Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/02/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/14/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0008 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 08/14/2008 DUE DATE: 8/29/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 2/14/09. 2. Provide a copy of the vehicular and pedestrian cross access agreement for review and provide the docket and page recording information on the plan. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.K List the conditions of rezoning (C9-74-10) on the plan and provide a letter stating how each of the rezoning conditions have been meet that apply to this project. 4. DS 2-05.2.4.F The location of the future curb along Escalante Rd. is not indicated in the correct location. A 150' right of way has a 12' sidewalk area measured from the right of way to the back of future curb. See engineering comments. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide dimensions from the building to property lines and the back of future curb. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.K Review DS 2-08 for pedestrian circulation design criteria. DS 2-08.4.1.B Sidewalks are required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL where buildings are located. Required along the north side of the building. Indicate width of all sidewalks. DS 3-01.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. . Required along the north side of the building. Indicate width of pedestrian refuge. DS 2-08.2.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks. Note on plans indicate the top of curb is flush with pavement. This does not meet the requirements of being physically separate sidewalk. Revise. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parallel parking spaces located near the southeast corner of the building do not appear to meet the minimum 8' x 23' dimension. Provide dimensions. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Provide on the site plan the locations of the class two bicycle parking spaces. The indicated location of the class two bicycle parking spaces at the west side of the building does not appear to have enough room for the bicycle racks as indicated on the detail . Clarify. Indicate in the calculations that the bicycle parking spaces are class two type. The number of vehicle parking spaces in the bicycle parking space calculations is incorrect. The correct number is 21 not 27. Revise. 9. For clarity purposes remove the existing wheel stops, keynote #8, existing canopy to be demolished, keynote #9 10. FYI: Per LUC Sec. 3.4.5.6 a screen wall is not required for the loading zone when the loading zone is combined with the vehicle parking spaces. 11. The indicated trash enclosure does not appear to meet Development Standards. Contact Andy Vera @ 791-5543 ext. 1212 with Solid Waste for correct criteria. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0008dp.doc 14 August 2008 D08-0008/ADDITION TO ACCOUNTING OFFICE REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 I. SHEET 1 0F2 A. DENOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY. B. AT NOTE 15, DELETE "OR AT HC ACCESS AISLES TRANSITIONING TO THE SIDEWALK AREA" AND REPLACE WITH "AS PER 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 406.12 AND 406.14". II SHEET 1 0F2 SITE PLAN A. INSURE THAT ALL SLOPES OF NEW CONCRETE SURFACES FOR ACCESSIBLE ROUTE EXTENSIONS AND BUILDING EGRESS ARE COMPLIANT WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117, SECTION 1104 AND ICC 117.1 SECTIONS 402 WITH ATTENTION TO SECTION 403.3. B. VERIFY THAT REQUIRED BUILDING ENTRANCES AND EXITS ARE ACCESSIBLE AS PER 2006 IBC SECTION 1105 AND ICC117.1, SECTIONS 302 AND 303. C. REFERENCE ACCESSIBLE PARKING TO DETAIL D/2 D. PROVIDE A LARGE SCALE DETAIL OF THE SOUTHERLY END OF THE MARKED CROSSING. CAN'T REALLY TELL WHAT'S GOING ON HERE. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS, SHOW RAMPS IF REQUIRED AND ALL IN COMPLIANCE WITH ICC CHAPTER 3 AND SECTIONS 402, 405 AND 406 DETAIL D/2: A. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ARE NOT REQUIRED IN THIS SITUATION BY CODE. OWNER OPTION B. RAMP SLOPE MAX 1:12 C. FLANGE SLOPE MAX 1:10 D. DELETE REFERENCE TO COT STANDARDS AND REPLACE WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 CODE STANDARDS E. NOTES 29 AND 30: DELETE ALL REFERENCES TO "ADAAG STANDARDS" AND REPLACE WITH "2006 IBC/ICC 117.1". DETAIL E/2 A. BOTTOM OF SIGN TO BE 7' A.F.G. B. ADD "VAN ACCESSIBLE" WHERE REQUIRED C. CHANGE FINE TO $532.00 END OF REVIEW |
| 08/15/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | August 15, 2008 To: Becky Hammond EEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: An Addition to Existing Accounting Office - 7802 E. Escalante Road Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D08-008 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 08/15/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0008 Addition to Existing Acct Off 08/15/08rh ( ) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-74-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan & The Groves Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 29, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: March 17, 2008 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: August 15, 2008 |
| 08/21/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: August 21, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Accounting Office, 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan D08-0008 (Second Review) T14S, R15E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. Show or call out locations of the sidewalk scuppers. Per previous comment. Drainage Report: 1. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes and is accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7802 E. Escalante Rd._CDRC 2 |
| 08/22/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The screening requirements of Section 3.4.4.3 can be waived when the loading zone(s) provided under this section are combined with the required vehicle parking spaces. (Ord. No. 10414 ,§2, 6/5/2007). The loading screen wall along Escalante is not required. 2) Revise the site and landscape plans to provide for curb openings for water harvesting in the landscape borders and show the landscape borders as depressed on the site/grading plans. LUC 3.7.2.3.B RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 09/04/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | ES approves of this small office development for APC refuse and recycle curbside collection services. There is adequate street frontage access from Escalante Rd. |
| 09/05/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | |
| 09/05/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 09/05/2008 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/08/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 8, 2008 Becky Hammond Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0008 Addition to Existing Accounting Office Development Plan Dear Becky: Your submittal of August 5, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Cross vehicle and pedestrian access agreement (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 dp-resubmittal |