Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0053
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 01/04/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/09/2008 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | January 8, 2008 To: STEVE OLIVERIO/DAVID WHIT WLB GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: CALL CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-053 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. 1. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction's case number, D07-0053, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. 2. Sheet 1:Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 01/14/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the Landscape and Development Plan to provide a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 along Pantano Road. 2) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 3) Revise the landscape plans to include the following standard notes for landscaping in the public right-of-way: "All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work. It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities within the public right-of-way. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on site. 4) Dimension the length and width of landscape borders on the development plan and landscape plan per DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.f. 5) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the development, landscape and native plant preservation plans. Use the correct rezoning case number C9-07-03. DS 2-07.2.1.B 6) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary. A screen is required along Pantano Road and at the south parcel boundary. LUC 3.7.3 & DS 2-06.3.7. 7) Revise the Development Plan to note the correct existing zoning in general Note 2 on sheet 1. 8) All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise sheet 2 of the landscape plan. DS 2-05.2.1.A 9) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. LUC 3.7.4.3.A 10) Revise the development plan to indicate graffiti resistant paint for both sides of any screen walls visible from the public right-of-way. 11) Revise the plans to clarify how rezoning condition 6 is met. The wall is required to include visually appealing design treatments, such as 2 or more decorative materials, varied wall alignments, or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations. 12) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 13) An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. 14) Revise the sheet designator for the section at the south side of the property. 5/1 should be 5/2, I believe. |
| 01/15/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0053 CALL CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 15, 2008 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 01/15/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#192207 January 15, 2008 Dear Steve Oliverio: SUBJECT: Call Center Employee Parking D07-0053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 7, 2008 It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Nancy DiMaria at (520) 918-8267, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures cc:N. DiMaria |
| 01/24/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-03 (authorized M/C Aug. 6, 2007) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Groves Neighborhood Plan (plan amendment) GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: January 24, 2008 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 1/22/08 D07-0053 Call Center for Employee Parking On sheet 1/2 of the Development Plan (DP), General Note #2, the existing zoning is SR, and proposed zoning is P. This plan must demonstrate compliance with the rezoning conditions for C9-07-03. Please list out all rezoning conditions on the DP. DP sheet 1/2: Detail 1, typical PAAL: Please show the existing 6-foot masonry wall on the western edge of the parking lot, and note on the detail that the wall will be painted with graffiti-resistant paint. Also, please show the existing and relocated 7-foot metal fence east of the parking lot. DP sheet 1/2: To demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition #7, please add a General Note stating that damage to perimeter walls will be repaired within five (5) working days. DP sheet 2/2: Please note on the plans that cross-section references A-A, B-B, C-C and D-D refer to the hydrology report. For those who don’t have the hydrology report, it’s somewhat confusing. Please change the callout 5/1 to 5/2. DP sheet 2/2: Regarding sections 2 and 3, please show the existing and relocated 7-foot fence on both sections. DP sheet 2/2: Regarding section 2, it appears that the basin is in the right-of-way (ROW). Permission must be obtained from the City Engineer to put the basin in the ROW. Also, if the fence is relocated to the edge of the ROW, some disturbance of the ROW will occur, and permits must be obtained to work in the ROW. DP sheet 2/2: Please show the relocated 7-foot fence in the plan view. DP sheet 2/2: Please indicate that the 7-foot fence along the southern edge of the parking lot will remain. Is it necessary to have a gate there for fire access? Landscape border and screen along Pantano Road: In response to concerns from neighbors, the owner/developer had a landscaping border (trees and shrubs and likely an irrigation system) placed along the western side of Pantano Road. It appears that this will need to be removed in order to construct the basin along the eastern edge of the parking lot. Please put a general note on the DP indicating that the existing landscaping in this area will be removed. D07-0053 Call Center for Employee Parking Regarding the comment above, a new landscape border, include screening, must be placed along the eastern edge of the parking lot, presumably in the basin. The landscape plan must clearly show this. Please provide a section showing the landscape border along Pantano Road on the landscape plan. On the Landscape Plan, General Note #2, existing zoning is SR, proposed zoning is P. Please revise the note. |
| 01/24/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 01/24/08 DUE DATE: 1/24/08 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 1/21/09. 2. DS 2-05.2.2.B.1 In general note #1 the existing zoning is indicated as C-1 which is incorrect. The is existing zoning of this parcel is SR, revise note. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 This development plan has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is SR and P." DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D07-0053 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 Add a note to the general notes indicating the proposed use of the property as "Parking "40" subject to: Sec.3.5.4.12." 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that: "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R)." 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.11 In general note #1 the indicated gross area of this parcel is greater than the indicated 50,400 square feet (1.16 acres). Per Pima County Assessors records the size of the lot is 92,268 square feet (2.21 acres). Revise note. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.A The entire lot must be shown on the development plan, including the vacant portion of the lot located to the south. Label the portion of the lot that is unused as vacant. Provide distance and bearings for all property lines. There is a conflict in distance measurements between the east property line and the west property line. A search of Pima County Assessors records indicate the portion of the property indicated as abandoned alley is part of the lot located to the north. Missing from the plans is a 60' radius located to the west of indicated north west corner of the project which is part of the alley abandonment. Include on plans. This small portion of the property is still zoned R-2, indicate such. A tax parcel combination and covenant regarding the use and development of real property will be required to be completed and recorded. Provide docket and page information for the covenant on the plan. The tax parcel combination and covenant will be required to be completed for all four parcels including the separate parcels located to the north. This will establish that the entire use of the call center is under one parcel tax code as it appears that no one parcel could be considered a stand alone property if the parcels were to be sold separately. By adding 114 parking spaces to this entire site additional handicap parking spaces and bicycle parking spaces may be required. If the last approved site plan indicates there are enough handicap parking and bicycle parking spaces to accommodate the additional 114 parking spaces then no changes to the existing site is required. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with the next submittal. If additional handicap parking and bicycle parking spaces are required a separate submittal for a revised site plan for the existing call center site will be required. Submit a copy of the approved revised site plan with next submittal. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.B Indicate the zoning boundary on the parcel between the SR and the P zoned portions of the property. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a dimension of the PAAL at the access to the parking lot clearly indicating the minimum width of 24'. The width of the PAAL near the existing electric power poles does not appear to meet the minimum width of 24'. The distance scales at approximately 22'. Revise and provide dimensions. The following comment will apply at the south end of the parking lot. Per DS 3-05.2.2.D A back-up spur will be provided at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. The spur will be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth, will have a three (3) foot radii, and will have a wheel barrier to prevent encroachment onto any unsurfaced areas. A minimum distance of three (3) feet will be provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen, or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. The minimum width of a backup spur is 24'. Provide dimensions. 10. DS 2-05.2.4. This project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, future curb location, right-of-way lines, etc.) 11. DS 2-05.2.4.P The minimum width of a parking space per DS 3-05 Table 1 is eight (8) feet six (6) inches. Revise plan to meet this requirement. The required minimum distance from the front of the parking space to the wheel stop is two (2) feet six (6) inches. Provide dimensioned detail. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.U Provide a written response on how all conditions of rezoning have been meet. Provide on the plan all conditions of rezoning. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0053dp.doc |
| 01/25/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/28/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment. |
| 01/28/2008 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 02/05/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 5, 2008 SUBJECT: Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 4110 S Pantano Road, T14S R15E Sec32 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0053 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan, Preliminary Drainage Report (The WLB Group Inc., 29JUL04), and Landscape Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The Drainage Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Provide a sealed statement from the engineer of record stating that all aspects and conditions outlined within the report are still applicable and that nothing has changed upstream or downstream of the parcel that would effect the drainage design since the report was originally sealed 29JUL04. Per the aerial photographs based on 2005 photos the parking lot has already been constructed and is in violation of the Development Standards and Land Use Code. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.1 &2.2: Revise the Drainage Report and discussion along with basin design for the project. All projects that fall within a balanced basin are required to show that the post developed discharge value for the 2-, 10-, and 100-year storm events are less than or equal to the existing discharge values. Since the project is a commercial development and is larger than 1-acre (1.86) 5-year threshold retention criteria shall apply. Revise the Drainage Report and Development Plan to meet all the requirements within DS Sec.10-01 for basin design. 3) DS Sec.3-01.4.4.F: Provide a revised Drainage Report showing calculations that demonstrate that the 10-year flood flow is contained under the sidewalk at all required scupper concentration location, specifically the sidewalk located along Pantano Road where the sidewalk crosses the abandoned driveway entrance.. Provide details and dimensions in plan view for the scuppers on the proposed Development Plan. 4) Clarify the differences on the Drainage Report, Development Plan and Assessors records for the total acreage of the lot. Per the Assessors records the lot has an area equal to 1.86 acres, which is different from both the Development Plan and Drainage Report. Revise the Drainage Report to include the entire parcel acreage within the discussion and for the retention/detention calculations. 5) Verify that the Development Plan and all associated cross sections meet the minimum requirements within the proposed Drainage Report. Cross Sections 1-5 must accurately reflect all dimensions, elevations, setbacks, slopes, etc that is required within the Drainage Report. Verify all WSEL within the basin to determine if security barriers are required around the perimeter of the basins. An example is Basin A, per the cross section the WSEL is 50.0 and the basin bottom is 47.0, which would give 3.0 feet of water during a 100-year storm and would require a security barrier for safety concerns. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D07-0053) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Revise the general note section on Sheet 1 to add a note that reads "This project is designed to meet the overlay zones criteria; Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Clarify the differences on the Development Plan, Drainage Report and Assessors records for the total acreage of the lot. Per the Assessors records the lot has an area equal to 1.86 acres which is different from both the Development Plan and Drainage Report. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.A: Revise the Development Plan to accurately show the site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distances in feet. Per MapGuide and the Assessors Records the parcel that is shown on the proposed Development Plan does not meet the entire parcel shown on the Assessors records. Revise to include the entire parcel on the Development Plan or provide an approved lot split with recordation information. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Review of the Development Plan shows a Tucson Gas and Electric easement that falls within the entire parcel boundaries that may have maintenance access obstruction issues with the proposed improvements. Obtain a letter from each entity having a recorded interest in all easements, as shown on the proposed Development Plan that will be obstructed by the construction of the proposed parking lot. Each entity must provide a letter stating that they do not have any issues with the proposed parking lot being constructed over the existing easements. 11) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalk for Pantano Road. Label Pantano Road as a Public MS&R Road. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.E: Revise General Note #4 to include the datum reference used for the basis of bearing section (i.e. NGVD29 or NAVD88). 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.F: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the existing wall and wall openings at the existing storm grate location in the northwest corner of the lot. Per the Drainage Report a portion of the 100-year flow into the storm grate over tops the grate and continues into Pantano Road. Provide a detail and photographic documentation to show the wall openings and to verify conditions. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.A: Revise the Development Plan to accurately show the entire site boundary information, including bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds together with distances in feet. Per MapGuide and the Assessors Records the parcel that is shown on the proposed Development Plan does not meet the entire parcel shown on the Assessors records. Revise to include the entire parcel on the Development Plan or provide an approved lot split with recordation information. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.2: Revise the Development plan to indicate if the existing street is public or private; provide the roadway widths, curbs, sidewalks and utility locations fully dimensioned. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide dimensions for the required back-up spur at the south end of the parking lot with a minimum of 3 feet in depth, a 3-foot radius, and a 3 foot separation between curb and any proposed walls or unsurfaced areas. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.D for clarification. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the Development Plan reflects handicap access ramps with truncated domes (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria) at all existing and proposed handicap ramp location. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. Specifically at the existing 4-foot sidewalk along Pantano Road where it crosses the abandoned driveway entrance. Refer to Tucson Department of Transportation for the existing driveway entrance, if the entrance is abandoned then the curb cut must be closed and the sidewalk must be continuos allowing the 10-year flow from the site to flow under the sidewalk at the required scupper location. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that all existing and proposed PAAL widths meet the minimum 24-foot width requirement. Clearly dimension all PAALs. Specifically at the PAAL entrance from the adjacent property and adjacent to the existing electric poles within the parking lot area. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.4: Provide the cross-access easement agreement required for the PAAL entrance from the adjacent parcel. If private easements are utilized protective covenants establishing the right of access is required. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the future MS&R curb and 6-foot sidewalk area for Pantano Road. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Revise the Development Plan and Drainage Report to show conformance with DS Sec.10-01. The proposed project falls within a balanced basin and is larger than 1 acre therefore retention requirements apply and must be addressed in the Drainage Report. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Clearly show drainage arrows for all vehicular use areas to demonstrate onsite drainage patterns. Provide any existing wall openings in plan view with a detail. Provide scupper locations with supporting calculations in a revised Drainage Report to demonstrate that the 10-year flow is contained underneath all pedestrian circulation at all concentration points. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Verify the required 6-foot wide sidewalk along the street frontage of Pantano Road. Per the adopted Mayor and Counsel policy all sidewalks along MS&R right-of-ways for arterial and collector streets require 6-foot wide sidewalks. If an existing sidewalk is already constructed along the frontage of Pantano Road provide photo documentation showing that the existing sidewalk is in good condition. If the sidewalk is missing in spots or is cracked and buckled a new 6-foot sidewalk will be required. A DSMR will be required for modifying the development standards to allow a sidewalk that does not meet the minimum 6-foot width requirements along Pantano Road. The DSMR must be approved prior to Development Plan approval. All exhibits and discussion must reflect any changes made by the approved DSMR. Provide a General Note to list the DSMR number, the Development Standard being modified along with the date of DSMR approval. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Label and dimension the maneuverability for all required loading zones on the subject property. 25) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: Provide estimated cut and fill quantities on the Development Plan for grading plan purposes. 26) DS Sec.11-01.9: Revise the Development Plan and associated cross sections to provide for the required 2-feet setback from all property boundaries to the proposed limits of grading, fill slopes, retention/detention basin, block wall and any associated erosion protection. Revise the plan view and Cross Sections 2 and 3 to clearly show the 2-foot setback from the property line. 27) Review and approval from TDOT Permits and Codes for all improvements within the public right-of-way will be required. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Refer to the following links for TDOT Forms and applications: a) http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Forms_Fees___Maps/Applications/applications.html / b) http://www.dot.ci.tucson.az.us/engineering/pia.php c) Or contact Thad Harvison at 837-6592 for all additional questions regarding r-o-w. GRADING PLAN: 28) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 29) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 30) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) requirements are also applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required with a grading plan submittal. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 31) DS Sec.10-01.III.3.5.1.3.a, 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the basins, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils. b) Provide percolation rates for retention/detention basins for 5-year threshold retention to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. d) Provide a slope stability recommendations for the constructed slopes that are proposed within the basin. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan, Drainage Report and a Geotechnical Report that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 02/07/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMMENTS City of Tucson CDRC - Community Design Review Committee CASE NUMBER: D07-0053 CASE NAME: Call Center Employee Parking: Development Plan Submittal #: 1 COMMENTS DUE: 1/24/08 COMMENTS SENT: 2/6/08 Items being reviewed: ( ) Tentative or Final Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Related Cases: annexation - N/A rezoning - C9-07-03 CDRC - N/A Parks and Recreation Department Staff has reviewed this proposal and offers the following comments: (ü) APPROVED - No Resubmittal Required. (ü) No comment ( ) Proposal complies with annexation or rezoning conditions ( ) Proposal satisfies trails, recreational amenities, and/or parks and open space requirements ( ) No additional comments - complies with comments submitted on: ( ) NOT APPROVED - Resubmit the following. See attached comments. ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: Joanne Hershenhorn DATE: 2/6/08 S:\PARKS_AND_RECREATION_DEPT\REVIEW_COMMENTS\CDRC_Cases\2008_ReviewsD07-0053_Call_Center_Employee_Parking.doc |
| 02/12/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 12, 2008 Steve Oliverio/David Whitney The WLB Group, Inc. 4444 East Broadway Blvd. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: D07-0053 Call Center Employee Parking Development Plan Dear Steve/David: Your submittal of December 24, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Form (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 881-7492 dp-resubmittal |
| 12/24/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/26/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/27/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor's Office Mapping Department DATE: December 27, 2007 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan D07-0053 CALL CENTER FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING T141432 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 12/31/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0053, CALL CENTER EMPLOYEE PARKING: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS This is a plan for a parking lot designated for the use of call center. Parking lot itself does not produce/attract traffic. All traffic is produced/attracted by the facility it serves which is the call center. Traffic impact of call center should have been studied when call center development plan was conducted. If not, detailed information of the call center is needed to estimate call center traffic impacts. Please call if you have questions. Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |