Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: CORE REVIEW
Permit Number - D08-0010
Review Name: CORE REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/15/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/10/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Eastpoint Commercial Center - Core Review D08-0010 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2008 DUE DATE: March 13, 2008 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 23, 2009. 2) D.S. 2-05.2.2.A.1 Based on the Assessor's records it does not appear that the owner/developer for Lots 1-4, shown on the plan is correct, please clarify. 3) D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 List the D08-0010 development plan number in the lower right corner of the plan. 4) D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Label all existing zoning for the adjacent parcels, including across the adjacent right-of-way, on the new plan. 5) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a backup spur, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.D, at the west end of the south parking area on Lot 1. 6) D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 The 21.9' two-way parking area access lane (PAAL) located north of Building 3 does not meet the minimum width requirements for a two-way PAAL, see D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.1. When revising this PAAL be sure to review D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3 for setbacks from a PAAL to a vertical obstruction. 7) D.S. 2-05.2.4.I It does not appear that the proposed buildings meet the required building setback to the R-2 zoned property to the west. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 Development designators 28 & 29 the required setback to an R-2 zoned property is 1-1/2 times the height of the proposed building wall. This said based on a 25' foot high building wall the required setback is 37.5 feet. Provide a setback dimension for both buildings. 8) D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Show the 400' Scenic Corridor line on the plan. 9) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K For all accessible ramps that do not meet the STD. Detail No. 207, provide a detail that meets the requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003, i.e. the access ramps at the proposed handicapped parking spaces, the access ramp at the southeast corner of proposed Building 1, etc. 10) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide an accessible ramp, both sides of the entrance PAAL off of Broadway Blvd, at the proposed crosswalk and new sidewalks. 11) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide an accessible ramp at the north end of the landscape island, on the east side of the entrance PAAL off of Broadway Blvd. 12) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The proposed crosswalk shown on the east side of the entrance PAAL off of Broadway Blvd. encroaches into the required PAAL width, revise the curb access ramp. 13) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide wheel stops at all vehicle parking spaces adjacent to a sidewalk with a width that is less than 6'-6" as parking vehicles will reduce the width of the sidewalk below the minimum width of 4'. 14) D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It appears that there are stairs proposed between Buildings 1 & 3. Per D.S. 2-03.1 an accessible route is required between all buildings on site, clearly delineate the accessible route on the plan. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 15) D.S. 2-05.2.4.M Provide the square footage for each proposed building separately on the plan. 16) D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide overall dimension for the proposed buildings. 17) D.S. 2-05.2.4.O The loading space calculation is not correct. Per LUC 3.4.4.1.B.2 On a project containing more than one (1) building, loading spaces shall be provided for each building, based on the number of spaces required for the uses within each building. Show the required and provided number of loading spaces on the plan. Also show the loading spaces on the plan. 18) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Provide a typical detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Show the 1:48 maximum slopes for the handicapped vehicle parking space and the access aisle on the handicapped parking space detail, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5. Also show the location for the wheel stop curbing, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2 19) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The two (2) vehicle parking spaces located at the west end of the south parking area are required to be ten (10) foot wide, see D.S. 3-05.2.1.B.3. 20) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Based on the provided last approved development plan there are 220 vehicle parking spaces located at Lot 5, Block 3. Per this plan there are only 183 vehicle parking space on Lot 5, Block 3. Please explain the difference. 21) D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The parking space calculation is not correct. The total square footage does not add up to the total proposed for both buildings. Also the mixed use calculation is based on the sum of the amount required for each use, see LUC Section 3.3.5.1. Based on a Zoning Administrators determination if the uses, other than office, are 5% or more of the proposed square footage than the mixed use may apply to the office. This said the mixed use can apply for all uses proposed for this project. The calculation for the Second Floor shows "OFFICE RETAIL" parked at one space for every 250 sq. ft. The one space for every 250 sq. ft. only applies to office use not retail. Revise the calculation. The parking calculation should be based on the entire site there for include all proposed buildings, see D04-0032. Additional comments maybe forth coming. 22) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a bicycle parking calculation on the plan based on the revised parking calculation. 23) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Provide a detail for both Class 1 & 2 including materials for lighting and paving, type of security, dimensions, specific type of rack and the number of bicycles it supports, and the location and type of directional signage if required. When adjacent to pedestrian paths, indicate the width of clearance available for the pedestrian area. 24) D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Clearly identify the main entrances for both buildings as it does not appear that the proposed Class 2 location meets the requirements of D.S. 2-09.4.1. 25) Ensure that all changes to the development plan are reflected on the landscape plans. 26) Additional comments may be forth coming depending on how each comment has been addressed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0010dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 03/10/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0010 EASTPOINT COMMERCIAL CENTER/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: March 6, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete the existing DP Book and Page on all sheets. Delete the completed Address Block on sheet 1 and provide a “blank” Address Block. Completely spell Boulevard for Broadway on sheet 4. jg |
| 03/12/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#194456 March 12, 2008 Dear Mr. Salonga:: SUBJECT: Eastpoint Commercial Center D08-00010 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 3, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:City of Tucson (Email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/12/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Submit a revised landscape plan with resubmittal of the revised development plan. DS 2-07.2.0 |
| 03/13/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/13/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 29, 2008 To: Peter Salonga Oracle Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Eastpointe Commercial Center, Lots 1-5 Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-010 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D08-010, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #11 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1 and 3: Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different linetypes in the legend on Sheet 1. Sheet 2 and 4: Clearly indicate which sewer lines are public and which are private. Sheet 2 and 4: Call out the public sewer easement with width and recordation information. Sheet 2 and 4: All public sewer elements (manholes and sewer mains), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, should be identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Include the rim and invert elevations for the manholes. Also show the pipe size for all existing sewer shown on plan. Sheet 2 and 4: Show the slope/length/size and material of pipe and call the sewer line which runs to the buildings as private BCS. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $150.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/14/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0010 Eastpoint Commercial Center ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: D04-0032, D03-002, C9-85-79, C9-77-32, C10-86-92 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/13/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 03/12/08 |
| 03/19/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 4 - DP, lots 1 and 3 do not appear to have adequate number of enclosures to support their potential service needs. DS 6-01.3.2.B.Clarify the following: If the development will have a single owner or management company that will be responsible for the managing and maintenance of the refuse and recycle collection services and storage areas (enclosures) for the whole development. Then allowances for sharing collection services/enclosures may be approved. This must be annotated within DP general notes. Require minimum one double wide enclosure or two single enclosures. If each business or lot will be responsible for their own then will require a minimum of two double wide enclosures or four single enclosures. 2. All new development with large retail (or mutiple small retail)and restaurant business types are strongly encouraged to include two single enclosures or one double size enclosure (per business) to store both a refuse and recycle dumpster. 3. Chase building does not accurately depict the existing refuse/recycle enclosure that is currently is on site. Nor does the existing enclosure comply with DS 6-01.4.2 due to no side wall protectors. 4. Sheet 4, single enclosure does not provide the minimum required 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach. Conflicts with the 6 in curbed island. Recommend positioning slight counter clockwise to allow a direct approach. DS 6-01.4.1.C. 5. No refuse/recycle enclosure detail provided. However, previous approved DP does provide detail. This detail does not demonstrate the ability to secure the gates in the open and closed positions per DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. Please provide a detail drawing, show and annotate within. Recommend: "Positive locking and (Bayonet) anchors, QTY-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/21/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 1, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: East Point Commercial Ctr., 10205 E. Broadway Blvd. Revised Development Plan D08-0010 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 11 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. Provide access ramps or ADA compliant crossings where sidewalk joins any vehicular area. 3. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. The refuse vehicle cannot service the refuse enclosure as shown. 4. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 5. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 6. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 7. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. 8. Show Development plan number (D08-0010) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 9. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Provide a detail of the refuse enclosure. 10. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 11. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. and call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 12. "A grading permit and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to site plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/10205 E. Broadway Blvd. CDRC |
| 04/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 4, 2008 Peter Salonga Oracle Engineering Group, Inc. 199 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Subject: D08-0010 Eastpoint Commercial Center Development Plan Dear Peter: Your submittal of February 14, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Zoning, Landscape, Wastewater, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 292-6144 dp-resubmittal |