Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0014
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/23/2008 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/26/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 24, 2008 To: David Laredo Laredo Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality Subject: Desert Toyota Parking Expansion Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-014 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2ND REQUEST This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above mentioned comments, please contact me . |
| 07/02/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0014 Desert Toyota Parking Exp. 07/01/08 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-05 (Desert Toyota) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: No COMMENTS DUE BY: 7/21/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 6/30/08 The Department of Urban Planning and Design D08-0014 – Desert Toyota Parking Exp. Development Plan June 30, 2008 Staff offers the following comments: Rezoning case C9-07-05 was approved by Mayor and Council on June 26, 2007, with 27 rezoning conditions. The rezoning conditions apply to the entire site and therefore full site compliance is required. Please revise the development plan and landscape plan accordingly. The following are required revisions: Revise development plan, sheet 3 of 4 to include rezoning case number at top of page. As a requirement of rezoning condition # 11, revise development plan to show service bay doors only on north oriented building elevations (existing buildings and proposed buildings). Development plan, sheet 1 of 4 identifies under keynote (22) a free-standing business sign. However, it is hard to determine if sign location meets rezoning condition # 13 since two different locations are being shown for this one sign. Revise DP and landscape plan to identify the correct location of freestanding sign. If two signs are proposed, please review with DSD staff to determine if allowed. Revise development plan and landscape plan to identify a masonry wall (single course of block with wrought iron top) along the full eastern perimeter as required by rezoning condition # 26. Include a cross-section of this wall. Fence permit # T060T3210 does not void rezoning condition # 26 if issued in conflict of this condition. Revise development plan and landscape plan to identify location of all on-site pole and bollard lighting, or other similar lighting (illustrations), drawn to scale to demonstrate site design compliance with rezoning condition # 22. Staff comments 2 through 5 are requirements of rezoning. Change of rezoning conditions may only be approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 07/14/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) According to the calculations, 15 Foothills Palo verde were required for mitigation, but only 14 were located. DS 2-07.2.2. Please verify that 15 are located on the mylars. Resubmittal not required. |
| 07/15/2008 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 07/15/2008, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Desert Toyota Parking Expansion D08-0014, T14S, R15E, SECTION 20 RECEIVED: Development Plan and Drainage Report on June 20, 2008 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Drainage Report and on the Development Plan where the revisions were made (responses such as drawings revised, provided, noted, etc. are not sufficient): Drainage Report: 1. Show on the Drainage Exhibit all proposed drainage solutions/structures with all required details (i.e. type, materials, location, size and dimensions, slopes, grades, high and low points, water ponding and slope setback lines, retention/detention basins inlet details, water harvesting basins, surface flow arrows, finished floor elevations, cross section locations and details, etc.) that would clarify how the proposed drainage scheme will work. The drainage information shown on the Development and Grading plans will be based on the information provided in the drainage report text and drainage exhibits. 2. The drainage exhibit and the Development Plan show one roof drainage downspout and one sidewalk scupper. Is this sufficient for the proposed building? Development Plan: 1. Revise the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number on all sheets (i.e. D08-0014) (D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2.). 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be equivalent to twelve (0.12") point or greater in size (D.S. 2-05.2.1.C). Revise all affected sheets. 3. Provide (show and describe) the Basis of Bearing between two established monuments and provide its bearing and distance between the monuments. Additionally provide the tie between one of the subject parcel corners and the basis of bearing (D.S. 2-05.2.3.A.). 4. Existing contour lines are very light. Provide darker contour lines as needed (D.S. 2-05.2.3.E.). 5. Since this project is not providing runoff detention, remove any reference to "detention" from the "Retention Facility Maintenance" statement. 6. Show clearly how site drainage will be conveyed from paved areas to the proposed retention and water harvesting areas (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.2). 7. Show all proposed drainage structures including sidewalk scuppers, retention basin, basin inlet and outlet structures, roof drains and roof drainage arrows, etc. as required by (D.S. 2-05.2.4.H.3). Provide drainage structures details such as cross section, dimensions, materials, water depth, etc. 8. Revise the drainage structures maintenance responsibility statement to include that the structures have to be inspected annually and after every major storm. 9. Check if one roof drain is sufficient for the proposed building. 10. Revise the Development Plan according to the Drainage Report revisions. Landscape Plan: 1. Landscape Plan is acceptable pertaining to Engineering and Floodplain Review. |
| 07/18/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/21/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-0014, Desert Toyota Parking Expansion - full code entire site. 7550 E. 22nd Street, C-2 rezoning case, Development Plan, 2nd Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 21, 2008 DUE DATE: July 21, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B., regarding easements: A) please note type of easement at far east side of site - noted as 5' wide B) note recordation info for 1' no access easement at far east (above C-2 zone note) 2. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, keynote signs advising no public access near garage site entries 3. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, separate the pedestrian route to dumpster from the loading zone 4. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, sht 3, detail G, show wheel stop fully in top 2'6" of parking space 5. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, note in bike parking calc all class 1 parking is permitted/provided 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.R, show sight visibility triangles for site entry by garage building. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.U, regarding rezoning conditions: A) keynote where free-standing signs will be posted to advise drivers of condition 9 B) Assessor's photos show garage doors along south side of existing auto garage. Per Glenn Moyer, condition 11-prohibiting garage doors on south face of buildings - applies to entire site. Provide notes & building elevations showing how condition 11 to be met. Your response to above states new building complies, however, response does not address existing building complies and the plan shows openings on south wall. For staff to accept plan, provide written advisement from Rezoning or Glenn Moyer indicating this condition does not apply to the existing building. C) show location of free-standing lighting on the site - meeting condition 22 - provide elevation drawing noting pole height. Also, appears poles will be on south lot line. Condition 22 indicates pole lighting only allowed within 15' of north lot line and other light sources on the site can only be 5' tall. See condition 22 please. D) sheet 4, detail A, wrought iron fencing elevation is missing a block under it per-condition 26. In addition, the wrought iron is not allowed to bow out of the property line. Please provide a note stating that wrought iron tips shall be directed inward to the property, or will be erected straight. 8. Please note further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951 if there are any questions on this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0014 desert Toyota expansion 2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 07/22/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 22, 2008 George Lance L2 Architects 6418 East Tanque Verde #102 Tucson, Arizona 85715 Subject: D08-0014 Desert Toyota Parking Expansion Development Plan Dear George: Your submittal of June 20, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, DUPD, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (DUPD, Engineering, Zoning, DUPD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 546-4777 |