Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0043
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/14/2008 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#190744 December 27, 2007 Robinette Architects, Inc. Attn: Anthony Falgiano 1676 E River Road Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Mr. Falgiano : SUBJECT: Tu Nidito D07-0043 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 6, 2007. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Ms. Mary Boice New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8732 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/15/2008 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 15, 2008 Anthony Falgiano Robinette Architects, Inc. 1670 East River Road Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: D07-0043 Tu Nidito Development Plan Dear Anthony: Your submittal of November 6, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Plan (Wastewater, Landscape, DUPD, Addressing, ESD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Landscape, DUPD, Zoning, Engineering, DSD) 2 Copies Revised NPPO Plan (Landscape, DSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 888-5518 dp-resubmittal |
| 11/05/2007 | FRODRIG2 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/08/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/09/2007 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Gary Ault, Mapping Supervisor Pima County Assessor’s Office Mapping Department DATE: November 9, 2007 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding DEVELOPMENT PLAN D07-0043 TU NIDITO T131430 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUBMITTAL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROSANNA WERNER AT 740-4390 ROSANNA WERNER |
| 11/13/2007 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT has NO COMMENT on this development D07-0043 Robinette Architects Inc TU NIDITO -------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. |
| 11/14/2007 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2007 | CDRC1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | >>> "Aichong Sun" <asun@pagnet.org> 11/19/2007 10:37 AM >>> CASE: D07-0043, TU NIDITO - DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: Daily: 213 PM Peak: 22 Please call if you have questions, Aichong Sun Pima Association of Governments 177 N. Church Ave, #405 Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: (520) 792-1093, Fax: (520) 620-6981 Web: www.PAGnet.org and www.RTAmobility.com |
| 11/21/2007 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Submit a landscape plan per DS 2-07.0 in accordance with DS 2-06. 2) Submit an irrigation plan. LUC 3.7.4.5.C 3) Show and identify by genus and species existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 4) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape borders must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. Revise the plans to show the plants and calculations vegetative ground coverage. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5 5) Submit documentation supporting the assertion that the site does not contain, or the proposed project does not impact, Protected Native Plants. DS 2-15.2.0 6) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify the type and locations proposed for inert ground cover materials or seeded areas. A minimum two-inch layer is required. LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C 7) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 RESUBMITTAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED |
| 11/21/2007 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | November 20, 2007 To: Anthony Fallgiano Robinette Architects Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ___________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6579), representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environment Quality Subject: Tu Nidito Dev. Plan - 1st Submittal D07-043 The proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use. This project will be tributary to the Roger Road Wastewater Treatment Facility via the SRWC Interceptor. Per written guidance provided by the PCWMD Development Services Section, sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity exists in the downstream public sewerage system for this small project, and a formal capacity response letter from the PCWMD will not be required for this small project. All Sheets: Show the jurisdiction’s case number, D07-0043, in or near the title block of each sheet. This case number should be shown larger and bolder than any associated cross-reference numbers. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. Sheet 1: Add a General Note that states: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 1: Eliminate General Notes #7, #8 and #16. Sheet 1: Revise the site plan so that it shows all public sewer elements (sewer mains and manholes), that are located on this project or are less than 100’ from this project, identified with the wastewater improvement plan and manhole IMS numbers. Also include the rim and invert elevations for manholes. The improvement plan and IMS numbers may be found at the PCWMD Maps and Records Section office (5th floor), or on PCWMD and PCDOT MapGuide internet websites. Sheet 1: Show the pipe size and material for both the public and private sewer. Sheet 1: Mark the sewer lines on site as PRIVATE BCS. Show symbols in a Legend for the various sewer elements. Make sure to distinguish on plan public from private sewer. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you have any questions regarding the above-mentioned comments, please contact me. |
| 11/23/2007 | ROGER HOWLETT | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | DEPARTMENT OF URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D07-0043 Tu Nidito 11/21/07 ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan ( ) Landscape Plan ( ) Revised Plan/Plat ( ) Board of Adjustment ( ) Other CROSS REFERENCE: C9-0715 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Northside Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 12/05/07 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: ( ) No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment ( ) Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions ( ) RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies ( ) See Additional Comments Attached ( ) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (XXXX) Resubmittal Required: ( ) Tentative Plat (XXXX) Development Plan (XXXX) Landscape Plan (XXXX) Other - Wall Detail REVIEWER: drcorral 791-4505 DATE: 11/16/07 This case was reviewed for consistency with the amended Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and zoning conditions adopted by the Mayor and Council . 1. Please correct Rezoning Condition #1 to Read A development plan in substantial compliance………..etc. 1. Rezoning condition #3 states "All walls visible from a public right-of-way and/or adjacent to existing residential development, are to be graffiti-resistant and incorporate one (1) or more visually appealing design treatments, such as the use of two (2) or more decorative materials like stucco, tile, stone, or brick; a visually interesting design on the wall surface, varied wall alignments (jog, curve, notch, setback, etc.); and/or trees and shrubs in voids created by the wall variations." Please submit an elevation and a copy of the landscape plan to reflect how this condition will be met. |
| 11/26/2007 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D07-0043 TU NIDITO/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 26, 2007 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct Tax Code 113-01-0500 to 113-01-050A. Number buildings numerically. jg |
| 11/27/2007 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | DATE: November 27, 2007 TO: DSD_CDRC@ tucsonaz.gov FROM: Glenn Hicks Parks and Recreation 791-4873 ext. 215 Glenn.Hicks@tucsonaz.gov SUBJECT: D07-0043 Tu Nidito: Development Plan(11-6-07) Parks and Recreation has no comments on this project. |
| 12/03/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for on site refuse and recycle storage and collection. Per DS 6-01.4.1.A Current curbside APC collection service in excess of minimum allowed (DS 6-01.3..2.A) and therefore must meet above mentioned standard. Provide on site refuse/recycle enclosure with adequate access and maneuverability within development. Require minimum 14 ft x 40 ft clear approach to enclosure area. 2. Include a detail drawing of refuse/recycle enclousure with all dimensions. Minimum required: A. 10 ft x 10 ft inside clear service area between the rear and side wall protectors and front gates. B. Gates must be equipped with the ability to be secured in the open and closed positions. Show within detail and annotate, "positive locking with (Bayonet) anchors, QTY-4, 1 in. dia. x 6 in. long galvanized pipe flush with concrete/foundation. Recommend gates open a minimum 180 degrees with anchors appropriately positioned to secure at this position. Please provide corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/05/2007 | FRODRIG2 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Approved | >>> Jim Stoyanoff 12/05/2007 11:05 AM >>> No comment |
| 12/05/2007 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/10/2007 | HEATHER THRALL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Heather Thrall Senior Planner PROJECT: D07-043, Tu Nidito, 3922 N. Mountain Avenue Rezoning of undeveloped portion of site to "P" to allow for parking Development Plan, 1st Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 10, 2007 DUE DATE: December 5, 2007 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 5, 2008. 2. This project was reviewed for compliance with the Land Use Code (LUC), Development Standard (DS), American National Standard Institute (ANSI) and International Building Code 2006 (IBC). Specifically, this project was reviewed for content of DS 2-05, Development plan criteria. 3. Per Zoning Administrator advisement written May 1, 2007 - the new parking lot to be developed on the vacant portion of the existing Tu Nidito site is not an expansion that will require full code compliance. This parking area expansion is to allow the Tu Nidito children's medical outpatient service to come into compliance for the parking needs of the existing use. The existing Special Exception and variance cases existing on the site will not be altered by the parking area expansion. 4. Per DS 2-05.2.1.C, please increase all type size (even on map) to a minimum of 12 point, for microfilming. 5. Per DS 2-05.2.1.D, please add Duke Drive and Prince Road to the location map. 6. Per DS 2-05.2.1.D, please add the township range and section of the location and adjacent sections to the location map. 7. Per DS 2-05.2.2.A.1, please add the developer's contact information to the plan. 8. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.2, Development Services assigned case number D07-0043 to this project. Please provide the case number on the lower right hand corner of the plan. 9. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.6, in the variance notes for this project, A) In note 4, add that landscaping and screening variances are granted and to be in compliance per the Preliminary Development Plan submitted to the Board of Adjustment. B) Add the date of approval for the variances, April 29, 1992. 10. Per DS 2-05.2.3.B, ensure any an all easements, with type of easement and recordation information, is graphically depicted on the plan. 11. Per DS 2-05.2.4.B, please provide a dimension from the new "P" zoning line to the east property line, so it is clear where the rezoning area is defined and that only parking activity is in this area. 12. Per DS 2-05.2.2.B.2, in the rezoning conditions listed, please change the letter configuring of the last note in Condition 6, to read "F", rather than "G". There is no "G". 13. Per DS 2-05.2.4.K, regarding pedestrian access: A) please keynote the disabled access ramp at the east side of the site. Call out truncated domes and the slope. B) Please add to general note 9, that truncated domes are also included at the disabled access ramp. C) Please call out the width of the new sidewalk areas. 14. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, under Land Use Code data, in building area notes, revise to show that the building area is all "existing" that no new building area is "proposed" under this project. 15. Per DS 2-05.2.4.M, under Land Use Code data, in lot coverage notes - this should include the new parking area. The notes appear to only show the last site plan information without the new parking area proposed this review. Revise. 16. Per DS 2-05.2.4.N, for records, as this will be the most up to date document for this address, please show the dimensions of the building footprints. 17. Per DS 2-05.2.4.P, regarding parking: A) dimension the length and widths of the spaces - new and existing (typical note fine) B) clarify if any wheel stops will be provided to prevent sidewalks or landscaping from having any infringement. Keep in mind that sidewalks must have a minimum width of 4'. C) Please darken the parking space lines - they are hard to see. D) In the parking calculations, please show that parking ratio is to be provided at 1:175 g.f.a for medical service, and calling out the total s.f. of the building in the parking calculations as well. (I see the g.f.a. elsewhere, thank you, and I do acknowledge sufficient parking, thank you.). 18. Per DS 2-05.2.4.Q, I acknowledge no additional bike parking is needed. Please clarify that the bike parking is existing in the bike parking calc. 19. Per DS. 2-05.2.4.W, please declare any free-standing signage with height specs. 20. Please provide a separate response letter advising how all conditions of rezoning will be met. I acknowledge I do not see any issues with the rezoning conditions that affect zoning elements. Thank you. 21. Please note, further responses may be forthcoming, depending upon the responses provided. If you have any questions on this review, please contact me via email at Heather.Thrall@tucsonaz.gov or at 520-837-4951. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call (520) 791-5608. C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0043 tu nidio parking rezoning.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 12/11/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 11, 2007 SUBJECT: Tu Nidito Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3922 N Mountain Avenue, T135S R14E Sec30 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0043 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Hydrology Report (Rick Engineering Co., 30JAN07). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan or Hydrology Report at this time. The Hydrology Report was reviewed for Development Plan purposes only. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.A: Revise the Development Plan to include a minimum one-half inch margin on each side of the sheet. This allows for standardization of material for more efficient record keeping and assures legibility when microfilmed. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.C: Revise the Development Plan to include all lettering and dimensions to be the equivalent of twelve point or greater in size. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.1: Revise the project location map to show the subject property approximately centered within the 1-square mile shown. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map to identify conditions within the square mile area shown, specifically the Mountain View Wash adjacent to the property and the Rillito Creek once the property is centered. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.3: Revise the project location map to label the Township, Range and Section corners once the property is centered. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Revise the Development plan to include a legend which shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing, i.e. rock riprap, water surface elevation, manholes, etc. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D07-0043) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Provide the following note on the Development Plan to read; "A floodplain use permit is required for any work proposed within the limits of the mapped 100-year floodplain of the Mountain View Wash as shown on the Development Plan." Provide a Floodplain Use Permit application with the resubmittal of the Development Plan for review and approval prior to Development Plan approval. 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2: Revise the General Note #10 for the sight visibility triangles to reference the correct DS where the requirement is requested; "DS Sec.2-05.2.2.D.2." 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the Development Plan. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but maybe required to verify if any easements affect this property. 12) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to provide the existing driveway apron for the drop off area at the intersection of the PAAL and Duke Drive per the last approved Site Plan. 13) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.D: Revise the Development Plan to show all existing sewer lines. Provide the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and clean outs. 14) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.I.1: Provide the water surface elevation (WSEL) and the 100-year floodplain limits of Mountain View Wash that is shown in the proposed Hydrology Report. Label the 100-year floodplain limits in plan view on the Development Plan. 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show wheel stop barrier for the parking spaces located along any adjacent pedestrian circulation paths or landscape area. The barriers are to be set at a minimum 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required clear 4-foot pedestrian path and/or landscape areas. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the back-up spur provided at the end of the PAAL located on the east-side of the proposed Development Plan. The spur must label the minimum 3-foot depth with a 3-foot radius at both corners. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.2.3.D. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the Development Plan reflects handicap access ramps with truncated domes (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria) at all proposed handicap ramp location. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. Revise General Note #9 to include verbiage of the required truncated domes. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.G: Verify the location of all proposed utilities and provide any applicable easements for sewer, electric, water, gas, etc. 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Provide a revised Hydrology Report or addendum to show the new parking lot and impervious area. Verify that the 5-year retention is still addressed due to the new asphalt for the parking lot. 20) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide a discussion within the revised Hydrology Report on the proposed water harvesting area with the inlet and outlet and how flow is conveyed from the concentration point to the outlet. 21) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide a discussion within the revised Hydrology Report for the proposed wall openings for Concentration Points II and III along with the riprap design as shown on the proposed Development Plan. 22) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.6: Revise the Development Plan to show the 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100-hundred cfs or more. 23) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the Development Plan to show the minimum distance of 4-foot for the pedestrian refuge that is shown around the proposed basketball court. Provide a 4-foot wide pedestrian circulation path between the proposed parking spaces and the water harvesting area. 24) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.O: Label and dimension the maneuverability for all required loading zones on the subject property, if applicable through the Zoning Section. 25) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Provide a detail for all proposed parking spaces. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standards parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Refer to DS Sec.3-05 for design criteria for parking spaces and access. 26) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Provide the location with a detail for any existing or proposed refuse containers, per DS Sec.6-01.4.1.A current curbside APC collection service is in excess of the minimum allowed (DS Sec.6-01.3.2.A) and therefore must meet the above-mentioned standard. The enclosures must have a minimum inside clear dimension of 10 feet by 10 feet between the steel bollards that are required between the container and the enclosure's rear and sidewall. The inside clear dimensions must be shown from the face of the wall protectors. Refer to Figure 3 and DS Sec.6-01.4.2 for specifications and requirements on access, placement of containers, bin enclosure and construction. Provide the minimum 14-ft x 40-ft clear approach to the enclosure area. Refer to Environmental Services for further clarity on refuse requirements. DRAINAGE REPORT: 27) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.1: Provide a revised Hydrology Report or addendum to show the new parking lot and impervious area. Verify that the 5-year retention is still addressed due to the new asphalt for the parking lot. 28) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Provide a discussion within the revised Hydrology Report on the proposed water harvesting area with the inlet and outlet and how flow is conveyed from the concentration point to the outlet. 29) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.3: Provide a discussion and calculations within the revised Hydrology Report for the proposed wall openings for Concentration Points II and III along with the riprap design as shown on the proposed Development Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan, a revised Drainage Report, and a Floodplain Use Permit that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Report reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |