Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0048
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 4, 2008 Robert Page Robert Page, Architect 2102 North Country Club Road, #9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D07-0048 Arizona Auto SpaDevelopment Plan Dear Robert: Your submittal of November 16, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 9 Copies Revised Development Plan (Addressing, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, Traffic, DUPD, ESD, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property (Zoning, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 798-3341 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/16/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/19/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | >>> FireDSC FireDSC 11/19/2007 9:04 AM >>> The development plan is approved, November 19, 2007. |
| 11/21/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: November 20, 2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN D07-0048 ARIZONA AUTO SPA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 11/26/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this project D07-0048 Robert Page, Architect Arizona Auto Spa -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 11/27/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 27, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0048 Arizona Auto Spa: Development Plan(11-16-07) Parks and Recreation has no comments on this project. |
| 11/30/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0048 ARIZONA AUTO SPA/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 29, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Grant Rd. to Grant Road on sheet 3. Correct Brey Rd. to Bray Road on sheet 3. jg |
| 11/30/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/04/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0048, ARIZONA AUTO SPA, DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: NA PM Peak: 44 Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 12/07/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | |
| 12/07/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | December 6, 2007 To: Robert Page Robert Page, Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Arizona Auto Spa Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-048 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the SRWS Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-048, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Revise Wastewater Management Note #3 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 3: Are you proposing any new sewer? If not include the following General Note on Sheet 1: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. And remove Wastewater Management Note #3. Sheet 3: If you are proposing new sewer then show the BCS on plan marked as PRIVATE BCS and show the size/slope/material and length of pipe. Sheet 3: All public sewer elements (manholes and sewer mains), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, should be identified with the wastewater plan and IMS numbers. The IMS numbers are the sewer element identification numbers that can be found on the PCWMD Maps and Records (5th floor) basemaps or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Include the rim and invert elevations for the manholes and the pipe size for the sewer line. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 12/12/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | December 12, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0048 PROJECT NAME: Arizona Auto Spa PROJECT ADDRESS: 3150 E Grant Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. The access points require 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) 3. The COT Transportation Access Management Guidelines 5.4 requires a minimum driveway separation of 80' along any major-street and route such as Grant Road, therefore the proposed entrance and exit access points need to be modified. 4. Show and existing and future SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 5. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/12/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Arizona Auto Spa D07-0048 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 12, 2007 DUE DATE: December 17, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a separate response letter for zoning, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 15, 2008. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 Revise "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTE" #1 to read "EXISTING ZONING IS C-2", remove the reference to proposed zoning. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.2 Provide the development plan number D07-0048 in the lower right corner of the plan. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 Revise "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTE" #2 to read "AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE AND REPAIR, MINOR". 5. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.10 Revise "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTE, GENERAL NOTE" #1 to read "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 6. D.S. 2-05.2.3.B If applicable show all existing easements of record graphically on the plan together with recording docket and page reference. 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a dimension for the parking area access lane (PAAL) located north of the proposed loading space and parking space. This PAAL is required to be a minimum of twenty-four (24) foot wide in the area adjacent to the single parking space. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 The proposed two-way PAAL shown at the north end of the project encroaches into the right-of-way (ROW) along Grant Road. All vehicle maneuvering is required to be on site. Revise this PAAL so that it does not encroach into the ROW. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.G If applicable show all proposed easements of record graphically on the plan, dimension and label as to their purposes and whether they will be pubic or private. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.I Clarify the extents of the awning called out under keynote 26 and provide a setback to the nearest edge of travel lane along Brey Road. Clearly indicate the north edge of travel lane for Brey Road. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Some type of barrier is required at the proposed loading space to prevent a vehicle from encroaching into the handicapped access ramp. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K The pedestrian circulation/accessible route, sidewalk, shown north of the proposed two-way PAAL within the ROW appears to run into the side of a curb access ramp. Clarify that the cross slope of this sidewalk will not exceed the requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Section 403.3. 13. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It appears that there is some type of obstruction, columns, of the proposed five (5) foot sidewalk that runs along the west side of the proposed structure. Provide a clear dimension for the sidewalk at these obstruction so that Zoning can verify that the minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk is maintained. 14. D.S. 2-05.2.4.N Provide overall dimensions for the "OFFICE/EQUIP" area of the building. 15. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The provided parking calculation is not correct. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 COMMERCIAL SERVICES USE GROUP, Automotive - Minor Service and Repair, Car Wash, Automated System, Four (4) spaces plus one (1) space for each vacuum bay, wash bay and drying space and one stacking space for each vacuum bay. Within the parking calculation and on the plan clarify the number of vacuum bays, wash bays and drying spaces. Also show the required stacking spaces for the vacuum bays on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P In the parking calculation include the required and provided accessible vehicle parking space. 17. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per 2006 International Building Code (IBC) Section 1106.5 for every six (6) or fraction of six (6) accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van accessible parking space. This said, the provide accessible parking space does not meet the requirements of a van accessible parking space, see ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 Sections 502.2 and 502.4. Revise the plan and detail. 18. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P The concrete wheel stop dimension shown on the details does not meet the requirements of D.S. 3-05.2.3.C.2, revise the details to meet the thirty (30) inch requirement. 19. D.S. 2-05.2.4.P Per D.S. 3-05.2.1.B.1 the proposed 62 degree angled parking must be approved by the Traffic Engineer. Provide written documentation of this approval. 20. D.S. 2-05.2.4.U Provide a separate letter stating how all the rezoning conditions have been met. 21. D.S. 2-05.2.4.W Clarify the type (monument, pole mounted, pedestal) sign is existing on site. If this sign is a monument sign then it may not be located within the existing and/or future sight visibility triangles (SVT's). It also appears that the existing sign is partially located within the proposed PAAL, please clarify. 22. Clarify the proposed use for the awning called out under keynote 26. 23. Zoning acknowledges the receipt of the Pima County Assessors Combo Request. Provide a copy of the Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property that has been recorded at the Pima County Recorders Office, see attached. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. I:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0048dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 12/17/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Sheet 0.2, enclosure detail Each enclosure service area requires a minimum 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear area between the rear and side bollards and the front gates. Show all dimensions within/of enclosure. 2. Correct the spacing of the bollards so the side bollards are 4 ft from the front/face of enclosure and the rear bollards are spaced 4 ft on each side from the center bollard. 3. Position gate post to face of CMU wall to allow for minimum 12 ft gate opening. 4. Identify pipe flush in concrete within detail drawing and show appropriately positioned to secure where open and closed. 5. Sheet 0.3 DP Service vehicle must be able to access development from closest lane to development without encroaching within neighbor lane or jumping curb and ramp. Not adequate turning radii to perform this movement. Show service vehicle circulation onto and within development. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/17/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0048 Arizona Auto Spa ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-99-07 and C9-92-19 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Grant-Alvernon Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: December 17, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: () Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat () Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 12/13/07 D07-0048 Arizona Auto Spa: Development Plan Rezoning condition #4 requires that all masonry screen walls be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials, and that the block be either split-face or acoustical CMU block. Please add a couple of notes to detail 6 on sheet 2 of the development plan, indicating that a) the wall will be constructed of or painted with graffiti-resistant materials; and b) the CMU block will be either split-face or acoustical. |
| 12/18/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | No comment |
| 12/24/2007 | MATT FLICK | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | D07-0047 Arizona Auto Spa - Grant Road DSD Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The following comments are offered: 1. The proposed onsite drainage does not comply with the rezoning condition to maximize water harvesting. This Division recommends frequent curb openings and warping of pavement towards curbing along the one-way drive to allow drainage into the pond. Otherwise, water will have to pond to over 1' deep at the eastern end to begin to pond in the western portion. More openings along the western and southern portions of the pond will allow runoff from the paved areas to be used beneficially by the plants in the pond. 2. M&C policy is for 6' sidewalks along Major Streets & Routes. Even if TDOT allows a smaller sidewalk because of the future Grant Road improvements, sidewalk placed against the curb requires an additional foot in width than a sidewalk placed with a shy space between the sidewalk and curb. 3. Indicate drainage openings along southern wall by keynote or specific notation. The drainage submittal is acceptable for Development Plan purposes. RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan |
| 12/27/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#190725 December 27, 2007 Robert Page, Architect 2102 N. Country Club Rd #9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Mr. Page : SUBJECT: Arizona Auto Spa D07-0048 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 16, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |