Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0053
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/28/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Per LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3. "Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets". 2) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing to this office, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. If approval for landscaping in the public right of way is approved, a maximum of five feet of the required ten feet can be located outside of the property line. Landscaping is not allowed to interfere with pedestrian access. 3) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the development plan and landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. The location of these dimensions are likely to change, see comment 1. 4) Add the CDRC case number D07-0053 and any related case numbers to the development, landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 5) Trees and shrubs are to be selected and located so that, at maturity, they do not interfere with existing on-site or off-site utility service lines or utility easements. LUC 3.7.2.6.B Utility providers may restrict landscaping in easements. Revise the plans if necessary to comply with applicable utility standards. 6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. The screen wall required for the south parcel boundary is to be located per LUC 3.7.3.2.A. 7) Basin slopes are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths are three feet or greater. (Basin depth is measured from top of slope at lowest point on basin rim to toe of slope at lowest in basin per DS 10-01, P.78) Slopes for basins less than three feet are to be no steeper than 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes. DS 10-01.4 |
| 05/08/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 05/09/2008 DUE DATE: 05/09/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 1/21/09. 2 This comment has not been addressed completely.. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is SR and P." 3. DS 2-05.2.1.C All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise general notes and conditions of rezoning. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Add a note to the general notes indicating the proposed use of the property as follows: " Proposed use is "Parking "40" subject to: Sec.3.5.4.12." Do not list with the proposed zoning note. 5. DS 2-05.2.4.A Provide distance and bearings for all property lines. There is a conflict in distance measurements between the east property line and the west property line. There is indicated a property line splitting the parcel approximately in half. If the property is to be split it must first be submitted and approved by the City of Tucson. Provide documentation that the lot split has been approved at the next submittal. If there is not lot split proposed remove the property line, distance and bearing from the plan. If this line is meant to show the zoning boundaries between the SR and P zones change to a different line weight and indicate as such. The zoning boundary between the two zones is required to be indicated on the plan. A search of Pima County Assessors records indicate the portion of the property indicated as abandoned alley is part of the lot located to the north. Missing from the plans is a 60' radius located to the west of indicated north west corner of the project which is part of the alley abandonment. Include on plans. This small portion of the property is still zoned R-2, indicate such. A tax parcel combination and covenant regarding the use and development of real property will be required to be completed and recorded. Provide docket and page information for the covenant on the plan. The tax parcel combination and covenant will be required to be completed for all four parcels including the separate parcels located to the north. This will establish that the entire use of the call center is under one parcel tax code as it appears that no one parcel could be considered a stand alone property if the parcels were to be sold separately. By adding 103 parking spaces to this entire site additional handicap parking spaces and bicycle parking spaces may be required. Provide parking space calculations for the entire site clearly indicating the number of required and provided parking spaces including the number of handicap parking spaces, van accessible parking spaces and required and provided class one and class two bicycle parking spaces. If additional handicap parking and bicycle parking spaces are required a separate submittal for a revised site plan for the existing call center site will be required. Submit a copy of the approved revised site plan with next submittal. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.B Indicate the zoning boundary on the parcel between the SR and the P zoned portions of the property. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.D. The following comment will apply at the south end of the parking lot. Per DS 3-05.2.2.D A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. The minimum width of a backup spur is 24'. Provide dimensions. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0053-2dp.doc 9 MAY 2008 D07-0053/CALL CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW 1. PLEASE SUBMIT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND NEW PARKING QUANTITY CALCULATIONS INCLUDING UPDATED ACCESSIBLE PARKING COUNT. REFERENCE 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106. 2. ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PARKING LOT EXPANSION. ADDITIONAL SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE, 2006 IBC, SECTION 1106.6 3. SHOW LOCATION OF REQUIRED ADDED ACCESSIBLE SPACES FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/14/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approv-Cond | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS 2nd review Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking Items reviewed: () Development Plan () Landscape Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-03 (authorized M/C Aug. 6, 2007) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Groves Neighborhood Plan (plan amendment) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: May 9, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: The plans are CONDITIONALLY APPROVED subject to resolution of the sidewalk width along Pantano Road per DSMR 08-18, and revision of the plans to be consistent with the approved DSMR. No resubmittal is necessary. REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 1/22/08 |
| 06/12/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 12, 2008 SUBJECT: Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 4110 S Pantano Road, T14S R15E Sec32 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0053 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan, Drainage Report (The WLB Group Inc., 29JUL04, revised 10APR08), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon, 08APR08) and Landscape Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.2.1 &2.2: Revise the Drainage Report, drainage exhibits and Development Plan to provide a low flow bleed pipe from Basin B into Basin A. Provide a detail showing the size (minimum 8-inch), depth of inlet from bottom of basin, and percent slope. The bleed pipe within the basin is required due to the percolation test (13.34 Hours) submitted by Terracon. The maximum drain down time is 12 hours for the size of water shed that contributes to the property. 2) Revise the Drainage Report, drainage exhibits and Development Plan to meet the recommendations within the Geotechnical Engineering Report. The Geotechnical Report provides recommendations for slope stability for all proposed constructed slopes. The Drainage Report has provided calculations for rock riprap sizing, however the Geotechnical Report provides recommendations on side slope stability that needs to be incorporated into the Development Plan and Drainage Report. The details and sections provided on the Development Plan do not meet the recommendations within the Geotechnical Report, revise. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Per the photographs that were submitted for the existing wall openings Engineering Section recommends that the wall openings be cleared of vegetation and sediment to allow storm water to drain per the proposed drainage design. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to clearly show the entrance that is to be abandoned is closed off from traffic along Pantano Road. If the entrance is to be abandoned then it must be closed off with a continuous curb that matches the existing curbing along Pantano Road. Provide a detail or show in plan view the construction of the required curbing at the abandoned driveway entrance. 5) Clarify on the Development Plan keynote #1 that is representing the proposed (3)- 1-foot curb openings along Basin A. Provide this keynote with description on the Development Plan or provided this symbol within the legend for clarity. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow the existing 4-foot sidewalk, that does not meet the minimum 6-foot width requirements, along Pantano Road. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 7) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GRADING PLAN: 8) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 9) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 10) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are also applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and Drainage Report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Report reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 06/17/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 17, 2008 Steve Oliverio/David Whitney The WLB Group, Inc. 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan Dear Steve/David: Your submittal of April 11, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 4 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Form (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Approved site plan for Call Center Site (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 dp-resubmittal |