Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D08-0005
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/15/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/17/2008 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 17 SEPTEMBER 2008 D08-0005/LA CURACAO DEPARTMENT STORE REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW I. SHEET 1 of 48 A. NOTE GOVERNING ACCESSIBILITY CODE; 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY. II. SHEET 1 of 48 A. SHEET 3 OF 48 IS MISSING, PLEASE PROVIDE. III. SHEET 4 of 48 A. AT DETAIL NUMBERS 1, 2 AND 7: CHANGE THE SPECIFIED DETECTABLE WARNING +/- 2" BORDER TO READ 2'-0". B. DETAIL 1: NOTE ALL RAMP FLARED SIDES TO BE A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1:10 AS PER ICC 117.1, SECTION 406.3. IV. SHEET 16 of 48: A. PLEASE BE AWARE FOR ALL KEYED NOTES REFERRING TO DETAILS ON SHEET 3, SHEET 3 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. B. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF THE NEW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES LAYOUTS SHOWING ALL REQUIRED RAMPS, SIZE, SLOPES, SIGNAGE, DIMENSIONS, ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, ETC., AND COMPLYING WITH 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106 AND ICC 117.1, SECTIONS 502, 405 AND 406. C. IF ZONING APPROVES THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO REMAIN IN FRONT OF THE DUMPSTERS, THEN A RAMP MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE SOUTHERN END OF THE MARKED CROSSING. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING ALL SLOPES, WIDTHS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND DIMENSIONS. REFERENCE ZONING COMMENTS. D. ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1. V. SHEET 18 of 48: A. ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1. ALL PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH COT DOT REQUIREMENTS. FOR R.O.W. CURB RAMPS REFERENCE DETAILS 207. PLEASE CHANGE ALL KEYED NOTES TO REFLECT THESE REFERENCES. VI. SHEET 20 of 48: A. ALL PRIVATE PROPERTY ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1. ALL PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS ARE TO COMPLY WITH COT DOT REQUIREMENTS. FOR R.O.W. CURB RAMPS REFERENCE DETAILS 207. PLEASE CHANGE ALL KEYED NOTES TO REFLECT THESE REFERENCES. B. PLEASE BE AWARE FOR ALL KEYED NOTES REFERRING TO DETAILS ON SHEET 3, SHEET 3 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SET. C. WHERE IS KEYED NOTE 79? D. THE NEW PARKING SPACE SHOWN WEST OF BUILDING "3" DOES NOT COMPLY WITH ICC 117.1, SECTION 502.4.3 (ACCESS AISLE LENGTH) AND SECTION 406.12 (DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT MARKED CROSSINGS). PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS SHOWING ALL SLOPES, WIDTHS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND DIMENSIONS. E. FOR THE "T" SHAPED MARK CROSSING CONFIGURATION: 1. THE MOST EASTERLY CROSSING NEEDS TO BE STRAIGHT ACROSS THE PAAL TO THE ISLAND, PROVIDE A CURB ACCESS AT THE ISLAND THE SAME WITH AS THE MARKED CROSSING AND A 2' DEEP BY SAME WIDTH AS CROSSING DETECTABLE WARNING STRIP. 2. THE FLUSH ISLAND CROSSING NEEDS TO BE 4' WIDE FROM THE EDGE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING OF THE MARKED CROSSING FROM BUILDING 2. 3. THE STAMPED CONCRETE CROSSING FROM BUILDING 2 NEEDS TO BE SAME WIDTH AS CURB RAMP AND NEEDS TO BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATHS (PLURAL) OF TRAVEL, SEE RED LINES ON DRAWING. 4. ALL DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS NEED TO BE 2' DEEP BY SAME WIDTH OF RAMP/CROSSING AND BE RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. 5. PROVIDE LARGE SCALE DETAILS OF ALL DIFFERENT TYPES OF RAMPS AND FLAT INTERSECTIONS SHOWING ALL SLOPES, WIDTHS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND DIMENSIONS. F. AT THE TWO CONCRETE RAMP BUILDING ENTRYWAYS: 1. 2006 IBC/ICC 117.1 REQUIRES THAT DETECTABLE WARNINGS TO BE USED ONLY AT BOTH ENDS OF A MARKED CROSSING TO PROVIDE A CLEARLY MARK PATH ACROSS HAZARDOUS AREAS OF TRAVEL THAT HAS BOTH A BEGINNING AND AN END. THE STRIP OF TRUNCATED DOMES AT THE END OF THE ENTRY RAMPS CERTAINLY PROVIDES A HAZARDOUS WARNING BUT PROVIDES NO CONTINUED DIRECTION NOR DOES IT HAVE AN END OF HAZARDOUS AREA PROVISION. THIS ITEM IS A BIT CONFUSING FOR VISION IMPAIRED PERSONS. MAYBE MARKED CROSSINGS SHOULD BE PROVIDED. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/17/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store Site Plan - Revision (1st Review) D08-0005 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2008 DUE DATE: September 29, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5 Sheet 18 provide a dimension for the parking area access lane (PAAL) located between the landscape island with the two (2) refuse containers and the parking spaces to the southwest. 2. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 16, the three (3) vehicle parking spaces shown without wheel stops are, located south of the proposed loading spaces, are required to have wheel stops due to the sidewalk width being less than six (6) foot six (6) inches. 3. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q As zoning looks at loading spaces similar to parking spaces per D.S. 2-08.4.1.F Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas may not be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space. This said the crosswalk shown west of the proposed loading spaces and refuse enclosures cannot to be located in this area. 4. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0005-REV RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store Grading Plan - Revision (1st Review) T08BU00171 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2008 DUE DATE: September 29, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the site plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Site plan has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU00171 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 09/26/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD Engineering does not recommend approval of the revised sheets and will require a revised set with the next submittal. The following comments are offered: Sheet 18 - Please correct the callout or dimensioning for the 2 loading areas which are clearly larger than 12'x35'. Sheet 20 - Please dimension all sidewalk along the northern side of the new grocery store. Sheet 25 - Please dimension the sidewalk in the vicinity of the loading zones. Sheet 27 - Please correct the callout or dimensioning for the 2 loading areas which are clearly larger than 12'x35'. Sheet 27 - Provide additional horizontal control in the vicinity of the revision. Sheet 29 - Please dimension the sidewalk along the southern side of the new grocery store. |
| 09/29/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store 09/29/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( X ) Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: September 29, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( X ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: May 15, 2008 ( X ) No Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( X ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( X ) Elevations REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 9/29/08 |
| 10/02/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 18, call out trash compactor and add to keynotes. Compactor will require an enclosure for screening from public view and ensure a minimum 12 ft inside clear between the side walls with side wall protectors (one on each side) 2ft from the front gates with a minimum 10ft clear between. Provide required gate anchors for securing gates when open and closed. Refer to DS 6-01.4.2 & 6-01.4.3 2. Sheet 20, Must provide a minimum 3 ft clear between the service vehicle and all structures and parking areas to allow for adequate maneuvering and approach. Curent position of enclosure demonstrates potential conflcit with adjacent parking. Recommend repositioning enclosure counter clockwise (or to a 30 degree angle) to allow adequate and safe approach to position collection vehicle perpendicular to enclosure. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/06/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES October 6, 2008 Matthew T. Connors Stantec Consulting, Inc. 201 North Bonita Avenue, #101 Tucson, Arizona 85745 Subject: D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store Development Plan Dear Matthew: Your submittal of September 16, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, ADA, Engineering, ESD, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 750-7470 |