. There is not a section line at this location, please clarify. 5) D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Remove the reference to S01-040 and S06-138 from all plans. 6) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0019 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 7) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 The proposed use, listed under General Note 2 should be TRAVELERS ACCOMMODATION, LODGING, subject to: LUC Sec. 3.5.13.5 8) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide an overall plan showing how the proposed parking area access lanes (PAALs) that cross over property lines will work. Provide a copy of the cross access agreements required by the rezoning. 9) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas. This said provide the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the dumpster location. 10) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K As it appears that this project will act a site in conjunction with all adjacent parcels a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required to all adjacent parcels, provide an overall plan showing the continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route. 11) D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide as a note, the square footage of the commercial structure and the specific use proposed. This includes all floors. 12) D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide the proposed height of the Porte Cochere within the footprint on the plan. 13) D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide an east/west dimension for the south end of the proposed hotel. 14) D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Once the overall square footage has been provided zoning can verify the loading space requirement, see comment 11. For your information per LUC 3.4.5.5 the required loading space dimensions are 12' x 35'. 15) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The handicapped vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per the International Building Code (IBC) Table 1106.1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is based on the total number of vehicle parking spaces provided. This said, 85 vehicle parking spaces provided requires 4 accessible vehicle parking spaces not 3 as shown on the plan. 16) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Revise the bicycle parking calculation to reflect the required and provided Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking. Per Section 3.3.4, COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Travelers' Accommodation, Lodging, eight (8) percent - seventy-five (75) percent Class 1 and twenty-five (25) percent Class 2. This said five (5) Class 1 and two (2) Class 2 bicycle parking spaces are required. 17) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show the location of the required Class 1 bicycle parking on the plan. 18) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a detail for both Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking on the plan including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. Be sure to review the revised D.S. 2-09 for bicycle parking requirements. 19) D.S. 2-05.2.4.R If applicable show any required sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. See engineering comments. 20) D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Provide a separate letter stating how all rezoning conditions have been met. 21) D.S. 2-05.2.4.V If applicable show the location and type of postal service proposed for this project. 22) D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards. 23) Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 24) Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0017dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. Review for Accessibility requirements done by Ronald Brown, Structural Reviewer. 8 APRIL 2008 D08-0019/HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 1. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBS SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 402. A. SHOW LOCATION OF NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORTAION DROP OFF POINT. 2. IT APPEARS A BRIDGE IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PUBLIC WAY TO THE SITE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AT THE PARKING ISLE. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DEATIL OF HOW THIS IS GOING TO WORK IN CLUDING ALL REQUIRED RAILS, STOPS, CURB RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS. 3. THE CURB RAMP SHOWN AT THE NORTH END OF THE RAISED MARK CROSSING AT THE FROM OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT WORK. NO LANDING AT THE TOP OF THE RAMP. PROVIDE A SIDEWALK RAMP 4. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS REQUIRED BY ADAAG SECTION 4.7.7 AT BOTH STREET ENTRANCE DRIVE CURB RAMPS. 5. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILED PLAN OF THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, SIGNAGE AND ISLE. SHOW ALL DEMINISIONS AND SIDE WALK OR CURB ACCESS RAMPS AS PER ICC 117.1; SECTION 405 AND 2006 IBC, SECTION 1010. 6. THE FRONT TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES COULD BE LOCATED CLOSER TO THE MAIN ENTRANCE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.6 7. PROVIDE DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT THE RAISED MARKED CROSSING AT THE REAR PARKING LOT AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 406.12 AND 705. 8. INSURE ACESSIBILITY SLOPES FOR ALL SURFACES AT PORTE COCHERE, IBC 2006, SECTION 1106.7 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 503, 503.4. 9. VERIFY THAT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES ARE ACCESSIBLE AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. A. HOW IS THE MAIN ENTRANCE GOING TO BE MADE ACCESSIBLE IF THE FINISHED ELEVATION AT THE PORTE COCHERE IS 4.25' LOWER THAN THE INDICATED BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR? 10. PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE LOADING ZONE AS PER 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106 AND ICC117.1, SECTION 503. 11. IN ANALIZING THE SLOPES OF THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, IT WAS ASSUMED THAT ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE OF ASPHALTIC PAVING GUTTER LOCATIONS AND NOT TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS. 12. THE SOUTH WEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING HAS A WALK WAY SLOPE OF 8%, THIS IS A RAMP AND REQUIRES GRAB BARS AND LANDINGS. 13. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SPOT GRADES FOR THE INTERIOR WALK WAYS OF THE RECREATION AREA FOR SLOPE CONFORMATION. |
| 04/14/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 14, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0019 PROJECT NAME: Holiday Inn PROJECT ADDRESS: 7648 S Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Revise the TIA to incorporate all data from the various proposed projects, which includes these two sites and the 2 adjacent sites. The other projects include a proposed steak house and fast food restaurant. 3. Prior to the next submittal a meeting maybe warranted to finalize potential offsite improvements associated with these developments. 4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/16/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 04/17/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. This type of business/development will generate both refuse and recycle waste. It is therefore strongly encouraged to include provisions for two single enclosures or one double wide enclosure to accomodate for both refuse and recycle collection services. Please include provisions as noted above. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/18/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/23/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0019 CASE NAME: Holiday Inn Express: DP (Wilmot/I-10) Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 4/14/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/22/08 Items being reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Related: rezoning - C9-01-05 CDRC – S07-25, D07-0044 Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required. Note: We are interested in pursuing implementation of a trail along the old Rodeo Wash. This site is well north of the wash, so there are no trail considerations. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/22/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0019_Holiday_Inn_Express.doc |
| 05/09/2008 | ELIZABETH EBERBACH | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Coordinator FOR: A. C. Tsang Engineering SUBJECT: Wilmot/I-10 Holiday Inn Express 1st submittal Engineering Review REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0019 SUMMARY: The Development Plan was reviewed by Engineering as part of the development fro the Wilmot I-10 Commercial Center. The package included the Development Plan for the Holiday Inn Express, rezoning conditions, the drainage report, and landscape plans. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The drainage report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No. 2-05.2.3.I.1, 2-05.2.3.E.1, 2-05.2.4.H, & 10-02.2.3.1.5, 10-02.1.5: Address the following drainage comments for the development plan: a) Show detention/retention 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevation for basins. b) Label basin slopes per drainage report. c) Clarify pedestrian access area across basin showing grades/slopes. d) Clarify basin outlets for offsite discharge areas. e) Clarify types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points on planview. f) Show basin maintenance access on planview. g) For the development plan indicate roof drainage on a plan view sheet. h) Show where sidewalk scuppers will be needed, if any, and provide calculations. i) Provide information on planview showing provision for water harvest areas. j) Planview sheets for the development plan shall match drainage exhibits. k) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Clarify the following in the drainage report: i) Provide copy of the block plat layout showing the basin locations. The Holiday Inn Express design shall match the block plat with regard to watershed delineation and basin locations. ii) Clarify and explain outlet design for basins in body of report. iii) Provide detail showing 2-ft off set from property boundary along west side of west basin. iv) Explain how sediments are controlled / reduced when entering stormdrain system. v) Provide discussion of maintenance requirements for proposed drainage improvements including the connecting pipe between south basin and offsite stormdrain system. vi) On exhibit, label Q100 within the offsite stormdrain system adjacent to this project. 2) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.D, 2-05.1.1: Explain how Rezoning condition 26 is addressed for this project. Per discussions with ADOT, the spine road improvements may not be completed during Commercial Center Block Plat improvements. Clarify access improvements to be completed prior to Holiday Inn Express C of O. Address any revised TIA requirements and explain in response letter how the access will be provided for this use. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.9: The applicable case number is D08-0019; provide at lower right hand corner of sheet next to the block plat case number. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2: Complete General Note 16. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Assure all existing utilities and easements are delineated and labeled on the plan view with any applicable dimensioned widths and invert elevations. Specifically address the following utility comments: a) Label pipe size of stormdrain pipe south of the site. b) Identify and label proposed hydrants per general notes 16 and 17. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C: Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for this project. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. Explain how phases will affect Grading Plan. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: If the project is part of a phased block plat, the phase under consideration shall be designed so that later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, and roads or PAAL's are not provided, access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and a note can be added stating whether they will be public or private. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Clarify proposed pavement, sidewalks, and curb on planview. Clarify elevations for each. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Show and dimension SVT's. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 12) DS Sec.2-03.7: Due to significant changes affecting this Development it has been determined in a meeting by CDRC staff (Jose Ortiz, Elizabeth Eberbach, David Rivera and Steve Shields) that a request for revised tentative/development plan is appropriate. Please contact Patricia Gehlen for information and requirements for a revised TP/DP. 13) Please acknowledge that a separate grading permit application submittal will be required for development of the site once the Development Plan is approved. Submit the revised Development Plan addressing all of the comments. Include the revised drainage report, the revised Final Plat block plat, copy of rezoning conditions, and response letter thoroughly explaining each comment. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Eberbach, PE Civil Engineer Engineering Division Development Services |
| 05/14/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 14, 2008 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0019 Holiday Inn Express Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of March 17, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Landscape, Addressing, Wastewater, DUPD, TEP, Zoning, Traffic, ESD, Engineering, ADOT, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Dimensioned Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 3 Copies Cross Access Agreement (Zoning, DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 |
| 05/14/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | Please contact ADOT directly for any resubmittal comments they may have. The contact is Tom Martinez 388-4226 |