Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0016
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/10/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | Verify a fire department approved lock box is provided at the vehicle gate. |
| 03/11/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | To Whom it May Concern: The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the project D08-0016. Summary: CASE: D08-0016 COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS. Warning: Small number of observations used in calculation Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 83 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Sandy Sandra C. Holland Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 Tel: 520 792 1093 X462 Fax: 520 620 6981 |
| 03/13/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 03/14/2008 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 04/07/2008 10:25 AM >>> No comment. Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Program City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/18/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/18/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/20/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: March 19, 2008 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D08-0016 THE GARDEN GATE T151521 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 03/20/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR# 194979 March 20, 2008 Robinett Architects, Inc. Attn: Anthony Falgiano 1670 E. River Rd. # 112 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr Falgiano: SUBJECT: The Garden Gate D08-0016 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted March 14, 2008. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. Please identify all existing TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development including but not limited to overhead & underground electric lines, utility poles, and pad mounted equipment. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson Development Services Department for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Steve Garcia at 917-8739 should you have any technical questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist hn Enclosure cc: City of Tucson (by e-mail) S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/21/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0016 The Garden Gate 03/21/08 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-84-84 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Esmond Station GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 04-03-05 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 03-21-08 |
| 03/26/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | March 26, 2008 To: Ronald Robinette Robinette Architects Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: The Garden Gate Lot 7 Sunbelt Industrial Center Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-016 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (RWRD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D08-016, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 2. Sheet 1: The existing public sewer line shown on this plan is not correct. The public sewer should not be shown on site. It should be shown just south of the property. The public manhole fronting the lot should be shown with the correct IMS# and rim and invert elevations. Also include the construction plan # and pipe size for the existing public sewer line. 3. Sheet 1: Show how and where the existing 4" private BCS connects to the public sewer line. 4. Sheet 1: Are any new sewer lines proposed for this project? If not then add the following note: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. 5. Sheet 1: If there is new sewer proposed then show it on this plan and add the appropriate sewer notes per the county's development plan checklist. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/26/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0016 THE GARDEN GATE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/26/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Number existing and new buildings numerically. es |
| 03/31/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0016 CASE NAME: Garden Gate: DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 4/3/08 COMMENTS SENT: 3/31/08 Items being reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED - No Resubmittal Required. No comments. REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 3/31/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0016_Garden_Gate_8500_Old_Vail_Rd.doc |
| 04/07/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/07/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0016, The Garden Gate 8500 E. Old Vail Rd, expansion to existing Building/Grounds Maintenance and Wholesale Facility Development Plan, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 4, 2008 DUE DATE: April 3, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is March 6, 2009. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standards (DS), American National Standards Institute (ANSI), Tucson City Code 20-222, and International Building Code 2006 (IBC). Specifically, this plan was reviewed for compliance with criteria outlined for development plans under DS 2-05. This project was reviewed for full code compliance due to the increase in square footage greater than 25% of the existing approved building area. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.6, please note, the former variance case C10-95-96, does not apply to this project, as it is not the same use. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.8 -near title block, please note the DSD assigned case number for this project is D08-0016. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.10, please provide these notes: A) This project is designed to meet the requirements of the Major Streets & Routes Overlay, LUC 2.8.3. B) This project is designed to meet the requirements of the Airport Environs Overlay Zone, specifically the ADC-2 and NCD-65 portions of the overlay, LUC 2.8.5. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.11, I see there has been a lot split that was performed in 2006 under case S06-080. I recall processing the split, however, I do not recall the exact lot sizes that were proposed. Please provide a copy of the lot split drawing with dimensions/bearings, that I stamped, to verify the sizes shown on this proposal are the same. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.3.A, please show any easements graphically on the plan, with recordation information noted. 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B, please revise the zoning classification on the east side of the south boundary to include the "RX-1"zoned area. Please call out where the zoning boundary is between the RX-1 zone and the GR-1 zone. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian access: A) Per DS 2-08.5.1.C - please ensure the surfacing of all sidewalks is concrete. Keynote. B) Per DS 2-08.3.1 - please provide a pedestrian route to all buildings C) Per DS 2-08.5.1.A - please keynote the width of the sidewalk to all points of the site. D) Per DS 2-08.3.1 - provide pedestrian access to the dumpster -whether with a man gate to the enclosure or re-positioning the dumpster. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N - regarding the buildings: A) please dimension the footprints of the structures - for permitting/records. ' B) please call out building entrances C) please call out type of roof D) note building height from grade to top of flat roof/parapet OR height from grade to midpoint of roof and top of pitch. E) please revise the floor area ratio calculation to a decimal format of .046 F) please provide a note that the floor area ratio max is .30, per the ADC-2 G) please provide a note that the development designator is "35" 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.O - regarding loading zones: A) A 2005 aerial of the site does not show the loading area near the 1904 s.f. building, thus it appears it will be a new loading zone installed on this site. Please label as such. B) please provide maneuvering lines for the loading zone - it appears a vehicle at 12x55 size will have difficulty maneuvering into the PAAL C) in loading zone calculations, note Building Grounds requires one 12x35 loading zone D) in loading zone calculations, note Wholesale requires one 12x55 loading zone E) provide a loading zone by the greenhouse buildings at 12x55 size. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P - regarding parking: A) please provide detail for handicapped parking space B) clarify if any outdoor area will be used for wholesale and park accordingly as well C) please provide curbing at the end of the row of parking by the greenhouses, to ensure no use of the undeveloped land occurs. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q - regarding bicycle parking: A) provide bicycle parking calculations for each of the two uses, in ratio required per LUC 3.3.4 under each use. B) per DS 2-09.4.1, class 2 bike parking needs to be within 50' of the entry of the building of which the parking serves. Provide bike parking near the greenhouses. C) please provide a bike parking detail, noting that DS 2-09 has been updated to exclude certain types of class 2 bike parking racks. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, indicate location of postal service to the site. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, indicate location(s) of any free-standing signage or lighting, with base pole width and vertical clearance. 16. 8 APRIL 2008 D08-0016/THE GARDEN GATE REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 1. PROVIDE AND IDENTIFY ACCESSIBLE ROUTE THROUGHOUT SITE TO ALL BUILDINGS AND PARKING FACILITIES AND TO NEAREST PUBLIC TRANSPORATION POINT AS PER 2006 IBS SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTION 402. PROVIDE SPOT GRADES OR OTHERWISE CONFIRM SLOPES OF ACCESSIBLE ROUTES AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 405 AND 406. 2. NEED CURB RAMPS AT DRIVE WAY FROM OLD VAIL ROAD AS PER DS______, 2006 IBC SECTION 1010 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 406 AND 406.12 AND ADAAG 4.7.7 3. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILED PLAN OF THE TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, SIGNAGE AND ISLE. SHOW ALL DEMINISIONS AND SIDE WALK ACCESS RAMPS AS PER ICC 117.1 SECTION 405 4. PROVIDE A DETAILED RAISED MARKED CROSSING ACROSS THE ROAD WAY ACCESS TO THE LOADING AREA. PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER ICC 117.1 406.12 AND 705 5. PROVIDE AN ACCESIBLE ROUITE TO BOTH GREEN HOUSES AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1104A ND ICC 117.1, SECTION 402 6. PROVIDE A DETAILED RAISED MARKED CROSSING ACROSS THE ROAD WAY ACCESS TO THE EXISTING EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA AND AT THE PARKING ACCESS ROAD. PROVIDE CURB RAMPS AND DETECTABLE WARNINGS AS PER ICC 117.1 406.12 AND 705 7. VERIFY THAT ALL BUILDING ENTRANCES ARE ACCESSIBLE AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303 17. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0016dpa.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 04/07/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/10/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 04/10/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: The Garden Gate D08-0016, T15S, R15E, SECTION 21 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Drainage Report on March 07, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed. The Drainage Statement is acceptable for development plan purposes and it is hereby approved. Landscape Plan is acceptable to Engineering and Floodplain Review. The Development Plan is approved conditionally subject to the following conditions: Development Plan: 1. Complete the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2. 2. Provide all applicable drainage general notes as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.C. 3. Add general note concerning sight visibility triangles as required by D.S. 2-05.2.2.D. 4. Some proposed culture callouts appear to be existing improvements that were installed as part of the previously approved development plan. Revise the development plan to clearly show all existing improvements, including existing grades (i.e. old contour lines appear to have been changed with the existing improvements and do not appear to be needed on this plan, etc.). 5. Are there any grading activities associated with this development? 6. Show clearly the water harvesting areas and demonstrate how site drainage will be directed to them. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan |
| 04/15/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 15, 2008 Anthony Falgiano Robinette Architects, Inc. 1670 East River Road, Suite 112 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D08-0016 The Garden Gate Development Plan Dear Anthony: Your submittal of March 7, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (TEP, Wastewater, Addressing, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Copies of City approved lot split documents (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 888-5518 dp-resubmittal |