Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/28/2009 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/02/2009 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: June 2, 2009 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Accounting Office, 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan D08-0008 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan. The Development Plan (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. The e-mail from Environmental Services approving the refuse enclosure was not included with the DP re-submittal. E-mail me the approval letter or include the letter to the CDRC office with the next submittal. 3. Provide additional depressed curbs at the back up spur (south boundary) to except stormwater drainage. According to the drainage arrows, the stormwater is draining to the SE corner as well as drainage from the adjacent parking lot. The storm water will pond in the area because of the back up spurs extruded curb and the existing island/median to the east. It is preferred that that area be depressed 6" for water harvesting. 4. Provide drainage blocks along the west screen wall to provide an exit for the stormwater above the area depressed 6" for water harvesting. Quantity and spacing of the openings shall be by the engineer. 5. There seems to be a discrepancy between the note on the plan indicating that the top of curb is to match the existing asphalt and keynotes 24 and 25 that calls-out vertical curbs. 6. Key note 11 calls out for a landscape border, asphalt removal, depressed curb etc. 10' from the west property line. However the same key note 11 is also shown on the landscaped area on the north side of the property. Revise as required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7802 E. Escalante Rd._CDRC |
| 06/04/2009 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0008 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 06/04/2009 DUE DATE: 8/29/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 2/14/09. 2. A copy of the vehicular and pedestrian cross access agreement has been provided. Clearly indicate on the plan the area of the easement. Provide on the plan the recording docket and page information for the ingress/egress easement. 3. DS 2-05.2.4.K DS 2-08.2.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. The note on plans indicating that the top of curb is flush with pavement does not meet the requirements of being physically separate sidewalk. Revise. The existing sidewalk at the northwest corner of the existing building is required to be physically separated from the vehicular use area. Clearly indicate barriers, elevation change, curbs, etc. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Provide on the site plan the locations of the class two bicycle parking spaces. The indicated location of the class two bicycle parking spaces at the southeast corner of the building does not meet the requirement of DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Bicycle access through the development will be separate from the pedestrian ways. Vehicular access may be used as bicycle access. Revise location of the bicycle parking. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0008dp.doc 3 JUNE 2009 D08-0008/ADDITION TO ACCOUNTING OFFICE-RESUBMITTAL REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW-RESUBMITTAL 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 II SHEET 1 0F2 SITE PLAN A. Show slopes of marked crossing compliant with 2006 IBC/ICC 117, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 402 WITH ATTENTION TO SECTION 403.3. B. Please provide a large scale detail of the Southerly end of the marked crossing. Can not tell what's happening here. Provide dimensions, elevations, ramps as required and all in compliance with ICC CHAPTER 3 and Sections 402, 405 AND 406. If the concrete accessible route is flush with the vehicle paving, please provide spot grades indicating so. C. Provide Detectable Warnings at both ends of the marked crossing. D. Please provide large scale detail of sidewalk ramp at the North Easterly corner of the building showing all required dimensions, slopes, widths, lengths and slopes in compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 405. DETAIL D/2 and Site Plan: A. As per site plan, the parking aisle is part of the marked crossing. Please show such on large scale detail. Detectable Warnings are required at both ends, raised or other wise flush with the PAAL as per Sections 406.12 and 406.14. Please provide Detectable warnings at both ends of the marked crossing. B. Wheel stops need to be provided to protect the Accessible signage from being hit by parking autos. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/08/2009 | JWILLIA5 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 8, 2009 Becky Hammond Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0008 Addition to Existing Accounting Office Development Plan Dear Becky: Your submittal of August 5, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 3 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies ES Refuse Enclosure Letter (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 321-0333 |