Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D08-0017
Parcel: 14044009K

Address:
7632 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Permit Number - D08-0017
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/12/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/13/2008 JIM EGAN COT NON-DSD FIRE Denied Road details are necessary to show fire access.

Hydrant and TBM have same symbol, show hydrant locations.
03/20/2008 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)
FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor
Pima County Assessor’s Office
Mapping Department

DATE: March 19, 2008


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan
D08-0017 CARL’S JR RESTAURANT T151424

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.


COMMENTS:

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390


ROSANNA WERNER
03/20/2008 PGEHLEN1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved
03/21/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The Landscape Section does not recommend approval of the plans at this time due to inconsistencies with adopted codes and standards. The plan was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS) and other applicable standards and guidelines referred to in the comments. Revise the plans as necessary to comply.

2) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).
Revise the landscape plan as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.3.A

3) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. DS 2-05.2.1.A
Revise the Development/Landscape Plans.

4) Gated openings of refuse enclosures are required to meet the screening standards of LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Include details or other information regarding refuse screening. Revise the Development/landscape plans.

5) Revise the landscape plans to provide a street landscape border at Wilmot Road. LUC 3.7.2.4

6) The site is required to include screening from adjacent street per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary.
LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7.

7) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C

8) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb (or traffic lane), if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance.
LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

9) Rain water harvesting must be conducted at this site per the requirements in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.1.1.A, requiring that landscaping should accomplish natural resources conservation; LUC Section 3.7.4.3.B requiring integration of grading, hydrology and landscaping to make the maximum use of stormwater for on-site irrigation; and LUC Section 3.7.4.5.B requiring that stormwater and runoff harvesting be used to supplement drip irrigation for both new and preserved vegetation. Techniques to design and implement water harvesting are described in the City of Tucson's Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. This document can be downloaded as from the following website: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/

10) To comply with the above-referenced LUC sections, rain water harvested from building roofs, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be employed to assist in supporting landscaped areas including parking lot tree wells, landscape buffers, sidewalk plantings, and other vegetation locations at the site. Details and Specifications for water harvesting shall be clearly indicated on site plans to ensure it is correctly implemented at all necessary stages of construction.

11) The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey or Frank Sousa in OCSD to make an appointment.

12) Landscape plans shall include a summary of plants required for mitigation and show their site location
on the landscape plans. Show the total PIP, TOS, required mitigation for each species. DS 2-15.3.4.B

Revise the native plant preservation plans to show the limits of grading. DS 2-15.3.4.A

13) Temporary Fencing shall be required during construction for all undisturbed natural desert areas. DS 2-15.3.4.B.5

14) Compliance with the conditions of rezoning case C9-01-05 (Ord. 10336) is required. A Development Plan for the property subject to the ordinance is required.

RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED. A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE SITE IS REQUIRED.
03/21/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Carl's JR - Wilmot & I-10
D08-0017
Development Plan (1st Review)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 19, 2008

DUE DATE: April 09, 2008

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1) Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 11, 2009.

2) This development plan cannot be approved until the tentative & final plat for this subdivision, S07-0025, have been approved.

3) Provide a copy of the approved tentative & final plat for this subdivision, S07-0025, with your next submittal. Additional comments maybe forth coming.

4) D.S. 2-05.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12) point or great in size. This said there is text on sheet DP-1, SITE DETAILS & SITE NOTES that does not meet this requirement.

5) D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.3 The section corners shown on the location map are no correct. The section line runs north/south at Wilmot Road and the section corners should be shown at that location. The north section intersection should be labeled; northwest - 13, northeast - 18, southwest - 24, southeast - 19. The south section intersection should be labeled; northwest - 24, northeast - 19, southwest - 25, southeast - 30.

6) D.S. 2-05.2.1.D There is text on the location map that is unreadable, please clarify.

7) D.S. 2-05.2.1.K Remove the reference to S01-040 and S06-138 from all plans.

8) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0017 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan.

9) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 The proposed use should be "FOOD SERVICE, "30" SUBJECT TO 3.5.4.6.C & 3.5.13.5".

10) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Provide a note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE".

11) D.S. 2-05.2.3.B Provide the recordation information for all easements shown on the plan.

12) D.S. 2-05.2.3.B There appears to be considerable differences in the easements called out on this plan and the proposed tentative and final plats, please clarify.

13) D.S. 2-05.2.3.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

14) D.S. 2-05.2.4.A It is very difficult to tell the difference between lot lines and the proposed contours, please clarify.

15) D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Label all existing zoning for the adjacent parcels, including across the adjacent right-of-way, on the plan.

16) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly delineate the required vehicle stacking for the drive-through on the plan. Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.C2.c The minimum vehicle stacking capacity of any drive-through facility with one (1) drive through lane is six (6) vehicle spaces, including the space at the window, unless a different requirement is provided in Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC.

17) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 The proposed location for the "MENU BOARD AND CUSTOMER ORDER SPEAKER" Site Note 21R, will create a stacking issue where vehicles will be backed up into the adjacent PAAL, relocate the menu board so that at least three stacking spaces are provided from the menu board to the PAAL.

18) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide information on the plan that shows how this site will be accessed i.e. the proposed easement, PAAL along the south side of the property.

19) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 There are three (3) PAALs appear to connect to adjacent parcels As it appears there will be cross access to other parcels through this parcel show what these PAALs connect to and provide a copy of the cross access agreements.

20) D.S. 2-05.2.4.F It appears that Wilmot Road ROW is at full width. Show the future sidewalk and curb for Wilmot Road.

21) D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable all proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private.

22) D.S. 2-05.2.4.G Clarify what the height restriction easement is for.

23) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. Provide the required sidewalk out to Wilmot Road.

24) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas. This said provide the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the dumpster location.

25) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K As it appears that this project will act a site in conjunction with all adjacent parcels a continuous pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, is required to all adjacent parcels, show on the plan.

26) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps. ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 406.13

27) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Show the required access ramps for the sidewalk and crosswalk at the drive through lane near the southeast corner of the building.

28) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide a striped crosswalk across the PAAL between what appears to be curb access ramps located near the proposed handicapped vehicle parking spaces.

29) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There is a detail call out "3N" pointing to the two curb access ramps located near the proposed handicapped vehicle parking spaces. "3N" is not shown under site details.

30) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide details for all curb access ramps proposed on site. Include the required truncated domes on the detail.

31) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K There appears to be an access ramp near the proposed location of the menu board, what is the purpose of this access ramp. If the proposed ramp is for delivery access, access to the loading zone is not allowed across the stacking spaces. See comments 17 & 37.

32) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The proposed sidewalk along the north side of the proposed building does not meet the minimum width requirements for a sidewalk adjacent to vehicle parking spaces. The minimum width for this sidewalk is 6'-6". Delineate the 2'-6" overhang and 4'-0" clear sidewalk on the plan.

33) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It appears that the handicapped ramp proposed at the handicapped vehicle parking spaces may not meet the requirements of D.S. 2-08.4.1.E Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to a ten (10) year flood event. Demonstrate on the plan or detail how this ramp meets this requirement.

34) D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide as a note, the square footage of the commercial structure and the specific use proposed. Zoning acknowledges General Note 2 but the proposed use should be listed as "Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5. Please clarify the difference in square footage listed in the footprint of the building and the parking calculation.

35) D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide the proposed height of the building within the footprint on the plan.

36) D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Fully dimension the proposed loading space. It does not appear that the proposed loading space meets the minimum requirements for a 12'x35' loading space.

37) D.S. 2-05.2.4.O Access to the loading zone is not allowed across the stacking spaces within the drive through.

38) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Zoning acknowledges the provided van accessible parking detail. Fully dimension the vehicle parking space and provided maximum allowed surface slopes, see, ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003

39) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail.

40) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The provided vehicle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.3.8 Fractional Amounts. When the final result of the calculation of required motor vehicle and bicycle parking spaces results in a fractional number, a fraction of one-half (½) or more is adjusted to the next higher whole number, and a fraction of less than one-half (½) is adjusted to the next lower whole number. This said 2,982/100 = 29.82 or 30 vehicle parking spaces required, revise the calculation.

41) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The provided handicapped vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per the International Building Code (IBC) Table 1106.1, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, when 54 vehicle parking spaces are provided, 3 accessible vehicle parking spaces are required, 1 being van accessible.

42) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The location of the handicapped signage shown on the site plan encroaches into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. Relocate the sign show that it does not interfere with this overhang

43) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a detail for the required handicapped signage.

44) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P There is a double row of vehicle parking spaces shown along the west end of this parcel, demonstrate on the plan how access is provided to the western parking spaces. It does not appear that there is a PAAL providing access.

45) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 the row of 12 parking spaces along the north property line requires some type of barrier to prevent the vehicles from overhanging the property line.

46) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.1 some type of barrier is required to prevent vehicles from accessing the unimproved areas of the adjacent parcels until such time as they are developed. So these barriers on the plan.

47) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P It does not appear that the required landscape border has been provided along Wilmot Road, see landscape comments. This requirement will affect the backup spur and possibly parking spaces along the street frontage.

48) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q The provided bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.3.4 four (4) bicycle parking spaces are required, 2 Class 1 and 2 Class 2. Based on Site Note 70A it appears that only two (2) Class 2 have been provided.

49) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Show the location of the required Class 1 bicycle parking on the plan.

50) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a detail for both Class 1 and Class 2 bicycle parking on the plan including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage. Be sure to review the revised D.S. 2-09 for bicycle parking requirements.

51) D.S. 2-05.2.4.R Show any required sight visibility triangles (SVTs) on the plan. See engineering comments.

52) D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Provide a separate letter stating how all rezoning conditions have been met.

53) D.S. 2-05.2.4.V If applicable show the location and type of postal service proposed for this project.

54) D.S. 2-05.2.4.W If applicable provide the location, type, size and height of existing and proposed freestanding signage and billboards.

55) Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans.

56) Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956.

C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0017dp.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents.
03/25/2008 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied Here is the review letter for this submittal.

C.C. Patel, P.E.

________________________________




CARMINE DEBONIS, JR.

Director




FAX: (520) 740-6380


























March 25,
2008



TO: Joshua T. Cocagne

Lingle Design Group




THRU: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager

City of Tucson Development Services Department



FROM: Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E., Civil Eng. Manager

Development Review Division (Wastewater)

Pima County Development Services Department



SUBJECT: Carl's JR Restaurant, Tucson


Development Plan - 1st Submittal

D08-017







The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced
development have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department
of Environmental Quality (PDEQ), and the Pima County Wastewater
Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments
pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments
are offered for your use.






1. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D08-017 to the
title block of each
sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any
cross-reference numbers.



2. Provide a letter from PCRWRD Capacity Management
Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that the treatment and
conveyance system capacity for this project is available. A capacity
request form may be found at
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf



3. SHEET DP-1. Provide a LEGEND and show symbols for
proposed/existing and private/public sewer lines using different line
types. Use the same line types to depict these sewers on the plan.



4. SHEET DP-1 Show sewer service line ( building connection
sewer) for the restaurant building.



5. SHEET DP1. Show the length, size and slope of the building
connection sewer (BCS).



6. SHEET DP-1. Identify the sewer line shown in the PROPOSED
DRIVE with Pima County plan number. If this is the proposed sewer line
G-2007-085, then note that your development will not receive sewer
service until construction of this G-2007-085 sewer is completed, and
the sewer line is accepted by the Pima County in the public sewer
system. This sewer G-2007-085 will be built by another developer,
therefore the PCRWRD has no control over when or if it will be
constructed.



7. SHEET DP-1. If your proposed BCS is 6-in in size, it must be
connected to the proposed 8-in sewer by constructing a new public
manhole.



8. SHEET DP-1 Provide necessary COs on the BCS, and show their
rim and invert elevations.



9. SHEET DP-1. Show the information pertaining to the point of
connection of the new BCS to the existing or proposed PUBLIC sewer line.
Show the Pima County plan number for this existing sewer with its size
and slope, and show the necessary information about the existing
manholes ( IMS numbers, rim and invert elevations, etc.) located
immediately upstream and downstream of the planned connection point of
the new BCS.



10. SHEET DP-1 If you are planning to connect the proposed BCS to
the existing 10- in sewer line in Wilmot Road, please note that the PC
RWRD will not allow such a connection.



11. SHEET DP-1 Identify the sewer line shown on the west side
of the building.



12. SHEET DP-1 Show recording information for the existing
easement shown on the east side of the building.



13. SHEET DP-2 Add a Permitting Note that reads:



A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM THE PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON
THIS PROJECT.



The next submittal of this project will be the 2nd submittal. A check
for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 made out
to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER must accompany the revised set of bluelines and
the response letter.






If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please do not
hesitate to contact me.



Sincerely,







Chandubhai C. Patel, P.E.

Telephone: (520) 740-6563



Copy: Project file
03/26/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0017 CARL'S JR-RESTAURANT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 3/26/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:


1.) Location of this project is labeled as an excluded parcel on Wilmot/I-10 Commercial Center (S07-025), not Block 2. Revise the Title Block, excluded parcels are not part of the recorded plat.


es
03/27/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied March 27, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0017
PROJECT NAME: Carl's JR
PROJECT ADDRESS: 7632 S Wilmot Rd
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the development plan.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Provide the Traffic Impact Analysis as required by rezoning condition # 6. This development plan will not be approved until Traffic has accepted the required TIA.

3. A coordination meeting will be warranted to discuss/coordinate cross access with neighboring developments or a separate exhibit shall be submitted to demonstrate and illustrate on site traffic circulation via cross access easements/additional driveways.

4. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the right-of-way along Wilmot Road. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
03/31/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D08-0017 Carl's Jr-Restaurant 03/28/08

( ) Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
( X ) Landscape Plan
( ) Revised Plan/Plat
( ) Board of Adjustment
( ) Other

CROSS REFERENCE: C9-01-05; D08-0019

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN:

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: April 9, 2008

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
( X ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
( X ) Resubmittal Required:
( ) Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
( X ) Landscape Plan
( ) Other

REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 3/26/08

Comments


1) It should be noted that the rezoning conditions for C9-01-05 call for the applicant to demonstrate that its development is in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated October 2, 2006. These conditions call for an overall integrated site with the various planning elements of vehicular circulation, shared access, pedestrian systems, landscaping, water harvesting, and revegetation of set aside open space. Hence it is imperative that individual development plans being submitted show how these developments are integrated into an overall design context that is consistent with the required rezoning conditions. Please include a sheet with the development plan that provides a comprehensive overview of how this development plan is integrated into the overall project, and how it is consistent with the preliminary development plan submitted at the time of rezoning. This development plan sheet should include, overall vehicular circulation (access, cross access easements, shared access, connection to the residential development to the west), landscape border along the south and west boundary of the project, pedestrian circulation linkages between development lots/pads. (Rezoning Condition 1)

2) Please provide a cross section that depicts a safe and attractive pedestrian facilities between the hotel, restaurants, and mini mart, using planned open space. Identify this pedestrian circulation and open space areas on the development plan with a keynote. Also how will the pedestrian linkages be made to the development pads to the south across the proposed drive? And what are the pedestrian linkages to the west, i.e. sidewalk? (Rezoning Condition 1.d.)

3) Please provide a note on the landscape plan that the applicant is coordinating with the Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development to revegetate the area set aside as open space and/or detention basin along the south side of the rezoning site, and that rainwater harvesting is utilized on the site, including all rooftop, parking areas, and PAALs.

Defer to the Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development for Rezoning Conditions: 1.a., 11, 12, 13, 21, and 22.

4) Please provide a note on the development plan that a blanket cross-access and parking easement or covenants has been recorded and provided for the entire rezoning site. (Rezoning Condition 1.b and c. and 8)

5) Please provide in the General Notes what development lot this project is within, i.e. Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3 or Lot 4.

6) Defer to TDOT/Traffic for Rezoning Conditions: 2, 4, 6, 26, 27, and 28.

7) Defer to TPD for Rezoning Condition: 23.

8) Defer to DSD for Rezoning Condition 19.

9) Provide a note and/or keynote that identifies signage to be collocated and integrated in order to improve the overall appearance of the development site. (Rezoning Condition 16)

10) In order to address Rezoning Condition 18, please label on the development plan all existing zoning adjacent to the development site.

11) Please provide elevations that show that all sides of the structures will have the same level of architectural detail. (Rezoning Condition 15)
04/02/2008 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Denied 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR# 195203 April 1, 2008



Linge Design Group
Attn: Joshua Cocagne
158 W. Main St.
Lena, IL 61048

Dear Joshua Cocagne:

SUBJECT: CARL’S JR. RESTAURANT
D08-0017

Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted March 19, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer.

Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions.

Sincerely,



Henrietta Noriega
Office Specialist

hn
Enclosure
cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail)
S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power
04/07/2008 FRODRIG2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approv-Cond To Whom it May Concern:



The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the
project D08-0017.



Summary:

CASE: D08-0017

COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS. However, further traffic
impact and traffic mitigation studies are recommended.





Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 1473 PM Peak: 103



Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions,



Sincerely,

Sandy





Sandra C. Holland

Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst



Pima Association of Governments

177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405

Tucson AZ 85701



Tel: 520 792 1093 X462

Fax: 520 620 6981
04/07/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee

CASE NUMBER: D08-0017
CASE NAME: Carl's Jr - Restaurant: DP
Submittal #: 1

COMMENTS DUE: 4/9/08 COMMENTS SENT: 4/7/08


Items being reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan
Related: C9-01-05, Wilmot Shell LLC - I-10
Land Use Plan: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan, map detail #9

Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments:

APPROVED - No Resubmittal Required. No comments.



REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 4/7/08


























S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0017_Carl's_Jr_Restaurant_Wilmot_I10.doc
04/14/2008 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved No comment
04/16/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied 1. DP-1, Does not demonstrate adequate maneuverability for positioning collection vehicle perpendicular to enclosure area in one fluid movement. DS 6-01.3.1.A

2. DP-2, Dumpster enclosure detail - Front side wall protectors should be spaced 2 ft to center from face of CMU wall and rear side wall protector 4 ft to center from front side wall protector.
Recommend positioning gate post to the face of the CMU wall and provide a 10 ft x 10 ft concrete slab in front of the enclosure to reduce pavement damage during service operations.

3. Fast food restaurants generate both refuse and recycle waste. Recommend providing two single or one double wide enclosure/s to accommodate for both services.

Please provide corrections on resubmittal.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
04/16/2008 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Denied ADOT has some comments on this submittal;



* Is there any TIA for this project, ADOT would like a copy for
our files?
* There is a proposed median on Wilmot Rd., show it on the plan if
applicable.
* The note in the middle of the page does not satisfy any drainage
requirements, a revised drainage report may be needed.
* What type of contributions will be committed, by the developer,
for improving the I-10 and Wilmot road area?



If you have any questions or comments, I can be contacted at 388-4226.
thank you. TM.

--------------------------------------------------------


Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments.
04/18/2008 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
06/13/2008 ELIZABETH EBERBACH ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied TO: Patricia Gehlen; CDRC Manager
FOR: Jeffrey Geurian, PE, CEI Engineering
SUBJECT: Development Plan Engineering Review submittal
PROJECT: Carl's Jr Restaurant Development Plan
LOCATION: 7632 S WILMOT RD, Ward 5
FEMA PANEL: 2855K X-unshaded
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Eberbach
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0017

SUMMARY: The Development Plan package including development plan, drainage report, rezoning conditions, and landscape documents was submitted and reviewed. Development Services Department Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time.

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS:
1) City of Tucson Development Standards (DS) Section No.10-02.2.3.1.3.A.2, 2-05.2.3.F, 2-05.2.4.H, 2-05.2.3: The project is within the Airport Wash Watershed, a balanced basin management area. Address the following drainage comments:
a) It appears the portion of the Drainage Report from Bogardus indicates a generated 100-yr runoff of 9 cfs for the Carls Jr parcel. However, a current Tentative Plat indicates that there is a basin for the site. Provide current copy of Drainage Report for adjacent property plat indicating that there is no basin for this parcel. Clarify Note on sheet DP-1 of the Development Plan regarding no onsite detention, as this is a discrepancy to the plat submitted for the adjacent project. Also, if applicable, clarify any bleed pipe from any basin to stormdrain system.
b) Revise 5th sentence in the Onsite Drainage section of the Drainage Report to reflect that the offsite stormwater system runs within a stormwater easement along the south portion of the parcel according to the Tentative Plat for the adjacent property.
c) Provide a discussion and exhibit for offsite watersheds.
d) Show existing stormwater drainage pipe at south side of project on drainage exhibits.
e) Revise First sentence of Off-site Drainage section of Drainage Report to include discussion of stormwater that comes from offsite drainage from the east to the site and is conveyed by stormdrain system to be constructed.
f) Discuss in Drainage Report and show on Development Plan water harvesting areas.
g) On drainage exhibits, label Q100 entering and exiting the site.
h) Provide administrative address and case number (D08-0017) on the report cover page.
i) Provide verification that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development plan area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.)
2) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Provide recommendations for setback distance from buildings if there is any drainage area that will detain stormwater.
3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.C: Assure lettering for site details and site notes on sheet DP-1 are twelve (0.12") point or larger for legibility when reproduced and photographically reduced (microfilmed) for record-keeping purposes.
4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Clarify for the project-location map on sheet DP-1:
a) Identify major watercourses including Old Rodeo Wash.
b) Assure the adjacent subdivision labels are legible.
5) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.G: Revise the title block information at lower right corner of the sheet to include updated Book and page and reference to Block 2.
6) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.H: Provide contour interval with north arrow/scale on sheet DP-1.
7) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Symbols and keynotes on sheet DP-1 need to be clarified. Address the following comments:
a) Provide or identify items 3N, 9S and 12A that are shown on planview.
b) Provide or identify on planview the item listed as 21U in keynote list.
c) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.W: For 21Q add height for clearance.
d) Revise hatching for heavy duty concrete to match planview hatching.
e) Clarify type of curb labeled as type "A". See Standard Detail 209 for types of curbs or provide a detail for "A".
8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: LUC Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone.
9) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1: Check spelling of rezoning condition 16 (Signage shall be collocated …" )
10) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.1.a: Correct spelling for general note 12: " … caused by water, whether surface flood ..."
11) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.F: Assure that the sanitary sewer line alignment matches adjacent property proposed or existing conditions.
12) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement is to occur prior to issuance of permits. Specifically show the 15-ft stormwater easement along east boundary.
13) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.C: The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.
14) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.D: Some of the existing utilities are shown yet not clearly labeled. The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location of any existing fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
15) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.E: Indicate basis of elevation / benchmark with datum.
16) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.F: Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown, including existing stormwater system at the east side of site.
17) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.G: Show existing (or proposed as shown on plat) wall along east side of project. Label as to be removed, retained, or proposed.
18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.C, 2-05.2.4.D.4: Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function as one entity. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, cross access agreement, are required.
19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F, 2-05.2.4.L: Show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right-of-way for Wilmot Road. Label the MS&R future sidewalk (6-ft min width) along Wilmot.
20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. Specifically, show 20-ft public sewer easement along west side of project or other areas as per plat. Also, label sewer manhole missing at northeast side of parcel.
21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clarify stormwater system indicated on north side of proposed building; clarify inverts for each junction and label pipe type/size of north-south stormdrain pipe at west side of system.
22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.7: Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points.
23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Show ramps for the on-site pedestrian circulation, showing ADA ramps located south east of proposed restaurant. Also, clarify pedestrian access shown at west side of proposed building as it does not appear to be aligned with other pedestrian access areas and crosses drive-through area.
24) IBC 1101.2: Truncated domes are required for any ramps along the accessible routes. Add to legend or provide note to clarify handicap ramps.
25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Show maneuverability for the loading zone on a planview.
26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Show sight visibility triangles per Figure 6 of DS Sec.3-01.10.
27) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.S: Label radii for curb returns on planview.
28) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: To provide for on-site collection and maneuvering to avoid on-street traffic conflicts and for minimum conflict with pedestrian and vehicular traffic along onsite PAAL's, check angle of approach or discuss proposed dumpster design with Environmental Services.
29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.U: Indicate graphically, where possible, and by notes, in all other instances, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Specifically, the rezoning conditions require that integrated access is provided to and within the rezoning site, which includes the parcels adjacent to the site. The 24-ft ingress-egress easement along north side of project does not align with the adjacent ingress egress as shown on the plat for the adjacent parcels. Revise accordingly to show alignment to and access is provided through the parcel per rezoning condition 1c.
30) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.V: Indicate location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.
31) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.X: Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. See Landscaping and Zoning comments.
32) DS Sec.2-05.3.1.E, 2-05.2.2.A.2: Provide registrant's expiration date for seal on Drainage Report and all sheets of the Development Plan. Expiration date is required per recent AzBTR requirements.
33) DS Sec.2-05.3.1.H, 2-05.3.2.D: Submit any additional documentation required as the result of a rezoning case, including any traffic impact report as determined by TDOT Traffic or ADOT.
34) DS Sec.2-05.3.2.A: A report which includes the proposed solution for any land with unusual topography, soils, or other geographic hazards to life, health, or property shall be prepared to the City Engineer's specifications and will be submitted. Include a soils report with the resubmittal.
35) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.A.2: Adjacent project designs should be considered for layout to assure that alignments for utilities, access and other features are congruent through the parcel. Assure the pedestrian and vehicular access along west side of project matches adjacent project design. Coordination with adjacent project designers may be necessary.
36) For resubmittal, provide the revised Development Plan, revised Drainage Report, CC&R's or other agreement regarding cross access, any other supplemental documents, and a response letter.

A response letter is required with the resubmittal of the revised Development Plan package, acknowledging or addressing all of the above comments. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934.

Elizabeth Eberbach, PE
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Development Services
06/18/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 18, 2008

Joshua T. Cocagne
Lingle Design Group
158 West Main Street
Lena, Il 61048

Subject: D08-0017 Carl's Jr - Restaurant Development Plan

Dear Joshua:

Your submittal of March 12, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

12 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Zoning, Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Traffic, DUPD, TEP, ESD, ADOT, Engineering, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, DUPD, Engineering, DSD)

2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD)

2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD)

3 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, ADOT, DSD)

2 Copies Dimensioned Elevations (DUPD, DSD)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,

Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: (815) 369-4495
06/18/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied March 9, 2010

Joshua T. Cocagne
Lingle Design Group
158 West Main Street
Lena, IL 61048


SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILE


Development Plan

Per Section 5.3.8.2.A, Expiration Dates, of the Land Use Code, "an applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A development plan application that has been in review for a period of one (1) year which has not been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a development plan for the property, a new development plan which complies with regulations in effect at that time must be submitted. The new submittal initiates a new one (1) year review period."

Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date

D08-0017 Carl's Jr Restaurant March 12, 2008

Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat application is required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. CDRC members should be advised of their ability to review the new applications per the current regulations.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,



Patricia Y. Gehlen
CDRC Manager


xc: CDRC file D08-0017