Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0044
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/31/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/05/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | New hydrants and an automatic sprinkler system are required. The water utility plan does not show the hydrant or the fire line. |
| 11/06/2007 | FRODRIG2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | CASE: D07-0044, THE ROADSIZE STEAKOUT: DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 648 PM Peak: 54 Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 11/07/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: November 7, 2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN D07-0044 THE ROADSIDE STEAK HOUSE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 11/14/2007 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#190037 November 14, 2007 Dear Antony Tsang: SUBJECT: The Roadside Steakout D07-0044 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and disapproved the development plan submitted November 7, 2007. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Please identify all TEP facilities within the mapped area of the development plan for approval. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities, and attached for reference In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Please call the area Designer Steve Garica at (520) 918-8739, should you have any questions. Sincerely, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures Cc S. Garcia, Tucson Electric Power City of Tucson (E-Mail) |
| 11/14/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Add any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B The loading area is required to be screened from the street per LUC table 3.7.2-I. Show all proposed and required screen walls on the development and landscape plans. DS 2-07. Per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 5' high masonry walls are required wherever the adjacent zoning is residential. Revise the native plant preservation plan to show the limits of grading and any proposed offsite disturbances, such as access or utility routes. Resubmittal of alll plans is required. |
| 11/21/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 20, 2007 To: Tony Tsang AC Tsang Engineering Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: The Roadside Steakout Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-044 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the Southeast Interceptor. Obtain a letter from the PCWMD's Development Services Section, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/forms/docs/CapResponseRequest.pdf. The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-0044, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #16 to read as follows: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 2: Revise General Note #23 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet 1: The sewer line G-2007-085 should be called out as PROPOSED PER G-2007-085 Sheet 1: You are proposing a private 6” sewer line thru a public utility easement. This is not acceptable because private sewer can not run thru public easements. Sheet 1: This development plan can not be accepted until G-2007-085 has been approved. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 11/23/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0044 THE ROADSIDE STEAKOUT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: 11/20/07 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.) Correct location of Block lines for Block 3. 2.) Correct Block 4 to Block 3. 3.) Correct Block 5 to Block 4. 4.) Correct N 35° 49' 45" E 149.41 to 131.72. 5.) Label Wilmot Road. 6.) Label point of access for Block 2. 7.) Label recorded Bk. And Pg. for Wilmot/I-10 Commercial Plat prior to approval of this project. |
| 11/27/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 27, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0044 The Roadside Steakout: Development Plan(11-1-07) Parks and Recreation has no comments on this project. |
| 11/28/2007 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D07-0044 The Roadside Steakout Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: 11/28/07 DUE DATE: 11/30/07 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 11/29/08. 2. The tentative plat and final plat (S07-025) for this site has not been completed. The development plan cannot be fully reviewed nor approved until completion of the final plat. Provide a copy of the approved tentative and final plat with the next submittal. 3. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 Case number D07-0044 has been assigned to this development plan (DP). Please place this number in the right corner of all sheets of the development plan, landscape plan, NPPO, and any other associated sheets. 4. DS 2-05.2.2.3 In general note #2 the proposed use should read as follows: Food Services "30" subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5 5. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 Clearly indicate the location of curbs or barriers along all PAALs and near parking spaces to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Revise detail DD. See DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. The PAAL access to the adjacent property at the north end of the property will require temporary barriers to prevent access onto unimproved property. Clearly indicate type and location of barrier proposed. See DS 3-05.2.3.C.1. The indicated 24' ingress/egress, utilities, and pedestrian easements is not wide enough to incorporate the required pedestrian circulation path. A sidewalk will be required on each side of the PAAL located off site. Revise plan and detail DD. If this is the width of the easements on the tentative and final plat, a revised tentative and final plat will be required. Provide a copy of the CC&Rs regarding the cross access requirement of rezoning condition #8. See engineering comments regarding radii of curb returns. 6. DS 2-05.2.4.G Provide recording docket and page information for all proposed easements. 7. DS 2-05.2.4.K The portion of the indicated crosswalk which is adjacent to the parking spaces is required to be a physically separated concrete sidewalk with handicap ramps at the ends of the sidewalk. Provide a detail of the handicap ramp clearly indicating the slope, width, landing and the minimum 24" in depth truncated dome location. Clearly indicate that all sidewalks are physically separated from the vehicular use area. At the north corner of the building it appears that the minimum 4' sidewalk wide is not provided between the building and the parking space. Revise. On the development plan clearly indicate the location of the handicap ramps at the handicap access aisles. 8. DS 2-05.2.4.N Provide all dimensions for the footprint of the building on the development plan. 9. DS 2-05.2.4.P Provide a detail and location of the required handicap parking signage for the handicap parking spaces. FYI: the minimum distance from grade to the bottom of the sign is seven (7) feet per City of Tucson standards. A copy of the required verbiage for the handicap sign can be obtained at the front counter at DSD. General note #7 indicates 96 parking spaces provided, the plan indicates 95 spaces provided. Clarify. In the parking calculations the number of required handicap parking spaces is incorrect. The number of required spaces per IBC Sec.1106.1 for 76 to 100 parking spaces provided is 4. Revise. 10. DS 2-05.2.3.Q Indicate in the parking calculation portion of page 1 of 2 the correct number of required and provided bicycle parking spaces. Per LUC the required number is 8% of the number of provided parking spaces with 25% being class one bicycle parking spaces and 75% being class two bicycle parking spaces. Total required bicycle parking spaces is 8 with 2 being class one and 6 being class two. Revise calculations and the development plan. Please provide a dimensioned detail for class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking racks and spaces. Be aware that that development standard 2-09 has been revised. Once provided and reviewed further comments may result. The revised standards can be found at the DSD web site: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/Codes___Ordinances/DevStd209.pdf Please provide a plan view detail of the proposed class 1 and class 2 bicycle parking spaces. Class 2 bicycle parking spaces shall meet the following requirements. Single rack spaces placed in a row will allow a minimum of seventy -two (72) inch length per bicycle parking space and a minimum of thirty (30) inches between outer spaces of racks. A five (5) foot wide access aisle measured from the front or rear of the seventy-two (72) inch long parking space will be provided beside each row. Lighting will be provided such that all facilities are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings, during working hours. The surface of the facility can be surfaced the same as for motor vehicle parking or with a minimum of one (1) inch thickness of one-fourth (1/4) inch aggregate material. DS 2-09.5.1, DS2-09.5.2, DS 2-09.5.4, & DS 2-09.6.2 11. DS 2-05.2.4.U Provide written response indicating how compliance with all of the rezoning conditions have been met., 12. DS 2-05.2.4.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Also indicate if there are existing billboards on site. Billboards will be required to meet all LUC requirements as stated in LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26. If none exists please state so. DS 2-05.2.4.W & LUC 3.5.4.26 13. Additional comments may be forth coming depending on changes to this plan and responses to the above comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0044dp.doc |
| 11/30/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. There is not adequate service vehicle turning radii throughout development without encroaching onto sidewalk areas. Recommend providing curb returns at an appropriate radius (25 ft) to allow adequate service vehicle maneuverability (turning radii) within development. 2. Enclosure detail and approach to enclosure area works. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 11/30/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0044 The Roadside Steakout 11/29/07 ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: S07-25, C9-01-05 (wilmot/I-10 Commercial Center) NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Rincon Southeast Subregional Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: N/A COMMENTS DUE BY: November 30, 2007 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (ü) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (ü) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (ü) Development Plan (ü) Landscape Plan (ü) Other - color elevations, see comments REVIEWER: J. Hershenhorn 791-4505 DATE: 11/27/07 The Roadside Steakout: Development Plan D07-044 This development plan (DP) was reviewed for compliance with the rezoning conditions for C9-01-05, as amended by the Mayor and Council on November 17, 2006; and consistency with the Tentative Block Plat for Wilmot/I-10 Commercial Center, S07-025, which is currently being reviewed. 1) Please revise the Development Plan to allow access to the 24-foot-wide ingress/egress easement between Blocks 3 and 4, as shown on S07-025. Integrated vehicular access throughout the site must be provided, as per rezoning condition 1.C. 2) Demonstrate how safe and convenient pedestrian cross access will be provided between this Block (Block 2) and Blocks 1, 3, 4 and 5 (see rezoning condition 1.D). 3) Please show all required and proposed screen walls, and provide a screen wall detail on the DP. Also show the wall alignment on the DP and/or Landscape Plan, as required to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 14. 4) Please provide color elevations to demonstrate compliance with rezoning condition 15. 5) Please show the sidewalk in cross-section DD on sheet 2/2 of the DP. 6) Please provide a cross-section of the eastern-most PAAL that provides access to Block 2. |
| 11/30/2007 | CDRC1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 11/30/2007 2:01 PM >>> No comment |
| 11/30/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | November 30, 2007 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D07-0044 PROJECT NAME: The Roadside Steakout PROJECT ADDRESS: 7648 S Wilmot Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. Along Wilmot and the PAAL show and label the SVTs (DS 2-03.2.4.M). 3. The submitted Traffic Statement needs to incorporate the data provided in the Traffic Impact Analysis that was prepared by Curtis Lueck & Associates for the Blackhawk development located west of this proposed site. 4. Prior the next submittal a meeting is needed to discuss possible on-site improvements to prevent conflicts with future off-site traffic flows. 5. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5550 ext. 1107. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-4259 x76730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/03/2007 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/04/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Denied | ADOT has the following comments on this project; * Why is there no mention of any mitigation @ the frontage road and Wilmot? * This developer needs to coordinate with the Estancia people to see, if and who, will participate on any intersection mitigation NOW! * Are signals needed presently, a signal study needs to conducted for next submittal. * Identify access control on the plan. * Check the corridor study for future foot print of the proposed interchange for any conflict with the development layout. * Show the frontage road, in the diagram on pages 6&7 of the Traffic document; its diamond interchange with frontage roads. * The Traffic document does not address the frontage road and is not acceptable to ADOT. If there any questions or comments on the submittal, I can be contacted @ 388-4226. Thank you. TM. -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 12/05/2007 | BIANCA RAMIREZ | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 29, 2007 SUBJECT: The Roadside Steakhouse - Engineering CDRD - Development Plan Review TO: Anthony C Tsang LOCATION: 7648 S Wilmont, T15S R15E Sec 27, Ward 4 REVIEWER: Bianca Ramirez, CFM ACTIVITY: Development Plan D07-0044 (First Review) RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan The Engineering Division has reviewed the development plan and we do not recommend approval at this time. The following comment must be addressed prior to approval: . 1. Each sheet should include a minimum one-half (1/2) inch margin on each side. This allows for standardization of material for more efficient record keeping and assures legibility when microfilmed. 2. Add Note: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 3. Add Note: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangle in accordance with Development Standard 3-01.0.0." 4. Verify that all easements have been drawn on the development plan. The recordation easement, location, width, and purpose of all easement on site need to be indicated. 5. Provide existing public right of way adjacent to the property and label as public; provide the name of the existing street, right of way width, and recordation data type along with dimension width of paving curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. 6. Verify that the following information regarding existing utilities are provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including pipe diameter and the interval and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles and communication cables, on ground junction boxes, and street lights. 7. Verify that structures, fences, walls, etc. are shown in a different line weight than the proposed improvements. Add label to be removed or remain. 8. Provide percent slopes for drainage and sidewalks on development plan. 9. If temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legend documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information. 10. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks and utilities all fully labeled and dimensioned. 11. Verify that a minimum setback distance of five (5) feet for a pedestrian refuge area is maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL. Northeast corner of building does not appear to meet minimum five (5) feet of pedestrian refuge area. 12. All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 13. Show onsite pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. 14. Modify pedestrian circulation path to include access from Wilmot Rd to building Development Standard 2-08.3.0. 15. Modify pedestrian circulation path to include access to dumpster area per Development Standard 2-08.3.0. 16. Show proposed sidewalks along abutting right of way. All sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled. As per the Federal ADA requirements, all wheel chair ramps shall have the truncated domes instead of the standard grooves that are shown on COT SD 207. Aside from the Truncated Domes, all wheel chair ramps shall be constructed in accordance with COT SD 207. 17. Call out all material for sidewalk areas and PAAL(s). 18. Provide MS&R future sidewalk and right of way lines, etc. 19. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 20. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 21. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and /or onsite runoff discharge points. 22. Provide the 100-year floodplain limits along with determined water surface elevations. 23. Provide applicable setback lines for retention basin. Provide geotechnical report and letter identifying determined setback for basin. 24. All spine roads for access to a lot as well as any required basins located outside of the lot shall be constructed and completed prior to C of O. 25. Show existing or proposed sidewalks along abutting right of way. Also include future sidewalk and curb, fully dimensioned and labeled. 26. Depict all curbing on development plan. 27. Dimension maneuverability for loading zones. 28. Correct site visibility triangles on development plan and include site visibility triangle along Wilmot from proposed road. 29. Refuse collection area is to include screening location, and materials and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned. Provide all the pertinent information on the development plan. Provide label calling out refuse collection area. 30. Enclosure door per architect/engineer design. Minimum standard construct door frame using 3" X 3" X ¼" thick welded steel angle. Face with type B metal deck with positive locking and "Baybonet" anchors. 31. Development plan will not be approved until the Block Plat had been approved. 32. Revise general note 4 - explination does not apprear to read correctly. 33. Verify that finished floor elevation matches elevation in drainage report. 34. Additional comments may be forthcoming. Drainage Report - Denied 1. Drainage Report was reviewed for compliance with Development Plan review only. 2. Provide datum information in drainage report. Provide WSE along with the converted elevation in the drainage report on the site plan. Bianca C. Ramirez, CFM Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4928 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 12/07/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 7, 2007 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell, Suite S Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D07-0044 The Roadside Steakout Development Plan Dear Tony: Your submittal of November 1, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised Development Plan (Fire, TEP, Landscape, Wastewater, Addressing, Zoning, DUPD, ESD, Traffic, ADOT, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, Zoning, DUPD, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies CC&R's (Zoning, DSD) 2 Copies Color Elevations (DUPD, DSD) 3 Copies Revised Traffic Statement (ADOT, Traffic, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 325-0979 |
| 12/07/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | February 22, 2010 Antony C. Tsang A.C. Tsang Engineering Group, Inc. 4626 East Fort Lowell Road, Suite S Tucson, AZ 85712 SUBJECT: CLOSURE OF CDRC FILE Development Plan Per Section 5.3.8.2.A, Expiration Dates, of the Land Use Code, "an applicant has one (1) year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A development plan application that has been in review for a period of one (1) year which has not been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a development plan for the property, a new development plan which complies with regulations in effect at that time must be submitted. The new submittal initiates a new one (1) year review period." Case # Case Name DSD Transmittal Date D07-0044 The Roadside Steakout October 31, 2007 Please note that this case has been closed and that, in order to continue review of the project, new development plan/tentative plat application is required which comply with regulations in effect at the time of the new submittals. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, Patricia Y. Gehlen CDRC Manager xc: CDRC file D07-0044 ……. |