Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0008
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/15/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/19/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/25/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 02/27/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | To Whom it May Concern: The attached PDF contains the estimated trip generation information for the project D08-0008 Summary: CASE: D08-0008 COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 23 PM Peak: 3 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Sandy Sandra C. Holland Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 Tel: 520 792 1093 X462 Fax: 520 620 6981 |
| 02/28/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | February 27, 2008 To: Becky Hammond EEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: An Addition to Existing Accounting Office - 7802 E. Escalante Road Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-008 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Ina and Roger Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Pantano Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D08-008, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #9 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: In the Legend show a symbol for proposed private sewer and cleanout. Sheet 2: Show the point of connection of the proposed private sewer line and indicate the pipe size/slope/length and type of pipe material. Also show the proposed cleanout rim and invert elevations. Sheet 2: Indicate the construction plan# for the existing public sewer and the IMS# with rim and invert elevations for any existing public manholes shown on plan. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/05/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0008 ADDITION TO EXISTING ACCOUNTING OFFICE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 03/11/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). Revise the landscape plan as necessary to provide adequate canopy coverage for the parking row located east of the addition. LUC 3.7.2.3.A 2) Revise the street landscape border to include an additional tree in order to comply with LUC 3.7.2.4. & 3.7.2.3.A.1.b. 3) Photinia fraseri is not on the approved plant list. Document and provide calculations for any oasis areas on the site. LUC 3.7.2.2.A, LUC 3.7.2.2.C.3 4) Show required sight visibility triangles on the landscape plan. Plant materials located within SVT's should consist of ground cover or low-growing vegetation of a species that will not grow higher than (30) inches. Contact the Department of Transportation Landscape Architect if existing vegetation in the right-of-way interferes with visibility. 5) Revise the site and landscape plans to provide a curb for plant protection at the western landscape border. Allow curb openings for water harvesting and show the landscape border as depressed on the site/grading plans. LUC 3.7.2.3.B RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 03/12/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D08-0008 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 03/12/2008 DUE DATE: 3/17/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 2/14/09. 2. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12 Expansions. Any expansion of an existing use or any addition of a new use to an existing development which results in an expansion in lot area, floor area, vehicular use area, number of dwelling units, or number of seats is subject to the following. B. If an expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a twenty-five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. This project is greater than a 25% expansion for building area and will require full code compliance for the entire site. Review the Land Use Code and Development Standards for required criteria. This project for zoning review purposes is considered a stand alone project for the purposes of full code compliance review. It is also considered acting in conjunction with the adjoining property because of the shared vehicular access with the adjoining property to the east. Provide expansion calculations and revised FAR calculations for the entire site including the adjoining property to the south and east. Provide a copy of the vehicular and pedestrian cross access agreement for review and provide the docket and page recording information on the plan. 3. DS 2-05.2.1.K Provide the rezoning case #C9-74-10 in the lower right hand corner, near the title block. List the conditions of rezoning on the plan and provide a letter stating how each of the rezoning conditions have been meet that apply to this project. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D08-0008 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 The proposed use indicated should be listed as follows: "Administrative and Professional Office "29". This use is not "subject to" any sections of the LUC. Revise. 6. DS 2-05.2.1.B.10 Add a note on the plan to read as follows: This project has been designed to meet the criteria of the "Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone LUC section 2.8.3. 7. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 In general note #2 list the gross area of this site by square footage as well as acreage. 8. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.A Provide bearings and distances for all lot lines on the site plan. It appears that portions of the parking spaces are located outside of this projects property lines. Clarify. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.B Clearly indicate the surrounding zoning classifications of the adjoining property. The zoning of the adjacent property along the south property line of this project is zoned SR and C1. Clearly indicate the location of the zoning boundary in this area. Contact Bill Marum with DSD for the exact location of the zoning boundary. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Review DS 3-05 for vehicular use area design criteria. Indicate the width of the PAAL behind the indicated handicap parking spaces to the indicated sidewalk at the north west corner of the building. Indicate the width of the PAAL at the entrance from the adjoining property. DS 3-05.2.2.D Backup spurs are required at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. Backup spurs will be required at the northwest corner and at the southeast corner of this project. Provide a dimensioned detail indicating width, radius and clear area behind the backup spur. DS 3-05.2.3.C. A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings; or overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas or unpaved areas on or off site and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.F Indicate the location of the future curb along Escalante Rd. Provide the location of the future and existing sight visibility triangles. See engineering comments. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide dimensions from the building to property lines and the back of future curb. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.K Review DS 2-08 for pedestrian circulation design criteria. DS 2-08.3.1Pedestrian Circulation Paths Required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This accessible route may be identical to the pedestrian circulation path. The above required pedestrian circulation path must also connect to the buildings within the adjoining property. Provide a detail of the required handicap ramps including width, slope, landings, truncated domes, etc. Revise note #15. Details for the truncated domes are required on the development plan as well as the grading, paving etc. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. DS 2-08.4.1.B Sidewalks are required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL where buildings are located. Required along the north side of the building. DS 3-01.2.2.B.1 A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. . Required along the north side of the building. DS 2-08.4.1.C A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. (See Figure 2.) Required along the east side of the building. DS 2-08.2.4.1.A At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage. DS 2-08.2.4.1 Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks, 15. DS 2-05.2.4.N On the drawing, label the footprint of the building with dimensions. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.O Review LUC Sec. 3.4.4 for required loading zone requirements. Provide a dimensioned loading zone on the site plan and include maneuverability for the vehicle in and out of the loading zone. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.P The parking space calculations will be required to be revised because of any redesign of the vehicle use area. Please provide a detail of both a standards parking space and a handicap parking space. Refer to development standard 3-05.0 for design criteria for standard parking and the ANSI 117.1-2003 for handicap parking criteria. Clearly indicate the location of wheel stops on the standard detail of the parking spaces per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. minimum 2'-6" from the front of the parking space. Per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 clearly indicate on the detail for the handicap parking spaces and access aisle the maximum slope in all directions of 1:48. Provide location and detail of the required handicap parking sign. FYI: minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the sign is seven (7) feet per City of Tucson standards. The handicap parking spaces are to be located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. Clearly indicate the location of the main entrance and relocate the handicap parking spaces if required. Where it may apply, DS 3-05.2.1.3 When the side(s) of a parking space abuts any vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport, the required width for the space is ten (10) feet to provide extra width to allow passengers to enter and exit the vehicle on the side where the barrier exists. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Provide on the site plan the locations of the class one and class two bicycle parking spaces. Provide in the calculations the number of required and provided bicycle parking spaces. Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. Per DS 2-09.4.1 Class 2 bicycle parking facilities will be located no more than fifty (50) feet from the main building entrance(s) and will be along the front side of the building as well as along other sides of the building that has an entrance. Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.T Provide location of the refuse collection area, including location of dumpsters. See engineering comments. 20. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 21. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 22. Provide on the plan the allowed and provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations for this site and for the adjoining property. 23. All changes, modifications, and/or corrections must be made on all applicable plans including the development plan, landscape plan, and NPPO. Once changes, modifications, and/or corrections are made and reviewed further comments may result. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-0008dp.doc |
| 03/12/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#194461 March 12, 2008 Dear Ms. Hammond: SUBJECT: Addition to Existing Acct. Office D08-0008 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 3, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:City of Tucson (Email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 03/13/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/14/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0008 CASE NAME: Addition to Existing Acct. Office: DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 3/17/08 COMMENTS SENT: 3/14/08 Items reviewed: Development Plan, Landscape Plan Related: annexation - N/A rezoning - C9-74-10 Land use plan(s) - Groves Neighborhood Plan, South Pantano Area Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: APPROVED - No Resubmittal Required. No comments. Reviewed by: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 3/14/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0008_Addtn_Acct_Ofc_Pantano_Escal.doc |
| 03/17/2008 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 03/17/2008 1:14 PM >>> No comment |
| 03/19/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0008 Addition to Existing Acct Off () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-74-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan & The Groves Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: March 17, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X*) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (*) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (*) Development Plan (*) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: March 10, 2008 Department of Urban Planning and Design Comments D08-0008, Addition to Existing Acct Office: Development Plan March 10, 2008 Staff offers the following comments: The site is not effected by current area plan policies. Rezoning case C9-74-10 effects the site. The applicant has not included the approved rezoning conditions of case C9-74-10. Therefore the applicant is required to include all rezoning conditions of C9-74-10, verbatim as approved by Mayor and Council, as a new general note. (*) DUPD staff does not require a follow up review, unless the proposed site design is in conflict with approved rezoning conditions and requires site design revisions. |
| 03/20/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for on site refuse and recycle collection services. DS 6-01.4.1.A. Clarify if improvements meet or exceed 25% and therefore required to meet current code requirements. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/21/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 04/03/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: April 3, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: Accounting Office, 7802 E. Escalante Rd. Development Plan D08-0008 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 32 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Statement. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Statement (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.3.12 Expansions. Any expansion of an existing use or any addition of a new use to an existing development which results in an expansion in lot area, floor area, vehicular use area, number of dwelling units, or number of seats is subject to the following: B. If an expansion is twenty-five (25) percent or greater or if a series of expansions cumulatively results in a twenty- five (25) percent or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site. 3. This project is greater than a 25% expansion for building area and will require full code compliance for the entire site. Review the Land Use Code and Development Standards for required criteria. 4. Address does not match with the City of Tucson Transportation web site. Explain or correct as needed. 5. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. At all locations where the sidewalk meets the parking area. 6. Please provide property description per D.S. 2-02.2.1.3. 7. Please label lot dimensions and bearings per D.S. 2-02.2.1.5 8. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. 9. Show future curb locations. 10. Construction, other then on the project site is prohibited, See zoning comments. 11. Pedestrian Circulation Paths Required. Within all development, a continuous pedestrian circulation path is required. This path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. The buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas and all other common use areas. Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required. The accessible route must connect all areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. This accessible route may be identical to the pedestrian circulation path per DS 2-08.3.1. 12. Sidewalks are required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL where buildings are located. Required along the north side of the building per DS 2-08.4.1.B 13. A minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge are a must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Required along the north side of the building per DS 3-01.2.2.B.1. 14. A sidewalk will be provided adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene. Required along the east side of the building per DS 2-08.4.1.C. 15. At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided to a project from each street on which the project has frontage per DS 2-08.2.4.1.A. 16. Sidewalks within a project must be physically separated from any vehicular travel lane by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, railings, or other means, except at crosswalks per DS 2-08.2.4.1. 17. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Dimension entrance to property. 18. Sidewalks are required adjacent and parallel to any PAAL where buildings are located. Required along the north side of the building per DS 2-08.4.1.B 19. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. 20. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 21. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. A grading plan may be required depending on the amount of cut and fill. 22. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 23. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. 24. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 25. Show Development plan number (D08-0008) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 26. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Include a detail of the enclosure on the plans. 27. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 28. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 29. Remove general note no. 16, there is no need for a flood plain use permit nor an elev. certificate. 30. "A grading permit may be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading plans upon the completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to the development plan approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes and is accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/7802 E. Escalante Rd._CDRC |
| 04/08/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 8, 2008 Becky Hammond Engineering and Environmental Consultants, Inc. 4625 East Fort Lowell Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D08-0008 Addition to Existing Accounting Office Development Plan Dear Becky: Your submittal of February 15, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 321-0333 dp-resubmittal |