Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0005
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/17/2009 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Fire Comments: The building plans for this project show a automatic fire sprinkler system. Page 20 of 48 does not show the fire service. |
| 09/22/2009 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store Site Plan - Revision #3 (1st Review) D08-0005 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2009 DUE DATE: October 1, 2009 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5. Show the six (6) required motor vehicle stacking spaces on the site plan, see D.S. 3-05.2.1.C.2.a. 2. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Based on the provided summary letter, Sheet 20 comment 7, does the revised vehicle parking calculation include the proposed outdoor seating? If outdoor seating is proposed it is required to be included in the parking calculation. 3. D.S. 2-05.3.9.O Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension for 6th Avenue on the plan, see LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B 4. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q If outdoor seating is proposed clearly show the area of the outdoor seating on the plan and the square footage. 5. D.S. 2-05.3.9.R The proposed crosswalk shown running from the accessible access aisle needs to run perpendicular to the parking area access lane (PAAL). 6. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0005-REV3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store Grading Plan - Revision #3 (1st Review) T08BU00171 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 22, 2009 DUE DATE: October 1, 2009 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the site plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Site plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU00171 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 09/23/2009 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store 09/23/09 Revision - 3 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan - Revision 3 ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: October 1, 2009 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: REVIEWER: JBeall 791-5550 DATE: 9/23/09 |
| 09/29/2009 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Existing accessible parking spaces are not compliant to 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 502.4.3; access aisles shall extend the full length of the served parking space. 2. The marked crossing in not compliant to 2006 IBC, ICC (ANSI) 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14; a. A detectable warning is required at the accessible parking asile. b. The detectable warning at the curb ramp must be parallel to the direction of travel, straighten out the marked crossing. c. This location for accessible parking may not be the best for code compliance. Perhaps a new location would be better i.e. at the North end of the building. 3. The accessible curb ramp with a detectable warning strip shown at the South end of the building leads to nowhere for visually impared persons. It would be best if a 6" high curb separation were maintained as a detectable separation of the sidewalk to the PAAL. |
| 09/30/2009 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | September 25, 2009 To: MATTHEW CONNORS STANTEC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: SOUTHGATE SHOPPING CENTER Development Plan Rev 1-1st Submittal D08-005 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 120 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Sheet 2: Is this plan intended to be for the Panda Express Restaurant? If so why are the proposed fixture units for an existing grocery store and the La Curacao included in General Note #18 on Sheet 2. Sheet 20: Why is the existing grocery store shown as proposed on plan? Sheet 20: Show the length slope and size of the existing BCS for the proposed restaurant where you are intending to connect. Also show the cleanout with rim and invert elevations at the point of connection. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. |
| 09/30/2009 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Show the landscaping on the landscape plan. DS 2-07 |
| 10/02/2009 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/07/2009 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 10/08/2009 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 8, 2009 Corey Thompson Stantec Consulting Inc. 201 N. Bonita Avenue #101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store Development Package Dear Corey: Your submittal of September 17, 2009 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Fire, Zoning, HC Site, Wastewater, Landscape, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 750-7470 dp-resubmittal |