Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0045
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2008 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/15/2008 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 02/27/2008 | FRODRIG2 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | February 26, 2008 To: Leo Katz Leo R. Katz Architect Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Site plan – 2nd Submittal D07-045 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The Site Plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2nd Request. 2nd Request.The site plan submitted is significantly deficient. Refer to Pima County Development Services “Development Plan Review, Checklist Requirements” section J. WASTEWATER, for submittal requirements. The checklist is available at; http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/DevPlanReq.pdf Most of the wastewater notes are missing. 2nd request. IMS#’s for the manholes with rim and invert elevations and the construction plan # and pipe size for the public sewer. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the . The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd ) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 03/07/2008 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) The required screening for the refuse storage area is a six-foot high masonry wall per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the plans as necessary. |
| 03/10/2008 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0045 Speedway Office 03/06/08 () Tentative Plat () Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment (XXXX) Other – Site Plan CROSS REFERENCE: C9-06-30 Palo Verde Import/Export - Speedway Blvd NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Blenman Vista Neighborhood Plan/University Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 03/14/08 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (XXXX) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 11/21/07 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other – Color Elevations REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 03/04/08 |
| 03/10/2008 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0045 SPEEDWAY OFFICE/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 3/10/08 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ES |
| 03/14/2008 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 03/14/2008 8:18 AM >>> No comment |
| 03/17/2008 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 17, 2008 SUBJECT: Speedway Office - Engineering CDRD - Development Plan Review TO: Leo Katz LOCATION: 2339 E Speedway, T14S R14E Sec 5, Ward 6 REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: Development Plan D07-0045 (Second Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The Engineering Division has reviewed the development plan and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comment must be addressed prior to approval. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the development plan. 1. Project location map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile. Provide scale 3" = 1 mile along with section, township and range. Include section corners within location map. Scale is not 3" = 1 mile it is 3 miles = 1inch and section corners have not been depicted. Revise accordingly. 2. Complied 3. Complied 4. Provide contour interval on development plan together with scale and north arrow. 5. Complied 6. Complied. 7. Complied 8. Complied 9. Complied 10. Complied 11. Verify that lot dimension and bearing information is provided for all site boundary lines; include nearing in degrees, minutes and seconds, with basis for bearing noted. 12. Complied 13. Complied 14. Provide recordation information for Norton Avenue and Speedway Boulevard. 15. Complied 16. Provide percent slopes for drainage and sidewalks on development plan. 17. Complied 18. Call out COT detail for scuppers called out on development plan. 19. All sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 20. Complied 21. Complied 22. Label the height and dimension of each building on development plan. 23. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and /or onsite runoff discharge points. 24. If there are any proposed signs, indicate the type of proposed sign (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are not conflicts with other requirements and the minimal locational requirements can be met. Proposed sign appears to be located within the SVT - in addition unable to locate detail for sign. 25. Align site visibility triangles so that they are aligned with the edge of curb(s). Clarify the reasoning for the 30' SVT located at the northeast corner of parcel from the alley along Norton Avenue. 26. Label MS&R 120' dimension as existing / future 120' right of way. 27. Call out radius dimensions for back up spur located in the northwest corner of proposed development. 28. Provide detail for handicap ramp on handicap parking space detail. Provide appropriate ramp and truncated domes. 29. Unable to locate keynotes 2 and 8 on site plan. 30. Call out water harvesting areas and provide openings for onsite drainage to enter water harvesting areas. 31. Call out Speedway Boulevard as an arterial street and call out Norton Avenue as a local street. 32. Depict median that is located within the right of way of Speedway. 33. Provide letter from environmental services permitting the pick up of refuse from alley as proposed on the development plan. 34. Correct handicap access ramp detail to permit the access of the handicap. Remove curb and provide truncated domes and landing area on detail. 35. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Bianca C. Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 03/18/2008 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department, Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall, Senior Planner PROJECT: D07-0045, Speedway Office, 2339 E. Speedway Rezoning from R-1 to allow office and residential apartment Development plan, 2nd review TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 18, 2008 DUE DATE: March 14, 2008 COMMENTS: 1. Per last review: Per DS 2-05.2.1.D, regarding location map: A) please revise to meet a scale of 3" = 1 mile (reverse sized scale actually provided) B) add Township, Range and Section number of site - and adjacent sections 2. Per last review: Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, list the names, addresses and phone numbers of the project DEVELOPER. (I see the ownership and architect data provided, thank you.) 3. Per last review: please delineate the sidewalk or concrete along loading zone area - it's hard to tell where the sidewalk ends and landscape begins. 4. Per last review: Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, For permitting & records, DIMENSION footprint of both 1st and 2nd floors. (I see square footage notes, thank you.) 5. Per last review: Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) on detail in sheet 3, revise wheel stops to be fully within 2'6" of top of parking space. 6. Per last review: Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, revise class 2 bike rack per DS 2-09. (the ribbon style provided was removed from the acceptable style of bike parking racks.) 7. Per DS 2-05.2.4.U, please provide a SEPARATE response letter declaring how the property will be developed to meet rezoning conditions. (Sorry, not found in package) 8. Per DS 2-05.2.4.W, I see provided free-standing signage is within the sight visibility triangle. The location of the sign, if the sign is over 30" in height, must be changed. 9. Further comments may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. I may be reached at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0045 Speedway Office 2.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan. |
| 03/20/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 20, 2008 Leo Katz Leo R. Katz, Architect 2415 East 7th Street Tucson, Arizona 85719 Subject: D07-0045 Speedway Office Development Plan Dear Leo: Your submittal of February 14, 2008 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Landscape, Wastewater, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-3904 (call first) |