Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: D08-0005
Parcel: 11901051L

Address:
3390 S 6TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN

Permit Number - D08-0005
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/18/2008 FERNE RODRIGUEZ START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/30/2008 FRODRIG2 PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Approved April 29, 2008

To: MATTHEW CONNORS
STANTEC

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department

___________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County
Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality

Subject: SOUTHGATE SHOPPING CENTER
Development Plan-2nd Submittal
D08-005


The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use.

The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted.

Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality.

Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution.
05/05/2008 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Development Package Comments

1) Per LUC 3.7.2.3.A, every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree. A canopy tree is defined as a woody plant, other than a palm tree, with a mature crown diameter of at least fifteen (15) feet per LUC 6.2.3. Revise the tree species proposed to meet the canopy tree requirements to include species with a minimum canopy of 15 feet. Xylosma congestum is a shrub that can trained to provide a tree-like appearance, but it does not provide the required 15' canopy, therefore, the tree is not acceptable where a canopy tree is required. Specify an acceptable canopy tree for landscape borders and parking lot islands.

2) Revise sheet 35 of the landscape plan to include a tree in the planter, east of the existing building, in order to comply with the spacing requirements.

3) Provide at least a ten- foot wide landscape border along the I-10 frontage. Include 50% vegetative coverage, exclusive of the screen plantings. Show any plantings in the ADOT right-of-way used to meet the coverage requirements. LUC 3.7.2.4

4) Revise the development plan to provide dimensions for each landscape border. Graphically indicate any approved landscape areas in adjacent public rights-of-way. Development Package Checklist

5) A vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel-stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site.
per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the development plans (sheet 20) to show/or provide the barrier at the edge of the drive-through lane adjacent to the 6th Avenue landscape border.

6) Revise the landscape plan to note location and provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area and relevant calculations. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b
Queen palm, Star jasmine, and creeping fig vine are not on the regulatory plant list and may only be used within the oasis allowance. LUC 3.7.2.2

GRADING PLANS

1) Revise the grading plans as necessary to correspond with changes made to the development and landscape plans

2) Rain water harvesting must be conducted at this site per the requirements in Land Use Code (LUC) Section 3.7.1.1.A, requiring that landscaping should accomplish natural resources conservation; LUC Section 3.7.4.3.B requiring integration of grading, hydrology and landscaping to make the maximum use of stormwater for on-site irrigation; and LUC Section 3.7.4.5.B requiring that stormwater and runoff harvesting be used to supplement drip irrigation for both new and preserved vegetation. Techniques to design and implement water harvesting are described in the City of Tucson's Water Harvesting Guidance Manual. This document can be downloaded as from the following website: http://dot.tucsonaz.gov/stormwater/

To comply with the above-referenced LUC sections, rain water harvested from building roofs, sidewalks, and parking lots shall be employed to assist in supporting landscaped areas including parking lot tree wells, landscape buffers, sidewalk plantings, and other vegetation locations at the site. Details and Specifications for water harvesting shall be clearly indicated on site plans to ensure it is correctly implemented at all necessary stages of construction.

The City of Tucson's Office of Conservation and Sustainable Development is available for consultation regarding water harvesting principles, techniques and code requirements. Please contact Ann Audrey or Frank Sousa in OCSD to make an appointment.


RESUBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED
05/05/2008 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

KAY MARKS
ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
PH: 740-6480
FAX #: 740-6370


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL
SUBJECT: D08-0005 LA CURACAO DEPARTMENT STORE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: 5/02/08



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project.


Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses.

2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection.




ES
05/12/2008 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store
Site Plan (2nd Review)
D08-0005

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2008

DUE DATE: May 15, 2008

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 29, 2009.

2. D.S. 2-05.2.5 Show the required three (3) inch by five (5) space in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for the approval stamp on all sheets.

3. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.8.A It appears that this project may comprise five (5) parcels, 119-01-051L, 119-01-076A, 119-01-075A, 119-01-075C, & 119-01-0550, therefore you will need to show how the parcels can work as stand alone parcels if sold separately or provide a Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property.

4. Zoning acknowledges the ROW width dimensions shown on the plan. Sheet 12 shows a 105' R/W MS&R (EXISTING). Based on the COT MS&R map the future ROW for 6th Avenue is 120', so the future ROW on the plan. D.S. 2-05.3.8.C and D.S. 2-05.3.9.I List 6th Avenue as a MS&R and provide the right-of-way width, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks for both existing and future if applicable for both 6th Avenue and 44th Street.

5. The comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Detail 1 sheet 3, handicapped vehicle parking, show the maximum allowed surface slopes for the handicapped vehicle parking space and access aisle, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 502.5.

6. This comment has not been addressed. It still appears that the signs are located within the 2'-6" vehicle overhang area. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a The proposed handicapped signage shown on the plans appears to encroach into the2'-6" vehicle overhang. This signage cannot reduce the 2'-6" overhang area and may not encroach into the minimum 4' sidewalk width.
7. Zoning acknowledges the handicapped ramps. Provide a dimension from the top of ramp to the building so that Zoning can verify that the four (4) foot sidewalk width is maintained. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 16, it is not clear how a handicapped person will gain access to the sidewalk from the handicapped vehicle parking space shown on this sheet. Provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how this handicapped parking space and access aisle will work. Truncated domes are required at any curb access ramp or where pavement is flush with the curb.

8. Zoning acknowledges the handicapped ramps. Provide a dimension from the top of ramp to the building so that Zoning can verify that the four (4) foot sidewalk width is maintained. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 17, it is not clear how a handicapped person will gain access to the sidewalk from the handicapped vehicle parking space shown on this sheet. Provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how this handicapped parking space and access aisle will work. Truncated domes are required at any curb access ramp or where pavement is flush with the curb.

9. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 18, a two (2) foot setback is required from proposed wall, around the trash enclosures called out under keynote 6, to the adjacent PAALs, see D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.3, provide a dimension for verification.

10. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 19, adjacent to the 1,217 sq. ft. building, it is not clear how a handicapped person will gain access to the sidewalk from the handicapped vehicle parking space shown on this sheet. Provide a detail that clearly demonstrates how this handicapped parking space and access aisle will work. Truncated domes are required at any curb access ramp or where pavement is flush with the curb.

11. Zoning acknowledges that loading space numbers have been provided. Is this the required or provided. Please provide both. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.c Provide a loading space calculation on sheet 2 that includes the number of loading spaces required and provided.

12. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.K Zoning acknowledges the proposed easements shown on the plan. Provide the docket and page prior to approve of this plan.

13. This comment has not been fully addressed. There is an area near the north corner of the building that has striping but no side walk. This area is required to meet the five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area and the sidewalk requirement. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 13, per D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 a five (5) foot pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL & D.S. 2-08.4.1.B a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. This said there is an area located near the north corner of the proposed building that does not meet these requirements. Also the four (4) sidewalk proposed along the south side of the proposed building does not meet these requirements.

14. The propose route does not meet the requirements, the proposed route will reduce the width of the PAAL to below minimum width. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 13, per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the trash enclosures called out under keynote 6.

15. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 13, per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide the required pedestrian circulation to the proposed bicycle parking called out under keynote 11.

16. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 18, per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide the required pedestrian circulation/accessible route to the trash enclosures called out under keynote 6.

17. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 19, it is not clear how the proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible route, crosswalk and truncated domes, shown at the northwest corner of parcel 119-01-0550 work. Provide a detail to clarify.

18. Reference the cross section 1/sheet 29 on sheet 20. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 20, it is not clear how the proposed pedestrian circulation/accessible route located within the landscape island at the west end of the entrance PAAL off of 6th Avenue works. Truncated domes are required, 24 inches minimum in the direction of travel and extend the full width of the flush surface, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 406.13.1 & 406.13.2. Provide a detail for this area.

19. Provide documentation from Solid Waste that approves the dual use. D.S. 2-05.3.9.S Sheet 19, there does not appear to be a refuse collection area for the existing 6,481 sq. ft building.

20. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Show the required wheel stops for the vehicle parking spaces located along the northwest side of the building on sheet 13, see D.S. 3-05.2.3.1.

21. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a There is a landscape area near where the property line jogges, approximately mid page, that the adjacent parking space to the south appears to encroach into the 24'-0" PAAL width. Provide a dimension for this PAAL.

22. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 16 handicapped vehicle parking spaces require wheel stops to prevent vehicles from running into the proposed signage.

23. D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Sheet 19, 60 degree angled parking along the north side of the property, per LUC Table 3.3.7.I the minimum width of a PAAL that accesses 60 degree angled parking is sixteen (16) feet. The proposed 15.5' PAAL does not meet this requirement.

24. D.S. 2-05.3.9.Q Sheet 19, Building 2, it is still not clear that the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.2.B.1 & D.S. 2-08.4.1.B are met along the north and east sides of the existing building.

After discussions with Ron Brown, Structural Review, City of Tucson, Development Services Department in regards to the ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 and the requirements for detectable warnings (truncated domes), it has been determined that some locations previously requiring truncated domes may no longer require them. The following comments are a direct result of these discussions. If you have any questions in regards to the requirements for truncated domes contact Ron Brown @837-4908.

1. Sheet 14, the truncated domes shown near the main entrance of the proposed building are no longer required.

2. Sheet 15 the truncated domes shown at the ends of each accessible access aisles for the accessible parking spaces are not required.

3. Sheet 16 the truncated domes shown at the end of the accessible access aisle for the accessible parking spaces, shown near the southeast corner of Building #5, are not required.

4. Sheet 17 the truncated domes shown at the end of the accessible access aisle for the accessible parking spaces, shown near Building #4, are not required.

5. Sheet 19 the truncated domes shown at the end of the accessible access aisle for the accessible parking spaces, shown near Building #1, are not required.

6. If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ d08-0005
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents.


CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office
FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: La Curacao Department Store
Grading Plan (2nd Review)
T08BU00171

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 12, 2008

DUE DATE: May 15, 2008

GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section and appears to be in general compliance with the site plan but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the Site plan has been approved.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T08BU00171
RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents.
05/14/2008 MATT FLICK ENGINEERING REVIEW Approved
05/15/2008 ANDY VERA ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied 1. The presumption is that buildings 1 thru 5 will be sharing in solid waste disposal services. Therefore provide a general note stating " One single property owner, management, or association will be responsible for the mangement and maintenance of the refuse and recycle services and storage/enclosure areas".

2. The new buiding identifies sufficient service/enclosures for this site only. In order to support adequate collection services for this development a minimum of one single enclosure positioned next to each of the existing three enclosures by buildings 4 & 5 and one by buildings 1 & 2 will be required for refuse and recycle collection services. DS 6-01.3.2.B & 6-01.4.1.A.

3. Building 1, the loading dock still remains in conflict with the path for the collection vehicle to maneuver from the enclsoure area and exit south with the flow of traffic.

4. Trash enclosure detail - Note indicating positive locking and bayonet anchors etc... This note must include a reference that this equipment is required for the enclosure gates/doors.

Please provide corrections on resubmittal.

If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov
05/15/2008 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied May 15, 2008
ACTIVITY NUMBER: D08-0005
PROJECT NAME: La Curacao Department Store
PROJECT ADDRESS: 295 W 40th St
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal.

The following items must be revised or added to the development plan.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. To ensure that no conflicts will exist with the off-site improvements for both this development and the Circle K development please schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan for both projects. A follow up meeting may be warranted to verify the proposed off-site layouts.

3. It has come to my attention from other city staff that a bike lane project will run adjacent to this project. Therefore enough pavement needs to be provided to ensure that the future bike lane project will fit within the new cross section of Sixth Avenue post construction of these off-site improvements.



If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
05/16/2008 FRODRIG2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Approved no comment
05/16/2008 ROGER HOWLETT COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store 4/30/08

() Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
(X) Elevations

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN:

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE:

COMMENTS DUE BY: May 15, 2008

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
( X ) See Additional Comments Attached
( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
( X ) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
(X) Elevations

REVIEWER: JBeall 791-4505 DATE: 4/30/08


Comments


The Julian Wash Linear Park abuts the project site and continues east across South 6th Avenue. Please continue to work with City of Tucson Parks and Recreation as to the appropriate cross section design and landscaping of this pedestrian trail.


Please address the issue of four-sided detail on the southern side of existing Building 4, more architectural detail will be needed to break up the long expanse of blank walls to provide a more enhanced pedestrian environment. Please stretch the façade improvements so as to avoid long expanse of blank walls, continuing the canopies, window projects, and textured finishes that appear on some of the building walls; provide a new elevation for Building 4.
05/20/2008 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Denied PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS

City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee

CASE NUMBER: D08-0005
CASE NAME: La Curacao Department Store: DP
Submittal #: 2

COMMENTS DUE: 5/15/08 COMMENTS SENT: 5/20/08

Items being reviewed: Development Plan and Landscape Plan

Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments:


(") NOT APPROVED - Please see the following comments.

Thank you for meeting with us, and showing the following on the plans:
" A 10-foot-wide sidewalk with landscaping on both sides, along the north side of 44th Street (since it is in the road right-of-way, we agree that it does not need to be dedicated to the County Regional Flood Control District);
" lighting along the southern edge of the parking lot, adjacent to the 10-foot sidewalk area;
" stamped, colored concrete where the pathway crosses the drives on 44th Street;
" a paved path that connects the pedestrian bridge over the Tucson Diversion Channel (TDC) and the western edge of the western access on 44th Street; and
" a relocated Tucson Diversion Channel (TDC) linear park path that minimizes the park area encroachment on the development site.

Please address the following:

1) Ten-Foot-Wide Paved Path. For the TDC path east of the western-most access drive on 44th Street, please replace the 10-foot-wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of 44th Street (keynote 8) with a 10-foot-wide, paved, bi-directional asphalt path, constructed of 2-1/2 inches AC over 4 inches ABC, with thickened edges and edges beveled. Please provide a path section on the Development Plan (DP) and Landscape Plan (LP). There should be a line down the center of the paved, 10-foot section, to enhance the safety of bi-directional, multi-modal users.

2) Unobstructed Corridor. Please place the following note on the DP:
"All utilities and other obstructions will be removed from the 10-foot-wide paved area along the north side of 44th Street by the owner/developer, at no expense to the public."

La Curacao/Southgate Shopping Center
D08-0005


3) Signs. Thank you for providing signage for the 10-foot-wide paved path. Based on further internal discussions, only the location of the signage is to be shown on the plan; we will work with you to determine the design. Please add the following note to the DP and LP: "Prior to installation, all signs relating to the Tucson Diversion Channel path and the extension of the path along the north side of 44th Street, must be approved by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department, and Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation." Also, please modify keynote 46 accordingly.

4) Lighting. Regarding keynote 38 and lighting detail 5 on sheet 4, please provide the height of the light poles. The poles should be the lowest height needed to provide the illumination and security lighting needed.

5) Elevated truncated domes. These are located where the access drives on 44th Street abut the 10-foot paved path, near the handicap curb access ramps. We are concerned that these may create an unnecessarily rough surface. Please replace with a feature that is less rough.

6) Pima County Flood Control District (PCFCD). Please indicate on the DP that the parcel with the Tucson Diversion Channel that is adjacent to the Southgate site is owned by the PCFCD.

7) TDC Paved Path, Northwest of Pedestrian Bridge. The owner/developer will be required to reconstruct the relocated portion of the paved path northwest of the pedestrian bridge, including the portion on the PCFCD land. Please identify the portion of the path that will be reconstructed, and add the following note on sheet 18/48, and other sheets as appropriate:

"Offsite improvement plans are required, in conjunction with this project, for the relocation and reconstruction of the Tucson Diversion Channel path."

Please add the following General Note: "Offsite improvement plans are required for the relocation and reconstruction of the Tucson Diversion Channel path northwest of the pedestrian bridge over the Tucson Diversion Channel. The plans must be reviewed and approved by the City of Tucson Parks and Recreation Department; Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation; and the Pima County Regional Flood Control District. Final occupancy permits will not be issued until the path has been reconstructed, inspected, and accepted by the City and County."

Also, public easements for non-motorized pathway use must be granted to the City and County, by separate instrument, for the portions of the pathway that are on the development site. Recording information must be provided on the DP prior to DP approval.
La Curacao/Southgate Shopping Center
D08-0005


8) New TDC Path, Between Pedestrian Bridge and Western Driveway on 44th Street. Thank you for showing the connecting path on the plans. We believe that the TDC path will provide enhanced multi-modal access to the Southgate Shopping Center, which will benefit the owner/developer. Therefore we believe it is in the owner/developer's interest to fund the design and construction of the connecting path. Should the owner/developer elect to do so, please place notes on the plans similar to what has been requested in item #6 above.

Should the owner/developer decline to design and construct the connecting path, please add the following note to sheet 18/48, and other sheets as appropriate, and indicate the portion of the path to which it applies: "Tucson Diversion Channel path to be constructed by others."



Please call Joanne Hershenhorn at 791-4505 if you'd like to discuss these comments.


REVIEWED BY: Joanne Hershenhorn, 5/20/08





















S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD08-0005a_La_Curacao_44th_6th_Ave.doc
06/17/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Approv-Cond COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

May 20, 2008

Matthew T. Connors
Stantec Consulting, Inc.
201 North Bonita Avenue, #101
Tucson, Arizona 85745

Subject: D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store Development Plan

Dear Matthew:

Your submittal of April 18, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Traffic, ESD, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, Parks and Recreation, DSD)

2 Copies City of Tucson lot combo form (Zoning, DSD)

2 Copies Revised building elevations (DUPD, DSD)




Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.

Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager
All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/
Via fax: 750-7470
06/17/2008 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Approv-Cond COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES


June 17, 2008

Warren Thompson
Stantec Consulting, Inc.
201 Noth Bonita Avenue, #101
Tucson, Arizona 85745

Subject: D08-0005 La Curacao Department Store Development Plan

Dear Warren/ Laura/Debra:

The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per the roundtable review held June 13, 2008, please submit the following documents for sign-off.

1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal).
AND
1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the Development Plan.
AND
1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan.

The extra Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete mylar set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the mylar and two (2) blackline copies to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options.

TO ENSURE A MORE RAPID REVIEW OF THE MYLARS, PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/CDRC Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC Stamp/cdrc stamp.html.

DUE TO THE FULL CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF THE SOUTHGATE SHOPPING CENTER, NO CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY MAY BE ISSUED UNTIL ALL SITE IMPROVEMENTS AND FACADE RENOVATIONS FOR THE EXISTING BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED.

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919.
Sincerely,


Patricia Gehlen
CDRC Manager

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/

Via fax: 750-7470