Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0054
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/09/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | January 9, 2007 To: THOMAS P. PANNO THOMAS P PANNO, ARCHITECT Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: CAYLOR OFFICES (CAMPUS FARMS MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING) Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-054 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the South Rillito Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. 2. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D07-054, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 3. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #22 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 4. Sheet 1:Add a Permitting Note that states: A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT. 5. Sheet 1:Show the public and private sewer lines using different line-types, so that they can readily be distinguished from each other. Also, show and describe examples of these different line types in the legend on Sheet 1. 6. Sheet 2: Include the pipe size for the existing public sewer G-182 and revise the call out for this sewer line from G-I-82 to G-182. 7. Sheet 2: Include the rim and invert elevations for all public sewer manholes. 8. Sheet 2: Show the connection to the public sewer for this development. Include the private BCS with pipe size/slope/length and material of pipe 9. Sheet 2: Include directional arrows for all sewer lines shown on plan. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 01/14/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 01/14/2008 7:00 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project |
| 01/15/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | DP CASE: D07-0054, CAMPUS FARMS MEDICAL OFFICE BU: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 376 PM Peak: 39 |
| 01/24/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | SUBJECT:D07-0054 Campus Farm Medical Office C9-07-34- Wesson LLC- Campbell Avenue T07BU02661 The Landscape Section has reviewed the plans and offers the following comments: Rezoning 1. The Landscape Section recommends approval of the application subject to compliance with the Campus Farm Design Guidelines contained in the Northside Area Plan: "5. Require a 20-foot-wide landscaped strip along the Campbell Avenue frontage (measured from the future curb line). Where new development occurs at the intersection with a collector street, a 10-foot-wide landscaped strip should extend along the collector street frontage. The landscaped strip should include native desert landscaping, berms, masonry walls, or other architectural elements, but should not include parking." Revise the plans to provide landscaping in the adjacent Campbell Avenue right-of-way, to the extent approved by the City Engineer. "8. Retain mature trees with a caliper of 4 inches or greater in new development, or replace with new mature vegetation of comparable size and density." Revise the Native Plant Preservation and Landscape Plans to indicate the preservation, transplantation, or replacement with similar size of each of the thirty existing Prosopis velutina on site. Development Plan (including Landscape & NPP Plan) 1. Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A A. Revise the landscape plans to provide at least 35% vegetative coverage at basins 6 & 7. (p.89) B. Revise the landscape plans to provide two shrubs for every tree. (p. 92) C. Thirty-five percent of the shrubs in the basin should be 5.g. size. (p. 92) D. Revise the plans such that decomposed granite is not placed in the basin bottom. (p.95) E. Use groundcover plantings per the guidelines on p. 95. 2. Revise the landscape plan to identify all required screening elements. Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and note the height and materials used to construct any proposed or required screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 3. Add the following required general note to the landscape plan: The height of screening material adjacent to property lines is measured on the project side of the screen, at finish grade. Revise related Development and Grading plans to conform if necessary. DS 2-06.3.7.A.1 4) Revise the Landscape and Development plans to indicate compliance with the requirement for a 6' high masonry screen wall for loading and refuse storage areas from the property to the south. LUC Table 3.7.2-I. (specific use) Grading Plan 1. Revise the Grading Plan to include any applicable changes made to the Development and landscape plans. DS 2-07.2.2 2. Revise the Grading Plan if necessary to address Development plan comments regarding screen walls, openings for water harvesting, and basin groundcover, if necessary. 3. Revise the Grading Plan to identify any drainage openings through the vertical curb to the landscaped basins and water harvesting areas. |
| 01/25/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Re-zoning C9-07-34: ES has no objections or comments to this re-zoning request. Development Plan: The following are comments resulting from the initial review. 1. DP2 - Does not provide/show adequate access onto site from Campbell (outside single lane)without requiring service vehicle to jump the curb and travel over sidewalk with the inside rear wheels and potential conflict with outside front of vehicle with parking stalls. Require minimum 3 ft buffer between vehicle turning radii and structures. DS 6-01.3.1.A and DS 6-01.0 figure 1. Demonstrate vehicle circulation and turning radii from Campbell and within development. 2. Does not provide adequate maneuverability or turning radii for service vehicle to back from the refuse enclosure area as shown. Turning radii for service vehicle is 36 ft inside rear wheel and 50 ft outside front bumper. DS 6-01.0 figure 1. 3. No provisions shown to accommodate for both refuse and recycle services. Recommend adding an additional single enclosure or design one double sized enclosure to accommodate for both. Office type facilities generate both refuse and recycle waste materials. 4. DP3, Trash Enclosure detail - Properly dimension entire enclosure elements. Bollard spacing should be as follows: A. Front side bollards (3 in. steel pipe) 3 ft to center from front/face of CMU wall. B. Two rear bollards spaced 4 ft to center from side wall. 5. Enclosure requires gates at face and must be equipped with the ability to secure the gates in the open and closed positions. DS 6-01.4.2.C.4. and 6-01.4.2.B. Show within detail and annotate. Recommend "positive locking with (Bayonet) anchors, Qty-4/ 6 in. long x 1 in. dia. galvanized pipe/sleeves flush with concrete/foundation. Be sure to identify sleeve positioning within detail and call out. Above items must be corrected upon resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/28/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0054 CAMPUS FARMS MEDICAL OFFICE BLDG/CAYLOR OFFICES/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 28, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Allan Road to Allen Road on sheet 2 and in the Location Map. Spell out Avenue for Campbell on sheet 2. jg |
| 01/28/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0054 CAMPUS FARMS MEDICAL OFFICE BLDG/CAYLOR OFFICES DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 30, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW: CORRECT ALLAN ROAD TO ALLEN ROAD ON SHEET 2 AND IN LOCATION MAP. SPELL OUT AVENUE FOR CAMPBELL ON SHEET 2. REZONING REVIEW: NO OBJECTION jg |
| 01/29/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Water on site plan. |
| 01/30/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#192720 January 30, 2008 Daniel Wesson Company LLC. Attn: Daniel Wesson 3567 E Sunrise Dr. Suite 237 Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Wesson : SUBJECT: Campus Farms Medical Office D07-0054 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 16, 2008. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Warren McElyea at (520) 918-8268. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) W. McElyea, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/30/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/30/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | D07-0054 Rezoning - TEP doesn't have any comments or concerns. |
| 01/30/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0054 Campus Farms Medical Office BU: Development Plan 01/28/08 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-34 Wesson Company LLC Campbell Ave. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: Yes COMMENTS DUE BY: February 6, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-4505 DATE: 1/25/08 Department of Urban Planning and Design Rezoning-C0-07-34, Development Plan-D07-0054, Grading-T07BU02662 January 25, 2008 DUPD staff offers the following groups of comments: Rezoning C9-07-34 Comments: The Northside Area Plan supports nonresidential use with primary access to an arterial street. The rezoning site fronts Campbell Avenue, a Gateway Route and an arterial street. Access is provided from Campbell Avenue. Campus Farm Subarea, Design Guideline 2, supports non-residential in the “Campus Farm” subarea, with direction to protect and buffer the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The Plan supports single-story structures with southwestern motif in architectural styles, colors, and landscaping. The applicant provided a single elevation architectural design showing a southwestern motif for the northern façade. However, staff will need to see all four sides of the proposed southwestern motif (conceptual) building. Renderings to include a color pallet or paint scheme identifying paint name/ brand called out on the renderings. At the present time access can only be provided onto Campbell Avenue. The signalized intersection at Campbell and Allen is approximately 230 feet from this site. During peak traffic hours, exiting north onto Campbell from the site, or north bound traffic on Campbell Avenue seeking to enter the site may be difficult due the potential stacking of southbound traffic on Campbell Avenue. DUPD staff defers this issue to the Traffic Engineering Section of Development Services. In the future, it may be possible to integrate the on-site vehicular circulation system with adjacent parcel(s) to the south. This opportunity will be reflected in the recommended conditions of rezoning. The site is within an area supported for medical and office use, and abuts a residential area identified as Area #2 of the Campus Farms Subarea. Therefore the site design will define the edge between these two different uses that are supported uses in the area. To address impacts, mitigation, compatibility, and visual esthetics, staff offers the following considerations. Based on the grading plan topo lines of one-foot increments, the site is elevated approximately ten feet above the adjacent mobile home park to the north with slightly less grade change with the residential development to the west. The grade change does not occur gradually but instead it is abrupt, especially along the northern edge. The proposed development layout requires a steep retaining wall along the full northern and western perimeter. The grading plan indicates six “weep holes” type drainage designed into the retention wall. Weep holes are shown at 6” above grade of the retention basin that is designed along the inside of this retaining wall. The exterior of the retaining wall will be stepped out at 1” inch increments at the level just below where “weep holes” are placed to allow cascade of drainage/overflow onto the adjacent mobile home park property. Based on the site plan, the existing vegetation along the northern perimeter will be removed to construct an approximate ten-foot tall retaining wall, with an additional above grade perimeter wall on this northern edge. Grade infill will level the interior of the site to satisfy on-site drainage and on-site parking and maneuvering requirements. Campus Farm Subarea flood control Policy 2, encourages new development to incorporate gutters and water catchment systems to enhance on-site groundwater recharge. Staff defers the proposed flood control methods to the Department of Development Services to review the site design to ensure overflow drainage exiting “weep holes” along the northern perimeter are not detrimental to the adjacent mobile home park or the predevelopment drainage system. In addition, the adjacent mobile park residents who live along the edge will be looking at a ten feet plus combination retaining/perimeter wall. Staff refers to General Plan Policy 5, which requires a sensitive design of non-residential development as it relates to adjacent residential neighborhoods. As viewed by the adjacent residents this exposed wall/edge needs to be softened and broken up by careful design of wall material that needs to include; color, texture, and landscaping. Campus Farm Subarea Design Guideline 4 and 8, supports perimeter walls to include vegetation that will provide a 50% screen and be at 50% maturity within the first two seasons. This indicates a priority of the Plan to address vegetation to buffer the edges of the development. Staff recommends that in addition to the wall design criteria, that consideration be given to an off-site landscape buffer, located within the adjacent mobile home park site to soften the edge of the proposed ten foot plus tall perimeter wall to help mitigate the potential mass and scale of this wall on the existing residential neighborhood. The rezoning request is subject to the Northside Area Plan policies and staff offers the following conditions of rezoning: Exit onto Campbell Avenue limited to right-out exit only, or as may be determined by the Department of Development Services. Prior to development plan approval, secure an off-site twenty-foot wide landscape easement abutting the full length of northern property line and the required vehicular access for maintenance of landscape easement material. Recorded landscape document required at the time of development plan review. The off-site landscape easement material will include a year round irrigation system, thornless native canopy trees placed twenty-five feet on center, thornless shrubs, thornless groundcover plants, and earth tone color decomposed granite. Exposed decomposed granite limited to 25% of the ground area. Prior to development plan approval, the perimeter retaining/screen wall along the full northern and western boundary shall be approved by the Department of Urban Planning and Design. Development plan submittal to include a wall color palette and a wall rendering drawn to scale. Wall design to include a combination of block material such as; split face, textured, and southern motif color. Building elevations drawn to scale to be submitted at the time development plan review shall reflect a four-sided architectural response (with color renderings and color palette) for all proposed structures on site. Provide an on-site vehicular circulation system with the flexibility to allow future integration with adjacent parcel to the south. Applicable Land Use Policies GENERAL GOALS AND POLICIES General Policy 3 supports new nonresidential uses on vacant parcels when access is provided from an arterial street. All required parking and maneuvering can be met on-site, and proper screening and buffering is provided to adjacent non-commercial uses. General Policy 5 directs new nonresidential development to minimize the number of vehicular access points, and integrate vehicular and pedestrian circulation systems with adjacent non-residential uses. Promotes consolidation of abutting parcel for new non-residential uses to allow for adequate buffering of adjacent residential uses. At the time of rezoning provide conceptual site designs that addresses sensitive design of non-residential development as it relates to adjacent residential neighborhoods. B.Drainage Policies Policy 2: Ensure that new development is sensitive to drainage conditions within the Northside area. D.University of Arizona Policies Policy 1, encourage harmonious development on parcels that are in proximity of the University of Arizona Campus Agricultural Center. a. Encourage developers of properties in proximity of the Campus Agricultural Center to inform prospective residents of the noise and odor conditions related to the agricultural activities. General Design and Buffering Guidelines Policy 1, provide a minimum 5-foot-high masonry wall along the perimeter of new development adjoining less intense development Policy 4, Design architectural elements to be compatible with existing land uses, with techniques such as Policy 8, Provide for mature vegetation in landscaping by preserving existing mature trees on site, when possible. Subarea: CAMPUS FARM Campus Farm Design Guidelines 1a. Limit new nonresidential development to one story, not to exceed 26 feet, to include all roof features such as parapets, gables, and chimneys, and to be measured from design grade. 2. Encourage new developments to incorporate a southwestern motif in architectural style, colors, and landscaping. 3. Require outdoor lighting to be low-pressure sodium lights, no higher than 10 feet from the ground 4.a. Provide a minimum five-foot-wide landscaped screen and/or a six-foot-high decorative masonry wall along property lines. Should landscaping be used, vegetation should provide a minimum 50 percent screen and should obtain 50 percent of growth within two growing seasons. 8. Retain mature trees with a caliper of 4 inches or greater in new development, or replace with new mature vegetation of comparable size and density. Flood Control Policies 2. Encourage new development to incorporate gutters and water catchment systems in design to enhance on-site groundwater recharge. Work with the Building Safety and Transportation Departments to consider these methods for incorporation in future updates of the City of Tucson Building Code Additional notes: The site is within the Campus Farms Subarea of the Northside Area Plan and abutts Area #2 of the Campus Farms Subarea. Area #2 encourages the contunued use of mobile homes as a means of sustaining affortable housing for the elderly and young families in the area. Therefore, if approved, this site will define the edge between residential and non-residential uses in the area. The proposed O-1 medical office use complements the surrounding medical uses in the area such as the UMC North, a Cancer Research Center located across Campbell Avenue and the existing O-3 office use to the south at the intersection of Allen Road and Campbell Avenue. However, if the site is rezoned to O-1 zone, the adjacent R-1 zoned parcel to the south, with access to Campbell Avenue will be sandwiched inbetween non-residential uses. It is encouraged to provide flexibility in the site design to allow potential future consolation and integrated vehicular and pedestrian connectivity. Development Plan Comments: DUPD staff offers the following comments: Please provide documentation of landscape easement as required by rezoning C9-07-34, condition # 2. Please provide a landscape and irrigation plan to comply with rezoning C9-07-34, condition # 3. Please provide in color, perimeter wall elevations for the north and west property lines as viewed from the adjacent northern and western properties. Wall elevation(s) to comply with rezoning C9-07-34, condition # 4. Please provide four-side building elevations in compliance with rezoning C9-07-34, condition # 5. s:\caserev\cdrc\D07-0054 Campus Farms Medical Office BU: Development Plan |
| 02/01/2008 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Campus Farms Medical Office Development Plan (1st Review) D07-0054 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 01, 2008 - Revised February 07, 2008 DUE DATE: February 06, 2008 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 07, 2009. 2) D.S. 2-05.2.5 Show the required three (3) inch by five (5) space for the approval stamp on the plan. 3) D.S. 2-05.2.9 The legend shown on sheet GP-1 is not required as the same legend is shown on sheet DP-1. 4) D.S. 2-05.3.1 If available provide the email addresses for owner of the site, developer of the project, registrant(s) in the plan. 5) D.S. 2-05.3.2.E The number of pages should be inclusive of all pages for this project, i.e. development plans, grading plans and landscape plans or a total of 10 sheets. 6) D.S. 2-05.3.3 Provide the development plan number D07-0054, rezoning case number C9-07-34 and the grading plan number T07BU02661 adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 7) D.S. 2-05.3.7.A.1 Based on the City of Tucson's Zoning maps and the legal description for rezoning case C9-70-47 (rezoning for the parcel located to the north) The existing zoning for this project is R-1 and MH-1. Revise general note 1 to reflect the correct existing zoning. DSD Rezoning section, Mark Castro, has been made aware of this issue. 8) D.S. 2-05.3.7.A.3 List the rezoning conditions of approval on the plan. 9) D.S. 2-05.3.7.A.4 List the existing use as a general note on the plan. 10) D.S. 2-05.3.7.A.4 The proposed use listed under general note 4 is Professional Offices. On the development plan the use is listed as Medical Office Building and under general note 10 the parking ratio is 1 space for every 175 GFA or Medical Service - Outpatient. Please clarify the proposed use. If this use is Medical Services - Outpatient per Subject to section 3.5.4.11.G this project will require review by the Design Board (DRB) prior to approval of the development plan. 11) D.S. 2-05.3.7.A.6.a List as a general note the Design Board (DRB) case number and any findings. 12) D.S. 2-05.3.8.C Provide the recordation information for Campbell Ave. 13) D.S. 2-05.3.9.D It appears that this project is comprised of three (3) different parcels. There are two (2) options in regards to utilizing the three (3) parcels as one site. Prior to approval of the development plan provide; 1) A Pima County Tax Parcel Combo and a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property, or 2) Provide a development plan for each parcel that shows how the parcels can stand alone, if sold separately, and meet the requirements of the LUC if sold separately along with a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. 14) D.S. 2-05.3.9.E Provide the zoning for the parcel (s) along the east side of Campbell Ave. 15) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a The vehicle parking calculation shown under General Note 10 is not correct. The required parking 10,400/175 equals 59 spaces, revise the note. 16) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Details 3 & 4/DP-3 per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 502.5 provide the maximum allowed surface slopes. 17) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a The detectable warnings (truncated domes) for the handicapped vehicle parking space access aisles are not shown correctly on the plan. The truncated domes should run the full width of the access aisle where the asphalt is flush with the curb. Provide a detail that correctly shows the truncated domes 18) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Detail 6/DP-3 notes the truncated domes as being 18" deep. Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 406.13.1 the truncated domes shall be 24" minimum. 19) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Detail 7/DP-3 the truncated are not shown correctly. See ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 406.13. for correct location. 20) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.a Detail 2/DP-3 Zoning acknowledges that the detail calls out for a "7' STEEL POST", clearly indicate on the detail that the bottom of sign is to be 7'-0" above finish grade. 21) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.d The bicycle parking calculation shown under General Note 10 is not correct. Per LUC Sec 3.3.4 , COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Medical Services - Outpatient the required bicycle parking is 50% Class 1 and 50% Class 2. Revise the calculation and the details. 22) D.S. 2-05.3.9.G.5.d Detail 1/DP-3 as it appears the proposed Class 2 bicycle rack is near the proposed building provide a dimension from the end of the rack to the building, see D.S. 2-09.5.1.B and D.S. 2-09 Figure 9. 23) D.S. 2-05.3.9.N It appears that several details have been duplicated on the proposed grading sheet GP-4 and sheet DP-3, ensure that all requested revisions have been made to the duplicated details on both sheets. For your information it is not necessary to duplicate details. 24) D.S. 2-05.3.9.N The building setback to adjacent residential zoned properties under General Note 8 is not correct. Revise the note to read "ADJACENT PROPERTY IS R-1 AND MH-1, 10' OR ¾ (H) SETBACK IS REQUIRED". 25) Add a note to the grading plan stating "PER LUC SECTION 3.5.13.2 HOURS. THE PRINCIPAL USE IS RESTRICTED TO HOURS OF OPERATION OF 7:00 A.M. TO 10:00 P.M. 26) Add a note to the grading plan stating "PER LUC 3.5.13.3 LIGHTING. IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 6, SECTION 6-101, OUTDOOR LIGHTING CODE, OF THE TUCSON CODE, ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING UTILIZED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE USE SHALL BE LOCATED AND DIRECTED SO AS TO ELIMINATE GLARE TOWARD STREETS AND ADJOINING R-3 OR MORE RESTRICTIVE ZONING. 27) Add a note to the grading plan stating "PER LUC 3.5.13.4 NOISE. IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE II, NOISE, OF THE TUCSON CODE, THE USE MUST BE LOCATED WITHIN AN ENCLOSED BUILDING. THERE SHALL BE NO OPENINGS ON THE SIDE OF THE BUILDING ADJACENT TO R-3 OR MORE RESTRICTIVE ZONING. 28) LUC Section 3.2.5.2.H.2 The height of the proposed retaining wall along the north property line may not exceed 10'-0". A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. 29) D.S. 2-05.3.9.T Provide a separate letter that addresses how all rezoning conditions are met. 30) If applicable ensure all changes are made to the grading and landscape plans. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T07BU02661 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Campus Farms Medical Office Grading Plan (1st Review) T07BU02661 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 01, 2008 DUE DATE: February 06, 2008 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2) Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development plan has been approved. 3) It appears that several details have been duplicated on the proposed grading sheet GP-4 and sheet DP-3, ensure that all requested revisions have been made to the duplicated details on both sheets. For your information it is not necessary to duplicate details. 4) LUC Section 3.2.5.2.H.2 The height of the proposed retaining wall along the north property line may not exceed 10'-0". A Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ T07BU02661 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Rezoning Section FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Campus Farms Medical Office C9-07-24 Rezoning from R-1 to O-1 TRANSMITTAL: February 01, 2008 The zoning for this property is proposed as O-1. The existing use falls under the Commercial Services Use Group, Medical Services - Outpatient "26", Subject to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.8.A and .B, Sec. 3.5.4.9.A, and Sec. 3.5.4.11. Also per the General Restrictions 2.4.1.6 the use is subject to the following; A. Drive-through services are not permitted. B. All land use activities, except vehicular use areas, shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building unless specifically provided otherwise. All nonresidential land uses shall comply with the Performance Criteria in Sec. 3.5.13.2, Sec. 3.5.13.3, and Sec. 3.5.13.4. Development designator "26" requires or allows the following: Minimum site area 10,000 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) = 0.25 Maximum building height = 16 feet Interior perimeter yard indicator = BB 1) Zoning has reviewed this proposal for compliance with The City of Tucson Development Standard Land Use Code (LUC). The proposed project meets the minimum requirements for the proposed use. 2) This project is subject to LUC Section 3.5.4.11.G and will require review by the Design Board (DRB). 3) Based on the City of Tucson's Zoning maps and the legal description for rezoning case C9-70-47 (rezoning for the parcel located to the north) The existing zoning for this project is R-1 and MH-1. DSD Rezoning section, Mark Castro, has been made aware of this issue. Off-Street Parking: Required 59, Provided 60 Off-Street Loading: Required 1 - 12'x35', Provided 12'x35' Bicycle Parking: Required 5 - 50% Class 1 & 50% Class 2, Provided 4 Class 1 & 1 Class 2 Pedestrian Access: The proposed pedestrian Access meets the requirements of the Development Standards and the Land Use Code. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Steve Shields, (520) 836-4956. |
| 02/05/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approv-Cond | IF any additional right of way or easements are required to be dedicated to the public by this re-zoning or if any public easements need to be abandoned related to this development then the following items need to be submitted to the Real Estate Division located at 201 N, Stone Avenue, 6th Floor Attn: Services Section: 1.) Legal description and sketch for the area (right of way or easement) to be dedicated to the public, 2.) Title report for the subject parcel(s) dated within 30 days, 3.) If a public easement needs to be abandoned you will need to contact the Real Estate Division directly, attn: James Rossi, Services Coordinator at 791-4181. There is an application and $200.00 fee for all easement abandonment’s and right of way vacations. |
| 02/06/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | February 6, 2008 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0054 PROJECT NAME: Campus Farms Medical Office PROJECT ADDRESS: 3883 N Campbell Ave PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. As stated in the rezoning conditions C9-07-34 a Traffic Impact Analysis shall be submitted providing an analysis for potential off-site traffic mitigation and improvements. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 5. If applicable schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on PIA plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 02/07/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC – Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D07-0054 CASE NAME: Campus Farms Medical Office Building: Dev. Plan Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 2/6/08 COMMENTS SENT: 2/6/08 Items being reviewed: ( ) Tentative or Final Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Related Cases: annexation - N/A (N/A means not applicable) rezoning - C9-07-34 (concurrent review) CDRC – N/A Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: () APPROVED – No Resubmittal Required. () No comment ( ) Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions ( ) Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements ( ) No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on: () NOT APPROVED – Resubmit the following. See attached comments. () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 2/1/08 S:\PARKS_AND_REC_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_reviews\D07-0054_Campus_Farms_MOB_Campbell.doc |
| 02/07/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT - REZONING COMMENTS C9-07-34, Wesson Company LLC - Campbell Ave R-1 to O-1, Medical Office Building 2/4/08 General The 1.18-acre vacant site is located at 3883 N. Campbell Avenue, on the western side of Avenue north of Allen Road. The proposed use, a medical office building, would complement the UA Cancer Center North, which is to the east across Campbell Avenue. The UA Agricultural Farm area is to the north a short distance. The site is within the urbanized metropolitan area, and this is considered an infill project. To the north is an established mobile home park, to the south is a medical services building, and to the west are single-family residences. Bartlett Wash is approximately 300 feet west of the site. It flows northwest towards Mountain Avenue, and joins up with the Mountain Avenue Wash at Limberlost Road. Land Use Plan The site is within the bounds of the Northside Area Plan, and is within the Campus Farm Subarea. The Campus Farm Design Guidelines specify that the feasibility of maintaining the Duke Drive drainageway (aka Bartlett Wash) in its existing condition should be investigated, and existing vegetation should be protected. As indicated above, the drainageway is slightly west of the site and will not affect development of this project. Other Existing vegetation associated with a minor drainageway is present on the site. Trails, Recreational Amenities, Parks and Open Space Requirements There are no existing washes, trails or other open space areas on or immediately adjacent to the site. There are no recreational requirements associated with the development of this site. No other comments or conditions are offered. Reviewed By: Joanne Hershenhorn S:\PARKS_AND_REC_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\Rezoning_Cases\2008_Reviews\C9-07-34_Wesson_C0_LLC_Campbell_Ave.doc |
| 02/07/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | Item Reviewed: 1) Development Standard No.2-05.0.0 Development Document COMMENTS DUE: 2/6/08 COMMENTS SENT: 2/6/08 Another comment to add - please note this does not replace the comments sent previously. Thanks. Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed these documents and offers the following comments: Development Standard No.2-05.0.0 Comment 2: 2-05.3.0 CONTENT. Please add the following new General Notes 3.7.F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 1. If a trail or path is proposed, provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication. 2. If a new trail or path will be constructed, add the following note, as appropriate: "All new onsite and offsite trails or paths constructed in conjunction with this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be subject to the review and approval of the City's Parks and Recreation Department, and, if requested, Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and Recreation." 3. The Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan does not show any trails on or adjacent to the development site. REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn DATE: 2/6/08 S:\PARKS_AND_REC_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\Development_Standards\2008_ReviewsDS_2-05_another_comment.doc |
| 02/08/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Here are DSD Engineering's comments: D07-0054 - Campus Farms Medical Office Building DSD Engineering offers the following comments: 1. Please describe the monuments used for the Basis of Bearing (General Note #11). 2. Please correct the phone number for Blue Stake: 1-800-782-5348 (General Note #21). 3. The cut/fill quantities disagree with the quantities shown on Sheet GP-1 (General Note #27). 4. Sheet 2: Please describe the existing property corner monuments. 5. Sheet 2: Please dimension the sidewalk along Campbell Avenue and indicate whether existing or proposed. Matt Flick, P.E. Engineering Manager Development Services Department City of Tucson Phone: (520) 837-4931 Fax: (520) 879-8010 Please visit our web site: www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd |
| 02/08/2008 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 02/08/2008 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Here are DSD Engineering's comments. A SWPPP will be required with the next submittal. T07BU02661 - Campbell Farms Medical Office Building DSD Engineering offers the following comments: 1. Sheet 1: Please correct overwrite Property Line/R-1 in Legend. 2. The cut/fill quantity does not agree with the development plan (General Note 21). 3. Sheet 1: The bar scale does not agree with the scale listed below the north arrow. 4. Please fill in the phone number 791-4259 (General Note 22). 5. Sheet 2: Please indicate that this is Sheet 2/4, not 1/3. 6. Sheet 2: Insufficient grading information is shown in and around basins. Please indicate sufficient grades to construct basins, demonstrate storage volumes and conform to rezoning conditions for Case No. C9-07-34. 7. Sheet 2: Please check curb and pavement grades along sidewalk adjacent to building. Grades indicate varying heights of curbing above pavement grades. 8. Sheet 2: Check existing topography near NE corner of parcel. The reviewer could not ascertain existing grades in this area. 9. Sheet 2: Keynote #5 indicates drainage openings at 6” above basin bottom. This conflicts with the drainage report that states the basins will have 1’ of retention storage. 10. Sheet 2: Please depict the driveway radii as requested in Traffic Engineering’s comments for D07-0054. 11. Sheet 3: 8” curb is indicated on Section J. Curbing on majority of project looks to be 6”. Also see Comment #7. 12. Sheet 3: Section C indicates a wall within the sidewalk. 13. The disturbed area is greater than 1 acre; a SWPPP is required. 14. A separate building permit will be required for retaining wall construction. 15. Conformance with the differential grading criteria in Dev. Std. 11-01 can not be ascertained until the existing topography is accurately depicted. The drainage report cannot be approved until the development plan and grading plan accurately reflect the basin volumes as given in the drainage report. Matt Flick, P.E. Engineering Manager Development Services Department City of Tucson Phone: (520) 837-4931 Fax: (520) 879-8010 Please visit our web site: www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd |
| 02/08/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 8, 2008 Thomas Panno 496 Centerwood Drive Tarpon Springs, Florida 34688 Subject: D07-0054 Camput Farms Medical Office Building Development Plan Dear Thomas: Your submittal of January 8, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 10 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, ESD, Addressing, DUPD, Zoning, Real Estate, Traffic, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Color and dimensioned elevations of the wall and building (DUPD, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate) 2 Copies Traffic Impact Analysis (Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (727) 934-3825 dp-resubmittal |