Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0050
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2008 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Douglas Kratina" <DKratina@azdot.gov> 01/02/2008 8:42 AM >>> ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 01/09/2008 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | January 9, 2008 To: Patricia Gehlen CDRC/Zoning Manager FROM: Loren Makus, EIT Engineering Division SUBJECT: Argo Properties Development Plan D07-0050(First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 04 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The development plan has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comments must be addressed: Drainage Report Comments: 1. The Drainage Report is accepted for Development Plan Purposes. Development Plan Comments: 2. Clearly delineate the features that will be developed at this time and which will be developed in the future in conjunction with road widening. The distinction can be made by using different line weights and very clearl notations, however it would probably be more clear if two different plans are shown. 3. Show the sight visibility triangles for the intersection of Alvernon Way and Lee Street. 4. Provide correct dimensions for the PAAL. 5. Show existing contours or existing grades for the project site and adjacent properties. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520.837.4927 or loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 01/09/2008 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: January 08, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0050 ARGO Properties: Development Plan(11-27-07) Parks and Recreation has no comments on this project. |
| 01/30/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#192026 January 30, 2008 Christos Rahoc 3305 N Swan Road 109-226 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Rahoc : SUBJECT: Argo Properties D07-0050 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 27, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/30/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 30, 2008 Christos Vlahos 3305 North Swan Road #109-226 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0050 Argo Properties Development Plan Dear Christos: Your submittal of November 27, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, DUPD, Zoning, ESD, Real Estate, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 3 Copies Dimensioned, color building elevations (DUPD, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Title Report (Real Estate, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-9900 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/27/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/29/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 12/04/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: December 3, 2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding Development Plan DO7-0050 ARGO PROPERTIES T141404 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 12/05/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0050, ARGO PROPERTIES, DEVELOPMENT COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 31 PM Peak: 4 Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 12/07/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0050 ARGO PROPERTIES/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: December 6, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. jg |
| 12/12/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number (D07-0050) along with the rezoning case number (C9-07-10) and any other related case numbers to all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan and Native Plant Preservation Plan. 2. All lettering and dimensions shall be the equivalent of twelve (0.12") point or greater in size. Revise all text in the drawing on sheet L-1 to meet this requirement. DS 2-05.2.1.A 3. The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise as necessary by indicating required screening for the street landscape border (landscape bufferyard #4). The landscaping and required screening must extend the length of the parking spaces to screen the vehicular use area from Alvernon Way. Revise the notes on the drawing and bufferyard table on sheet L-1 which state that no sceening is required for the street landscape border to indicate the required screening and show on the drawing how the screening requirements will be met. 4. Indicate required screening for the loading zone on the landscape plan, including location, height, and materials of construction. DS 2-07.2.2.3; LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5. Show any required/ provided trash enclosure on the landscape plan and detail required screening. DS 2-07.2.2.A.3 6. Revove the background shading for the landscape borders and sight visibility triangles on sheet L-1. It is difficult to read the plant symbols in certain areas, especially in the areas where these two shaded areas overlap the street landscape border. |
| 12/12/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approv-Cond | December 12, 2007 To: Benjamin Vogel Benjamin Vogel Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Argo Office Building 1601 N. Alvernon Way Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-050 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the SRWS Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-050, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: In the Legend include a symbol for the sewer lines both proposed and existing. Sheet 1: Show the rim and invert elevations for the public manholes shown on plan and include the IMS #’s. Also include the construction plan# and pipe size for the existing public sewer line. Sheet 1: Include the slope/length and material of pipe for the proposed BCS and label it as PRIVATE BCS . Sheet 2: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Subject to the above, the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan. The required revision(s) may be shown on the Mylars. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/19/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0050 Argo Properties () Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-07-10 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant/Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/26/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (xxxxx) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan (xxxxx) Other – Color Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 12/17/07 Rezoning condition #9 reads “building facades at the rear and sides shall be designed with attention to the architectural character and detail comparable to the front façade, with consistent design treatment the proposed structure shall be designed with the same attention to architectural detail on the front, side and rear facades.” Please submit elevations and color pallets to reflect how you will comply with this condition. |
| 12/19/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0050 Argo Properties Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 12/19/07 DUE DATE: 12/26/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 12/25/08. 2. DS 2-05.2.1.D A small, project-location map shall be drawn on the first sheet of the development plan, preferably in the upper right corner. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. 1. Section, township, and range; SECTION CORNERS; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.A.1 List the telephone number for the property owner. List the name, address, and telephone number of the developer of the project. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D07-0050 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 5. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 In the site data portion of DP-2 list the proposed use as "Administrative and Professional Office "27" ." 6. DS 2-05.2.2.B.10 Add a note stating that: "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R)." 7. DS 2-05.2.3.B If applicable, draw all easements (proposed and existing) on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.B The indicated zoning for the property to the south of this project is R-2 not C-1 as indicated. Revise. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Indicate the width of the PAAL at the entrance from Alvernon. The width of the PAAL at the parking spaces appears to be correct but is dimensioned at 12'. Revise dimension to required minimum of 24'. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.E Show all right of way dedication on or abutting the site. Per rezoning condition #11 dedication is required. Contact Jim Rossi with real estate division on how to proceed. Provide on the plans a place to indicate the recording information (docket and page) for the dedication. Provide lot dimensions and bearings for the lot after dedication has taken place. In addition it appears that the property is within the intersection widening section, more specific the taper section. For Alvernon Way the taper has half R/W of seventy-five (75) feet in width for a length of three hundred (300) feet measured from the centerline of Pima Street, then tapers for three hundred (300) feet to meet the future half R/W of sixty (60) feet Please verify with City Engineering if additional widening will required for this intersection. Please draw, label, and dimension the future taper on the plan. The future curb and sidewalk based on the future intersection widening must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned. Please refer to the Major Streets and Routes Plan. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.I Provide dimensioned elevations of the building clearly indicating wall heights measured from adjacent grade. In the site data portion of the DP-2 correct the following: 1. Remove the lot coverage calculations. Not required 2. The FAR calculations are based on the size of the lot after the right of way dedication has taken place. Revise 3. Revise lot square footage and acreage to reflect size after right of way dedication. Revise 12. DS 2-05.2.4.K The minimum width of a sidewalk is 4'. The sidewalk in front of the handicap parking spaces at the corners of the building does not appear to meet the minimum width. Revise. Provide required handicap ramps at the flush area in front of the access aisle. Access ramps at crosswalks connecting to sidewalks must be provided. In addition Truncated Dome (early warning systems) must be added to all access ramps where transitioning from the pedestrian area to the vehicular use area or at HC access aisles transitioning to the sidewalk area. Provide a detail of all handicap ramps clearly indicating width, slope, truncated domes location, landings, etc. The location of the handicap parking sign may interfere with pedestrian circulation and cannot be located in a handicap ramp. Clarify. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.O FYI: There has been a change in the loading zone requirements which may be of benefit to your project. For office use where the building is less than 5000 sq. ft. the loading zone can be a 10X18 space which can be incorporated into the parking spaces. See LUC Sec. 3.4.5.6. List as a note the number of required and provided loading zones. 14. DS 2-05.2.4.P Per DS 3-05.2.3.C.1 wheel stops or barriers are required at each parking space to prevent damage to walls, over hanging sidewalks which reduces the width of the sidewalk to less than 4', etc. Clearly indicate location of wheel stops on the plan. On the detail of the standard and handicap parking spaces provide the location of the wheel stops as per DS 3-05.2.3.C.2. Per ANSI 117.1-2003 Sec. 502.5 indicate the maximum slope of the handicap parking space and access aisle. (max. 1:48) 15. DS 2-05.2.4.Q Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. Please review the revised DS 2-09 and provide the necessary corrections to the bicycle parking as required. Once changes are provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised DS may be found on the web at: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf The type of class two bicycle rack indicated on detail 3 of DP-2 is not an approved type of rack. See DS 2-09 Figure 2 and 3 for acceptable bike rack designs. 16. DS 2-05.2.4.T Show refuse collection areas, including location of dumpsters fully dimensioned. See engineering comments. 17. DS 2-05.2.4.U Provide a separate response letter detailing compliance with rezoning conditions. 18. DS 2-05.2.4.W Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. 19. DS 2-05.2.4.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0050dp.doc |
| 12/19/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/20/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/21/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Must identify storage area for APC's and provide screening from public view. 2. Approved for APC refuse and recycle curbside collection service for this small office bldg. Prior approval furnished by John Clark. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/27/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Denied | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 12/26/2007 11:45 AM >>> Per re-zoning condition No. # 11, submit the following items to the Real Estate Division if needed. 1.) Legal description and a sketch of the area to be dedicated as right of way, 2.) A title report of the subject development dated within 30 days. Send the requested items directly to the Real Estate Division at 201 N. Stone/6th Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701, Attn: Jim Stoyanoff. Phone 791-4181. |