Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0045
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2009 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 2, 2008 Leo Katz Leo R. Katz, Architect 2415 East 7th Street Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0045 Speedway Office Development Plan Dear Leo: The above referenced development plan has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made per on-line comments, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the COMPLETE SET of the Development Plan, Landscape Plan, and the Native Plant Preservation Plan (if part of the original submittal). AND 1 Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar of the Development Plan. AND 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan. The extra Double Matte right-reading Océ or Photo Mylar that you submit will be delivered to Pima County for permanent recording. Additional blackline copies will be made from the complete mylar set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City's contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your mylars to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Your printing company will deliver the mylar and two (2) blackline copies to your office. If you are out of town you will need to contact the printing company for pick up or mailing arrangement options. TO ENSURE A MORE RAPID REVIEW OF THE MYLARS, PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/CDRC Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC Stamp/cdrc stamp.html. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE MYLARS TO THE CDRC OFFICE, THEY MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PCWWM. THE APPROVAL MUST BE IN WRITING (E-MAIL IS OKAY). Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-3904 (Call first) |
| 04/25/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/30/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | April 30, 2008 To: Leo Katz Leo R. Katz Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Site plan –3rd Submittal D07-045 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Sheet DP-1: Remove Wastewater Note #5. There is no public sewer line on site. Sheet DP-1:Cleanout # 8895*28 should be shown in Speedway Blvd not on site. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the . The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fourth (4th ) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 04/30/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | July 3, 2008 To: Leo Katz Leo R. Katz Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Site plan –4th Submittal D07-045 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. The Pima County Department of Environmental Quality and Wastewater Management Department hereby approve the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. Please note the following: Approval of the above referenced submittal does not authorize the construction of public or private sewer collection lines, or water distribution lines. Prior to the construction of such features, a Construction Authorization (Approval To Construct) may need to be obtained from the Pima County Environmental Quality. Also, air quality activity permits must be secured by the developer or prime contractor from the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality before constructing, operating or engaging in an activity which may cause or contribute to air pollution. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 05/01/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/16/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/21/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: D07-0045, Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Rezoning from R-1 to allow office and residential apartment Development plan, 3rd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 21, 2008 DUE DATE: May 23, 2008 COMMENTS: APPROVED 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0045 Speedway Office 3.doc |
| 05/29/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 29, 2008 SUBJECT: Speedway Office - Engineering CDRD - Development Plan Review TO: Leo Katz LOCATION: 2339 E Speedway, T14S R14E Sec 5, Ward 6 REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: Development Plan D07-0045 (Third Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The Engineering Division has reviewed the development plan and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comment must be addressed prior to approval. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the development plan. 1. Complied 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Complied 5. Complied 6. Complied. 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Complied 12. Complied 13. Complied 14. Complied 15. Complied 16. Provide percent slopes for drainage and sidewalks on development plan. 17. Complied 18. Call out COT detail and type for scuppers called out on development plan. Keynote (13) calls out sidewalk scupper as per L.U.C Standard. The scupper detail is associated with a development standard, not the L.U.C.. 19. All sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. All offsite ramps are to comply with COT SD 207 - call out as detail 207 on development plan. For onsite ramps the details should be called out as ANSI 405/406. Call out ramp as 1:12 slope with side ramps. Call out 1:20 slope above actual ramp. 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Complied 23. Complied 24. Keynote (11) calls out free standing sign. It appears to be located within the SVT. Unable to locate detail for sign on development plan. Provide detail on development plan and clearly indicate height of sign. 25. Align site visibility triangles so that they are aligned with the edge of curb(s). 26. Complied 27. Complied 28. Revise detail for handicap ramp on handicap parking space detail. Verify that detail matches what is being indicated on the development plan. Provide appropriate ramp and truncated domes. 29. Complied 30. Complied 31. Complied 32. Depict median that is located within the right of way of Speedway. 33. Complied 34. Correct handicap access ramp detail to call out ANSI 405/406 on detail. 35. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Bianca C. Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 05/30/2008 | GLYNDA ROTHWELL | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Passed | |
| 05/30/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0045 Speedway Office 03/06/08 ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other - Site Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-30 Palo Verde Import/Export - Speedway Blvd NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Blenman Vista Neighborhood Plan/University Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/14/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 11/21/07 ( ) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat ( ) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Other - Color Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 03/04/08 |
| 05/30/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | |
| 05/30/2008 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed |