Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D07-0042
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/25/2007 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/31/2007 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/06/2007 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: North Tucson Business Center - Development Plan D07-0042 Development Plan (1st Review) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 6, 2007 DUE DATE: November 26, 2007 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a separate response letter for zoning, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 28, 2008. 2. D.S. 2-05.2.1.D.2 Label the major watercourses, Santa Cruz River, on the location map. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.1 General Note 2 remove the reference to "PROPOSED ZONING" from the note as the I1 zoning is existing. 4. D.S. 2-05.2.2.B.3 General Note 3 and Notes and Calculations Note 1 revise the reference to "WAREHOUSE" to commercial storage. 5. D.S. 2-05.2.4.B Indicated the zoning for the adjacent parcels to the south and east on the development plan. 6. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Provide a dimension for the eastern most parking area access lane (PAAL). 7. D.S. 2-05.2.4.D.3 Wheel stops are required for the standard vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the accessible vehicle parking spaces to prevent parking vehicle from damaging the proposed accessible parking space signs. 8. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Provide dimensions for sidewalk located between the accessible vehicle parking spaces and the existing building. 9. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K It is unclear exacting how the accessible vehicle parking space access aisles will gain access to the sidewalk. Is the entire accessible vehicle parking area pavement flush with the curb or will the sidewalk be ramped up and down at each access aisle. If ramps are proposed provide a detail show how all requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 are to be met. 10. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per ICC/ANSI A117.1-2003 section 406.13 Detectable warnings (truncated domes) will be required at all curb access ramps and areas where asphalt is flush with the curb i.e. at the access aisles. Show the detectable warnings on the development plan and details. 11. D.S. 2-05.2.4.Q Zoning acknowledges Keynote 5 in regards to bicycle parking, but was unable to locate Keynote 5 on the plan, please clarify. 12. D.S. 2-05.2.4.T Show required refuse collection areas on the development plan. 13. Provide a copy of the site/development plan that approved the cellular tower for this site. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956. I:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D07-0042dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 11/08/2007 | PETER MCLAUGHLIN | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Dimension on the landscape plan the minimum width and label the square footage measured from the inside of tree planters in the vehicle use area. An unpaved area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.c, DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.e 2. Provide a calculation of canopy trees within the reconfigured parking lot area. Within vehicular use areas, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 10 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1.a 3. Landscape plan shall include irrigation specification design and layout per DS 2-07.5.4.A & DS 2-07.5.4.B including source of irrigation, sleeves for driveways and sidewalks, locations of valves, low-flow bubblers or drip irrigation. 4. Add the CDRC Development Plan case number to all sheets of the development plan and landscape plan. |
| 11/23/2007 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 23, 2007 SUBJECT: North Tucson Business Center Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3760 N Commerce Center Drive, T13S R13E Sec28 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D07-0042 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan and Landscape Plan. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D.2: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1 to identify conditions within the square mile area shown, specifically the Santa Cruz River adjacent to the property. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The correct Development Plan number (D07-0042) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the Development Plan to show wheel stop barrier for the parking spaces located adjacent to the handicap parking spaces. The barriers are to be set at 15.5-feet to accommodate the required 2.5-foot overhang to prevent encroachment or damage to the required handicap signage. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that the Development Plan reflects handicap access ramps with truncated domes (see ANSI 705.5. for design criteria) at all existing and proposed handicap ramp location. Specifically at the proposed handicap parking space locations. Please refer to this standard and the figures provided for additional curb access ramps requirements. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Verify that all existing and proposed PAAL widths meet the minimum 24-foot width requirement. Dimension all PAALs. Specifically at the proposed PAAL adjacent to the proposed loading zone and adjacent landscape curb median along the northern portion of the property. A minimum of 24-feet is required for 2-way traffic. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Revise the site plan to clearly show the minimum distance of 4-feet for the pedestrian refuge that must be maintained between any enclosed structure and the proposed parking spaces. The development plan shows a 16-foot parking spaces and an 8-foot sidewalk width, which will accommodate the required 4-foot pedestrian circulation and the 2.5-foot overhang, but this must be clearly shown on the development plan. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.P: Revise the detail for the proposed parking spaces to show the required wheel stop barrier to prevent encroachment or damage to the handicap signage. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Label and dimension the minimum maneuverability for the existing refuse containers with the new vehicular use layout design. Provide the required 14-foot x 40-foot clear approach for all refuse container locations. Refer to DS Sec.6-01 for all refuse requirements. Label and dimension the minimum 36-foot inside and 50-foot outside radii to show vehicle maneuverability to verify that landscaping and parking spaces are not an obstruction. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan reviews. For any questions, or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Development Services |
| 11/30/2007 | ANDY VERA | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | 1. No provisions shown or mentioned for on site refuse/recycle storage and collection. Identify along with service vehicle circulation within development with proposed change. Please include corrections on resubmittal. If you have any questions you may contact Andy Vera at (520) 791-5543 ext 1212 or e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/03/2007 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 3, 2007 Eduardo Gonzalez Olsson Associates 3025 West Ina Road Tucson, Arizona 85741 Subject: D07-0042 North Tucson Business Center Development Plan Dear Eduardo: Your submittal of October 29, 2007 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, ESD, DSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, DSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen CDRC Manager All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 777-3872 dp-resubmittal |