Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0007
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/06/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/08/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please provide an approved water plan showing fire hydrant locations. |
| 02/12/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 02/12/2008 9:23 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this plan |
| 02/19/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | February 15, 2008 To: Grant Gete CDG Architects Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: El Rio Health Center Southeast Clinic Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D08-007 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Both Ina & Roger Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Central. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D08-007, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #36 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. Sheet 2: Show flow arrows on all existing and proposed sewer lines. Sheet 2: Indicate the construction plan # for the existing public sewer shown on plan. Sheet 2: Show the public sewer easement w/recordation information for the existing sewer line shown south of the project. We will send to your office via e-mail, a .pdf file containing a Sewer Service Agreement for the proposed number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. Three originals will need to be printed out from this file for notarized signatures by the Owner of Record. The three signed originals of the Agreement must be returned to this office in order to satisfy the necessary requirements needed to approve the Mylars of the development plan . Title company, trust no. and owner information will be required prior to drafting of SSA. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 02/25/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D08-0007 EL RIO HEALTH CENTER SE CLINIC/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: February 26, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Delete direction from all street names in Location Map. Completely spell all suffixes for all street names on sheet 2. Number proposed buildings numerically. jg |
| 02/29/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#194083 February 28, 2008 CDG Architects Attn: Grant Getz 2102 N Country Club Rd #9 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Dear Grant Getz SUBJECT: El Rio Health Center SE Clinic D08-0007 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 21, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) N. DiMaria, Tucson Electric Power |
| 02/29/2008 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | To Whom it May Concern: We are unable to develop traffic impact estimates for Project D08-0007. We would need information on the gross floor area of the project to develop estimates. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions, Sincerely, Sandy Sandra C. Holland Senior Statistical/ Research Analyst Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson AZ 85701 Tel: 520 792 1093 X462 Fax: 520 620 6981 |
| 03/03/2008 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a One of the paking spaces in the row of ten (10) spaces located on the east side of the parking lot, adjacent to the easternmost building, does not fall within 40 feet of a canopy tree trunk. Revise plan. 2. Revise the title in the title block to match the title of the development plan. 3. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D08-0007), along with the rezoning case number (C9-05-21), and any other related case numbers to all sheets of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan and Native Plant Preservation Plan. 4. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-06.5.4.A & DS 2-06.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. The landscape plan received did not include an irrigation plan as required. Landscape plan sheet 3 of 3 was not included with the submittal. Provide a copy of this sheet with the next submittal. 5. The 30-inch vegetative screen must extend the entire length of the vehicle use area. Show and label required screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I along the back of the Golf Links Road street landscape border at the west end of the parking lot and at the east end (just east of the entrance drive) of the parking lot. 6. Landscaping along parking lots where plants are susceptible to injury by vehicular traffic must be protected by appropriate means, such as curbs, bollards, or low walls per LUC 3.7.2.3.B. A vehicle overhang area of 2-1/2 feet in depth is required in front of the parking spaces located adjacent to the street landscape border along Langley Avenue. Dimension this overhang area between the required 5-foot high screen and the parking spaces. 7. Dimension the minimum width and label the square footage measured from the inside of tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 8. The 6-foot wide trail located within the 20-foot wide trail corridor along the east side of the property, as required by rezoning condition, is labeled on sheet 2 of the landscape plan "to be seeded with native seed". Revise to show no seeding within the 6-foot path. 9. Storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Plants located in the bottom one-third (1/3) of the detention/retention basin must be adaptable to periods of submersion. For basins located adjacent to arterial thoroughfares, planted areas should account for at least 35% of the total basin area. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. 10. A minimum two (2) inch layer of organic or inorganic material (i.e., decomposed granite, rock mulch, or other material) will be used as ground cover under and around the vegetation in landscaped areas, including within adjacent right-of-way, to help cool soil areas, reduce evaporation, and retard weed growth per DS 2-06.5.2.C. Indicate use of d.g. within adjacent rights-of-way (between curb and sidewalk and between sidewalk and property line) on the landscape plan. 11. The project is subject to the provisions of the Watercourse, Amenities, Safety, and Habitat Ordinance, TCC 29. A separate application and review is required. Contact Patricia Gehlen/Zoning Manager at 791-5640 Ext. 1179 for submittal requirements. A pre-submittal meeting is required. 12. The background symbol used within portions of the retention/detention basins is not shown in the legend. Please clarify what type of basin treatment or rock work is being used here by indicating it with a legend symbol. Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2:1 for protected. DS 10-01.4 13. The dumpster to the south of the easternmost building is shown to be in slightly different locations on the landscape plan and development plan. Revise to be consistent. 14. It is unclear if the dashed lines running through the property on the development plan and landscape plan are intended to represent new lot lines. If so, this project should be reviewed as a tentative plat/development plan. Please clarify and add lot dimensions and bearings if applicable. If these are inteded to be zoning district boundaries clarify so with a line in the legend and add the zoning designations to the drawings. 15. Any revisions to the development plan based on comments from other review agencies must also be reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 03/06/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | Additional right of way and linear park areas are required to be dedicated to the public by this re-zoning, the following items need to be submitted to the Real Estate Division located at 201 N, Stone Avenue, 6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701 Attn: Services Section: 1.) Legal description and sketch for the area (right of way and linear park) to be dedicated to the public, 2.) Title report for the subject parcel(s) dated within 30 days, Sincerely, Jim Stoyanoff Property Agent Real Estate Program City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl. Tucson, Arizona 85701 (O) 520.837.6719 (F) 520.791.5641 Jim.Stoyanoff@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 2, each enclsoure must be positioned so that they provide a minimum 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach in front of the enclosure and that there is a minimum 3 ft buffer (clearance) between any structure (i.e. curb, bldg, parking stalls etc.) to allow for adequate maneuverability. DS 6-01.4.1.C & 6-01.0 figure 1. If each building will be individually owned and/or managed then each must be equipped with at least two single enclosures or one double wide enclosure to accommodate for both refuse and recycle collection. If this development has one owner and/or property management for all three buildings and will maintain the collection areas and service, then the current three single enclosures will work. Please clarify and annotate accordingly. 2. Sheet 3, Trash enclosure - Please call out all dimensions inside and outside of enclosure detail. Identify bollard spacing as follows: side front bollard 2 ft to center from face of CMU wall or front gates, rear side bollard 4 ft to center from front side bollard, and rear bollards 4 ft to center from side wall with all bollards having a minimum 6 inch separation from wall. 3. It is recommended that the enclosure gates be mounted to the face of CMU wall or post so provides a minimum 12 ft opening of gates/enclosure. 4. Gates must be equipped witrh the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. Show within detail and annotate. Recommend: "Positive locking and (bayonet) anchors, Qty-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush in concrete/foundation." DS6-01.4.2.C.4. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/07/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | March 7, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0007 PROJECT NAME: El Rio Health Center SE Clinic PROJECT ADDRESS: 6950 E Golf Links Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis to address potential off site improvements such as a right turn lane, queuing dimensions for the proposed left turn lane, and the impacts to Langley Avenue. 3. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. 4. Schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/10/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/11/2008 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Patricia Gehlen DATE: March 11, 2008 CDRC/Zoning Manager SUBJECT: El Rio Health Ctr., 6950 E. Golf Links Rd. Development Plan D08-0007 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 30 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Perhaps routing the storm water into the Alamo Wash with a bleed pipe would be a better solution than to draining into the existing storm drain in Golf Links Road. Discuss this option in your response letter. 3. Obtain and provide documentation for approval to connect the proposed 12" bleeder pipe from the ret. basin into the existing catch basin in Golf Links Road with COT-DOT/Permits & Codes located @ 201 N. Stone Ave. on the 4th floor. 4. Provide detail of all drainage facilities and cross-sections of the retention basins. 5. This parcel is subject to the W.A.S.H. wash overlay zone. Applicants proposing a project with encroachment into the W.A.S.H wash or the one hundred (100) year floodplain are required to submit a mitigation plan in accordance with Sec. 2.8.6.5.D of the LUC and an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Sec. 6.2.5 of the LUC. Compliance with regulations in accordance with the DSD - Procedure are also required. Contact Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919 or via e-mail at Patricia.Gahlen@tucsonaz.gov for assistance with the review process. 6. Show the 50-foot study area (resources area) for parcels subject to the W.A.S.H. Ordinance. A mitigation plan is required for any disturbance in the resource area. Include the mitigation plan on the next submittal. 7. Obtain and provide documentation for compliance for the following general notes: 7, 8, 13, and 26. 8. Add to note no. 35 that all changes made to the plan will require revisions to all plans affected by the changes. 9. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. 10. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. A striped cross-walk leading to the refuse enclosure from the sidewalk adjacent to the proposed building is required. Also at, but not limited to, all interior pedestrian crossings a wheel ramps are required per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 11. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 12. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. A new pedestrian easement will be required for the new 5' wide sidewalk, at the South property line, partially located in the public right-of-way and partially located on the parcel. 13. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 14. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27. Call out the drainage blocks (quantity and size) for the new 5' block wall at the South side of the property. 15. Show Development plan number (D08-0007) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. 16. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Call out the Development Standard detail no. for the refuse enclosure on the detail sheet. 17. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 18. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 19. A Stormwater pollution prevention plan will be required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 937-4932 for additional information. 20. "A grading permit and a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP's) will be required for this project. Submit 3 sets of grading and SWPPP's with text, upon completion and submittal of a grading permit application. A grading permit may not be issued prior to DP approval. Subsequent comments may be necessary, depending upon the nature and extent of revisions that occur to the plans". Drainage Report: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. This review was performed for Development Plan purposes only. 3. Perhaps routing the storm water into the Alamo Wash with a bleed pipe would be a better solution than to draining into the existing storm drain in Golf Links Road. Discuss this option in your response letter. 4. Obtain and provide documentation in the DR for approval to connect the proposed 12" bleeder pipe from the ret. basin into the existing catch basin in Golf Links Road with COT-DOT/Permits & Codes located @ 201 N. Stone Ave. on the 4th floor. 5. On page 3 of the DR, it's stated that a preliminary grading plan by OPW Engineering, L.L.C. set the FFE's. A statement in DR indicating that you have reviewed and agree to the data provided by the grading plan. 6. Provide detail of all drainage facilities and cross-sections of the retention basins. 7. Addendums to any Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accecpted. The new information or the revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Report. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/6950 E. Golf Links Rd. CDRC |
| 03/11/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Denied | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D08-0007 CASE NAME: El Rio Health Center SE Clinic: DP Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 3/6/08 COMMENTS SENT: 3/11/08 Items being reviewed: ( ) Tentative or Final Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Related: annexation - N/A rezoning - C9-05-21 CDRC – N/A Adopted land use plan(s) – South Pantano Area Plan Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: () APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required. () No comment () Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions () RCP Proposal; complies with land use plan () Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements () No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on: () NOT APPROVED – Resubmit the following. See attached comments. ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 3/11/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0007_El_Rio_Health_Center_SE.doc D08-0007 El Rio Health Center_SE_Clinic Within the 20-foot trail corridor, please provide a slightly meandering, 10-foot-wide paved path, with landscaping, as per rezoning condition #11. Please note there needs to be a minimum 2-foot clear area on each side of the trail. The trail is to be constructed of a minimum 2-inch thickness of AC, with thickened edges, compacted to 95%, over compacted subgrade (over-excavate and recompact to 100%). Please provide a construction detail on the development plan. On the western side of the trail, install native trees (minimum size 15 gallons) and irrigation, and show on the landscape plan. For the length of the project frontage along the Alamo Wash, the owner/developer shall install safety railing to City specifications. Please provide a construction detail for the safety railing on the development plan. On the development plan, please provide a section of the trail corridor, showing the edge of wash, safety railing, trail and clear areas, landscaping, western corridor edge and adjacent site area. On the development plan, provide curb cuts from the parking lot to the 20-foot drainage access and maintenance easement/trail corridor. The 20-foot-wide corridor needs to be dedicated to the City for public trails purposes. The owner/developer will be responsible for maintenance/liability. Please place a note to this effect on the development plan. If you’d like to discuss any of the above comments, please call Joanne Hershenhorn at 791-4505. |
| 03/11/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0007 El Rio Health Center SE Clinic () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-05-21 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: South Pantano Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/06/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment (XXXX) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 3/06/08 |
| 03/12/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D08-007, El Rio Health Center Southeast Clinic 6950 E. Golf Links Road 1st Review, Development Plan, rezoning case C9-05-21 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 12, 2008 DUE DATE: March 6, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 6, 2009. 2. The proposal submitted does not match the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) that was approved on August 15, 2005. The use on the proposal and the building sizes have changed, which may require Mayor & Council to revisit the project under the rezoning case and associated conditions originally allowed to proceed, C9-05-21. Please send a letter to the Director of the Department of Urban Planning and Design, asking for advisement on whether this project is a major change to the PDP and requires Mayor & Council attention. For staff to accept the resubmittal in for review, a letter of advisement from the DUPD Director must be provided. Zoning reviewed the proposal with the thought that the proposal may be accepted in the rezoning division and allowed to proceed. Note that should there be changes in rezoning conditions, those changes must be noted on the resubmittal and staff will review the project for compliance with those conditions as well. 3. Per DS 2-05.2.1.C, all notes need to be 12 point minimum - on page 3, the detail for the handicapped sign is not large enough to show the fine for illegal parking. Enlarge. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, please provide a phone number for the owner of the site. 5. There is a line on the drawing that is not identified on the legend - please revisit the drawing and please show all symbols on the site plan. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.4.C, please advise if the project will be phased, and if so, please provide development criteria and access allowances for each phase. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.D, traffic circulation: A) please provide dimensions for all PAALs B) please remove the drive-thru lane from the 13, 600 s.f. building - per LUC 2.4.3.6.A, the O-3 zoning of this area of the site does not permit drive thru lanes 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.F, regarding right of way dedication: please clarify the provided lot size - before or after right of way dedication? Do FAR calcs need to be changed? 9. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian circulation: A) please provide a ramp with truncated domes where the sidewalk transitions to the PAALs. Please provide a detail drawing. B) the crosswalk connection near the east side of the 13,600 s.f. building needs to have a physical separation from the adjacent parking space, per DS 2-08 and to ensure pedestrian safety. In addition, the walkway area next to those parking spaces must be concrete per DS 2-08.5.1.C. C) Per DS 2-08.4.1, please provide a physical separation for the sidewalk along the PAALs and loading areas along the sides of all the buildings. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, regarding buildings: A) call out entrances B) call out any possible physical therapy offices (see parking notes on this) C) call out style of roofs, peak or flat w/ parapet? D) call out how building height is measured - from grade to either midpoint of peak - and give highest point of peak - OR from grade to flat roof and give height of parapet wall. E) call out any roof overhangs 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) on page 3 in the parking space detail, the free-standing handicapped sign is posted within the needed 2'6" vehicle overhang - revise location of the sign B) please ensure the handicapped signage detail provides a note that a $518.00 fine is incurred for illegally parking within a handicapped space C) In the parking calculation, please provide a total amount of parking provided 12. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, regarding bicycle parking: A) Per DS 2-09.4.1, class 2 bike parking must be provided within 50' of the entry to the buildings, please note the entries to the buildings and dimension distance from class 2 spaces. B) Per DS 2-09.4.2, class 1 bike parking should be reasonably located for access for the employee, please note that if there are multiple tenants in each building, then dispersing the employee biek parking may be called for. 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4. U, I see the rezoning conditions noted on the plan, thank you. Please separate them from the general notes and provide a specific header that calls them out as rezoning conditions. In addition, staff requires a response letter - separate from the review response letter - that indicates how each rezoning condition is met. Note that the rezoning conditions may change with the resubmittal, depending upon whether this is a major change to the PDP and is referred back to Mayor & Council. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.V, please indicate where the postal service location will be for the uses. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, please call out any free-standing signage and lighting, with height and base pole width information. 16. Please revise the Development Designator criteria notes on sheet 2 for the O-3 zoned building. The correct development designator is "30" - please see LUC chart and revise the development designator information. 17. I see on sheet 2 in the site notes, the allowed possible FAR and height notations for each zone on the site, for each building. Please provide the actual proposed height and proposed FAR. The proposed FAR should be provided in two ways, one for the overall site, and one for the zone of each proposed medical building. 18. Please note that further review comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 837-4951. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D08-007 el rio.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 03/14/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 14, 2008 Grant Gete CDG Architects 2102 North Country Club Road, #9 Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D08-0007 El Rio Health Center Southeast Clinic Development Plan Dear Grant: Your submittal of February 7, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 11 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, Wastewater, Addressing, Landscape, Real Estate, ESD, Traffic, Parks & Recreation, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Parks and Recreation, Engineering, Zoning,DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) 2 Copies Letter from Rezoning (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 798-3341 |