Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0049
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/30/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/16/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The plan was reviewed for compliance with City of Tucson codes and standards. No written response letter addressing the previous review was received and no Development plan was included with the plans transmitted to the Landscape Section. 1) Correct the street name on the landscape plan sheet L-2. 2) Revise the plans to coordinate with the NPP information that indicates removal of many of the existing protected plants. How are these plants to be removed outside of the grading limits. Plant protection fencing is required. Show locations on the plans. 3) Revise the landscape plan to show the extent of supplementary irrigation in each planting area provided by water harvesting methods. The only water harvesting area identified on the plans icludes no plantings. 4) The site contains a regulatory floodplain. Submit an Environmental Resource Report. Revise the plans as necessary to comply with the standard. DS 9-06.0 A pre-submittal Watercourse Consultation is suggested. 5) The vehicular use area must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide a barrier to all vehicle access beyond the paved vehicular use area. 6) Revise the "Developed Site" label on the D.P. and landscape plan to locate it where actual site development is proposed. If additional development is proposed, revise the grading/disturbance limits. 7) Revise the landscape plan to use vegetation appropriate for placement in the regulatory floodplain. Revegetation, restoration or enhancement should create or restore the riparian habitat through the planting of native trees, shrubs, and understory species and the distribution of seed mix native to the site or a comparable reference site to the extent possible. 8) All development within the Protected Riparian Area shall be reviewed to insure that there is no unnecessary disturbance of the riparian resources. Necessary development shall include only the crossing of riparian habitats with roadways, bikeways, paved walkways and utilities as listed below where there is no viable alternate crossing available and the crossing is necessary for the reasonable development of the property. A written explanation as to why the development is necessary shall be submitted with the appropriate plans. RESUIBMITTAL OF ALL PLANS IS REQUIRED |
| 07/18/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | June 25, 2008 To: Jeff Stanley Stanley Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: D & D Materials, 7575 S. Old Vail Road Dev. Plan – 2nd Submittal D07-049 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd request Sheet 1: The 4” Private BCS cannot run inside the public ROW. It must run inside the property line a minimum distance from the property line equal to the depth of pipe. The BCS should connect directly to G-84-89 not to MH# 4190-10A1. Sheet 2: Show the pipe slope and length for the proposed private BCS. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 07/18/2008 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0049 D&D Materials Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 07/18/2008 DUE DATE: 12/24/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 12/23/08. 2. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-05.2.4.A A search of Pima County Assessors records indicate a split has been done on this property in May of 2007. Prior to approval of the development plan a lot split application must be processed and approved. A separate application, fees, review, and approval by DSD is required for the lot split. Please call David Rivera if you have any questions related to the lot split process. If the lot split has been processed and approved by DSD, submit copies of the approved survey drawing along with the recorded legal descriptions (with docket and page stamped) with the next submittal. 3. The storage area will be required to meet the requirements of the LUC Sec. 3.3.7.3 for surface material. DG or gravel are not approved surface materials. The storage area is required to have barriers to prevent driving onto unimproved portions of the site (see DS 3-05.2.3.C). 4. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 The vehicle use area as indicated on the plan is required to provide barriers to prevent driving onto unimproved portions of the site at the south and east sides (near the parking space) of the paved area as well as the area used for the entrance to the trash enclosure. (see DS 3-05.2.3.C). 5. This comment has not been addressed. DS 2-05.2.4.Q A minimum of 2 class two bicycle parking spaces are required per LUC Sec.3.3.3.5. Revise calculations on sheet 1 of 2.. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0049-2dp.doc 18 JULY 2008 D07-0049/DGD MATERIALS REVIEWED BY RON BROWN ACCESSIBLE REVIEW 2006 IBC/ANSI-117.1 DENIED: SEE COMMENTS BELOW 1. Left side, sidewalk ramp 1:12 slope, does not have enough run for 6' of ramp required. 2. Show sign location on Development Plan. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/29/2008 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 29, 2008 SUBJECT: D&D Material Development Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 7575 S Old Vail Road, T155S R15E Sec21 Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0049 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan and Drainage Statement (Stanley Engineering & Drainage, Inc., 18NOV07, revised 02JUN08). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or Drainage Statement at this time. The Drainage Statement was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) Revise Sheet 1 and the mapped data to be drawn at a standard engineering scale having no more than 40-feet to the inch. The first page of the Development Plan is drawn at a 1-inch to 60-feet scale, which does not meet the requirements within the section. The scale is the minimum accepted due to clarity after photographic reduction for record keeping purposes. Using the sheet as a reference sheet does not eliminate the requirements of the 40-feet to the inch scale that is required, revise. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "A floodplain use permit is required for any work proposed within the limits of the mapped 100-year floodplain of regulatory wash as shown on the Development Plan." The roadway crossing encroaches into the 100-year floodplain and erosion hazard setback area. 3) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I.1: Provide the revised water surface elevation (WSEL) and the 100-year floodplain limits of the regulatory wash (168 cfs) that is shown on the Development Plan and within the proposed Drainage Statement. Label the 100-year floodplain limits in plan view on the Development Plan. A revised Drainage Statement is required and all new information must be depicted on the Development Plan. 4) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I.2: Provide the revised water surface elevation for the project at the 3 locations (may be more to determine floodplain limits) to verify finished floor elevation, roadway crossing elevation and discharge elevation at the existing drainage channel. Per the submitted Drainage Statement the proposed culverts increase the WSEL by more than 0.1 feet which is in violation of the Floodplain Ordinance, revise. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to include 6-inch curbing around the entire proposed vehicular use area. Curbing is required to prevent encroachment onto the adjacent undeveloped property. Provide a label with the associated keynote #7 to verify location. This comment was not fully addressed at all areas of the parking lot. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located on the east side of the proposed Development Plan. The spur must label the minimum 3-foot radius at the corner, but must also show the minimum 6-foot dimension. Specifically the back-up spur must be a minimum of 3 feet in depth but must also provide a minimum of 3 feet between the back of spur and any wall obstruction that is over 6 inches in height (required curbing). The Development Plan shows a wheel stop barrier encroaching into the required space. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.3.D. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Provide the recordation information for the proposed 15-foot utility easement that is shown on the Development Plan. The Development Plan can not be approved prior to the recordation of the easement. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Revise the Development Plan to provide a detail for the proposed corrugated metal pipes (CMPs). Provide the percent slope, inlet and outlet erosion protection (due to the calculated velocities), and spot elevations at the inlet, outlet and top of PAAL, and depth of water at inlet. This information must be shown on the Development Plan, stating that the information is shown on the grading plan does not satisfy Development Plan requirements. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.4: Revise the Development Plan to indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on the lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. This information must be shown on the Development plan, stating that the information is shown on the grading plan does not satisfy Development Plan requirements. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.6: Revise the Development Plan to show the 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100-hundred cfs or more. Provide a cross section at the upstream end of the proposed building to verify that the elevation of the finished floor is one-foot above the calculated water surface elevation. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the upstream WSEL and the finished floor elevation of the proposed buildings to verify the required 1-foot elevation above the WSEL. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.L: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the proposed sidewalks along the abutting right-of-way. Revise dimensions on Development Plan to show the proposed 6-foot wide sidewalk along Old Vail Road. Revise Keynote #11 to state the minimum width requirement. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Revise the detail provided for the refuse container to meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Provide the minimum 14-ft x 40-ft clear approach to the enclosure area. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Label and dimension the minimum maneuverability for the proposed refuse container. Label and dimension the minimum 36-foot inside and 50-foot outside radii to show vehicle maneuverability to verify that landscaping and parking spaces are not an obstruction. The maneuverability shown on the Development Plan has the refuse vehicle encroaching into the rock planter area in the middle of the vehicular use area and the wheel stop barriers along the south property line. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 14) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.1: Provide the revised water surface elevation (WSEL) and the 100-year floodplain limits of the regulatory wash (168 cfs) that is shown on the Development Plan and within the proposed Drainage Statement. Label the 100-year floodplain limits in plan view on the Development Plan. A revised Drainage Statement is required and all new information must be depicted on the Development Plan. 15) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.D: Provide the revised water surface elevation for the project at the 3 locations (may be more to determine floodplain limits) to verify finished floor elevation, roadway crossing elevation and discharge elevation at the existing drainage channel. Per the submitted Drainage Statement the proposed culverts increase the WSEL by more than 0.1 feet which is in violation of the Floodplain Ordinance, revise. 16) DS Sec.10-02.11.4.2: Revise the Drainage Statement to provide a detail of the proposed corrugated metal pipes (CMPs). Provide the percent slope, inlet and outlet erosion protection (due to the calculated velocities) per DS Sec.10-02.11.4.4.2, and spot elevations at the inlet, outlet and top of PAAL, and depth of water at inlet. The detail must be shown on the Development Plan and match the requirements within the revised Drainage Statement. 17) Per the meeting that was held on July 28, 2008 with Jason Green, CFM, Jeff Stanley, PE and Tom Patterson, PE provide all changes within the revised Drainage Statement and Development Plan to show that the project is in conformance with upstream development, existing channel construction, encroachment of the culverts in the 100-year floodplain, etc. Provide additional calculations to show that the WSEL does not increase by more than the 0.1 feet requirement. Revise the Development Plan accordingly. GRADING PLAN: 18) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 19) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and geotechnical report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 20) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) are applicable to this project per General Note #19. Per the note 4 acres of the property is to be disturbed which will require a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and a revised Drainage Statement that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Statement reviews. For any questions or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 07/29/2008 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Sheet 2, Masonry Refuse Enclosure - Identify within detail and annotate where the "cane bolt sleeves" will be positioned for securing the gates in the OPEN position during service operation. Not currently indicated. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/14/2008 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: DGD MATERIALS D07-0049 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 1, 2008. Alberta Adrian Office Specialist 918-8347 Ofc. 793-7504 Pgr. |
| 08/16/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 16, 2008 John Feneck Feneck Group Inc. P.O. 897 Vail, Arizona 85641 Subject: D07-0049 DGD Materials Development Plan Dear John: Your submittal of July 1, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan ( Wastewater, Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Engineering, Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Approved Lot Split Documents (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies ERR (Landscape, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 886-2992 |